News
Ind. Group contesting Colombo District warns of AKD’s bid to eliminate Opposition
‘Elpitiya result proves NPP cannot take things for granted’
The Leader of Independent Group 1 contesting Colombo district, Chamara Nakalanda, yesterday (28) said that President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s push for an overwhelming majority in Parliament at the forthcoming General Election is frightening and may pose a serious threat to representative democracy.
Civil society activist Nakalanda said that the National People’s Front (NPP) chief who is also the leader of the JVP owed an explanation why the parties he led wanted to rid Parliament of the Opposition.
Perhaps President Dissanayake desired a commanding dictatorial majority, similar to the victory secured by President J. R. Jayewardene at the 1977 parliamentary election. But the public know the dreadful consequences of that JRJ victory, Nakandala said, referring to the abusing of that mandate to pursue a destructive political agenda.
“What we need is a Parliament represented by many political parties and groups,” Nakalanda said, pointing out that on the contrary Dissanayake, as a lawmaker, had repeatedly declared in the past that a government with a 2/3 majority could be quite destructive.
Referring to President Dissanayake’s recent speeches at Katunayake, Polonnaruwa and Trinocomalee, Nakalanda said that the ruling party’s political stand baffled the country. However, the outcome of the Elpitiya Pradeshiya Sabha was nothing but a warning to the NPP and a tremendous boost to democracy, Nakalanda said.
The Elpitiya result proved beyond doubt that no one could take things for granted. Traditionally largely socialist oriented Elpitiya electorate has declared that the people couldn’t be swayed to accept the concept of one party rule, regardless of the political-economic-social crisis caused by those who ruled the country hitherto, the political activist said.
The ground reality is that the NPP couldn’t take at least one seat more than the combined Opposition at Elpitiya and the 30-member local government body was equally divided between the NPP and the Opposition. “That sends a strong signal to the electorate.”
Nakalanda stressed that in a way the Elpitiya result reflected the presidential election outcome as the combined Opposition polled more votes than the winner. He was referring to Dissanayake’s failure to obtain 50% + 1 vote at the Presidential Election to be a clear-cut winner.
Acknowledging NPP’s victory in terms of the largest block of seats one party could secure at the parliamentary election is a foregone conclusion, Nakalanda urged the people to elect a sufficient number of Opposition MPs. “Parliament shouldn’t be devoid of an Opposition. Whatever the wrongs and shortcomings on the part of major political parties which ruled the country in the past, the Parliament shouldn’t be devoid of the Opposition,” Nakalanda said.
Nakalanda said that the culture of switching sides, following general elections, should be stopped. Nakalanda added that they were strongly opposed to lawmakers switching sides at the expense of the political party or the independent group they originally represented. The despicable practice heavily contributed to the deterioration of the parliamentary democracy over the years, he said.
Responding to another query, Nakalanda said that though they had been engaged in politics and were genuinely interested in making a difference, the Election Commission has so far deprived them recognition as a political party, hence the decision to field an independent group under the symbol of a ‘Gift box.’
“EC rejected our applications in 2020 and 2022. We believe EC’s decision is not fair,” Nakalanda said, adding that they were forced to contest selected one district due to their inability to obtain one symbol and the independent group bearing number 1 for all electoral districts. Had the EC granted us approval, we could have contested under the ticket of Parapuraka Balaya.
Nakalanda said that Parapuraka Balaya pursued what he called practical politics taking into consideration vital issues that affected the country at all levels.
According to him, their effort was to build a strong political movement against those who governed the country irresponsibly since the British granted the then Ceylon independence. In spite of receiving independence without bloodshed, we couldn’t achieve real freedom, Nakalanda said, adding that the deterioration caused by the executive, legislature and judiciary hadn’t been properly ascertained.
Nakalanda said that the electorate should take into consideration that a political party that had never been in power was about to take control of the Parliament, having secured the presidency, many political veterans giving up active politics though they may appear before the people from time to time, and the weakening of the Opposition due to the powers that be unleashing police on political opponents in the guise of anti-corruption investigations.
Nakalanda said that the country is in a crossroads and nothing could be as dangerous as creating an authoritarian administration (SF)
News
Navy seizes an Indian fishing boat poaching in northern waters
During an operation conducted in the dark hours of 27 Dec 25, the Sri Lanka Navy seized an Indian fishing boat and apprehended 03 Indian fishermen while they were poaching in Sri Lankan waters, south of the Delft Island in Jaffna.
The seized boat and Indian fishermen (03) were brought to the Kreinagar Jetty and were handed over to the Fisheries Inspector of Jaffna for onward legal proceedings.
News
Delay in govt. response to UK sanctions on ex-military chiefs, and others causes concern
Admiral of the Fleet Wasantha Karannagoda said that he is still waiting for the government’s response to the UK sanctions imposed on three ex-military officers, including him, and a former member of the LTTE.
The former Navy Chief said so in response to The Island query whether he was aware of the position taken by a three-member ministerial committee, consisting of Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath, Justice and National Integration Minister Harshana Nanayakkara and Deputy Defence Minister Maj. Gen (retd) Aruna Jayasekera.
The government named the committee in the wake of the UK declaration of travel bans and asset freezes in respect of Karannagoda, General Shavendra Silva, General Jagath Jayasuriya and Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan, also known as Karuna. Maj. Gen. Jayasekera said that they inquired into the issue at hand.
Karannnagoda said that he would like to know the government’s recommendations if the ministerial committee briefed the Cabinet as per a decision taken by the Cabinet of Ministers. Karannagoda said that the issue should have been taken at the highest level as various interested parties continue to humiliate the war-winning military by targeting selected individuals.
Other sources, familiar with the issues at hand, told The Island that the government was yet to announce its stand.
Sources pointed out that the Opposition has been silent on what they called a matter of utmost national importance.
Cabinet spokesman Dr. Nalinda Jayathissa is on record as having described the UK move as a unilateral move and that committee was formed to examine the developments and recommend appropriate measures to the Cabinet.
Foreign Minister Herath told The Island the government was not successful in getting the British to withdraw sanctions. Describing the UK decision as unilateral, the Miniser said that the government conveyed its concerns but the UK didn’t change its stand.
The Island raised the issue with Minister Herath and Admiral Karannagoda in the wake of British MP of Sri Lankan origin, Uma Kumaran requesting the UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper to expand on the government’s sanctions imposed on the four above-mentioned persons.
During a Foreign Affairs Committee meeting on 16 December, the MP for Stratford and Bow highlighted the lack of accountability and political will from the current Sri Lankan government to address war crimes and mass atrocities committed in Sri Lanka.
Sources said that David Lammy, who served as Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs at the time of the declaration of sanctions, had no qualms in declaring that the action taken against four Sri Lankans was in line with a commitment he made during the election campaign to ensure those responsible wouldn’t be allowed impunity. The UK government statement quoted Lammy as having said that this decision ensured that those responsible for past human rights violations and abuses were held accountable.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
News
Sri Lanka outlines seven key vectors of international cooperation at Moscow forum
Sri Lankan Ambassador to the Russian Federation, Shobini Gunasekera recently presented a conceptual framework of seven key vectors that defined contemporary international relations and facilitated dialogue among States. She made the presentation at XI Moscow International Financial and Economic Forum held under the theme “Building Bridges: Partnership without Borders”.
In her address, the Ambassador emphasised that these vectors represent the channels through which ideas circulate, trade expands, and peace is strengthened, serving as guiding principles for cooperation amid global uncertainties. The seven key vectors highlighted were economic ties as a foundation for long-term stability; political choice and diplomacy through dialogue and multilateral engagement; security cooperation to address cross-border threats; cultural linkages through education, tourism, and professional exchanges; technological advancement, particularly in digital systems and artificial intelligence; environmental stewardship through collective action on renewable energy and climate change; and humanitarian obligations, including disaster relief and development cooperation.
Drawing on Sri Lanka’s experience, the Ambassador illustrated the practical application of these principles by highlighting the country’s strategic location in the Indian Ocean, its role as a trade and logistics hub, and its active engagement in regional groupings such as BIMSTEC and the Indian Ocean Rim Association, where the Russian Federation serves as a Dialogue Partner.
The potential for enhanced Sri Lanka–Russia bilateral cooperation was underscored, particularly through complementarities between Russia’s technological and energy expertise and Sri Lanka’s logistical capabilities and maritime infrastructure. She noted that such synergies could support joint initiatives in trade, innovation, tourism, and logistics, while cultural and scientific exchanges would further strengthen mutual understanding between the two countries.
Concluding her remarks, the Ambassador stated that sustained progress requires dialogue, mutual respect, and forward-looking partnerships capable of shaping a shared and stable future.
-
News7 days agoMembers of Lankan Community in Washington D.C. donates to ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka’ Flood Relief Fund
-
News5 days agoBritish MP calls on Foreign Secretary to expand sanction package against ‘Sri Lankan war criminals’
-
Features7 days agoGeneral education reforms: What about language and ethnicity?
-
News7 days agoSuspension of Indian drug part of cover-up by NMRA: Academy of Health Professionals
-
Sports5 days agoChief selector’s remarks disappointing says Mickey Arthur
-
News4 days agoStreet vendors banned from Kandy City
-
Editorial7 days agoA very sad day for the rule of law
-
News7 days agoUS Ambassador to Sri Lanka among 29 career diplomats recalled
