News
Interim Truth & Reconciliation Secretariat DG: Sri Lankan military will not be targeted

By Shamindra Ferdinando
Interim Secretariat for Truth and Reconciliation (ISTRM) Director General Dr. Asanga Gunawansa, PC, declared there was absolutely no basis for concerns that the proposed Commission for Truth, Unity and Reconciliation (CTUR) targeted the war-winning military.
Dr. Gunawansa said so responding to The Island query regarding Sarvajana Balaya raising this grave concern, both in and out of Parliament.
The PC asserted that Sarvajana Balaya or other political parties and organisations may have reached that conclusion for want of understanding of the Bill. Had the Bill been perused carefully, they would have realized their concerns were baseless, the ISTRM Chief said. “Perhaps, they misinterpreted the Bill due to lack of understanding of the issues at hand.”
The government presented the relevant Bill to the Parliament on Tuesday (03). National Freedom Front (NFF) lawmaker Wimal Weerawansa emphasized that the Bill shouldn’t have been presented in view of the impending Presidential Election and the matter should have been addressed after the Presidential Election.
Dr. Gunawansa emphasized that the Bill was not meant to harm the military.
In section 16 of the proposed Bill, it is specifically provided as follows:
“16. (1) The Commission’s recommendations shall not be deemed to be a determination of civil or criminal liability of any person.”
Even though Section 16(2) of the Bill provides as follows,
“16 (2) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, No. 15 of 1979 or any other law, it shall be lawful for the Attorney-General to institute criminal proceedings in a designated court of law in respect of any offence based on material collected in the course of an investigation or inquiry or both, as the case may be, by the Commission established under this Act”,
Pointing out that the Attorney General has the power to investigate and prosecute suspects for crimes,” Dr. Gunawansa explained if evidence emerged regarding perpetration of a crime during investigations and inquiries undertaken by the proposed Commission, then prosecutions would take place based on further investigation into such matters and provided that the Attorney General is satisfied that there were sufficient grounds to issue an indictment.
“Even if an indictment is issued, the starting point for any criminal prosecution in Sri Lanka is the presumption of innocence. Therefore, no one could be punished for a criminal offence unless proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.”
Dr. Gunawansa said that ISTRM conducted a spate of stakeholder meetings during December 2023 to August 2024 period. Representatives of police and the armed forces, as well as the Defence Ministry, who appeared before ISTRM, expressed the view that a credible domestic reconciliation mechanism could help them clear their names. Dr. Gunawansa quoted them as having said that in the absence of such a credible mechanism they and in some instances their children found it difficult to obtain visas to travel overseas.
Responding to another query, Dr. Gunawansa stressed that the Bill had been explained to all political parties, including senior members of the Sarvajana Balaya. According to him none of the political parties had submitted their views and observations as regards the draft Bill though they were invited to do so.
The government established ISTRM in September 2023 to lay the ground work for establishing the proposed CTUR.
Dr. Gunawansa pointed out that the ISTRM is a temporary entity. Since its establishment, it has done the following key functions:
(a) There was a draft prepared back in 2016 to establish a Truth Commission following the extensive consultations held by the Consultation Task Force. The ISTRM compared this draft with the laws enacted in other jurisdictions to establish truth commissions and based on a comparative study, introduced several amendments. This amended version was thereafter gazetted on 1st January 2024, in all three languages, as a concept paper, by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, with the objective of facilitation further consultations with stakeholders.
(b) The ISTRM held over 150 meetings with stakeholders during the period December 2023 to August 2024. These meetings were held in the Western province and all other eight provinces, covering 17 districts. The stakeholders included political leaders, religious leaders, victims, families of victims, civil society organizations, the military and the police, and former soldiers. Based on the findings and input received during the stakeholder meetings, several amendments were introduced to the aforesaid concept paper. Thereafter, the revised draft was Gazetted by H.E. the President on 05th August 2024.
(c) In addition to the above, currently the ISTRM is in the process of completing a study based on 12 jurisdictions which will provide way forward examples for the CTUR, should be established in Sri Lanka.
Latest News
Project to distribute smart boards for 1,000 schools with the goal of enhancing education has completely failed to meet its objectives and the investment of LKR 1.7 billion has been underutilized -PM

Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya stated that the project to distribute smart boards for 1,000 schools with the goal of enhancing education has completely failed to meet its objectives and the investment of LKR 1.7 billion has been underutilized.
The Minister of Education, Higher Education and Vocational Education, Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya made these remarks in the Parliament complex on Saturday [March 15, 2025] while discussing the project to establish networked classrooms by facilitating smart boards to the school system.
The Cabinet Memorandum No. AMP/24/0385/601/027 and the Cabinet decision dated March 4, 2024 has been presented for the approval of the provision of digital smart boards and other related equipment to 1,000 selected schools, with the objective of enhancing education through the establishment of a systematic network of smart classrooms within the school system funded by the Sri Lanka Telecommunications Regulatory Commission (TRCSL).
Subsequently, an additional Cabinet Memorandum, No. AMP/24/0978/630/009, dated May 14, 2024, was presented, proposing the implementation of this project in alignment with the project proposed by Chinese government for digitalizing Schools. Under this Chinese-funded project, plans were made to establish a centralized control center and a studio facility, along with the provision of an additional 500 smart boards. Accordingly, the integration of both projects was proposed to create a network of smart classrooms across 1,500 schools.
The cabinet decision has been presented requiring Sri Lankan Government to purchase smart boards with specifications identical to the smart boards which were proposed to be distributed by the Chinese Government.
In line with the Cabinet decision of May 14, 2024, the procurement for the 1,000 smart boards began in July 2024. However, at the time of purchase, the project proposed by the Chinese Government was still at the discussion stage, and no official agreement had been reached regarding the technical specifications of the smart boards.
However, the procurement was carried out through the Sri Lanka State Trading (General) Corporation without a competitive bidding process, relying on price quotations obtained from a single supplier based on unclear sources that were not officially verified by the Chinese government. The Sri Lanka Telecommunications Regulatory Commission incurred the full cost of LKR 1.7 billion, with an additional LKR 430 million allocated for services and installation.
The aforementioned procurement appears to have been conducted at an unusually accelerated pace when compared to the standard procedure typically followed for high-value procurements. Specifically, price quotations were requested on July 5, 2024, opened on July 15, 2024, and by July 16, 2024, the Technical Evaluation Committee had completed and submitted the report. Subsequently, the report was reviewed by the Standing Procurement Committee appointed by the Cabinet on July 17 and 18, 2024, with recommendations being provided on the same day. These recommendations were then submitted to the Cabinet on July 23, 2024, and approval was granted on July 30, 2024. Followed by this, the purchase requisition was issued to the supplier on August 5, 2024. Accordingly, the entire procurement process was completed within a span of one month.
As part of this procurement, a Letter of Credit was opened to facilitate the payment of USD 3,135,392.50 for 1,000 smart boards to Intelligent Express Limited Hong Kong, which has been identified as a representative of Huawei. While the relevant Cabinet paper indicated Huawei as the designated manufacturer supplying the smart boards under the Chinese funding project, the Chinese government has not yet confirmed the selection of such a supplier for this project.
According to aforementioned purchase requisition, the purchased smart boards and related equipment were delivered to the Ministry of Education in October 2024 and are currently stored at Pattala Gedara Teacher’s Training College. Although the procurement of the aforementioned Smart boards by the Sri Lankan Government has been finalized, the relevant project, which was intended to be implemented under the funding of Chinese government, has not yet commenced and a final agreement regarding its implementation has not been reached.
Prior to reaching a final agreement on the network integration facilities and centralized system proposed by the Chinese government, the procurement of these smart boards has resulted in the inability to utilize the equipment for the intended purpose. It is expected that the Chinese aid project is at the discussion stage, and the implementation may extend until the end of this year. Further, no official decision has been made regarding the selection of a supplier for the project.
Given this situation, if the 1,000 smart boards and other equipment currently stored in warehouses are to be distributed to schools, school principals must be provided with clear instructions on their proper use. However, due to the delay in implementing the project under the funding of the Chinese government, specific guidelines on the installation and utilization of the equipment cannot yet be issued.
Since network integration cannot be carried out at this stage, these smart boards can only be used as standalone classroom units. As a result, the objectives of the project will not be met, and the investment of LKR 1.7 billion made might be considered to be underutilized.
A formal investigation has been initiated to determine whether financial and procedural irregularities have occurred in this procurement. Additionally, discussions are currently continued with the Chinese government, and efforts are being made to secure the proposed facilities from China at the earliest convenience.
[Prime Minister’s Media Division]
News
LG polls: Sajith spurns UNP’s March 20 deadline

SLPP rebel group distances itself from RW
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) leader Sajith Premadasa yesterday (16) said that his party wouldn’t allow its agenda and timetable to be decided by political parties that weren’t even represented in Parliament.
Lawmaker Premadasa, who is also the Opposition Leader, said so when The Island sought his response to the UNP setting March 20 deadline for the SJB to declare its intention to join forces to contest the upcoming Colombo Municipal Council election. The main Opposition SJB parliamentary group consists of 40, whereas the UNP doesn’t have a single seat in the current Parliament. In the previous Parliament, the UNP was limited to just one national List MP.
The UNP also declared its readiness to expand the alliance to contest the local elections in other parts of the country. Nominations are scheduled to close at 12 noon on March 20th.
Colombo District parliamentarian Premadasa emphasized that they had decided to contest under the SJB’s telephone symbol. Members of the SJB-led coalition were also contesting under the telephone symbol, the SJB Leader said. The SJBer indicated that there was neither space no time for negotiations with the UNP.
Elections are to be held to 336 local bodies. The 336 LG bodies consist of 28 Municipal Councils, 36 Urban Councils and 272 Pradeshiya Sabhas. However, the Kalmunai Municipal Council, Dehiattakandiya Pradeshiya Sabha (Ampara District), Mannar Pradeshiya Sabha (Mannar District), Punakari Pradeshiya Sabha (Kilinochchi District), and Elpitiya Pradeshiya Sabha (Galle District) are excluded from the forthcoming election.
The last LG polls were held on Feb. 10, 2018. Former SLPP Minister Dr. Ramesh Pathirana told The Island that their efforts to somehow unite various warring factions, ahead of the LG polls, weren’t successful. Dr. Pathirana had been among the group of dissident SLPP MPs who contested/backed the New Democratic Front (NDF) led by Ranil Wickremesinghe at the last general election.
Dr. Pathirana said that they would be fielding independent groups for selected LG bodies, while some returned to the SLPP, and the rest got back to the SLFP. At the time of last general election, the group, represented by Dr. Pathirana, consisted of about 60 SLPP MPs.
Dr. Pathirana indicated that their group had completely distanced themselves from Wickremesinghe-led political grouping that backed the UNP leader’s candidature at the presidential election and contested the general election under the NDF’s Swan symbol.
Dr. Pathirana stressed that they couldn’t pose a proper challenge to the National People’s Power (NPP) at the LG polls unless various SLPP factions rejoined. The SLPP secured 145 seats at the 2020 general election and at the next it was reduced to just three.
Opposition sources said that due to the much deteriorated status of the UNP it would find it extremely difficult to field fully fledged teams at LG polls. Sources confirmed that no political party represented in Parliament had shown any interest in joining forces, let alone the main Opposition party.
The UNP didn’t even contest the Elpitiya LG polls held soon after the last parliamentary polls in late Nov. last year.
News
Ranil rejects Batalanda report wholesale

Former President Ranil Wickremesinghe yesterday rejected the Batalanda Commission report in its entirety.
“I wholly reject the report. No one can say the report was kept hidden. It was published as a sessional paper in 2000, but no one, including the JVP, asked for a debate,” Wickremeisnmghe said in a special statement.
He also said that there was no precedent in this country, or anywhere else in the world, of debating a sessional paper 25 years after it was published.
Making a special statement Wickremeisnghe said: “The Commission has only questioned my action to heed the request by then State Minister of Defence Ranjan Wijeratne to provide accommodation to the security forces which provided security to important state owned institutions in Biyagama during the height of the JVP insurrection of 1987/89.”
He pointed out that the Commission report mentions the heinous terrorist acts committed by the JVP during the 1988-90 period.
“I was only summoned as a witness. According to the Commission’s findings, I was implicated only in the matter of providing housing for police officers, which, as per regulations, should have been done through the Inspector General of Police. The report indicates that both Nalin Delgoda and I were indirectly responsibile for this process.
Apart from this, I was not implicated in any other allegations in the Commission’s report,” Wickremesinghe said.
The former President pointed out that the report was made available to Parliament in 2000, yet no party, including the JVP, requested a debate on it.
The full statement by former President Ranil Wickremesinghe:
In 1987, following the signing of the Indo-Lanka Accord, the JVP launched a wave of terror across the country.
During this period, President J.R. Jayewardene assigned the responsibility of securing key locations in the country to Cabinet Ministers. Several economically significant sites were located in the Biyagama area, including the oil refinery, diesel power plant, the substation supplying electricity from Mahaweli to Colombo, and the free trade zone. The military was deployed to safeguard these locations.
To accommodate security personnel, it was decided to provide them with abandoned buildings and houses owned by the Lanka Fertiliser Manufacturing Corporation. At the time, several employees of the Ceylon Electricity Board were residing in some of these houses.
During this period of terror, the Sapugaskanda Police Station was attacked, and its Officer-in-Charge was killed. In response, Deputy Minister of Defence Ranjan Wijeratne contacted me, requesting that the vacant houses in the complex be allocated to military and police personnel for their security. Consequently, the administrator at the time took steps to hand over the houses to Kelani Police Chief Nalin Delgoda.
Several individuals, including a Provincial Councillor, a cooperative society chairman, and a police sergeant, were assassinated during this period. Additionally, an attack was carried out on the residence of another Provincial Council member.
The government in power took steps to restore the country’s stability, rebuilding the economy and ensuring national security.
After 1994, President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga appointed a Commission to investigate allegations of a torture centre in the Batalanda area. Several individuals were summoned before the Commission, and I was called as a witness. At that time, I was serving as the Leader of the Opposition. The establishment of the Batalanda Commission was politically motivated, but the attempt to use it for political gain was unsuccessful.
According to the Commission’s findings, I was implicated only in the matter of providing housing for police officers, which, as per regulations, should have been done through the Inspector General of Police. The report indicates that both Nalin Delgoda and I were indirectly responsibile for this process.
Apart from this, I was not implicated in any other allegations in the Commission’s report. The report also extensively documented the JVP’s terrorist activities between 1988 and 1990, detailing the background and listing numerous violent acts committed by the JVP in Chapter Three. The entire history of those events is included in the report.
Beyond these findings, no other accusations in the report are relevant to me, and I completely reject the report.
No one can claim that the Batalanda Commission report was hidden. It was made available as a parliamentary session record in 2000, yet no one, including the JVP, requested a debate on it. Many did not accept the report, which may explain why no steps were taken to debate it in Parliament.
It is also noteworthy that no political party that came to power has attempted to use the report for political advantage. Furthermore, there is no precedent in Sri Lanka or other parliaments for debating a session record 25 years after its publication.
-
Foreign News2 days ago
Search continues in Dominican Republic for missing student Sudiksha Konanki
-
News5 days ago
Alfred Duraiappa’s relative killed in Canada shooting
-
Features4 days ago
Richard de Zoysa at 67
-
Editorial6 days ago
Ghosts refusing to fade away
-
Midweek Review5 days ago
Ranil in Head-to-Head controversy
-
Features4 days ago
SL Navy helping save kidneys
-
Features6 days ago
The Gypsies…one year at a time
-
Latest News3 days ago
Debutant Madara, Athapaththu fashion Sri Lanka women’s first T20I win in New Zealand