News
Lankan Tamils stranded on ‘secretive’ British island in Indian Ocean
Sixty Lankan Tamil refugees, including at least 16 children, claim to have been ‘unlawfully detained’ on Diego Garcia since 2021, said a report published by The Week of the UK yesterday.
It said: A paradise island in the Indian Ocean has become the centre of a complex legal dispute, a battle for control – and a “prison” for stranded migrants.
In 2021, Sri Lankan Tamils fleeing persecution attempted to sail to Canada to claim asylum, when their fishing boat suffered a leak. British Navy ships rescued dozens and brought them to Diego Garcia, the largest of the disputed Chagos Islands in the British Indian Ocean Territory (Biot) – long claimed by Mauritius – and site of a secretive military base leased by the UK to the US. The group of 60, including at least 16 children, claim to have been “unlawfully detained” since: the first people to file asylum claims in the Biot.
The territory’s Supreme Court was due to rule on the claim last week, but hours before the judge and lawyers got on the US military plane to start their journey, the US cancelled the hearing. Officials said they were “withdrawing its consent” for access to the “heavily restricted” island, with communication seen by the BBC describing the reasons as “confidential” – but that the visit presented “risks to the security and effective operation” of the base.
But parts of the island where access was denied (such as a gym and a swimming pool) were visited by US cheerleaders and celebrity chefs earlier this year. The fact that the Biot Supreme Court has been “prevented from sitting in its own territory on Crown land is an extraordinary affront to the rule of law”, said Tessa Gregory, a partner at Leigh Day, the London-based solicitors representing the Tamils.
Diego Garcia is the largest of the Chagos Islands, an archipelago about 310 miles south of The Maldives. The Biot is constitutionally separate from the UK, but administered from London.
The UK took the Chagos Islands from its then colony Mauritius in 1965 and evicted the population of more than 1,000 people, to build a military base. It signed an agreement in 1966 to lease the base to the US for 50 years, which has been extended and is now set to expire in 2036. So although Diego Garcia is technically in a British territory, most of the island is under US military control, including the accommodation and transport.
The US has sent planes from Diego Garcia to bomb Afghanistan and Iraq, while two B52 bombers were sent there for training earlier this year. The CIA has also denied allegations that it has been used as a base to interrogate terror suspects after 9/11.
Since Mauritius gained its independence in 1968, it has claimed ownership of the islands. In 2000, the British High Court ruled that the forceful eviction of Chagossians had been illegal, and granted them right of return – to any island except Diego Garcia.
The International Court of Justice ruled in 2019 that the UK’s control of the whole territory was “unlawful” and should end. In 2021, a separate UN maritime court found that the UK’s control of the islands amounted to an “unlawful occupation”.
But “regardless of widespread international opinion in favour of Mauritius, London has largely ignored these decisions”, said Foreign Policy. The UK government also argues that the refugee convention does not apply there.
Foreign Office plans to give the Chagos Islands back to Mauritius in a “Cyprus-style deal” were scrapped earlier this year, said The Telegraph. Then Defence Secretary Grant Shapps “urged” David Cameron not to cede the islands to Mauritius – a growing ally of China.
“In many ways, the island – with its pure white sands, palm trees and azure seas – looks a lot like paradise”, said The Guardian. But for the 60 asylum seekers, “that idyll could not be further from their reality” – they remain “stuck there” in a “desperate, dangerous limbo”.
They are forced to live in a “makeshift tented camp the size of a football pitch, surrounded by a 7ft-high metal fence”. The tents are “infested with rats, mice and cockroaches”. One person told the paper: “My mental state is deteriorating. I live in a body that has no life inside it”.
Many of the detainees “say they are escaping torture and persecution by either Sri Lankan security forces” due to their Tamil ethnicity, said The New Humanitarian, or Indian security forces due to being Sri Lankan refugees.
But on Diego Garcia, guarded by private security company G4S, “they are treating us like prisoners”, two asylum seekers said in an anonymous written statement. A G4S spokesperson denied the claims, saying the company “treats the migrants on the island with dignity and respect at all times”.
But there have been “multiple suicide attempts” and “reports of sexual harassment and assaults”, said the BBC. Some have been flown to Rwanda for medical treatment, but remain under Biot administration. “During Tuesday’s virtual hearing, one of the migrants on the island collapsed multiple times.”
Last year, UN representatives who visited the camp reported that “conditions there amounted to arbitrary detention”. The Foreign Office has also said that the island is not suitable for migrants. A ruling in their favour could allow them to claim compensation for years of detention, as well as having implications for Chagossians’ calls for reparations for their eviction.
The asylum seekers are “pinning all their hopes on their legal teams to get them off the island and to a place of safety where their troubled children can thrive”, said The Guardian. One told the paper: “We hope we will be allowed to escape from hell.”
News
PSTA worse than PTA: FSP
The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday accused the government of seeking to use the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA) to suppress popular political activity, claiming that some of its provisions were more repressive than those of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).
FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jayagoda told a media briefing, in Nugegoda, that the definition of terrorism in the Bill was so broad that it could be used to label almost any form of popular political activity as terrorism.
He said the Bill’s approach to defining terrorism was based largely on attempts to compel a government, or an international organisation, to do, or refrain from doing something, rather than on internationally recognised criteria, such as killings, causing serious bodily harm, kidnapping or acts intended to spread terror among the public.
Jayagoda also alleged that the Bill transferred substantial powers from the judiciary to the executive, while extending powers of arrest, investigation and detention to the armed forces, in addition to the police.
He claimed that the government had sought to portray the Bill as a replacement for the PTA while retaining or introducing provisions that could facilitate political victimisation and repression.
The FSP also questioned the government’s decision to proceed with the Bill, despite having previously sought public views on an earlier draft.
Jayagoda said a draft had been published earlier this year, with the period for public submissions ending on February 28, but the Bill subsequently gazetted was essentially the same draft with some provisions rearranged.
Jayagoda also referred to a letter reportedly sent by Attorney-at-Law Saliya Peiris, a member of a Committee, chaired by President’s Counsel Rienzie Arsecularatne, that had been appointed to draft the legislation. He said Peiris had stated, in the October 06 letter, that changes had been made to the draft prepared by the Committee.
“This means that even the Committee, appointed to prepare the Bill, was a deception,” Jayagoda alleged.
He said that the PSTA was fundamentally similar to the Anti-Terrorism Bill introduced by the previous government, in 2023, which the National People’s Power (NPP) opposed and challenged in court.
“If the NPP opposed that Bill then and is now bringing the same legislation before Parliament, the government must explain its position,” he said.
Jayagoda called on NPP MPs to oppose the PSTA in Parliament and urged trade unions and other groups to build a broad public movement against the legislation.
He challenged the government to an open debate on the Bill.
News
Shiranthi R remanded until 13 Oct.
Former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa was yesterday remanded until 13 October after being produced before the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following her arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).
Shiranthi, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, was arrested at her residence on Poorwarama Road, Kirulapone, after CIABOC officers recorded a statement from her for nearly two hours.
According to the CIABOC, the arrest was made over allegations that Rs. 10 million obtained from the National Savings Bank through the Siriliya Saviya organisation was misappropriated.
The money was allegedly obtained to provide a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner to the children’s hospital. Investigators allege that the scanner was not provided and that the funds were instead unlawfully used.
CIABOC is investigating alleged offences under the Public Property Act and corruption-related provisions in connection with the transaction and other financial activities involving Siriliya Saviya, which was headed by Rajapaksa.
Rajapaksa returned to Sri Lanka on Monday night on a flight from Malaysia after travelling overseas for medical treatment. She left for Singapore on 16 September after being admitted to a private hospital in Colombo on 15 September following an illness.
She had been due to appear before the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) on 13 October in connection with its investigation into the financial affairs of Siriliya Saviya.
Meanwhile, her lawyers filed an anticipatory bail application before the Maligakanda Magistrate’s Court on Monday, seeking an order preventing her arrest in connection with the FCID investigation.
News
Former NSB Chairman Kariyawasam granted bail
Former National Savings Bank (NSB) Chairman Pradeep Kariyawasam was yesterday granted bail by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following his arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).
Kariyawasam, husband of former Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, was arrested in connection with the Bribery Commission’s investigation into the ‘Siriliya Saviya’ account linked to former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa.
The investigation concerns financial activities involving the Siriliya Saviya initiative, which was headed by Rajapaksa, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
CIABOC is continuing investigations into the alleged financial irregularities relating to the account.
-
Editorial6 days agoColombo Port drug bust: The plot thickens
-
Features4 days agoThe first woman in the foreign service or Ceylon Overseas Service it was then called
-
Editorial5 days agoFuelling discontent and protest
-
News3 days agoGeneva takes up Sallay’s case and govt. ignores opportunity to answer accusations
-
Latest News5 days agoTharindu Rathnayake, bowlers secure Asian Games Bronze for Sri Lanka
-
Foreign News5 days agoTen injured after car crashes into rugby supporters in Australia
-
Features3 days agoSri Lanka Cricket Bill: Governance reform is not yet a cricket strategy
-
News4 days agoNearly 20 Iranian tankers stranded off Lanka amid US sanctions
