Features
ISCARIOT
by Algi Wijewickrema
“What do you want, Iscariot?”, questioned the High Priest, Joseph Caiaphas as Judas Iscariot approached him in his palatial residence. The chief priests and the officers of the temple guard were also there.
“It is not what I want but what I have to give you that I have come to talk about”, was Judas’ reply.
Caiaphas said “Well, well and what can a man like you give us?”
Judas responded “Is that all you have to say. What I have is not to be trifled with. You will have to pay for it”.
The High Priest’s interest was visible in his eyes and when Judas saw that he said “I will give you the person you seek if you pay me for it”.
“Pray tell us, Iscariot, who is this man you think we want, Barabbas perhaps.” laughed Caiaphas.
Once Judas had made it clear that he could help them arrest Jesus, Caiaphas paused. They had tried to have Jesus arrested on more than a few occasions, the last being after the festival of the Tabernacles when they sent guards but failed as they came back and reported that the people believed Jesus was a prophet or teacher, someone to be respected. “No one has spoken like Him” they said.
With that attempt failed, Caiaphas thought perhaps this was the opportunity to have him arrested. Having conferred with the others present, he agreed to pay Judas a sum of thirty pieces of silver, about a month’s wages in those days.
Judas was a confused Apostle, a loner who was more concerned with the money than with the message Jesus was preaching. Unlike most of Jesus’ Apostles who were from Galilee, Judas was from Judea. He led the way when the disciples commented about a woman who had broken an alabaster jar of perfume to anoint Jesus, “Why this waste?” they asked. “This perfume could have been sold at a high price and the money given to the poor.” That speaks about the mind of Judas. Not that he was concerned about the poor, but he was concerned about the money.
He knew about Jesus’ plans to have the Passover meal and His custom to pray afterwards in the garden of Gethsemane. So, he arranged with the High Priests and planned to hand Him over then. Soon after the Passover meal in the upper room at which Jesus had even hinted at His betrayal, Judas left and met the guards.
When he came to the garden of Gethsemane on that fateful Thursday night he was with the soldiers and without any sign of a betrayal he embraced Jesus. At this Jesus asked “Judas, are you betraying the Son of Man with a kiss?” But Judas was past caring for he had already taken blood money, thirty pieces of silver, for it. Judas had done what he had been paid for.
Judas followed the crowds unobtrusively. No one knew he was following them, he made sure of that. He was there hiding when Jesus was taken to the High Priest’s residence which in itself was highly unusual for this was the evening of the Passover meal. Why was the High Priest not readying himself for the festivities thought Judas? Instead of being with his family for the festival and preparing himself for his priestly duties, here was the High Priest ready to judge a man accused of blasphemy at best. Judas was intrigued that the High Priest should rush through deciding in the night time something he could have dealt with during the next day.
He was there hidden from others when Peter denied knowledge of Jesus three times before the cock crowed to announce the dawn and remembered Jesus’ words to Peter. He saw Jesus glance at Peter but thought there was no bitterness but pity in that look. He saw Peter go outside and weep bitterly.
After seeing Jesus’ look when Peter denied Him and seeing Peter weep afterwards Judas wasn’t sure if he had done the right thing and was a disturbed, more confused man thereafter.
The next morning Judas was there again. This time in view of the praetorium where Pilate was sitting to give judgement. Judas was following the crowds which had now dwindled. When the trial before Pilate took place, he was with the crowds that, instigated by the Pharisees and High Priests, shouted “crucify him”. Though he himself could not bring himself to shout, he felt safe among the crowds. Safety in numbers for him. He noticed an official handing over to Pilate a note which, after reading he tossed away and saw him wash his hands and pronounce judgement to crucify Jesus.
As Jesus was led away, Judas snapped. He rushed to the Chief Priests at the Temple and tried to return the thirty pieces of silver he had accepted to betray Jesus and said “I have sinned, I have betrayed innocent blood’ but they refused to accept the money back. It was too late for them to reverse the process. Too later for Jesus and was too late for Judas.
“What is that to us?” they asked seated in their comfortable seats. “That is your responsibility”.
So what was his responsibility? He knew he had to change what he had set in motion but knew he could not. So, what was he to do? His mind was in a whirl. He threw the money down and left the Temple not knowing where to go or what to do.
He remembered how Jesus had said just the previous evening “Truly I tell you one of you will betray me” and walking as in a trance he kept saying to himself “I betrayed innocent blood, I have no forgiveness”. Desperation and despondency took hold of himself. What must he do?
On his way he found a piece of rope and having given up any thought of forgiveness he hanged himself.
The other Apostles when they heard of his suicide remembered Jesus’ words “The Son of Man will go as it is written, but woe unto the man who betrays the Son of Man, it would be better for him if he was not born”.
While hiding for fear of the Jews Peter thought, if only Judas had believed in Jesus’ words “Forgive your enemies, pray for them”. Had he believed, thought Peter, he would have realised that those were not mere words uttered by Jesus but proven by Him on the Cross. Proven to him too when he had denied knowing Jesus.
Judas, having taken his life, despairing of God’s merciful forgiveness, unfortunately, could not include himself among those for whom Jesus prayed from the Cross, “Father forgive them for they do not know what they are doing”.
Features
‘There are no private universities in Sri Lanka’ – some considerations for higher education reform
Academics involved in education policy like to say that there is no such thing as a private university in Sri Lanka. The only ‘universities’ in the country are state universities; anything else offering degrees is a private higher education institution (HEI). This position is technically accurate. Yet, in the discourse and imagination of the public, private universities are very real – people teach in them, students register in them, families pay fees, and such degree holders enter job markets in Sri Lanka and outside.
For decades, activists concerned for public higher education have ignored or resisted looking at private HEIs, as if such scrutiny would taint them. Others have worked in both types of institutions, carrying practices from each to the other. The apex body governing state universities, the UGC, has, meanwhile, ignored the concept of conflict of interest and appointed individuals in private higher education in committees and leadership positions. It is unsurprising then that some of the ideologies informing private higher education appear in reform agendas in the state sector.
This is a good time then to consider the varying types of private HEIs around us, and to take a look at some of the issues within them in the hope that higher education reform agendas will include private, as well as state higher education.
What is a ‘private university’?
First, some clarifications. In the public imaginary, a ‘private university’ is typically an institution that provides a foreign or local degree for which the student makes a payment. But this broad classification encompasses a host of diverse institutions and types of degrees which I detail below.
The Non-State Higher Education Division (NSHE) of the Ministry of Education has recognised 295 degrees by 32 institutions. Most of these are private companies and include a handful of established, well-known private HEIs that are ‘university like’. The degrees are local degrees conferred by the institutions accredited by the NSHE Division. While private HEIs conferring local degrees must be accredited by the NSHE Division, there appears to be no legal consequence for not doing so. In addition, there are several permutations of the private degree that miss the net of this Division and the Standing Committee on Accreditation and Quality Assurance (SCAQA) that assists this Division.
For one, degrees conferred by foreign universities offered, via these same private HEIs, are not vetted by the NSHE Division. Secondly, there is a growing plethora of private HEIs which have either no physical presence locally or only a dubious presence. The University Grants Commission has notified the public, through their website, that foreign universities listed in the Commonwealth Universities Yearbook and the World Higher Education Database are recognised, but refrained from giving any other details – which degrees? Offered by what modes? These details are not known. Some of the foreign universities in the lists may be legitimate entities in their own land but the degrees conferred locally, in their name, may not adhere to curriculum or teaching specifications of the NSHE Division or the UGC.
Another troubling phenomenon is the ‘top up degree’, which appears to work on the same principle as that of a pre-paid mobile connection: if I have a Diploma or an HND of a sort, I am eligible to complete a course of study which provides me with a degree, usually from a foreign university. The idea that someone who does not initially qualify for a degree programme should be able to work their way towards one is a progressive notion. This is the concept that open and distance learning (ODL) was based on initially, but which is now sadly exploited. ODL models are expected to provide opportunity for learning for those who may be excluded from traditional learning institutions. In Sri Lanka, however, we have seen ODL become a marketplace offering easy to obtain, for-fee qualifications by institutions with little commitment to superior teaching and learning.
Finally, a perusal of the many types of private HEIs and their varied degrees bring to mind another question – how should the private degrees, provided by state institutions (that are not educational institutions), be regulated? Who should do so?
All of these create a host of problems for the public – for hopeful students and parents and trusting employers. For the higher education sector, recruitment of academic staff, too, has become difficult due to this plethora of ambiguous higher education qualifications, as I discussed in a previous Kuppi article (‘Recruiting academics to state universities’).
Some issues in private HEIs – a bellwether for change in state universities
In this second part of this article, I will discuss some aspects of work in private HEIs – albeit the more established institutions – given that such issues may appear in reform agendas in future.
Across state universities, all permanent staff of a specific category are paid according to the same criteria. The picture is not so clear when it comes to private HEIs since they are different entities legally, typically companies. Private HEIs have salary scales and financial incentives that are different to each other. The more established private HEIs reportedly have attractive renumeration packages, possibly a reason for academics of state universities migrating eagerly to such institutions during sabbatical years and on retirement. This may not of course be the case with other less established, or improperly registered HEIs of which we know little. Academic staff of these more accepted private HEIs seem to value the high financial remuneration they receive (in comparison to state universities) as something that makes their work rewarding.
Attractive remuneration is important to sustain the good life and is at times seen as the institution’s way of encouraging good work. Yet, this has implications for the future of the institution: to continue to deliver on promised financial packages, institutions must continue to have large profit margins. One strategy has been to enroll multiple cohorts of students per year, even up to three or four intakes per year. This can result in exploitative work conditions, since staff must cater to all these cohorts in that same year. If there is inadequate staff, employees are further burdened. On the other hand, if there is a sudden drop in enrolments (degrees can go out of fashion) unexpected layoffs occur. Similar to other sectors that employ short-term contract staff – including state universities – in private HEIs, too, individual teachers, who are on short term contracts that need regular renewal, can feel pressured to work under difficult or exploitative conditions.
At the same time, even in the more established private HEIs, work norms differ from those of state universities in that they include promotional work that keeps the institution’s name in the eye of the public. The Marketing (or similarly named) unit comes up in conversations as one of the most important departments. It appears to weigh in on decision-making related to the number of staff, the amount of re-sits per exams, and other pedagogically important matters. This is a worrying example of how financial rationales interfere with pedagogically or academically sound processes, resulting in problematic results in the classroom. On the plus side, junior colleagues, who had experience in both state and private HEIs, also felt that they faced less harassment in private HEIs – primarily due to the private HEIs ability to take swift action in reported cases of harassment. This is a real indictment on state institutions and their reluctance to address chronic issues of harassment in our universities.
Yet, while we hear much about problems in state universities, we hardly hear of problems that staff in private HEIs face. One rationale for a lack of public expressions by staff is that expressions of discontent might lead to trouble given the importance of reputation for private HEIs. The worry about reputational damage is a growing concern in state universities, too, as evidenced by social media policies and internal conversations on reputational damage, consequent to negative publicity. Institutional worries of reputational damage are harmful in the long run since these impact not only freedom of expression by student and staff, but also research that is possible in and about the education sector.
Some thoughts at the end…
A close look at the private higher education sector is important given its strong presence in the country. Impending reform needs to regulate this diverse array of higher education offerings in the private sector, as well as the state institutions that offer privately-funded options of higher education (a topic for a separate Kuppi on its own). It is time we carefully considered how to build a whole system of higher education out of this broken mess.
Kaushalya Perera is a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo.
Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.
Features
Ready for solo spotlight
Singer Nish Peiris is set to take the next big step in her music journey.
The talented vocalist, who has been seen and heard in the scene here for a short while, and was also featured with the now-defunct band, Inner Vision, has announced that she will be fully committing to her solo career, after completing her degree this year.
“I’m finishing my degree this year, and after that I’ll be fully committing to my solo music career,” Nish told The Island.
“I’ve already got a few tours lined up for next year, so I’m really excited for what’s ahead.”
Fans, no doubt, will remember Nish for her smooth voice and stage presence, and the good news is that she is now ready to chart her own path and bring new music to audiences at home and abroad.
With tours already planned for 2027, the year 2026 promises to be an exciting year for the young artiste as she steps into the spotlight on her own.
We wish Nish every success in this new chapter!
Features
Exclusive musical evening for Sri Lankans in Toronto
While Sri Lankan music lovers, in Dubai, are eagerly looking forward to being a part of the action on Saturday, 25th July, with Rajiv Sebastian in the limelight, Sri Lankans, in Toronto, Canada, are equally excited and are anxiously awaiting the arrival of Sri Lanka’s famous singer/entertainer Sohan Weerasinghe.
Having done the needful with The X-Periments, the legendary performer has now embarked on an exciting new chapter – a solo career – and Toronto, Canada, will see him do the needful, on Friday, 31st July, 2026, from 8.00 pm to 12.00 am, at the Angus Glen Golf Club.
Reports indicate that it’s a ‘sold out’ event – naturally with Sohan in the spotlight.
Having built his reputation through years of unforgettable performances, and hits that became part of our musical fabric, Sohan is ready to bring his own vision, sound, and stories directly to the audience, in Toronto, Canada, backed by the phenomenal Toronto Ceymphony Live Band.
Says Gamini Hemalal, who has been instrumental in reviving the Sri Lankan entertainment scene, in that part of the world:
“The countdown begins for the most exclusive musical event of the summer! Join us for a premium night of incredible music, elite hospitality, and a lavish buffet as the legendary Sohan Weerasinghe takes the stage live in Toronto!
“This is a high-end event, designed for those who appreciate exceptional entertainment and great food.”
Gamini, who is also a member of the Toronto Ceymphony Live Band, mentioned that it’s going to be an intimate musical evening with the celebrated Sohan Weerasinghe.
From packed auditoriums to intimate shows, Sohan continues to prove why he remains one of Sri Lanka’s most beloved entertainers.
For decades, Sohan Weerasinghe has been a household name in Sri Lankan entertainment.
Known for his captivating smooth voice and charismatic stage presence, Canada will experience it all on Friday, 31st July.
Next on the list of events, Gamini Hemal is working on, is Halloween night and he says “what we plan to do will be very interesting and unique … with a surprise guest star, as well!”
-
Business3 days ago‘Giving up was never an option’: The fisherman who fought back after losing millions in SL
-
Features3 days agoTwo memorable excerpts from a former SLAF commander’s memoir
-
Latest News3 days agoDavis cup Asia/Oceania Group IV 2026 to be held in Colombo from 20th to 25th July
-
Features3 days agoErdoğan’s New Republic
-
Life style3 days agoTaste of the Swiss Alps comes to Colombo
-
Features7 days agoDirty Money
-
News4 days agoDengue outbreak gallops ahead: Infections surpasses 73,455, leaving 50 dead
-
News4 days agoEvidence recorded in money laundering case against Yoshitha Rajapaksa


