Connect with us

Features

Obama joins Kamala’s campaign trail, boostig her chances

Published

on

Trump secretly sent Putin coveted Covid testing machines at height of shortage – Bob Woodward

by Vijaya Chandrasoma

George Washington’s farewell address delivered at Mount Vernon at the end of his second term in 1796, when he was 64-year-old, “stands today as a timeless warning about the forces that threaten American democracy”.

No president ever wanted to be the president of the United States as passionately as Washington. He deemed the pinnacle of his achievement to be the winning of independence from England and paving the way to the Federal Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, where he sat as its presiding officer till 1787. He most reluctantly accepted the presidency in 1789, and again in 1793. But in 1796, he was firm in his refusal, as he considered the presidency to be just an epilogue to his career, not his greatest achievement.

Washington worried that “party loyalty makes nations weaker, not stronger; that parties fighting for power (disguised as patriotism) serves to distract the public councils and enfeebles the public administration; it enables jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one party against the other; and foments occasional riots and insurrections. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions”.

The main thrust of his Farewell Address is that “Americans should focus on what’s better for the country, not what’s better for their political party”.

Some 136 years later, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a Democrat, was elected to the presidency in 1932, when America was in the depths of the Great Depression. The progressive policies of his New Deal enabled the nation to successfully navigate the Depression. His second term ended in 1940, when America was on the brink of World War II.

FDR broke the unwritten law set by Washington by running for a third term, defeating Republican Wendell L. Wilkie by a landslide of 449 to 82 electoral votes and a popular vote exceeding four million.

The Republican platform at that time was under the control of the America First Committee (AFC), an isolationist pressure group which was against the United States’ entry into World War II. The AFC, founded by former Republican President Woodrow Wilson after World War II, counted amongst its leaders luminaries like former President Warren G. Harding, Charles Lindbergh and Henry Ford, who were friendly with Hitler and sympathized with Nazi anti-Semitic policies. They were powerful leaders who, in those days, wielded enormous political influence.

AFC was rather like the MAGA (Make America Great Again) cult, founded and led by former President Donald Trump, that controls the Republican Party of today.

Had FDR adhered to the unwritten law after Washington’s Presidency and Republican Wendell Wilkie defeated the Democratic candidate for the presidency in 1940, the AFC, with its pro-Nazi ties and isolationist policies, may have persuaded Wilkie not to have America involved in the European tribal war against Hitler’s Germany.

There is little doubt Great Britain and the allies would have capitulated to Hitler in World War II, without the active participation of the United States.

Pearl Harbor was, according to FDR, “a day that will live in infamy”, that propelled the US to join its European allies in the war against Axis Powers of Germany, Italy and Japan. After the war, America joined the military alliance, formalized as the North American Treaty Organization (NATO), that defeated the Nazi menace of Hitler. NATO has endured as the strongest military alliance in history to this day.

After FDR died in 1945 during his fourth term, the two-term limit for the presidency was ratified by the 22nd Amendment to the constitution in 1951.

As Winston Churchill said, “The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see”.

I wrote an article during Trump’s presidency, indulging a fantasy that, had the two-term limit remained just an “unwritten law” in 2016, and not a constitutional Amendment, President Obama, who had completed two presidential terms of unparalleled competence, without a shadow of any kind of scandal, may have been persuaded to run for a third term. He had a popularity rating of over 70%, the highest ever for a departing president.

President Obama would not have allowed himself to be diminished by Trump’s Russian connections, his racist taunts and his juvenile nicknames. A man of Obama’s principled stature would have crushed Trump like the criminal moron he is. He would have won re-election for a third term in 2016 by an indisputable landslide, and headed an administration which would have sidestepped the horrors America has endured since Trump came down that golden elevator in 2016, when he announced his candidature for the presidency with a Hitler-like anti-immigrant rant that has polarized the US as never before.

Thanks to the 22nd Amendment, Donald Trump, with a little bit of help from his Russian mentor, Putin, was elected to the White House in 2016, defeating Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton.

In that article, I also expressed my disgust at the policies of the Trump administration, which were intent of subverting all the progressive steps taken by President Obama. Trump kicked off his administration with the colossal lie that the booming economy he inherited from Obama, with 75 weeks of consecutive economic development and the lowest unemployment rate in decades, was his own creation.

The first hint of Trump’s authoritarian ambitions was when he, like other dictators of the 20th century such as Hitler, Stalin and Mao, started calling the press “the enemy of the people”.

He followed through with policies that had the US withdraw from the Paris Agreement on climate change mitigation, with the moronic claim that climate change, which is even today proving to be the greatest danger facing the planet, is a hoax; by deregulating all the laws against pollution that President Obama had put in place; by pandering to the billionaire class and corporations with huge tax breaks; by polarizing the country by the racist demonization of brown-skinned immigrants; and by disbanding the National Security Council directorate, created by President Obama, charged with preparing for when, not if, another epidemic would hit the nation. This was a facility, initiated with presidential foresight, which would have helped in mitigating the chaos and loss of life when Covid hit the nation in 2019.

Americans realized the magnitude of their mistake and “fired” Trump comprehensively in 2020. President Biden won the presidency with an Electoral College rout of 302 – 236 votes and a record popular majority of over seven million votes.

A defeat which Trump, against all evidence, has still refused to concede, and “fought like hell” with lies, an insurrection and all the criminal weapons available to him and his white supremacist cult. The fight goes on, three years later.

Three long years, during which Trump has been adjudicated a rapist and a fraud, convicted of 34 felonies, awaiting trial on three more trials with 57 more felony charges. Three years when he is, amazingly, not in prison but the Republican candidate for the presidency, in an election he has a real chance of being re-elected as the 47th President of the United States!

This was thanks, of course, to the dilatory tactics employed by the most partisan, corrupt Supreme Court in the history of the nation.

America has less than 30 days to make a decision which ideological path it will choose for the future.

The first choice would be the Democratic Party, led by Vice-President Kamala Harris. The party guarantees a continuance of the democratic process of the constitution created by its Founding Fathers 250 years ago. A path that heeds all the prescient warnings and wisdom contained in the Farewell Address of the Father of the Nation, George Washington.

Vice-President Harris, who has been criticized for “not letting the public to get to know her”, has recently been doing a media blitz. She has appeared on “The Tonight Show with Stephen Colbert”, “The View”, “Call Her Daddy” and many other popular TV shows and podcasts, acquitting herself brilliantly, with compassion and humor. All the while carrying out her executive duties in ensuring that the needs of the victims of Hurricane Helene were being met to the best of the government’s substantial resources.

She has been actively wooing disgruntled Republican voters, with considerable success in attracting many prominent leaders, like the Cheneys, who have already endorsed her. She has also stated that she would have a Republican in her cabinet and has been floating the idea (tongue-in-cheek?) that she may offer Mitt Romney, a previous Republican candidate for the presidency in 2012, the coveted position of Secretary of State in her administration. A strategy which may persuade moderate Republicans disgusted with Trump (and there are millions) who had decided not to vote, to change their minds.

Until last Thursday, Kamala was leading with a razor-thin margin in the battleground states, though it still remains a race too close to call.

Kamala’s odds may have received the expected boost when the most popular Democrat in the nation, former President Barack Obama made a spectacular entry into the campaign trail last Thursday, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In a riveting speech, he praised Kamala’s record, saying she will be ready to do the job from Day One, which she has proved by a lifetime of public service. He mocked Trump, annihilating him with sardonic humor as only he can, turning Trump’s lies against himself. He granted that the election is tight “because there are a lot of Americans struggling out there”. He said, “What I can’t understand is why anyone would think that Donald Trump (whom he characterized as a ‘whiny and selfish billionaire who only cares about his ego, his money, his crowd sizes and his status’) will shake up things in a way that is good for you”.

President Obama will be on the campaign trail, joined by his equally popular wife, Michelle, till Election Day, which will undoubtedly increase Kamala’s chances of success.

The second choice is the Republican Party led by Trump.

If elected for a second term, Trump will withdraw from NATO and stop all aid to Ukraine, which will enable Putin’s Russia to complete the occupation of a sovereign nation. He will provide all assistance to his equally murderous war criminal buddy, Bibi Netanyahu, to finally complete the genocide of the Palestinian people and establish a one-state solution for the Promised Land. Trump will also set a precedent for other tyrants, that America will only watch, even encourage its new-found allies, while they break international laws and trample the sovereignty of smaller sovereign nations.

It was an open secret that Trump had a “special relationship” with Putin during his presidency. Who can forget his near-treasonous performance after the Helsinki Summit in 2018, when he stood onstage with Russian President, Vladimir Putin, and accepted the former KGB officer’s lies that Russia had not interfered in the 2016 election. A direct betrayal of all 17 of the US intelligence agencies, which had unanimously confirmed Russia’s interference.

The Washington Post revealed, according to a book entitled “War” by legendary journalist, Bob Woodward, to be released next week, that “As the Coronavirus tore through the world in 2020, and the United States and other countries were confronted with a desperate shortage of tests to detect the illness, Trump secretly sent a package of coveted Covid tests to Vladimir Putin for his personal use”.

The book also claims that Trump has had a continuing relationship with Putin since he left the White House in 2021; that Trump has had several private telephone conversations with Putin, and allegedly continues to share America’s top-secret information with the nation’s top adversary and his long-time puppet-master.

Trump has been predictably politicizing the hurricane, spreading lies that the administration is failing in its efforts to look after the affected citizens in North Carolina, Georgia and other states hit by Helene. Downright lies, which were immediately denied by all the Governors of the affected states, Republican and Democrat. Vicious lies that Republicans like Trump and Vance spew for political gain, although they know these lies put desperate peoples’ lives in danger. And they don’t care.

When Kamala heard about these lies, she threw up her hands in the air, and said, “Have you no empathy, man!”. No. He doesn’t. None. Except for himself.

The future of the nation in a Republican administration is clearly outlined in the conservative Heritage Foundation creation of the 925-page document, “The Project 2025 – Mandate for Leadership”. In essence, Authoritarian Governance for Dummies.

Whether Kamala Harris wins with a slight majority, which is what the polls predict today, or, as is my fervent hope, the undecided and moderate Republican voters finally come to their senses and give her an indisputable majority, Trump will still never concede.

In the event of a close election, there is the possibility that the aforementioned partisan Supreme Court would overturn the results of a few swing states with small Democratic majorities, and award the presidency to Trump.

The only certainty after the November 5 election is that there will be violence, which will make the January 6, 2021 insurrection look like a walk in the park.

Fortunately, President Biden will be the incumbent Commander-in Chief after the election. He will order the full might of the federal law enforcement and military forces to quell any violence. He will also ensure that the constitutional transfer of power, as mandated by the will of the people, will be upheld.

If Trump wins the election, or is fraudulently awarded the presidency, then America would have made its decision. To abandon democracy and embrace the ideology of an authoritarian kleptocracy, with a Mad King at the helm, supported by a bunch of white supremacist neo-Nazis calling the shots.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

How Black Civil Rights leaders strengthen democracy in the US

Published

on

Jesse Jackson / Barack Obama

On being elected US President in 2008, Barack Obama famously stated: ‘Change has come to America’. Considering the questions continuing to grow out of the status of minority rights in particular in the US, this declaration by the former US President could come to be seen as somewhat premature by some. However, there could be no doubt that the election of Barack Obama to the US presidency proved that democracy in the US is to a considerable degree inclusive and accommodating.

If this were not so, Barack Obama, an Afro-American politician, would never have been elected President of the US. Obama was exceptionally capable, charismatic and eloquent but these qualities alone could not have paved the way for his victory. On careful reflection it could be said that the solid groundwork laid by indefatigable Black Civil Rights activists in the US of the likes of Martin Luther King (Jnr) and Jesse Jackson, who passed away just recently, went a great distance to enable Obama to come to power and that too for two terms. Obama is on record as owning to the profound influence these Civil Rights leaders had on his career.

The fact is that these Civil Rights activists and Obama himself spoke to the hearts and minds of most Americans and convinced them of the need for democratic inclusion in the US. They, in other words, made a convincing case for Black rights. Above all, their struggles were largely peaceful.

Their reasoning resonated well with the thinking sections of the US who saw them as subscribers to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, for instance, which made a lucid case for mankind’s equal dignity. That is, ‘all human beings are equal in dignity.’

It may be recalled that Martin Luther King (Jnr.) famously declared: ‘I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up, live out the true meaning of its creed….We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.’

Jesse Jackson vied unsuccessfully to be a Democratic Party presidential candidate twice but his energetic campaigns helped to raise public awareness about the injustices and material hardships suffered by the black community in particular. Obama, we now know, worked hard at grass roots level in the run-up to his election. This experience proved invaluable in his efforts to sensitize the public to the harsh realities of the depressed sections of US society.

Cynics are bound to retort on reading the foregoing that all the good work done by the political personalities in question has come to nought in the US; currently administered by Republican hard line President Donald Trump. Needless to say, minority communities are now no longer welcome in the US and migrants are coming to be seen as virtual outcasts who need to be ‘shown the door’ . All this seems to be happening in so short a while since the Democrats were voted out of office at the last presidential election.

However, the last US presidential election was not free of controversy and the lesson is far too easily forgotten that democratic development is a process that needs to be persisted with. In a vital sense it is ‘a journey’ that encounters huge ups and downs. More so why it must be judiciously steered and in the absence of such foresighted managing the democratic process could very well run aground and this misfortune is overtaking the US to a notable extent.

The onus is on the Democratic Party and other sections supportive of democracy to halt the US’ steady slide into authoritarianism and white supremacist rule. They would need to demonstrate the foresight, dexterity and resourcefulness of the Black leaders in focus. In the absence of such dynamic political activism, the steady decline of the US as a major democracy cannot be prevented.

From the foregoing some important foreign policy issues crop-up for the global South in particular. The US’ prowess as the ‘world’s mightiest democracy’ could be called in question at present but none could doubt the flexibility of its governance system. The system’s inclusivity and accommodative nature remains and the possibility could not be ruled out of the system throwing up another leader of the stature of Barack Obama who could to a great extent rally the US public behind him in the direction of democratic development. In the event of the latter happening, the US could come to experience a democratic rejuvenation.

The latter possibilities need to be borne in mind by politicians of the South in particular. The latter have come to inherit a legacy of Non-alignment and this will stand them in good stead; particularly if their countries are bankrupt and helpless, as is Sri Lanka’s lot currently. They cannot afford to take sides rigorously in the foreign relations sphere but Non-alignment should not come to mean for them an unreserved alliance with the major powers of the South, such as China. Nor could they come under the dictates of Russia. For, both these major powers that have been deferentially treated by the South over the decades are essentially authoritarian in nature and a blind tie-up with them would not be in the best interests of the South, going forward.

However, while the South should not ruffle its ties with the big powers of the South it would need to ensure that its ties with the democracies of the West in particular remain intact in a flourishing condition. This is what Non-alignment, correctly understood, advises.

Accordingly, considering the US’ democratic resilience and its intrinsic strengths, the South would do well to be on cordial terms with the US as well. A Black presidency in the US has after all proved that the US is not predestined, so to speak, to be a country for only the jingoistic whites. It could genuinely be an all-inclusive, accommodative democracy and by virtue of these characteristics could be an inspiration for the South.

However, political leaders of the South would need to consider their development options very judiciously. The ‘neo-liberal’ ideology of the West need not necessarily be adopted but central planning and equity could be brought to the forefront of their talks with Western financial institutions. Dexterity in diplomacy would prove vital.

Continue Reading

Features

Grown: Rich remnants from two countries

Published

on

Mirissa (Image courtesy Wikivoyage)

Whispers of Lanka

I was born in a hamlet on the western edge of a tiny teacup bay named Mirissa on the South Coast of Sri Lanka. My childhood was very happy and secure. I played with my cousins and friends on the dusty village roads. We had a few toys to play with, so we always improvised our own games. On rainy days, the village roads became small rivulets on which we sailed paper boats. We could walk from someone’s backyard to another, and there were no fences. We had the freedom to explore the surrounding hills, valleys, and streams.

I was good at school and often helped my classmates with their lessons. I passed the General Certificate of Education (Ordinary Level) at the village school and went to Colombo to study for the General Certificate of Education (Advanced Level). However, I did not like Colombo, and every weekend I hurried back to the village. I was not particularly interested in my studies and struggled in specific subjects. But my teachers knew that I was intelligent and encouraged me to study hard.

To my amazement, I passed the Advanced Level, entered the University of Kelaniya, completed an honours degree in Economics, taught for a few months at a central college, became a lecturer at the same university, and later joined the Department of Census and Statistics as a statistician. Then I went to the University of Wales in the UK to study for an MSc.

The interactions with other international students in my study group, along with very positive recommendations from my professors, helped me secure several jobs in the oil-rich Middle Eastern countries, where I earned salaries unimaginable in Sri Lankan terms. During this period, without much thought, I entered a life focused on material possessions, social status, and excessive consumerism.

Life changes

Unfortunately, this comfortable, enjoyable life changed drastically in the mid-1980s because of the political activities of certain groups. Radicalised youths, brainwashed and empowered by the dynamics of vibrant leftist politics, killed political opponents as well as ordinary people who were reluctant to follow their orders. Their violent methods frightened a large section of Sri Lanka’s middle class into reluctantly accepting country-wide closures of schools, factories, businesses, and government offices.

My father’s generation felt a deep obligation to honour the sacrifices they had made to give us everything we had. There was a belief that you made it in life through your education, and that if you had to work hard, you did. Although I had never seriously considered emigration before, our sons’ education was paramount, and we left Sri Lanka.

Although there were regulations on what could be brought in, migrating to Sydney in the 1980s offered a more relaxed airport experience, with simpler security, a strong presence of airline staff, and a more formal atmosphere. As we were relocating permanently, a few weeks before our departure, we had organised a container to transport sentimental belongings from our home. Our flight baggage was minimal, which puzzled the customs officer, but he laughed when he saw another bulky item on a separate trolley. It was a large box containing a bookshelf purchased in Singapore. Upon discovering that a new migrant family was arriving in Australia with a 32-volume Encyclopaedia Britannica set weighing approximately 250 kilograms, he became cheerful, relaxed his jaw, and said, G’day!

Settling in Sydney

We settled in Epping, Sydney, and enrolled our sons in Epping Boys’ High School. Within one week of our arrival from Sri Lanka, we both found jobs: my wife in her usual accounting position in the private sector, and I was taken on by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). While working at the CAA, I sat the Australian Graduate Admission Test. I secured a graduate position with the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) in Canberra, ACT.

We bought a house in Florey, close to my office in Belconnen. The roads near the house were eerily quiet. Back in my hometown of Pelawatta, outside Colombo, my life had a distinct soundtrack. I woke up every morning to the radios blasting ‘pirith’ from the nearby houses; the music of the bread delivery van announcing its arrival, an old man was muttering wild curses to someone while setting up his thambili cart near the junction, free-ranging ‘pariah’ dogs were barking at every moving thing and shadows. Even the wildlife was noisy- black crows gathered on the branches of the mango tree in front of the house to perform a mournful dirge in the morning.

Our Australian neighbours gave us good advice and guidance, and we gradually settled in. If one of the complaints about Asians is that they “won’t join in or integrate to the same degree as Australians do,”  this did not apply to us! We never attempted to become Aussies; that was impossible because we didn’t have tanned skin, hazel eyes, or blonde hair, but we did join in the Australian way of life. Having a beer with my next-door neighbour on the weekend and a biannual get-together with the residents of the lane became a routine. Walking or cycling ten kilometres around the Ginninderra Lake with a fit-fanatic of a neighbour was a weekly ritual that I rarely skipped.

Almost every year, early in the New Year, we went to the South Coast. My family and two of our best friends shared a rented house near the beach for a week. There’s not much to do except mix with lots of families with kids, dogs on the beach, lazy days in the sun with a barbecue and a couple of beers in the evening, watching golden sunsets. When you think about Australian summer holidays, that’s all you really need, and that’s all we had!

Caught between two cultures

We tried to hold on to our national tradition of warm hospitality by organising weekend meals with our friends. Enticed by the promise of my wife’s home-cooked feast, our Sri Lankan friends would congregate at our place. Each family would also bring a special dish of food to share. Our house would be crammed with my friends, their spouses and children, the sound of laughter and loud chatter – English mingled with Sinhala – and the aroma of spicy food.

We loved the togetherness, the feeling of never being alone, and the deep sense of belonging within the community. That doesn’t mean I had no regrets in my Australian lifestyle, no matter how trivial they may have seemed. I would have seen migration to another country only as a change of abode and employment, and I would rarely have expected it to bring about far greater changes to my psychological role and identity. In Sri Lanka, I have grown to maturity within a society with rigid demarcation lines between academic, professional, and other groups.

Furthermore, the transplantation from a patriarchal society where family bonds were essential to a culture where individual pursuit of happiness tended to undermine traditional values was a difficult one for me. While I struggled with my changing role, my sons quickly adopted the behaviour and aspirations of their Australian peers. A significant part of our sons’ challenges lay in their being the first generation of Sri Lankan-Australians.

The uniqueness of the responsibilities they discovered while growing up in Australia, and with their parents coming from another country, required them to play a linguistic mediator role, and we, as parents, had to play the cultural mediator role. They were more gregarious and adaptive than we were, and consequently, there was an instant, unrestrained immersion in cultural diversity and plurality.

Technology

They became articulate spokesmen for young Australians growing up in a world where information technology and transactions have become faster, more advanced, and much more widespread. My work in the ABS for nearly twenty years has followed cycles, from data collection, processing, quality assurance, and analysis to mapping, research, and publishing. As the work was mainly computer-based and required assessing and interrogating large datasets, I often had to depend heavily on in-house software developers and mainframe programmers.  Over that time, I have worked in several areas of the ABS, making a valuable contribution and gaining a wide range of experience in national accounting.

I immensely valued the unbiased nature of my work, in which the ABS strived to inform its readers without the influence of public opinion or government decisions. It made me proud to work for an organisation that had a high regard for quality, accuracy, and confidentiality. I’m not exaggerating, but it is one of the world’s best statistical organisations! I rubbed shoulders with the greatest statistical minds. The value of this experience was that it enabled me to secure many assignments in Vanuatu, Fiji, East Timor, Saudi Arabia, and the Solomon Islands through the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund after I left the ABS.

Living in Australia

Studying and living in Australia gave my sons ample opportunities to realise that their success depended not on acquiring material wealth but on building human capital. They discovered that it was the sum total of their skills embodied within them: education, intelligence, creativity, work experience and even the ability to play basketball and cricket competitively. They knew it was what they would be left with if someone stripped away all of their assets. So they did their best to pursue their careers on that path and achieve their life goals. Of course, the healthy Australian economy mattered too. As an economist said, “A strong economy did not transform a valet parking attendant into a professor. Investment in human capital did that.”

Nostalgia

After living in Australia for several decades, do I miss Sri Lanka? Which country deserves my preference, the one where I was born or the one to which I migrated? There is no single answer; it depends on opportunities, prospects, lifestyle, and family. Factors such as the cost of living, healthcare, climate, and culture also play significant roles in shaping this preference. Tradition in a slow-motion place like Sri Lanka is an ethical code based on honouring those who do things the same way you do, and dishonour those who don’t. However, in Australia, one has the freedom to express oneself, to debate openly, to hold unconventional views, to be more immune to peer pressure, and not to have one’s every action scrutinised and discussed.

For many years, I have navigated the challenges of cultural differences, conflicting values, and the constant negotiation of where I truly ‘belong.’ Instead of yearning for a ‘dream home’ where I once lived, I have struggled, and to some extent succeeded, to find a home where I live now. This does not mean I have forgotten or discarded my roots. As one Sri Lankan-Australian senior executive remarked, “I have not restricted myself to the box I came in… I was not the ethnicity, skin colour, or lack thereof, of the typical Australian… but that has been irrelevant to my ability to contribute to the things which are important to me and to the country adopted by me.”  Now, why do I live where I live – in that old house in Florey? I love the freshness of the air, away from the city smog, noisy traffic, and fumes. I enjoy walking in the evening along the tree-lined avenues and footpaths in my suburb, and occasionally I see a kangaroo hopping along the nature strip. I like the abundance of trees and birds singing at my back door. There are many species of birds in the area, but a common link with ours is the melodious warbling of resident magpies. My wife has been feeding them for several years, and we see the new fledglings every year.  At first light and in the evening, they walk up to the back door and sing for their meal. The magpie is an Australian icon, and I think its singing is one of the most melodious sounds in the suburban areas and even more so in the bush.

 by Siri Ipalawatte

Continue Reading

Features

Big scene for models…

Published

on

Modelling has turned out to be a big scene here and now there are lots of opportunities for girls and boys to excel as models.

Of course, one can’t step onto the ramp without proper training, and training should be in the hands of those who are aware of what modelling is all about.

Rukmal Senanayake is very much in the news these days and his Model With Ruki – Model Academy & Agency – is responsible for bringing into the limelight, not only upcoming models but also contestants participating in beauty pageants, especially internationally.

On the 29th of January, this year, it was a vibrant scene at the Temple Trees Auditorium, in Colombo, when Rukmal introduced the Grey Goose Road To Future Model Hunt.

Tharaka Gurukanda … in
the scene with Rukmal

This is the second Model Hunt to be held in Sri Lanka; the first was in 2023, at Nelum Pokuna, where over 150 models were able to showcase their skills at one of the largest fashion ramps in Sri Lanka.

The concept was created by Rukmal Senanayake and co-founded by Tharaka Gurukanda.

Future Model Hunt, is the only Southeast Asian fashion show for upcoming models, and designers, to work along and create a career for their future.

The Grey Goose Road To Future Model Hunt, which showcased two segments, brought into the limelight several models, including students of Ruki’s Model Academy & Agency and those who are established as models.

An enthusiastic audience was kept spellbound by the happenings on the ramp.

Doing it differently

Four candidates were also crowned, at this prestigious event, and they will represent Sri Lanka at the respective international pageants.

Those who missed the Grey Goose Road To Future Model Hunt, held last month, can look forward to another exciting Future Model Hunt event, scheduled for the month of May, 2026, where, I’m told, over 150 models will walk the ramp, along with several designers.

It will be held at a prime location in Colombo with an audience count, expected to be over 2000.

Model With Ruki offers training for ramp modelling and beauty pageants and other professional modelling areas.

Their courses cover: Ramp walk techniques, Posture and grooming, Pose and expression, Runway etiquette, and Photo shoots and portfolio building,

They prepare models for local and international fashion events, shoots, and competitions and even send models abroad for various promotional events.

Continue Reading

Trending