Connect with us

News

Interim Truth & Reconciliation Secretariat DG: Sri Lankan military will not be targeted

Published

on

Dr. Asanga Gunawansa

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Interim Secretariat for Truth and Reconciliation (ISTRM) Director General Dr. Asanga Gunawansa, PC, declared there was absolutely no basis for concerns that the proposed Commission for Truth, Unity and Reconciliation (CTUR) targeted the war-winning military.

Dr. Gunawansa said so responding to The Island query regarding Sarvajana Balaya raising this grave concern, both in and out of Parliament.

The PC asserted that Sarvajana Balaya or other political parties and organisations may have reached that conclusion for want of understanding of the Bill. Had the Bill been perused carefully, they would have realized their concerns were baseless, the ISTRM Chief said. “Perhaps, they misinterpreted the Bill due to lack of understanding of the issues at hand.”

The government presented the relevant Bill to the Parliament on Tuesday (03). National Freedom Front (NFF) lawmaker Wimal Weerawansa emphasized that the Bill shouldn’t have been presented in view of the impending Presidential Election and the matter should have been addressed after the Presidential Election.

Dr. Gunawansa emphasized that the Bill was not meant to harm the military.

In section 16 of the proposed Bill, it is specifically provided as follows:

“16. (1) The Commission’s recommendations shall not be deemed to be a determination of civil or criminal liability of any person.”

Even though Section 16(2) of the Bill provides as follows,

“16 (2) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, No. 15 of 1979 or any other law, it shall be lawful for the Attorney-General to institute criminal proceedings in a designated court of law in respect of any offence based on material collected in the course of an investigation or inquiry or both, as the case may be, by the Commission established under this Act”,

Pointing out that the Attorney General has the power to investigate and prosecute suspects for crimes,” Dr. Gunawansa explained if evidence emerged regarding perpetration of a crime during investigations and inquiries undertaken by the proposed Commission, then prosecutions would take place based on further investigation into such matters and provided that the Attorney General is satisfied that there were sufficient grounds to issue an indictment.

“Even if an indictment is issued, the starting point for any criminal prosecution in Sri Lanka is the presumption of innocence. Therefore, no one could be punished for a criminal offence unless proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.”

Dr. Gunawansa said that ISTRM conducted a spate of stakeholder meetings during December 2023 to August 2024 period. Representatives of police and the armed forces, as well as the Defence Ministry, who appeared before ISTRM, expressed the view that a credible domestic reconciliation mechanism could help them clear their names. Dr. Gunawansa quoted them as having said that in the absence of such a credible mechanism they and in some instances their children found it difficult to obtain visas to travel overseas.

Responding to another query, Dr. Gunawansa stressed that the Bill had been explained to all political parties, including senior members of the Sarvajana Balaya. According to him none of the political parties had submitted their views and observations as regards the draft Bill though they were invited to do so.

The government established ISTRM in September 2023 to lay the ground work for establishing the proposed CTUR.

Dr. Gunawansa pointed out that the ISTRM is a temporary entity. Since its establishment, it has done the following key functions:

(a) There was a draft prepared back in 2016 to establish a Truth Commission following the extensive consultations held by the Consultation Task Force. The ISTRM compared this draft with the laws enacted in other jurisdictions to establish truth commissions and based on a comparative study, introduced several amendments. This amended version was thereafter gazetted on 1st January 2024, in all three languages, as a concept paper, by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, with the objective of facilitation further consultations with stakeholders.

(b) The ISTRM held over 150 meetings with stakeholders during the period December 2023 to August 2024. These meetings were held in the Western province and all other eight provinces, covering 17 districts. The stakeholders included political leaders, religious leaders, victims, families of victims, civil society organizations, the military and the police, and former soldiers. Based on the findings and input received during the stakeholder meetings, several amendments were introduced to the aforesaid concept paper. Thereafter, the revised draft was Gazetted by H.E. the President on 05th August 2024.

(c) In addition to the above, currently the ISTRM is in the process of completing a study based on 12 jurisdictions which will provide way forward examples for the CTUR, should be established in Sri Lanka.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Advisory for Heavy Rain issued for the Central, Uva and Sabaragamuwa provinces and in the Ampara, Batticaloa and Polonnaruwa districts

Published

on

By

Advisory for Heavy Rain Issued by the Natural Hazards Early Warning Centre at 12.00 noon on 21 February 2026 valid for the period until 08.30 a.m. 22 February 2026

Due to the low level atmospheric disturbance in the vicinity of Sri Lanka, Heavy showers above 100 mm are likely at some places in the Central, Uva and Sabaragamuwa provinces and in the Ampara, Batticaloa and Polonnaruwa districts and fairly heavy showers  above 75 mm are likely at some places elsewhere.

Therefore, the general public is advised to take adequate precautions to minimize damages caused by heavy rain, strong winds and lightning during thundershowers.

Continue Reading

News

Ravi demands full disclosure on Lanka’s usable reserves, flags forex leakages

Published

on

Ravi

Opposition MP Ravi Karunanayake on Wednesday called for an urgent government statement to Parliament on the integrity and usability of Sri Lanka’s Gross Official Reserves (GOR), raising concerns over foreign exchange leakages and regulatory consistency under the Foreign Exchange Act No. 12 of 2017.

Raising the issue under Standing Order 27 (i), Karunanayake urged the Government to provide a comprehensive disclosure on the composition, encumbrances and deployability of the country’s reserves, as well as on the Central Bank’s oversight of foreign currency transactions.

“Reserve credibility depends not merely on headline numbers, but on transparency, enforceability and consistency in regulation,” the MP told the House.

He sought clarification on the latest reported GOR figure and the net usable reserves after excluding encumbered assets, swaps and pledged balances. He also requested details of annual revenue earned on reserves from 2023 to 2025.

Following are the questions raised by MP Karunanayake:

1. What is the latest reported GOR figure, and what is the net usable reserve after excluding encumbered assets, swaps, and pledged balances? What is the revenue earned on are GOR 23-25 per year?

2. Provide a separate and detailed breakdown of GOR, including: (a) Monetary gold (quantity and valuation basis) is it real gold or gold paper? (b) Foreign currency assets by major currency and instrument; (c) SDR holdings; (d) IMF reserve position; (e) Foreign currency swaps, specifying counterparty type, principal amount, tenure, maturity profile, and all-in cost; (f) Domestic swaps, specifying amount, tenure, rollover terms, collateralisation, and effective cost.

3. Of the total reserves reported, how much is encumbered, swap-backed, or otherwise not immediately deployable for debt servicing or currency stabilisation?

4. What SLR spread, fee, or margin does the Central bank apply when buying or selling USD to the Government for reserve accumulation and external debt servicing and what total profit or gain has the C.bank realised from such transactions during the past three financial years? Advice per year.

5. Is the Central Bank subject to continuous and statutory audit by the Auditor General? If so, will the Government table the most recent audit report, specifying audit scope, sample size, reserve confirmations, swap verification and gold custody validation?

6. What triggered the recent circular warning domestic institutions on foreign currency transactions?

7. Has the C.bank quantified foreign exchange and tax revenue losses resulting from Sri Lanka-based businesses routing credit card and commercial payments through overseas payment gateways?

8. If domestic entities are regulated strictly, why has a binding circular not been issued against noncompliant business entities using foreign payment gateway arrangements that divert foreign exchange outside Sri Lanka’s regulated banking system?

The government asked for two weeks’ time to respond to the queries.

by Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

Sajith exposes highly questionable coal imports from South Africa in 25 vessels; calls for independent probe

Published

on

Sajith

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa yesterday alleged in Parliament that eight recently imported coal shipments were substandard and called for an independent probe into the matter.Speaking in the House, Premadasa said Sri Lanka typically requires 36–38 coal shipments annually. While 11 Russian shipments received so far had raised no concerns, he claimed that 25 vessels ordered from South Africa under a new tender were facing quality issues.

He cited combustion reports from the Norochcholai Coal Power Plant showing that the eight shipments already received under the new tender failed to generate the expected 300 megawatts per unit. According to the MP, the outputs were: 285 MW, 290 MW, 260 MW, 295 MW, 285 MW, 270 MW, 275 MW, and 255 MW.

“These are scientific data generated automatically through boiler combustion reports that cannot be altered,” Premadasa said, asserting that the figures indicate the coal supplied was below required standards.

He warned that low-quality coal could increase fuel consumption, raise operational costs, and damage equipment. Any shortfall in power generation, he said, would necessitate additional coal imports or greater reliance on diesel power, ultimately driving up electricity tariffs for consumers.

“The loss will have to be borne by the electricity consumer,” Premadasa said, urging the government to clarify whether the shipments met required specifications.

He also criticized delays and changes in tender requirements, alleging that supplier eligibility criteria had been relaxed to allow non-standard providers.

by Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

Trending