Latest News
IPL 2025: Demerit Points System explained, Pandya’s suspension to continue
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has stated that the introduction of the demerit points system in its code of conduct aims to establish a deterrent mechanism – focusing on the threat of suspension rather than suspension itself. This approach is designed to encourage a change in the behaviour of players, officials, and others.
In a communique to the franchises, the BCCI explained, “The IPL believes that the threat of a suspension is the strongest deterrent to bring about a change in behaviour, hence the system of accumulated Demerit Points which is included in the Code of Conduct.”
The new system is an adaptation of features from the International Cricket Council (ICC) Code but with slight differences, as reported by Cricbuzz. While the ICC carries forward points for five years, the BCCI system retains them for only three years. “The demerit points received by a player or team official under the regulations remain on their record for a period of thirty-six (36) months,” the BCCI says.
“Upon accumulation of Demerit Points, the Player or Team Official is awarded suspension(s). The details regarding the same are provided under Article 7.6 of the Regulations. An example of suspension through accumulation of Demerit Points is provided under Article 7.8 of the Regulations,” the mail mentions.
Article 7.6 specifies that the accumulation of four-seven demerit points will result in a one-match suspension, 8-11 points will lead to a two-match suspension, 12-15 points will incur a three-match suspension, and 16 or more points will result in a five-match suspension. Article 7.8 outlines the system for accumulating points over a period of three years and explains how the incremental system functions in the event of multiple breaches within these 36 months.
The BCCI also outlines how the demerits points are imposed under the new regulation. “Demerit Points will be imposed upon a Player or Team Official found to have committed an offence under the Code of Conduct. The number of Demerit Points imposed will be calculated by reference to the sanction imposed for the particular offences.”
Understandably, the levels of the breach will determine the number of demerit points. For instance, a fine of 25% of the match fee carries one (1) demerit point. A Level 2 offence attracts 3-4 demerit points, a Level 3 offence results in 5-6 demerit points, and a Level 4 breach leads to 7-8 demerit points. A key distinction is that the punishment may be imposed for a specific period or a certain number of matches. The match referee or an ombudsman determines this.
BCCI clarifies, “Where a Match Referee or Ombudsman imposes a period of suspension on any Player or Team Official, then, unless such period is for a fixed period of time (for example, one year) then, any such period of suspension shall be referenced by Suspension Points. Each Match in the League shall carry the weightage of one (1) Suspension Point. To clarify, a sanction of one (1) Suspension Point shall result in a one (1) Match suspension.”
The Pandya case
The BCCI has made it clear that Hardik Pandya will serve a one-match suspension for the breach from last season but will not incur any demerit points. “Any sanction imposed prior to the 2025 Season shall continue to be complied by the Player or Team Official. However, such sanctions imposed prior to the 2025 Season shall not result in imposition of Demerit Points.
“For example, a Player receiving a match suspension in his last game of the 2024 Season will serve the match suspension in the 2025 Season but will get no Demerit Points for this suspension,” the email states this and goes on to add, without explicitly referring to it, but clearly alluding to the Pandya case. “A minimum over-rate offence under the Regulations shall no longer carry a match suspension for the team captain. A minimum over-rate offence shall only result in the imposition of fine and fielding restrictions.”
There is also a system for an appeal against the sanctions, but it requires a payment of Rs 90 lakh. Says the mail, “Under the Regulations, any sanction imposed under Level 2 or Level 3 offence is appealable before the BCCI Ombudsman. However, any Player, Team Official or Franchisee that wishes to appeal such sanctions, may only do so upon the payment of an Appeal Fee which shall be the sum of INR 90 Lakh. This Appeal Fee is refundable only if the appeal is completely successful before the Ombudsman.”
According to the BCCI, the new regulations have been approved by the Governing Council of the IPL. The captains and managers of the teams were briefed about it at Thursday’s meeting at Cricket Centre.
Foreign News
Venezuela’s abducted leader, Nicolas Maduro, and wife appear in NYC court
Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro, recently abducted with his wife by US special forces from his home, has appeared in a federal courtroom in New York City for a hearing on alleged ‘narcoterrorism’ and other charges.
Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were brought before US District Judge Alvin K Hellerstein at 12pm (17:00 GMT) on Monday for a brief legal proceeding that kicks off a long legal battle over whether they can face trial in the United States.
Handcuffed and wearing blue jail uniforms, Maduro and his wife were led into the court by officers, and both put on headsets to hear the English-language proceeding as it was translated into Spanish.
Maduro pleaded not guilty, telling the judge, “I was kidnapped. I am innocent and a decent man, the president of my country.”
Across the street from the court, the police separated a small but growing group of protesters from about a dozen pro-intervention demonstrators, including one man who pulled a Venezuelan flag away from those protesting the US abduction.
The left-wing leader, his wife, son and three others could face life in prison if convicted of working with drug cartels to facilitate the shipment of thousands of tonnes of cocaine into the country. Some observers say there is no evidence linking Maduro to cartels.
Maduro’s lawyers said they will contest the legality of his arrest, arguing he is immune from prosecution as a sovereign head of a foreign state, though he is not recognised as Venezuela’s legitimate leader by the US and other nations.
Flores also pleaded not guilty to US charges against her during the arraignment. Hellerstein ordered the Venezuelan leader to appear in court for a hearing on March 17.

Near the end of the hearing, Maduro’s lawyer, Barry J Pollack, said his client “is head of a sovereign state and entitled to the privilege” that the status ensures.
Pollack said there were “questions about the legality of his military abduction”, and there will be “voluminous” pretrial filings to address those legal challenges.
Earlier, images showed the pair being led handcuffed and under heavy guard from a helicopter en route from a detention facility to the court, two days after they were forcibly removed from Caracas in a brazen US special forces operation.
At an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council earlier on Monday, Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed concern that Washington’s capture of Maduro violated international law.
“I remain deeply concerned that rules of international law have not been respected with regard to the 3 January military action. The Charter enshrines the prohibition of the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state,” Guterres said, referring to the UN’s founding document.
“The maintenance of international peace and security depends on the continued commitment of all member states to adhere to all the provisions of the Charter.”
Samuel Moncada, Venezuela’s ambassador to the UN, accused the US of carrying out an illegal armed attack against his country.
Venezuela was subjected to bombing, destruction of civilian infrastructure, the loss of civilian and military lives, and the “kidnapping” of Maduro and his wife, Moncada said.
The abduction of a sitting head of state breached a core norm of international law, the personal immunity of leaders in office, he added, warning that such actions set a dangerous precedent for all countries.
Russia and China, Venezuela’s most powerful allies, strongly condemned Maduro’s abduction and called for his release.
US allies France and Colombia also notably voiced concern, saying Washington’s military operation had undermined international law.
The US ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz, defended Maduro’s abduction, describing it as a “law enforcement operation”.
“The United States arrested a narcotrafficker who is now going to stand trial in the United States,” Waltz said.
Waltz accused Maduro of being “responsible for attacks against the people of the United States, for destabilising the Western Hemisphere, and illegitimately repressing the people of Venezuela”.
All eyes are on Venezuela’s response to the swiftly moving events after US President Donald Trump said late on Sunday that the US is “in charge” of the South American nation, which has the world’s largest oil reserves.
Vice President Delcy Rodriguez, meanwhile, was officially sworn in as interim president on Monday.
Rodriguez, a 56-year-old labour lawyer known for close connections to the private sector and her devotion to the governing party, was sworn in by her brother, Jorge, who is the head of the National Assembly legislature.
Delcy Rodriguez initially took a defiant stand against the seizure of the president, in what some observers labelled a return to “US gunboat diplomacy”. But she has now offered to colaborate with Washington.
One analyst said that Venezuela’s opposition appreciates the US intervention to remove Maduro from power, but is alarmed by Trump’s comments about US plans to “run” Venezuela, apparently with members of his government.
“Trump doesn’t recognise the decision of the Venezuelan people. We are not a colony of the US. We are an independent country,” Jose Manuel Puente, a professor at the Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Administracion, a private university in Caracas, told Al Jazeera.
“We want to initiate a transition to democracy, to rebuild the institutions, to rebuild the economy, to rebuild the oil sector. And we don’t see that from Trump until now.”
Venezuela’s National Assembly opened on Monday with lawmakers chanting “Let’s go, Nico!” as they denounced his abduction.
“The president of the United States, Mr Trump, claims to be the prosecutor, the judge, and the policeman of the world,” senior lawmaker Fernando Soto Rojas told the assembly. “We say, you will not succeed, and we will ultimately deploy all our solidarity so that our legitimate president, Nicolas Maduro, returns victorious to Miraflores”, the presidential palace, he added.
Rodriguez has served as Maduro’s vice president since 2018, overseeing much of Venezuela’s oil dependent economy and its feared intelligence service, and was next in the presidential line of succession.
She is part of a band of senior officials in Maduro’s administration who now appear to control Venezuela, even as Trump and other US officials say they will pressure the government to fall in line with their vision for the oil-rich nation.
On Sunday, some 2,000 Maduro supporters, including rifle-wielding men on motorcycles, rallied in Caracas with crowds shouting and waving Venezuelan flags. The Venezuelan military, loyal to Maduro, announced it recognised Rodriguez and urged calm.
The White House indicated on Sunday that it does not want regime change, only Maduro’s removal and a pliant new government that will enable US companies to exploit the country’s oil reserves, even if the government is filled with his former associates.
[Aljazeera]
Latest News
Advisory for low pressure area over South-east Bay of Bengal Sea area
The Natural Hazards Early Warning Centre of the Department of Meteorology has issued an advisory at 11.30 pm on 05 January 2026 regarding a low pressure area over South-east Bay of Bengal Sea area.
The low-level atmospheric disturbance in the Bay of Bengal, to the southeast of the Sri Lanka has intensified into a low-pressure area.
Hence, showery condition over the island, particularly
in the Northern, North-Central, Eastern, Uva and Central provinces is expected to enhance from January 8th.
The Meteorological Department is constantly monitoring the behavior of the system.
The general public are requested to be attentive to the future forecasts and bulletins issued by the Department of Meteorology in this regards.
Latest News
Bangladesh bans IPL broadcast over Mustafizur row
The Bangladesh government has banned the broadcast of IPL 2026 in the country as a response to the BCCI’s decision to pull Mustafizur Rahman out of the tournament.
A statement from the ministry of information and broadcasting said that it had “noted that no reason was communicated for the decision behind Mustafizur Rahman’s exclusion [from the IPL]” and that the development had “caused distress among the people of Bangladesh”. The decision had been taken “in public interest”, it said.
The statement was signed by the ministry’s assistant secretary Firoz Khan.
TV channels and streaming platforms have broadcast the IPL in Bangladesh since its inception in 2008. This is also the first time that the Bangladesh government has banned the telecast of an international cricket tournament, anywhere in the world.
On Saturday, Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR), the team that bought Mustafizur at the IPL auction in December, released him following instructions from the BCCI. The BCCI did not specify a reason – its secretary Devajit Saikia mentioned “recent developments” and did not elaborate.
Over the past few days, Indian spiritual and political leaders had criticised KKR and their owner Shah Rukh Khan for including Mustafizur in their line-up at a time when, according to reports, Hindu minorities are being attacked in Bangladesh. Relations between the two countries have deteriorated since.
Bangladesh are already petitioning the ICC to shift their T20 World Cup matches out of India. No decision has been made on that front yet. The original schedule has Bangladesh opening their campaign against West Indies at Eden Gardens in Kolkata on February 7.
Dr Asif Nazrul, who is currently the sports adviser to the Bangladesh government, said on Saturday evening that the IPL shouldn’t be shown in Bangladesh. Following that post on social media, the country’s information adviser Syeda Rizwana Hasan said any decision to stop broadcasting IPL in Bangladesh would be taken after reviewing the legal basis and thoroughly examining the relevant procedures.
Later on Sunday evening, the BCB confirmed that it has written to the ICC seeking relocation of Bangladesh’s T20 World Cup matches from India, likely to Sri Lanka, the other hosts of the tournament. They have reportedly also written to the BCCI seeking an explanation about Mustafizur’s withdrawal.
While there has been an unspoken ban in the IPL on players from Pakistan for many years now, several Bangladesh players have taken part in the tournament. Mustafizur was the only one picked by a team for the upcoming season, and has been an IPL regular since 2016, with Shakib Al Hasan (KKR and Sunrisers Hyderabad) the other prominent import from the country. Both of them have experience winning the title too.
Abdur Razzak (Royal Challengers Bengaluru), Mohammad Ashraful (Mumbai Indians), Mashrafe Mortaza (KKR), Tamim Iqbal (the now-defunct Pune Warriors India) and Litton Das (KKR) are the others from Bangladesh who have been a part of the IPL in previous years. The new season begins on March 26.
(Cricinfo)
-
News1 day agoPrivate airline crew member nabbed with contraband gold
-
News3 days agoHealth Minister sends letter of demand for one billion rupees in damages
-
News6 days agoLeading the Nation’s Connectivity Recovery Amid Unprecedented Challenges
-
Opinion5 days agoRemembering Douglas Devananda on New Year’s Day 2026
-
Latest News1 day agoCurran, bowlers lead Desert Vipers to maiden ILT20 title
-
Features1 day agoPharmaceuticals, deaths, and work ethics
-
News1 day agoBellana says Rs 900 mn fraud at NHSL cannot be suppressed by moving CID against him
-
News22 hours agoPM lays foundation stone for seven-storey Sadaham Mandiraya
