Latest News
IPL 2025: Demerit Points System explained, Pandya’s suspension to continue
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has stated that the introduction of the demerit points system in its code of conduct aims to establish a deterrent mechanism – focusing on the threat of suspension rather than suspension itself. This approach is designed to encourage a change in the behaviour of players, officials, and others.
In a communique to the franchises, the BCCI explained, “The IPL believes that the threat of a suspension is the strongest deterrent to bring about a change in behaviour, hence the system of accumulated Demerit Points which is included in the Code of Conduct.”
The new system is an adaptation of features from the International Cricket Council (ICC) Code but with slight differences, as reported by Cricbuzz. While the ICC carries forward points for five years, the BCCI system retains them for only three years. “The demerit points received by a player or team official under the regulations remain on their record for a period of thirty-six (36) months,” the BCCI says.
“Upon accumulation of Demerit Points, the Player or Team Official is awarded suspension(s). The details regarding the same are provided under Article 7.6 of the Regulations. An example of suspension through accumulation of Demerit Points is provided under Article 7.8 of the Regulations,” the mail mentions.
Article 7.6 specifies that the accumulation of four-seven demerit points will result in a one-match suspension, 8-11 points will lead to a two-match suspension, 12-15 points will incur a three-match suspension, and 16 or more points will result in a five-match suspension. Article 7.8 outlines the system for accumulating points over a period of three years and explains how the incremental system functions in the event of multiple breaches within these 36 months.
The BCCI also outlines how the demerits points are imposed under the new regulation. “Demerit Points will be imposed upon a Player or Team Official found to have committed an offence under the Code of Conduct. The number of Demerit Points imposed will be calculated by reference to the sanction imposed for the particular offences.”
Understandably, the levels of the breach will determine the number of demerit points. For instance, a fine of 25% of the match fee carries one (1) demerit point. A Level 2 offence attracts 3-4 demerit points, a Level 3 offence results in 5-6 demerit points, and a Level 4 breach leads to 7-8 demerit points. A key distinction is that the punishment may be imposed for a specific period or a certain number of matches. The match referee or an ombudsman determines this.
BCCI clarifies, “Where a Match Referee or Ombudsman imposes a period of suspension on any Player or Team Official, then, unless such period is for a fixed period of time (for example, one year) then, any such period of suspension shall be referenced by Suspension Points. Each Match in the League shall carry the weightage of one (1) Suspension Point. To clarify, a sanction of one (1) Suspension Point shall result in a one (1) Match suspension.”
The Pandya case
The BCCI has made it clear that Hardik Pandya will serve a one-match suspension for the breach from last season but will not incur any demerit points. “Any sanction imposed prior to the 2025 Season shall continue to be complied by the Player or Team Official. However, such sanctions imposed prior to the 2025 Season shall not result in imposition of Demerit Points.
“For example, a Player receiving a match suspension in his last game of the 2024 Season will serve the match suspension in the 2025 Season but will get no Demerit Points for this suspension,” the email states this and goes on to add, without explicitly referring to it, but clearly alluding to the Pandya case. “A minimum over-rate offence under the Regulations shall no longer carry a match suspension for the team captain. A minimum over-rate offence shall only result in the imposition of fine and fielding restrictions.”
There is also a system for an appeal against the sanctions, but it requires a payment of Rs 90 lakh. Says the mail, “Under the Regulations, any sanction imposed under Level 2 or Level 3 offence is appealable before the BCCI Ombudsman. However, any Player, Team Official or Franchisee that wishes to appeal such sanctions, may only do so upon the payment of an Appeal Fee which shall be the sum of INR 90 Lakh. This Appeal Fee is refundable only if the appeal is completely successful before the Ombudsman.”
According to the BCCI, the new regulations have been approved by the Governing Council of the IPL. The captains and managers of the teams were briefed about it at Thursday’s meeting at Cricket Centre.
Latest News
Sri Lanka’s World Cup winning team conduct coaching session in KL
On day two of Sri Lanka’s World Cup winning cricket team’s tour of Malaysia, they conducted a coaching session for children at the Royal Selangor ground in Kuala Lampur.

Latest News
Marsh onslaught, Akash three-for dent Chennai Super King’s playoffs chances
Mitchell Marsh’s boundary-laden 90 off 38 balls dented Chennai Super Kings’ playoffs chances and gave the Lucknow crowd something to cheer about. Chennai Super Kings (CSK) dropped from fifth to sixth after the result, with Rajasthan Royals (RR) leapfrogging them on net run-rate.
In pursuit of 188 on a tricky surface, Marsh flew out of the blocks, smashing 56 of the 86 runs Lucknow Super Giants (LSG) had hit in the powerplay. At the halfway mark of the game, ESPNcricinfo’s forecaster had pegged LSG’s win probability at 39.49%. It zoomed up to 91.24% after Marsh’s unfettered powerplay assault. Marsh fell ten short of a century, but Nicholas Pooran increased the count to 100% and sealed LSG’s fourth win this season.
They won by seven wickets with 20 balls to spare, but it still wasn’t enough to drag them up from the foot of the points table.
Akash Singh emerged from the sidelines for his first game of the season and produced career-best IPL figures of 4-0-26-3, against his former team. While Mohammed Shami explored the full length and conceded three fours to Sanju Samson in the first over, Akash banged it away on a hard length on a bouncy, red-soil Ekana pitch. He cramped all of Ruturaj Gaikwad, Samson and Urvil Patel and celebrated every wicket by pulling out a note from his pocket, which read: “#Akki on fire – Akash knows how to take wickets in a T20 game”
Only four of Akash’s 18 balls in the powerplay were fuller than a good length, according to ESPNcricinfo’s logs. His impeccable lengths were central to LSG restricting CSK to 37 for 2 in six overs. Akash bowled four overs on the trot and proved his point.
CSK’s 36 for 2 became 52 for 3 when Urvil holed out, but rookie Kartik Sharma repaired the innings along with Dewald Brevis, who contributed 25 off 16 balls. When left-arm fingerspinner Shahbaz Ahmed dragged one marginally short, Kartik picked up the length in a flash and swatted a six over midwicket in the ninth over. While Kartik’s back-foot play was Ambati Rayudu-esque, some of his front-foot shots and off-side range were reminiscent of Samson.
All told, Kartik took Shahbaz for 30 off 15 balls before the spinner had him caught at long-on in the 16th over. Kartik showed that he could also cut it against extreme pace as well when he backed away against Mayank Yadav and scythed a 144kph delivery to the right of point for four.
Kartik reached his half-century off 35 balls and hushed Ekana with his finger-on-the-lip celebration. When he was looking good for more, he fell for 71 off 42 balls.
Shivam Dube managed just one boundary off his first 11 balls, but went 6,4,4,6 off his last four balls to finish with an unbeaten 32 off 16 balls. Prashant Veer made a more sedate 13 not out off ten balls. With LSG incurring a penalty for slow over rate in the last over of the innings – they had just four men outside the circle – Prince Yadav cracked under pressure and leaked 23 runs.
Marsh set the tempo for the chase when he walked down the track to Mukesh Choudhary and picked him for four. Mukesh ended up conceding 15 runs in his first over and was taken out of the attack.
At the start of the third over, Marsh charged at Anshul Kamboj, manufactured swinging room and cracked him through the covers. It threw Kamboj off his signature hard length and he kept digging it shorter without having enough pace to trouble Marsh. In the penultimate over of the powerplay, Marsh lined Kamboj up for four sixes and a four. Marsh didn’t spare his Australia compatriot Spencer Johnson, who was on CSK debut, either, bashing him for three fours and a six in the sixth over.
In the absence of Jamie Overton, whose IPL has been cut short by injury, CSK lacked a middle-overs enforcer. They tried Gurjapneet Singh, but Marsh advanced at him too and launched him over the covers. Josh Inglis was just content to ride in Marsh’s slipstream.
Soon after Johnson knocked Abdul Samad over for seven off three balls, but Pooran rushed LSG home with four successive sixes off Kamboj, leaving CSK’s best bowler this season nursing figures of 2.4-0-63-0.
Brief scores:
Lucknow Super Giants 188 for 3 in 16.4 overs (Mitchell Marsh 90, Josh Inglis 36, Nicholas Pooran 32*, Mukul Choudhary 13*; Mukesh Choudhary 1-24, Spencer Johnson 1-39) beat Chennai Super Kings 187 for 5 in 20 overs (Sanju Samson 20, Rutraj Gaikwad 13, Kartik Sharma 71, Dewald Brevis 25, Shivam Dube 32*, Prashant Veer 13*; Mohammed Shami 1-41, Akash Singh 3-26, Shahbaz Ahmed 1-45) by seven wickets
[Cricinfo]
Latest News
ICC suspends funding to Cricket Canada over governance-related issues
The ICC has suspended funding to Cricket Canada over governance-related issues. Cricket Canada was informed earlier this week by the global governing body and faces a freeze in the funding it receives for the next six months.
ESPNcricinfo understands the funding suspension will not impact any cricket activities, including high performance programmes. But it will be a significant blow to Cricket Canada, who, as an Associate Member, rely heavily on ICC distributions. Its financial statement for the year-ending 2024 showed that income from the ICC made up 63% of the board’s total income (CAD$3.6 million out of a total revenue of CAD$5.7 million).
The details around the governance failures are not yet known, though the fifth estate in Canada, an investigative documentary programme, has reported “breaches of ICC policies, including concerns over Cricket Canada’s governance and lack of financial oversight.”
Cricket Canada has gone through a period of turmoil on and off the field recently. Canada’s match against New Zealand at the recent T20 World Cup is the subject of a probe by the ICC’s anti-corruption and integrity unit.
Another ACU investigation is underway, stemming from a recording of a telephone call involving then Canada coach Khuram Chohan, in which he claimed that senior (now former) Cricket Canada board members put pressure on him to select certain players to the national side. The audio was leaked last year and also contains claims of attempts to corrupt matches.
Last month, in a statement to ESPNcricinfo on the corruption investigation, Andrew Ephgrave, the ICC’s interim anti-integrity unit head had said: “Governance matters in relation to ICC Members are considered by the ICC, where they fall under its jurisdiction, in accordance with the ICC’s standard constitutional processes.”
Cricket Canada has also faced administrative challenges over the last year, most notably in the appointment and subsequent removal of former CEO Salman Khan. His appointment had attracted ICC attention, for failing to disclose prior criminal charges and he has been charged with theft and fraud by Calgary Police. Salman has denied the claims. In April, Arvinder Khosa was made the interim board president, replacing Amjad Bajwa.
The ICC’s funding decision came immediately after Cricket Canada’s annual general meeting last weekend (May 9-10), in which the board announced reforms it said were part of its “ongoing governance transformation initiative”. It also elected a new nine-person board of directors, with Khosa elected president, after his interim stint.
The ICC did not comment on the development and ESPNcricinfo has approached Cricket Canada for comment. In a statement to the fifth estate, the board’s media manager Jimmy Sharma said: “The current Board has inherited these issues and is fully committed to resolving all governance, compliance, and financial control deficiencies.”
[Cricinfo]
-
News7 days agoLanka Port City officials to meet investors in Dubai
-
News4 days agoEx-SriLankan CEO’s death: Controversy surrounds execution of bail bond
-
Features5 days agoWhen University systems fail:Supreme Court’s landmark intervention in sexual harassment case
-
Features5 days agoHigh Stakes in Pursuing corruption cases
-
Midweek Review4 days agoA victory that can never be forgotten
-
Features7 days agoServing as MR’s Deputy Finance Minister and the travel the job entailed
-
Features7 days agoBengal Turns BJP, Didi Falls
-
News6 days ago150th anniversary celebrations of Ave Maria Convent, Negombo
