News
LG polls: Cardinal asks Prez to abide by SC order
Archbishop of Colombo Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith yesterday (13) declared that President Ranil Wickremesinghe, who is also the Finance Minister, had to carry out the interim order issued by the Supreme Court on March 03 pertaining to a fundamental rights petition filed by SJB General Secretary Ranjith Madduma Bandara.
Addressing the media at the Bishop’s House, Borella, the Cardinal strongly criticised President Wickremesinghe’s conduct and statements by SLPP parliamentarian Premanath Dolawatte and State Finance Minister Shehan Semasinghe.
The Cardinal said Parliament had the authority to decide on suitable laws and rules for the country, but the interpretation of the application of these laws in concrete situations was the province of the judiciary. That power had not been conferred on the Parliament, the Church leader said.
The following is the text of a statement issued by Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith Archbishop of Colombo:
” It was reported in the media that two Members of Parliament have spoken concerning the judgment given by the Supreme Court enforcing on the Secretary to the Ministry of Finance as well as the Attorney General the allocation of funds, that had been approved by the Parliament for conducting the local government elections, which were scheduled to be held on the 9th March 2023, calling this decision a violation of their parliamentary privileges by the Courts. This matter is to be viewed with great concern and I wish to comment on it as follows.
This request by the two parliamentarians is not in keeping with the dignity and the freedom of the Supreme Court in deciding on this matter and so any interference on the basis of parliamentary privileges is totally unacceptable and I wish to condemn this attitude quite firmly.
On a previous occasion in a judgment given by the Supreme Court in the case reported in (1999) 1 SRI LR 157 on a contention between Dayananda Dissanayake, Commissioner of Elections and others against Karunatilleke and others, the judgment given very clearly affirmed that according to the provision No. 14 (1) of the National Constitution, the Courts accepted that the citizens of this country have a right to exercise their freedom to express themselves and to speak out also through the medium of elections basing itself also on the principle that people have the right to elect their own representatives during a course of a scheduled election.
According to the Constitution of Sri Lanka it is clear that the Supreme Court is the highest and last decision making body in matters concerning the interpretation and application of law to concrete situations. In this matter the Supreme Court holds the authority as the last source of appeal in all matters, as it has been assigned such authority by the very Constitution of the nation.
The Parliament as the law making body has the authority to decide on suitable laws and rules for the country. Yet, the interpretation on the application of these laws in concrete situations belongs to the judiciary. That power has not been conferred on the Parliament.
The Executive is bound to ensure that the laws that are passed by the Parliament are carefully implemented and that the wellbeing of the people is always ensured. The Executive does not have the authority to violate International Human Rights stipulations and the basic Human Rights Chapter inserted into the National Constitution. The President who is appointed as the Executive authority, always taking his oaths, assures that he or she will preserve carefully the provisions of the Constitution. He or she also accepts that they will work for the dignity and the progress of the people. As such the Executive does not have the authority to interpret the law according to their wishes, or to try to enforce them according to the way they visualize. In a similar fashion even though the Parliament prepares the legal bills and the rules and regulations concerning the country, it has no authority to decide on the implementation of the law according to their whims and fancies.
At this point I wish to remind everybody that in October 2018 the then President removed at his own discretion the Government, of the time where the then Prime Minister was the present President of Sri Lanka, without any legal basis. And so, the same Ranil Wickremesinghe went before the Supreme Court appealing against that decision and by order given on 13th December 2018, after a hearing of Case SC FR 351/218, the Court ruled the decision of the then President illegal and he had to eat humble pie and reappoint the same government of Wickramasinghe.
What is surprising is that the same Ranil Wickramasinghe who sought refuge in the Supreme Court that time is now allowing parliamentarians to belittle and criticize the decision of the Supreme Court in this case. We see a deep contradiction in his behaviour.
Hence since no one has the authority to interfere in the decision of the Supreme Court, it is clear that the judgement given on 3rd March 2023 by the Supreme Court binds on the President, the Government and the Parliament in equal measure. And so they need to follow that decision faithfully. Else they would be belittling the authority of the Supreme Court and undermining the very basis of democracy in our country.
I appeal that action be taken against such Ministers and MPs to ensure that the freedom of the judiciary is maintained at all costs without interference from petty politics and concerns.”
News
Elders’ home devastated by fire was a ‘house of horror’: Witnesses
Death toll rises to 12: Director remanded
Some residents were allegedly chained
Police have come under public pressure to investigate allegations of inhumane treatmenf the residents at an elders’ home in Batagoda, which was also reportedly used as a care centre for persons with special needs, following a devastating fire that has so far claimed 12 lives.
Eyewitnesses who were among the first responders told the media that several residents had been chained inside rooms at the Senehase Kedella Elders’ Home when the fire broke out on Wednesday. They claimed that rescue efforts were hindered as iron chains could not be removed, and that some residents died while being restrained.
Authorities have not yet verified these claims, and Police said investigations are continuing.
Police spokesman ASP F.U. Wootler, contacted for comment, said there were rumours to that effect, but the Police were not in a position to verify the claims until a report from the Government Analyst was received. He said eight survivors with burn injuries were being treated in hospital.
Meanwhile, the Director of the facility had been arrested and was due to be produced before the Horana Magistrate’s Court, Police said adding that he was remanded till June 11.
The death toll from the fire has risen to 12 as of Thursday morning following the recovery of additional charred remains during ongoing forensic examinations at the site. Six others sustained serious injuries and are being treated at the Horana Base Hospital.
Police said 72 residents were inside the facility at the time of the blaze. Of them, 10 died inside the building, seven were injured and hospitalised, while 51 were rescued and relocated.
Survivors were initially housed at Batagoda Junior School before being transferred with Army assistance to another branch of the same care network in Galpatha.
A magisterial inquiry was conducted on Thursday morning. Horana Magistrate Lakmini Vidanagamage visited the scene. The burnt remains were examined and removed under judicial supervision.
Separately, allegations have emerged that residents were required to pay an admission fee of Rs. 75,000, along with a monthly charge of Rs. 35,000 to the centre. Police have not commented on these claims.
The director was taken to the scene as part of ongoing investigations, while forensic experts continue examinations to determine the cause of the fire, which remains undetermined.Anguruwatota Police are conducting investigations.
By Norman Palihawadane and Nishan S Priyantha
News
CERT : AI-generated videos depicting Prez, PM lure public into financial scams
Sri Lanka CERT has issued a public warning over the circulation of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated videos falsely depicting President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, Prime Minister Harini Amarasuriya and several other prominent personalities to promote fraudulent investment schemes online.
According to complaints received by the national cyber security agency, the videos have been created using deepfake technology and are being used as part of attempts to defraud members of the public through financial scams.
The images of famous sports personalities and other public figures have also been misused in the deceptive content.
The agency has warned that similar AI-generated material has been used to spread false information relating to investment opportunities, employment offers, as well as matters concerning the country’s economy and tax policies.
According to Sri Lanka CERT, the videos are being widely shared across online platforms and frequently contain links urging viewers to make investments in return for purported profits.The agency has cautioned that these links may redirect users to fraudulent websites designed to steal personal information, financial data and money from unsuspecting victims.
Sri Lanka CERT has urged the public to exercise extreme caution when encountering such content online and advised against clicking on suspicious links or sharing personal information through unverified websites.
“The public should remain vigilant and avoid becoming victims of false information and online fraud schemes,” the agency said.
Sri Lanka CERT has also encouraged internet users to verify information through official sources before acting on any investment, employment or financial offers circulated via social media or other online platforms.
News
New tax law comes into force
Speaker Dr Jagath Wickramaratne on Wednesday endorsed the certificate on the Inland Revenue (Amendment) Bill, bringing the legislation into force as the Inland Revenue (Amendment) Act, No. 11 of 2026, Parliament sources said.
The Bill, which amends the Inland Revenue Act, No. 24 of 2017, was passed by Parliament on May 19.
The new law introduces a series of reforms aimed at modernising tax administration procedures, improving compliance and enforcement mechanisms, enhancing the accuracy of tax calculations and deductions, and strengthening transparency within the tax system.
The amendments also support broader economic policy objectives and include measures designed to reinforce anti-money laundering safeguards.Among the key provisions of the Act is the mandatory use of Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) certificates for specified high-value financial transactions.
The legislation also introduces revisions to the calculation of taxable income, clarifies tax exemptions applicable to certain projects and business entities, and expands the scope for information disclosure to relevant authorities.
The amendments are expected to improve the efficiency of tax administration while facilitating greater accountability and regulatory oversight.With the Speaker’s endorsement of the certificate, the Inland Revenue (Amendment) Bill has now become law as the Inland Revenue (Amendment) Act, No. 11 of 2026.
-
News6 days agoIMF urges Lanka not to meddle with exchange rate
-
News3 days agoLankan duo emerge winners in Latin dance championship held in Blackpool, UK
-
Business4 days agoIMF’s unstated rate:Sri Lanka’s $695m loan costs about 5.33% per annum
-
News6 days agoState of emergency extended
-
Features5 days agoAre threats to Buddha Sasana external or from within?
-
News4 days agoUNP challenges NPP move to amend Vihara – Devalagam Act
-
Business4 days agoSri Lankan scientist-innovator Milinda Edirisinghe introduces AI-integrated gem testing system to gemological world
-
News3 days agoSri Lankan teen killed in Chennai clash; three arrested
