Connect with us

News

‘Living with Omicron does not mean doing nothing about Omicron’- WHO official

Published

on

Booster- hesitancy is largely due to misinformation and disinformation that has been floated

Sri Lankan adverse event monitoring system is a regional model

Vaccine hesitancy is a serious threat to global health

The world still ‘has a job to finish’ in terms of bridging vaccine inequality – WHO special envoys

BY RANDIMA ATTYGALLE

Despite the availability of an abundant vaccine supply against COVID-19, less than 35% of Sri Lankans over 12 years have taken the booster dose. Health officials are concerned about this low level of booster intake in a context where more than 95% Lankans over 12 years have received the first dose and nearly 80% of them have also received the second jab.

The floating of misinformation and disinformation both through mainstream and social media is largely attributed to this. Speaking to the Sunday Island, Dr. Palitha Abeykoon, WHO Director-General’s Special Envoy (for South East Asian region for COVID-19) said that Sri Lanka has been one of the most ‘vaccine-compliant countries’ and therefore the vaccine hesitancy which is encountered right now comes as a surprise.

“Even before the advent of the COVID pandemic, in 2019 WHO ranked vaccine hesitancy (which is either the delay in the acceptance or refusal to vaccinate despite the availability of vaccine services) as a serious threat to global health.”

Omicron variant is far more transmissible than the earlier variants and therefore its spread is very rapid. “With the evidence that we have where the vaccine effectiveness seeming to wane slowly over a few months, getting a booster dose makes perfect scientific sense, particularly to prevent serious illness and death. Still many people do not seem to understand the difference between getting infected and the consequences,” remarked Dr. Abeykoon.

The vaccines as the public health official explained, does not prevent infection per se directly and even a vaccinated person can become COVID positive. “But the big difference is that if one has taken two doses and a booster at the correct time one will have the confidence that serious illness will not follow. The growing global evidence is supporting this position of the effectiveness of the vaccines and the booster taken after a certain interval from the second dose.”

The belief that Omicron variant is mild and therefore it is perhaps better to have Omicron and develop natural immunity than getting vaccinated is a risky attitude to have warns Dr. Abeykoon.

“The evidence is Omicron is possibly less severe than Delta but its higher transmissibility will give larger numbers of infections. This would lead to larger numbers getting serious illness and the pressure on health systems will increase. The number of deaths will also increase. Now the evidence that WHO has is that the numbers getting complications and dying are significantly higher for those who did not have at least two doses of vaccine. In Sri Lanka too there has been a near 30% increase in the deaths in the past weeks. Therefore still vaccination is a primary need along with the basic public health and social protection measures.”

Living with Omicron does not mean doing nothing about Omicron, reiterates the WHO official. Since people seem to get infected even after the booster, many question the need for it which is unwise thinking he said. “Getting infected per se is not as the same as getting seriously ill or dying.”

Another myth to be debunked is that the booster has many side effects and results in death. “The risk assessments done have given no such evidence to prove this. The Sri Lankan adverse event monitoring system is excellent; it is in fact a regional model and this too has no evidence to support this misconception.

“Some say that they are being used as guinea pigs here to test these vaccines. The vaccine trials and the follow-up have been going on for a couple of years for most vaccines and therefore this allegation is baseless. Of course being newer vaccines the WHO has advised close monitoring of the post vaccination situation globally,” Dr. Abeykoon remarked.

The fear of infertility is another major misconception to be debunked said the Consultant. There are also certain cultural and religious beliefs which preclude some wanting to take injections. “Getting vaccinated is a choice one makes but we have situations when there is a conflict of personal choice and public good. There are technical and ethical issues contained in this situation.”

In the region Sri Lanka already stands out as a leader in COVID-19 vaccination programme which further consolidates our ‘vaccination tradition’ Dr. Abeykoon pointed out. “There are a few countries that have not been able to cover 40% of the population with two doses, mainly due to supply and delivery issues. In fact we have already surpassed the WHO June global target of 60%.”

To date, and despite WHO’s endless efforts with Member States to deliver lifesaving COVID-19 vaccines to the world’s least-developed countries, through COVAX, particularly, as well as other facilities, there are still 83 Member States which did not reach the target of vaccinating 40% of their populations by the end of 2021.

The latest communiqué by the WHO Director General Dr. Tedros’s Special Envoys for COIVD-19 notes ‘a persistent lack of solidarity accentuating the inequities and unfairness. And this means that even more countries are likely to fall short of the goal of vaccinating 70% of their population by mid-2022.’

On a positive note, Sri Lankan management of the pandemic and people’s compliance with public health measures have been laudable in contrast with some of the Western countries, pointed out the WHO official. “We also recognize the advent of COVID-19 fatigue among many groups and the social and economic implications that have hurt most groups. But the fact that they still, by and large, adhere to the basic prevention measure is heartening.”



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Expert: Mismanagement of CEB hydro resources increases costly oil-powered electricity generation

Published

on

Vidura

The Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) is in one of the strongest hydro storage positions in recent memory, but it has mismanaged key hydropower complexes, causing an increase in oil-powered electricity generation and and costs.

Energy expert Dr. Vidura Ralapanawe has raised serious concerns over CEB’s operational decisions, particularly the skewed use of the Mahaweli and Laxapana hydropower complexes. “By mid-May, the system had ample storage — about 60% overall — which is actually a very good position to be in just before the South-West monsoon rains,” he said. “But within that headline figure is a huge imbalance. Mahaweli reservoirs are near 75%, while Laxapana is languishing at 30%.”

This lopsided storage has already caused direct operational problems. The Canyon power station, which is fed by the Maussakele Reservoir in the Laxapana complex, has been forced to reduce its output. The 60MW plant is now operating at just 40MW due to limited water availability. Downstream, the 100MW New Laxapana station is similarly constrained.

The Laxapana complex is not just another hydropower asset — it plays a vital role in Colombo’s drinking water supply. It is required to run continuously to maintain flows for water treatment plants. “That means the CEB must generate from Laxapana 24/7, no matter what,” Ralapanawe said. “So how did they allow it to reach such a critically low level, especially when Mahaweli reservoirs are full?”

Ralpanawe said: “Instead of making adjustments to maintain operational flexibility, the CEB appears to have run the Laxapana complex harder than necessary in previous months while underutilising Mahaweli, where Victoria and Randenigala are sitting comfortably. The consequence? More reliance on oil-based thermal generation, even as the country’s dams remain well-stocked.”

“This is not just a technical problem — it’s an economic one,” he stressed. “Oil is expensive. When you underutilise hydropower in a year like this, you’re actively choosing to drive up the cost of generation.”

The apparent lack of coordination between the Mahaweli and Laxapana systems is especially baffling given the CEB’s long-standing familiarity with both. “The CEB has operated these systems for over 40 years. They know the inflows, the rainfall patterns, the seasonal irrigation releases — none of this is new,” Ralapanawe said.

Moreover, the growing integration of AI and data-driven forecasting tools in the global energy sector makes such mismanagement increasingly indefensible. “If, in the age of AI, we’re still hearing that ‘it’s too complex’ to manage these reservoirs in tandem, then something is seriously wrong,” he added.

Dr. Ralapanawe urges the CEB to provide an explanation: “Why was Mahaweli underdispatched when it was full? Why was Laxapana overused to the point that we now can’t get full capacity from critical plants like Canyon and New Laxapana? What is the economic impact of burning more oil than necessary?”

The missteps are already costing the public. Higher generation costs will ultimately be passed on to consumers in the form of increased tariffs, a burden made heavier in an already strained economy,” says Dr. Ralapanawe.

Ironically, 2025 was shaping up to be a strong hydro year, offering a rare opportunity for cost savings and reduced fossil fuel use. Instead, mismanagement has left key reservoirs unbalanced and locked the system into a more expensive operating mode — one that benefits oil suppliers but punishes the average household and industry.

Dr. Ralapanawe’s message is blunt: “This is not just about water and electricity. This is about public accountability and economic responsibility. If the CEB cannot manage two hydro systems properly with decades of data at its fingertips, then it must rethink its leadership and planning structures — or risk repeating the same costly mistakes year after year.”

Our efforts to contact CEB officials for comment were in vain.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

Million Lankan women workers will lose their jobs if Trump’s 44 % tariff goes into effect

Published

on

As many as a million Lankan women workers in key export sectors will lose their jobs and income if the 44 percent tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump come into force at the end of the 90-day pause, Asia News has reported.

Sri Lanka’s main export industries, such as apparel, tea, gems, rubber and cinnamon, that employ mostly women, will be the most affected by the new tariffs since the US market is one of their most lucrative.

Apparel workers reproach the government for its “lethargic attitude” and failure to consider the concerns of workers and unions, not least because their representatives were not asked to participate in the discussions on tariffs.

The apparel industry accounts for about 40 percent of the country’s total exports, and is crucial for its economy. It also employs mainly women from low-income backgrounds in rural areas, for whom these jobs represent a crucial pathway out of poverty.

Since most apparel workers are also breadwinners, their wages help extended family networks in economically disadvantaged regions.

“The Women’s Centre collaborated with 25 other women’s organisations to carry out our campaign against the US tariffs hindering women workers,” said its Executive Director, Padmini Weerasuriya.

If the tariffs go into effect, “Their take-home pay will decrease significantly,” she added. “As orders dip and approximately six million dependents will also be severely impacted.”

“These women need job security as factories are already discussing about possible layoffs of workers, since demand is likely to drop.”

Compared to India and Bangladesh, she warns, Sri Lankan women face greater competition since “the tariffs imposed on Sri Lanka are higher”. That is why several manufacturers are already moving their operations to Vietnam, Bangladesh and Africa.

If plants shut down, more than 350,000 women working will be impacted. AsiaNews met three of them, 33-year-old Subadra Aponsu, 31-year-old Hemamamli Akaravita and 30-year-old Sandamini Tissera who spoke about their difficulties.

“We are the breadwinners of our families as our parents are elderly and sick. Our siblings are married and they are unable to provide for our parents. During the past several years, we have been working hard and providing for our families. If we lose our jobs, we have no option but to mortgage our homes,” they explained.

“During the economic crisis, we had to sell our paddy fields. Currently, our employers are planning to leave the country. We may lose our jobs shortly. We are unable to find employment elsewhere as almost every apparel manufacturer is planning to sell their business. In our boarding house, several women have already lost their jobs.”

According to economic analysts Sampath Amarasinghe and Niroshini Caldera, “due to the new tariffs, there will be a significant decline in export volumes with a severe erosion of Sri Lankan goods’ competitiveness in US markets.” All this, they warn, could result in “many Sri Lankan products ending up out of reach for US consumers and businesses.”

The greatest risk concerns “price- and cost-sensitive categories like garments, where profit margins are already low and competition from other countries is intense.”

The new tariff will see exports to the United States drop by 20 percent, with an annual loss of about US$ 300 million in foreign currency earnings.

As Sri Lanka’s total exports of goods in 2024 reached US$ 13 billion, the experts conclude, this represents “a major blow to the country’s balance of trade” and “economic growth prospects”.

Meanwhile, several women’s groups started a petition last week in the Katunayake Free Trade Zone (the first and largest of the country’s eight FTZs). – (AsiaNews)

Continue Reading

News

Sri Lanka reiterates commitment to repeal PTA in talks with EU

Published

on

EU and Sri Lanka delegations meet in Colombo (pic courtesy Foreign Ministry)

Sri Lanka has again declared its commitment to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) during the recently concluded talks with the European Union.

At the eighth meeting of the Working Group on Governance, Rule of Law and Human Rights under the EU-Sri Lanka Joint Commission, held in Colombo, Sri Lankan representatives “confirmed the commitment to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), and briefed the Working Group on the timeline to replace it with new counter-terrorism legislation in compliance with international norms and standards.”

The PTA has long drawn criticism from civil society, rights organisations, and international observers. The law has enabled arbitrary detention and torture for decades, particularly against Tamils. Despite repeated pledges by successive governments, no comprehensive repeal has yet materialised.

Though the National People’s Power (NPP)-backed government has stated its commitment to repeal the PTA during election campaigns last year, once in power it has not yet taken legislative action to do so.

The following is the text of the joint statement issued by the government and the EU: The eighth meeting of the Working Group on Governance, Rule of Law and Human Rights under the EU-Sri Lanka Joint Commission was held in Colombo on 5 May.

The Working Group discussed a range of matters of mutual interest, including efforts to combatting corruption, upholding human rights including labour rights; rights of persons belonging to minorities; women’s rights; child rights; a conducive space for civil society; strengthening electoral processes; and preventing discrimination based on gender and sexual orientation.

During the discussions, the European Union congratulated Sri Lanka on the well-organised and peaceful Presidential and Parliamentary elections last year and Sri Lanka appreciated the European Union Election Observation Mission at the Presidential elections.

The European Union also congratulated Sri Lanka on the stabilisation of the economy, continued efforts towards recovery and important initiatives such as the Government Action Plan for the implementation of governance reforms based on the IMF recommendations. Sri Lanka briefed the European Union on the adoption of the National Action Plan to Combat Corruption as well as steps taken to strengthen the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC). The EU and Sri Lanka agreed on the importance of governance and judicial processes to strengthen the rule of law. The Sri Lanka side briefed the EU on the steps being taken by the Government since its election to strengthen the democratic process, governance, rule of law and the legal framework for protecting and promoting human rights. They agreed on the important role of civil society organisations, particularly in fostering inclusive and consultative legislative processes within democratic societies.

The Working Group reiterated its shared commitment to promote and protect human rights and to collaborate, as applicable, on the effective implementation of international human rights instruments. Sri Lanka confirmed the commitment to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), and briefed the Working Group on the timeline to replace it with new counter-terrorism legislation in compliance with international norms and standards. The European Union recalled the need to bring relevant legislation in line with international Human Rights and ILO conventions to ensure continued access to the European market through the GSP+ trade preferences.

The European Union welcomed the commitment of the Government to end discrimination and build national unity, as well as the pledge to strengthen the truth and reconciliation framework in Sri Lanka, through an inclusive and participative process of all communities.

The EU and Sri Lanka reiterated their commitment to continue to work in the multilateral UN framework and continue their engagement with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Human Rights Council.

The European Union and Sri Lanka also reaffirmed their shared commitment to continuing to support a multilateral, rules-based international order grounded in international law, with the United Nations at its core.

The conclusions and recommendations of the Working Group will be reported to the EU-Sri Lanka Joint Commission to be held in Colombo during the latter half of the year.

The Delegation of Sri Lanka was led by Sugeeshwara Gunaratna, Director-General/ Europe and North America Division of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Employment and Tourism. The Delegation of the European Union was led by Charles Whiteley, Head of the South Asia Division of the European External Action Service.

Continue Reading

Trending