News
NJC warns Prez over Indo-Lanka MoUs
The National Joint Committee (NJC) has expressed serious concerns over recently concluded agreements between Sri Lanka and India. The NJC has emphasised the pivotal importance of transparency in the process while accusing the government of undermining Sri Lanka’s sovereignty.
The following is the text of the open letter Lieutenant General Jagath Dias (retd), President of the NJC, has sent to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake: We, representing a coalition of national organisations committed to safeguarding Sri Lanka’s sovereignty, write to express our profound concern regarding the recent engagements and agreements between Sri Lanka and the Republic of India. Our apprehensions are rooted in historical precedents and the current trajectory of bilateral relations, which appear to compromise our nation’s autonomy and long-term interests.
(1) Historical context of Indian interference Sri Lanka’s post-independence history is replete with grave examples of Indian interference that has undermined our sovereignty:
• Support for militancy: India’s direct involvement in training, arming, and funding Tamil militant groups in the 1980s, notably the LTTE, sparked a conflict that lasted over 30 years and cost over 100,000 lives.
• Violation of sovereignty: The unauthorised Indian air-drop “Operation Poomalai” in 1987 breached our airspace and sovereignty, setting a dangerous precedent.
• Sabotaging counter-terrorism: India intervened in May 1987 to prevent the Sri Lankan military from capturing LTTE leader Prabhakaran—frisking and flying him to India. This action that could have ended terror in May 1987 took 22 more years to end in May 2009.
* Imposition of the Indo-Lanka Accord (1987): Signed under duress, this agreement violated Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which prohibits threat or use of force against another state’s sovereignty. The resulting IPKF occupation led to mass atrocities including killings, rapes, and long-standing resentment.
• Violation of “Pacta Sunt Servanda”: India failed to uphold five specific commitments made in the Indo-Lanka Accord, including disarming Tamil militants. As per international law, failure to fulfil treaty obligations automatically invalidates the treaty.
(2)Secretive Agreements and lack of Transparency Recent developments indicate a continuation of opaque dealings:
• Undisclosed Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs): Several MoUs with India have reportedly been signed without any Parliamentary debate or public disclosure, violating democratic norms and constitutional accountability.
• Economic and Technology Cooperation Agreement (ETCA): Proposed liberalization of trade in services threatens to open Sri Lanka’s job market to Indian nationals, leading to demographic changes and erosion of local livelihoods.
(3) Economic overdependence and strategic vulnerabilities India’s creeping control over Sri Lanka’s core sectors risks turning Sri Lanka into an Indian satellite state:
• Energy and Infrastructure: Indian control of LNG supply, renewable energy projects, the Trincomalee oil tank farm, and joint ventures in ports and railways grants India leverage in critical areas.
• Currency Dominance: The push for Sri Lanka to accept Indian Rupee trade and loans gives India outsized monetary influence over Sri Lanka’s economy.
• Credit Line Coercion: India’s conditional credit lines requiring the purchase of Indian goods restrict Sri Lanka’s economic freedom and diversity.
• Digital Colonization: Indian firms are embedding themselves into Sri Lanka’s financial tech, surveillance, and digital governance sectors, giving India access to strategic data and long-term control over digital infrastructure. This poses a grave threat to national security and data sovereignty.
• Cultural Encroachment: India’s funding of kovils and promotion of “mythological Ramayana trails” undermines Sri Lanka’s Buddhist heritage and Article 9 of the Constitution protecting the Buddha Sasana.
(4) Precedents of Indian Coercion in the Region India’s behavior with neighboring states reflects a consistent pattern of coercion and domination, often violating international norms and undermining regional sovereignty:
• Nepal (2015): India imposed an unofficial blockade on Nepal for nearly six months in response to Kathmandu’s refusal to amend its new constitution as per India’s wishes, causing fuel and medicine shortages and drawing global condemnation for violating humanitarian principles.
• Pakistan: India’s threats to revoke the Indus Waters Treaty and unilateral restriction of water flow through tributaries are violations of the UN Charter’s Article 2(4) and constitute war crimes under international law.
• Bangladesh (2024): India abruptly halted electricity supplies to Bangladesh over payment issues without prior warning, leaving millions affected and undermining trust in bilateral agreements.
• Bhutan: India cut off fuel subsidies to Bhutan in 2013 to punish its government for improving ties with China, directly interfering in its foreign policy and internal democratic decision-making.
• Maldives: India has interfered in Maldivian domestic politics, backed specific regimes, and pressured successive governments to allow Indian military presence, prompting popular resistance and protests under the “India Out” campaign.
(5) Geopolitical Alignments and loss of Strategic Autonomy Sri Lanka’s defense engagements with India have dangerous consequences:
• Quad Alignment: India’s participation in the US-led Quad raises serious conflict-of interest risks for Sri Lanka, especially regarding its non-aligned tradition. Entering defense pacts with India could alienate our longstanding allies like China, Pakistan, and Russia.
• Intelligence Isolation: Sole dependency on India undermines our ability to collaborate with other nations who provided intelligence and military support to defeat LTTE terror-support that was critical to safeguarding Sri Lanka’s unity.
• Historical Warnings Ignored: N.Q. Dias, former Defence and Foreign Secretary, proposed military encampments in the North not to threaten Tamils, but to prevent illegal immigration and demographic alteration by influxes from Tamil Nadu- a concern still relevant today.
(6) Recommendations In light of the above, we urgently request that Your Excellency:
• Ensure Transparency: Immediately disclose to Parliament and the public all MoUs and agreements signed with India.
• Safeguard Sovereignty: Reassess and, where necessary, renegotiate any agreements that compromise Sri Lanka’s political, economic, and military independence.
• Diversify Partnerships: Uphold the spirit of non-alignment by maintaining balanced relations with global allies rather than being tethered to one power bloc.
• Protect the People: Ensure economic agreements do not displace Sri Lankan workers, farmers, or small businesses and that constitutional commitments to the Buddha
Sasana are honored.
The NJC warned at this critical time President Dissanayake’s leadership would determine whether Sri Lanka remains a free, sovereign nation or slips into dependency under foreign control. We implore you to act decisively.”
News
Diesel replacement costs up to Rs. 4.5 bn in April
Coal power generation falls by 27 GWh
A sharp decline in coal-fired electricity generation in April 2026, compared to the corresponding month last year, may have cost Sri Lanka more than Rs. 4.5 billion, as the country was compelled to rely on significantly more expensive diesel-powered generation to make up the shortfall, according to power sector data.
The coal-based electricity generation, in April 2026, was 27 GWh lower than in April 2025, a development that has sparked concern among energy experts and economists over the mounting financial burden on the country’s already strained power sector.
Industry calculations reveal that generating the lost 27 GWh through diesel-fired power plants would require approximately 8.1 million litres of fuel, based on a standard consumption rate of 0.3 litres per kilowatt-hour.
With fuel costs estimated at around USD 286 per barrel, or roughly USD 1.80 per litre, the replacement power would have cost approximately USD 14.57 million. At the prevailing exchange rate of about Rs. 315 to the US dollar, the bill exceeds Rs. 4.5 billion for April alone.
Energy sector analysts say the figure highlights the enormous economic value of maintaining high availability at coal-fired power plants, particularly at a time when Sri Lanka is seeking to reduce electricity costs and strengthen energy security.
“The financial impact of losing low-cost coal generation is substantial. Every unit not generated by coal has to be replaced by a much more expensive source, usually diesel or fuel oil, which ultimately affects the finances of the power sector and the wider economy,” a senior energy analyst said.
Even under a more conservative calculation, based on the average electricity generation cost of around Rs. 72 per unit recorded in 2025, the loss remains significant. The 27 million units not generated from coal would translate into an additional cost burden of nearly Rs. 2 billion.
The decline in coal generation comes at a critical juncture for Sri Lanka’s energy sector.
The government has repeatedly emphasised the need to maintain affordable electricity tariffs, while reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels and expanding renewable energy capacity.
Experts warn that any sustained reduction in low-cost baseload generation could undermine these objectives, increasing the need for costly thermal power and placing additional pressure on foreign exchange reserves.
The latest figures are expected to intensify scrutiny of generation planning, fuel procurement strategies and the operational performance of major power plants. They also underscore the importance of ensuring uninterrupted operation of coal-fired facilities until sufficient renewable and storage capacity is available to replace them reliably.
With the country striving to maintain economic stability and energy affordability, analysts argue that avoiding such generation shortfalls must remain a top priority for policymakers and power sector planners.
By Ifham Nizam
News
Sallay on hunger strike: Counsel warns CID
Asith Siriwardena Counsel for former Director of State Intelligence Service, Major General (Retd.) Suresh Sallay, detained under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) over the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks, has called upion the Director of the CID, SSP G. S. Abeysekara, to transfer his client either to a private or government hospital to receive urgently needed teatment.
Sallay was on a hunger strike, claiming mistreatment by the CID, his wife said, after visting him, yesterday.
Siriwardena wrote to the CID Director yesterday (07) after Sallay was visited by his wife, son and brother.
The text of the letter: “The family observed that Mr. Sallay’s physical condition has deteriorated to an alarming and critical level.
“He is reportedly unable to attend the visitation without the physical assistance of two officers. During the visit, he informed his family that he had refused medication, saline, food, and water. He further expressed a belief that his death is imminent and requested that arrangements be made for the donation of his eyes. He also requested an immediate visit from his Attorney for the purpose of executing his last will and other related legal documentation.
“These statements, and circumstances, demonstrate a grave deterioration in his physical and psychological condition. It is apparent that he is no longer capable of making rational decisions concerning his own welfare, health, and survival.
The prolonged conditions, under which he is presently being held have, at the very least, created a serious and immediate risk to his life.
“The State assumes a non-delegable duty of care toward every person held in its custody. Once an individual is deprived of liberty, the responsibility for safeguarding that person’s life, health, and wellbeing rests squarely upon the authorities exercising control over that individual. Any failure to discharge that duty in the face of a known and imminent medical emergency is a matter of the utmost legal seriousness.
“You are hereby formally notified that Mr. Sallay requires immediate medical intervention by qualified independent medical professionals and urgent transfer to an appropriate hospital facility capable of providing comprehensive assessment and treatment. Any delay, refusal, or failure to act despite clear knowledge of his precarious condition may give rise to personal and institutional liability under the criminal and civil law of Sri Lanka
“Should General Sallay suffer irreversible injury or death while remaining in the present conditions despite this explicit warning, it will be open to the relevant authorities, courts, and investigative bodies to examine whether such conduct amounts to a deliberate disregard of a known and foreseeable risk to life. Those responsible for decisions concerning his continued detention and medical care may be required to account personally for their actions and omissions.
“Accordingly, I demand that:
1. Mr. Sallay be transferred forthwith to a government or private hospital equipped to provide urgent medical treatment;
2. He be examined immediately by independent medical specialists, including psychiatric professionals if necessary; His legal representatives and family be granted reasonable access to him;
3. A written update on his medical status and the measures taken for his protection be provided without delay. This letter constitutes formal notice. Any further failure to act despite knowledge of the circumstances set out herein will be relied upon in any future judicial, criminal, constitutional, or international proceedings arising from harm suffered by my client.”
News
Opp. questions why Rs 10 bn meant for Ditwah victims held in Treasury account
The Opposition says the NPP government should explain why the funds received by Rebuilding Sri Lanka haven’t been utilised to provide relief to those affected by Ditwah cyclone in late November last year.
The failure on the part of the government to utilise as much as Rs 10 bn, received from local and foreign donors, came to light when the National Audit Office (NAO) appeared before the Public Finance Commission recently.
The NAO told the House Committee that no statutory fund currently existed under the name “Rebuilding Sri Lanka” and the programme operated through an account maintained under the Deputy Secretary to the Treasury.
The NAO declared that no payments had been made through this account to date.
Former SLPP MP Sanjeewa Edirimanne said that until the disclosure made by the NAO the country had been led to believe the Rebuilding Sri Lanka fund provided post-Ditwah relief. Pointing out that JVP General Secretary Tilvin Silva’s declaration in Jaffna that funds allocated to hold Provincial Council polls
had been utilised to assist Ditwah victims, Edirimanne said such blatant lies were propagated while the government held on to Rs 10 bn meant for the disaster victims.SJB MP Mujibur Rahman questioned the rationale behind keeping funds received specifically for Ditwah victims still living under extremely difficult conditions. (SF)
-
News7 days agoLankan duo emerge winners in Latin dance championship held in Blackpool, UK
-
Latest News5 days agoKusal Mendis, Pathum Nissanka, bowlers put Sri Lanka 1-0 up
-
News5 days agoNew US tariffs proposed on 60 countries, including Sri Lanka
-
News7 days agoSri Lankan teen killed in Chennai clash; three arrested
-
Features4 days agoPower crept into the Sangha and is now tearing it apart
-
Features4 days agoKondachchi wind farm and battery storage project to boost energy security, says Power Ministry Secretary
-
Features4 days agoSaudi Arabia sets new benchmark in Hajj management as 1.7 million pilgrims complete sacred journey
-
News3 days agoAsst. Manager, security officer arrested over Rs 30 mn snatch at Horana PB branch
