Midweek Review
IMF medicine too bitter to swallow: NPP faces tough choices
Mizukoshi
The Japanese Ambassador in Sri Lanka, Mizukoshi Hideaki, emphasised the importance and the responsibility on the part of Sri Lanka to implement the IMF formula. Hideaki, in an exclusive interview with the writer last August, in the run-up to the parliamentary election, declared that whoever wins the September 21 contest, the winner should adhere to, what he called, IMF remedies (Post-Aragalaya economic recovery depends on implementation of IMF formula – Japanese ambassador, The Island, August 21, 2024).
Bankrupt Sri Lanka, struggling to cope up with the deepening economic-political-social crisis, agreed, in late July 2024, to implement an IMF-led economic recovery programme, backed by Extended Fund Facility (EFF).
Having self-declared the country insolvent in April 2022, political parties, represented in Parliament, had no alternative but to accept the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) dictates to overcome it.
This was the 17th IMF bailout for Sri Lanka and the third since the country brought the war against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) to a successful conclusion in May 2009.
The much discussed EFF arrangement, approved in March 2023, with a total amount of SDR (Special Drawing Rights) 2.3 billion, was definitely the high point in UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe’ presidential tenure (July 22 to Sept 2024).
Sri Lanka received the first $330m tranche of the IMF bailout package in March 2023.
The then President Ranil Wickremesinghe and the UNP repeatedly proclaimed that the finalisation of the EFF arrangement was a huge achievement. The Opposition obviously accepted that position when the entire Opposition skipped an opportunity to vote against two controversial Bills that tied up Sri Lanka with the IMF.
Having lambasted Wickremesinghe for the IMF agreement, the main Opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB), Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) and national People’s Power (NPP) quietly backed two Bills that were designed to ensure compliance with the widely criticised ‘deal’ with the IMF. The consensus among political parties was nothing but a personal victory for Wickremesinghe who hadn’t received a public mandate to exercise executive powers as the President. Amidst political turmoil, the SLPP-controlled Parliament elected Wickremesinghe as President to complete Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s five-year term, won at the 2019 November presidential election and fearing mob justice otherwise, as was allowed to happen in Bangladesh. That was done at the expense of their own man Dullas Alahapperuma.
The Parliament issued the following statement in the evening of July 24, 2024: “Public Financial Management and Economic Transformation Bills passed in Parliament today (Jul. 25) with amendments and without a vote. Amendments were incorporated to the bills during the committee stage and subsequently, the third reading was passed without a vote. These two bills were presented to Parliament on 22 May 2024.”
Whatever the differences, the Parliament unanimously endorsed the two Bills that made the outcome of the presidential and parliamentary elections irrelevant. Regardless of promises and declarations made by Ranil Wickremesinghe (Independent), Sajith Premadasa (SJB), Anura Kumara Dissanayake (NPP) and Namal Rajapaksa (SLPP) on election platforms, all of them were bound by the IMF agreement. There was no escape for political parties.
Wickremesinghe and his associates repeatedly declared the IMF agreement as the panacea for Sri Lanka’s economic crisis. Wickremesinghe knew he couldn’t win the presidential election under any circumstances. Premadasa, too, realised that he didn’t have an opportunity at all in beating Dissanayake at the presidential election though he addressed rallies as if he was certain of victory.
The failure on the part of Premadasa and Wickremesinghe to reach consensus on the former’s candidature at the presidential contest ensured Dissanayake’s victory. Had the SJB and the UNP reached an agreement, Dissanayake’s victory could have been thwarted. Together they polled over 6.5 mn votes whereas Dissanayake could secure only 5.6 mn. Obviously Wickremesinghe felt much more comfortable with Dissanayake as President than Premadasa, the one-time deputy leader of the UNP.
The UNP knew Wickremesinghe’s decision to contest the presidential election not only ensured Dissanayake’s victory but caused irreparable damage to the SLPP. However, Dissanayake is now under pressure from the IMF to meet the bailout conditions or face the consequences.
President Dissanayake, who also holds the Finance portfolio, is under pressure to increase electricity tariffs in line with the IMF formula.
Stark warning from IMF
IMF spokesperson Julie Kozack recently warned that the final approval of the fourth review of the ongoing programme depended on the government completing, what she called, prior actions, including restoring electricity cost recovery pricing.
All political parties represented in Parliament, including the NPP, regardless of what they told the electorate during the presidential and parliamentary elections, now acknowledge privately Sri Lanka wasn’t in a position to go back on the agreement with the IMF.
The key prerequisite for the IMF Board Meeting on the fourth review is nothing but a significant increase in the pricing formula, not only for electricity, but in turn may extend to water and other basics.
International news agencies quoted Kozack as having said that the main prior actions related to restoring electricity cost recovery pricing and ensuring proper function of the automatic electricity price adjustment mechanism.
In other words, USD 344 million in financing – the fourth tranche – has been put on hold.
President Dissanayake is under pressure to break a key promise made during the costly promises-filled polls campaigns last year. Dissanayake’s promise to reduce electricity rates by 30 percent is irrelevant against the backdrop of the IMF’s stark warning. The agreement between Sri Lanka and IMF that had been endorsed by Parliament in July 2023, overnight, made the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) irrelevant.
The government owed the public an explanation whether the agreement with the IMF hindered the PUCSL, established in terms of the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka Act No 35 of 2002. If the pricing formula entirely depends on the proposed automatic electricity price adjustment mechanism the government cannot justify the operation of PUCSL.
The IMF has emphasised, in no uncertain terms, that Sri Lanka shouldn’t expect any opportunity to side-step what the lending agency called prior actions.
So, unless President Dissanayake increased electricity tariffs in line with the IMF’s formula, the EFF programme could be halted. That is the ugly truth. Perhaps President Dissanayake should disclose how political parties, represented in the previous Parliament, reached consensus on Public Financial Management and Economic Transformation Bills. At that time the NPP decided not to ask for division, there were only three NPP lawmakers in Parliament. The NPP group consisted of Anura Kumara Dissanayake, Vijitha Herath and Dr. Harini Amarasuriya. Today, the NPP parliamentary group comprises 159 lawmakers.
Having accepted both controversial Bills, the SJB now attacks the NPP over the proposed hike in electricity tariffs.
During the last phase of the parliamentary election campaign, President Dissanayake assured the country of a staggering 30% power tariff reduction in the near future with no intention to fulfill it. This false assurance was given on Nov 09, 2024, at Dambulla. The electorate was deceived. That was deliberate on the President’s part. Dissanayake couldn’t have been unaware that whoever won the parliamentary election the IMF expected the full implementation of the agreement.
Although the PUCSL initiated a public consultations process in line with the Electricity Act, President Dissanayake, in the first week of May, disclosed the decision to go ahead with the electricity tariff hike. The declaration was during a live discussion on Sirasa. Therefore, there cannot be any ambiguity over Sri Lanka adhering to the IMF agreement. The NPP has no option but to implement the agreement with the IMF.
Hideaki on IMF formula
The Japanese Ambassador in Sri Lanka, Mizukoshi Hideaki, emphasised the importance and the responsibility on the part of Sri Lanka to implement the IMF formula. Hideaki, in an exclusive interview with the writer last August, in the run-up to the parliamentary election, declared that whoever wins the September 21 contest, the winner should adhere to, what he called, IMF remedies (Post-Aragalaya economic recovery depends on implementation of IMF formula – Japanese ambassador, The Island, August 21, 2024).
Declaring that the position taken by creditors wasn’t meant to favour the then President Wickremesinghe, Hideaki said: “For Sri Lanka to achieve economic recovery, it is crucial to restore the international community’s trust. To this end, it is essential to steadily implement the various economic and social reforms laid down as conditions by the IMF, which is also the basis for the agreement on the debt restructuring.
Indian High Commissioner Santosh Jha expressed similar sentiments during an informal meeting with a selected group of journalists also in the run-up to the general election.
The country is in such a desperate situation, though there were no queues as during Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s presidency, the government needs to complete the four-year IMF programme. Increasing electricity tariff is not only inevitable but a necessity, though politically damaging, especially at a time the NPP had suffered a significant drop in votes within seven months.
Electricity tariff hike ahead of the forthcoming Provincial Council polls may further undermine the NPP’s vote base and provide a boost for the Opposition. But Dissanayake is not in a position to delay the process as the IMF intends to wrap up the work on the next tranche of funding.
The NPP cannot go back on its pledge to reduce electricity tariffs without losing further public support. The outcome at the Provincial Council election proved that the ruling party, in spite of having a commanding 2/3 majority in Parliament, is vulnerable. Loss of 2.3 mn votes out of 6.8mn that the NPP received at the parliamentary election, just seven months before, and the setback the government suffered in the predominantly Tamil speaking areas, underscored the developing difficulties.
Against that background, the NPP may find IMF conditions extremely difficult to meet but has no choice. Sri Lanka’s record in implementing IMF remedies is poor. Once the Treasury Secretary Mahinda Siriwardana, appearing on state run Rupavahini at the height of the economic crisis, pointed out how Sri Lanka deceived the IMF even during its previous engagements with the lending body. Siriwardena issued a dire warning to the powers that be against not adhering to IMF remedies. The outspoken official’s message was clear – If Sri Lanka bungled this opportunity that would be the end of the ongoing recovery process. Whatever corrupt politicians say to hoodwink voters the country is not out of the woods yet.
The country is in a critical juncture. President Dissanayake, in his capacity as the Finance Minister, is confronted with difficult choices. His government must prudently decide between economic relief and adherence to the IMF’s fiscal targets. Deviating from these targets can jeopardise the country’s access to multilateral financing from institutions, like the ADB and World Bank, which is essential for maintaining foreign currency inflows, necessary in line with the overall recovery process. The NPP cannot ignore that though IMF financial support is limited, its endorsement is crucial for unlocking broader international aid.
The NPP leadership will have to keep in mind that moratorium on repayment of loans ends in 2027 and the responsibility for accumulation of USD reserves lies with the administration. Sri Lanka has no option but to meet its obligations.
The government is unable to rectify sluggish job growth, declining living standards, and rising poverty. Therefore, finding effective policy tools to facilitate a robust recovery has become increasingly urgent.
Case of Pakistan
Former President Wickremesinghe has repeatedly appreciated India’s role in facilitating IMF bailout within months after he succeeded Gotabaya Rajapaksa whose government foolishly rejected the lending agency’s help. By the time the Rajapaksa administration realised irrationality in its much-touted domestic solution, the national economy was in tatters.
Against the backdrop of India interceding on behalf of Sri Lanka with the IMF, New Delhi’s opposition to Washington-based lending agency granting a fresh bailout of USD 1 bn to Pakistan seems contentious.
Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is on record as having alleged, at Bhuj airbase in Gujarat, that Pakistan would certainly utilise a significant portion of the fresh bailout package to rebuild, what he called, the terrorist infrastructure destroyed in operation Sindoor, mounted in response to the Pahalgam massacre on April 22, 2025.
The IMF disregarded India’s concerns. When compared with the IMF bailout package amounting to USD 3 bn to Colombo, the facility made available to Pakistan is much bigger. The IMF has agreed to support Pakistan with a total of $7 billion under the EFF programme. Pakistan received USD 2.1 billion in two separate instalments before the latest tranche of $1 billion was made after the IMF completed its first review of Pakistan’s progress.
Director of the IMF’s communications department Julie Kozack recently explained that under the circumstances the lending agency released USD 1 bn to Pakistan. Kozack dismissed claims of Pakistan utilising IMF funds for rebuilding terrorist infrastructure as money was subjected to tight controls meant to ensure proper utilisation.
Pakistan has denied having a hand in the Pahalgam attack. India’s all-out campaign against Pakistan over its role in international terrorism reminds us of what India did in Sri Lanka. New Delhi’s politically-motivated (no less a person than their National Security Advisor the late J.N. Dixit, admitted Indian intervention here based on political reasons, in his memoirs released in 2005, a year before Sri Lanka launched offensive action (Aug 2006-May 2009).
As combined Sri Lankan armed forces were engaged in large scale operations on the Vanni east front, various interested parties made a desperate bid to halt IMF funding for Sri Lanka. They sought to delay the USD 1.9 bn loan facility to discourage President Mahinda Rajapaksa from bringing the war to a successful conclusion.
In spite of President Rajapaksa’s rejection of a joint UK-France request to call off the Vanni offensive, the UN Security Council asserted that halting the IMF package was not their responsibility.
The then British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and his French counterpart Bernard Kouchner met President Mahinda Rajapaka during the last week of April 2009 as ground forces were making rapid progress on the Vanni east front.
Interested parties had been pushing hard to deprive Sri Lanka of IMF facility after the LTTE’s failure to halt the ground offensive. As long as they felt confident in the LTTE’s military capacity, those demanding accountability on Sri Lanka’s part today never wanted peace. They explored all possible avenues after the LTTE began retreating on all fronts. The bid to halt IMF funding for Sri Lanka should be examined in that context.
The LTTE lobby had been so influential it was able to reach the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton whose shocking involvement with the group surprised many. Even after the end of the conflict, the Human Rights Watch (HRW) demanded that the IMF should insist that the government of Sri Lanka address significant post-conflict human rights abuses as part of the approval for a USD 2.5 billion stand-by loan.
The IMF’s handling of funding during the last phase of the conflict, and after, proved that the lending agency couldn’t be influenced by external interventions.
The NPP will have to abide by the IMF remedies or face the consequences. In the run up to the presidential election, the IMF delegation met the NPP team. The meeting that was held at the Shangri-La on 14 March 2024, discussed Sri Lanka’s debt restructuring and anti-fraud processes were discussed at length.
Senior Mission Chief of the Fund, Peter Breuer, led the IMF. The delegation included Assistant to the Director of the Asia and Pacific Department at the IMF Katsiaryna Svieydzenka, and IMF Staff Manavee Abeywickrama.
Representing the NPP at the meeting were party executive members MP Vijitha Herath and Muditha Nanayakkara, and members of the party’s Economic Council Professors Anil Jayantha, Seetha Bandara, and Harshana Suriyapperuma, and former MP Sunil Handunnetti.
The Shangri-La meeting followed a meeting held on January 18, 2024, at the JVP head office at Pelawatte, Battaramulla.
The IMF had been fully involved with political parties during the presidential election campaign last year hence all knew what the IMF remedies were. All political parties exploited the situation to their advantage with the SJB and NPP once boycotting a meeting called by the then President Wickremesinghe with the IMF.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Midweek Review
Year ends with the NPP govt. on the back foot
The failure on the part of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) government to fulfil a plethora of promises given in the run up to the last presidential election, in September, 2024, and a series of incidents, including cases of corruption, and embarrassing failure to act on a specific weather alert, ahead of Cyclone Ditwah, had undermined the administration beyond measure.
Ditwah dealt a knockout blow to the arrogant and cocky NPP. If the ruling party consented to the Opposition proposal for a Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) to probe the events leading to the November 27 cyclone, the disclosure would be catastrophic, even for the all-powerful Executive President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, as responsible government bodies, like the Disaster Management Centre that horribly failed in its duty, and the Met Department that alerted about the developing storm, but the government did not heed its timely warnings, directly come under his purview.
The NPP is on the back foot and struggling to cope up with the rapidly developing situation. In spite of having both executive presidency and an overwhelming 2/3 majority in Parliament, the government seems to be weak and in total disarray.
The regular appearance of President Dissanayake in Parliament, who usually respond deftly to criticism, thereby defending his parliamentary group, obviously failed to make an impression. Overall, the top NPP leadership appeared to have caused irreparable damage to the NPP and taken the shine out of two glorious electoral victories at the last presidential and parliamentary polls held in September and November 2024 respectively.
The NPP has deteriorated, both in and out of Parliament. The performance of the 159-member NPP parliamentary group, led by Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, doesn’t reflect the actual situation on the ground or the developing political environment.
Having repeatedly boasted of its commitment to bring about good governance and accountability, the current dispensation proved in style that it is definitely not different from the previous lots or even worse. (The recent arrest of a policeman who claimed of being assaulted by a gang, led by an NPP MP, emphasised that so-called system change is nothing but a farce) In the run-up to the November, 2024, parliamentary polls, President Dissanayake, who is the leader of both the JVP and NPP, declared that the House should be filled with only NPPers as other political parties were corrupt. Dissanayake cited the Parliament defeating the no-confidence motions filed against Ravi Karunanayake (2016/over Treasury Bond scams) and Keheliya Rambukwella (2023/against health sector corruption) to promote his argument. However, recently the ongoing controversy over patient deaths, allegedly blamed on the administration of Ondansetron injections, exposed the government.
Mounting concerns over drug safety and regulatory oversight triggered strong calls from medical professionals, and trade unions, for the resignation of senior officials at the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) and the State Pharmaceutical Corporation (SPC).
Medical and civil rights groups declared that the incident exposed deep systemic failures in Sri Lanka’s drug regulatory framework, with critics warning that the collapse of quality assurance mechanisms is placing patients’ lives at grave risk.
The Medical and Civil Rights Professional Association of Doctors (MCRPA), and allied trade unions, accused health authorities of gross negligence and demanded the immediate resignation of senior NMRA and SPC officials.
MCRPA President Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa is on record as having said that the Health Ministry, NMRA and SPC had collectively failed to ensure patient safety, citing, what he described as, a failed drug regulatory system.
The controversy has taken an unexpected turn with some alleging that the NPP government, on behalf of Sri Lanka and India, in April this year, entered into an agreement whereby the former agreed to lower quality/standards of medicine imports.
Trouble begins with Ranwala’s resignation
The NPP suffered a humiliating setback when its National List MP Asoka Ranwala had to resign from the post of Speaker on 13 December, 2024, following intense controversy over his educational qualification. The petroleum sector trade union leader served as the Speaker for a period of three weeks and his resignation shook the party. Ranwala, first time entrant to Parliament was one of the 18 NPP National List appointees out of a total of 29. The Parliament consists of 196 elected and 29 appointed members. Since the introduction of the National List, in 1989, there had never been an occasion where one party secured 18 slots.
The JVP/NPP made an initial bid to defend Ranwala but quickly gave it up and got him to resign amidst media furor. Ranwala dominated the social media as political rivals exploited the controversy over his claimed doctorate from the Waseda University of Japan, which he has failed to prove to this day. But, the JVP/NPP had to suffer a second time as a result of Ranwala’s antics when he caused injuries to three persons, including a child, on 11 December, in the Sapugaskanda police area.
The NPP made a pathetic, UNP and SLFP style effort to save the parliamentarian by blaming the Sapugaskanda police for not promptly subjecting him for a drunk driving test. The declaration made by the Government Analyst Department that the parliamentarian hadn’t been drunk at the time of the accident, several days after the accident, does not make any difference. Having experienced the wrongdoing of successive previous governments, the public, regardless of what various interested parties propagated on social media, realise that the government is making a disgraceful bid to cover-up.
No less a person than President Dissanayake is on record as having said that their members do not consume liquor. Let us wait for the outcome of the internal investigation into the lapses on the part of the Sapugaskanda police with regard to the accident that happened near Denimulla Junction, in Sapugaskanda.
JVP/NPP bigwigs obviously hadn’t learnt from the Weligama W 15 hotel attack in December, 2023, that ruined President Ranil Wickremeinghe’s administration. That incident exposed the direct nexus between the government and the police in carrying out Mafia-style operations. Although the two incidents cannot be compared as the circumstances differ, there is a similarity. Initially, police headquarters represented the interests of the wrongdoers, while President Wickremesinghe bent over backwards to retain the man who dispatched the CCD (Colombo Crime Division) team to Weligama, as the IGP. The UNP leader went to the extent of speaking to Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, and Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena to push his agenda. There is no dispute the then Public Security Minister Tiran Alles wanted Deshabandu Tennakoon as IGP, regardless of a spate of accusations against him, in addition to him being faulted by the Supreme Court in a high-profile fundamental rights application.
The JVP/NPP must have realised that though the Opposition remained disorganised and ineffective, thanks to the media, particularly social media, a case of transgression, if not addressed swiftly and properly, can develop into a crisis. Action taken by the government to protect Ranwala is a case in point. Government leaders must have heaved a sigh of relief as Ranwala is no longer the Speaker when he drove a jeep recklessly and collided with a motorcycle and a car.
Major cases, key developments
Instead of addressing public concerns, the government sought to suppress the truth by manipulating and exploiting developments
* The release of 323 containers from the Colombo Port, in January 2025, is a case in point. The issue at hand is whether the powers that be took advantage of the port congestion to clear ‘red-flagged’ containers.
Although the Customs repeatedly declared that they did nothing wrong and such releases were resorted even during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency (July 2022 to September 2024), the public won’t buy that. Container issue remains a mystery. That controversy eroded public confidence in the NPP that vowed 100 percent transparency in all its dealings. But the way the current dispensation handled the Port congestion proved that transparency must be the last thing in the minds of the JVPers/NPPers holding office.
* The JVP/NPP’s much touted all-out anti-corruption stand suffered a debilitating blow over their failure to finalise the appointment of a new Auditor General. In spite of the Opposition, the civil society, and the media, vigorously taking up this issue, the government continued to hold up the appointment by irresponsibly pushing for an appointment acceptable to President Dissanayake. The JVP/NPP is certainly pursuing a strategy contrary to what it preached while in the Opposition and found fault with successive governments for trying to manipulate the AG. It would be pertinent to mention that President Dissanayake should accept the responsibility for the inordinate delay in proposing a suitable person to that position. The government failed to get the approval of the Constitutional Council more than once to install a favourite of theirs in it, thanks to the forthright position taken by its civil society representatives.
The government should be ashamed of its disgraceful effort to bring the Office of the Auditor General under its thumb:
* The JVP/NPP government’s hotly disputed decision to procure 1,775 brand-new double cab pickup trucks, at a staggering cost exceeding Rs. 12,500 mn, under controversial circumstances, exposed the duplicity of that party that painted all other political parties black. Would the government rethink the double cab deal, especially in the wake of economic ruination caused by Cyclone Ditwah? The top leadership seems to be determined to proceed with their original plans, regardless of immeasurable losses caused by Cyclone Ditwah. Post-cyclone efforts still remain at a nascent stage with the government putting on a brave face. The top leadership has turned a blind eye to the overwhelming challenge in getting the country back on track especially against the backdrop of its agreement with the IMF.
Post-Cyclone Ditwah recovery process is going to be slow and extremely painful. Unfortunately, both the government and the Opposition are hell-bent on exploiting the miserable conditions experienced by its hapless victims. The government is yet to acknowledge that it could have faced the crisis much better if it acted on the warning issued by Met Department Chief Athula Karunanayake on 12 November, two weeks before the cyclone struck.
Foreign policy dilemma
Sri Lanka moved further closer to India and the US this year as President Dissanayake entered into several new agreements with them. In spite of criticism, seven Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs), including one on defence, remains confidential. What are they hiding?
Within weeks after signing of the seven MoUs, India bought the controlling interests in the Colombo Dockyard Limited for USD 52 mn.
Although some Opposition members, representing the SJB, raised the issue, their leader Sajith Premadasa, during a subsequent visit to New Delhi, indicated he wouldn’t, under any circumstances, raise such a contentious issue.
Premadasa went a step further. The SJB leader assured his unwavering commitment to the full implementation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution that was forced on Sri Lanka during President JRJ’s administration, under the highly questionable Indo-Lanka Accord of July, 1987, after the infamous parippu drop by Indian military aircraft over Jaffna, their version of the old gunboat diplomacy practiced by the West.
Both India and the US consolidated their position here further in the post-Aragalaya period. Those who felt that the JVP would be in a collision course with them must have been quite surprised by the turn of events and the way post-Aragalaya Sri Lanka leaned towards the US-India combine with not a hum from our carboard revolutionaries now installed in power. They certainly know which side of the bread is buttered. Sri Lanka’s economic deterioration, and the 2023 agreement with the IMF, had tied up the country with the US-led bloc.
In spite of India still procuring large quantities of Russian crude oil and its refusal to condemn Russia over the conflict in Ukraine, New Delhi has obviously reached consensus with the US on a long-term partnership to meet the formidable Chinese challenge. Both countries feel each other’s support is incalculably vital and indispensable.
Sri Lanka, India, and Japan, in May 2019, signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) to jointly develop the East Container Terminal (ECT) at the Colombo Port. That was during the tail end of the Yahapalana administration. The Gotabaya Rajapaksa administration wanted to take that project forward. But trade unions, spearheaded by the JVP/NPP combine, thwarted a tripartite agreement on the basis that they opposed privatisation of the Colombo Port at any level.
But, the Colombo West International Terminal (CWIT) project, that was launched in November, 2022, during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency, became fully operational in April this year. The JVP revolutionary tiger has completely changed its stripes regarding foreign investments and privatisation. If the JVP remained committed to its previous strategies, India taking over CDL or CWIT would have been unrealistic.
The failure on the part of the government to reveal its stand on visits by foreign research vessels to ports here underscored the intensity of US and Indian pressure. Hope our readers remember how US and India compelled the then President Wickremesinghe to announce a one-year moratorium on such visits. In line with that decision Sri Lanka declared research vessels wouldn’t be allowed here during 2024. The NPP that succeeded Wickremesinghe’s administration in September, 2024, is yet to take a decision on foreign research vessels. What a pity?
The NPP ends the year on the back foot, struggling to cope up with daunting challenges, both domestic and external. The recent revelation of direct Indian intervention in the 2022 regime change project here along with the US underscored the gravity of the situation and developing challenges. Post-cyclone period will facilitate further Indian and US interventions for obvious reasons.
****

Perhaps one of the most debated events in 2025 was the opening of ‘City of Dreams Sri Lanka’ that included, what the investors called, a world-class casino. In spite of mega Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan’s unexpected decision to pull out of the grand opening on 02 August, the investors went ahead with the restricted event. The Chief Guest was President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who is also the Finance Minister, in addition to being the Defence Minister. Among the other notable invitees were Dissanayake’s predecessor Ranil Wickremesinghe, whose administration gave critical support to the high-profile project, worth over USD 1.2 bn. John Keells Holdings PLC (JKH) and Melco Resorts & Entertainment (Melco) invested in the project that also consist of the luxurious Nüwa hotel and a premium shopping mall. Who would have thought President Dissanayake’s participation, even remotely, possible, against the backdrop of his strong past public opposition to gambling of any kind?
Don’t forget ‘City of Dreams’ received a license to operate for a period of 20 years. Definitely an unprecedented situation. Although that license had been issued by the Wickremesinghe administration, the NPP, or any other political party represented in Parliament, didn’t speak publicly about that matter. Interesting, isn’t it, coming from people, still referred by influential sections of the Western media, as avowed Marxists?
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Midweek Review
The Aesthetics and the Visual Politics of an Artisanal Community
Through the Eyes of the Patua:
Organised by the Colombo Institute for Human Sciences in collaboration with Millennium Art Contemporary, an interesting and unique exhibition got underway in the latter’s gallery in Millennium City, Oruwala on 21 December 2025. The exhibition is titled, ‘Through the Eyes of the Patua: Ramayana Paintings of an Artisanal Community’ and was organized in parallel with the conference that was held on 20 December 2025 under the theme, ‘Move Your Shadow: Rediscovering Ravana, Forms of Resistance and Alternative Universes in the Tellings of the Ramayana.’ The scrolls on display at the gallery are part of the over 100 scrolls in the collection of Colombo Institute’s ‘Roma Chatterji Patua Scroll Collection.’ Prof Chatterji, who taught Sociology at University of Delhi and at present teaches at Shiv Nadar University donated the scrolls to the Colombo Institute in 2024.
The paintings on display are what might be called narrative scrolls that are often over ten feet long. Each scroll narrates a story, with separate panels pictorially depicting one component of a story. The Patuas or the Chitrakars, as they are also known, are traditionally bards. A bard will sing the story that is depicted by each scroll which is simultaneously unfurled. For Sri Lankan viewers for whom the paintings and their contexts of production and use would be unusual and unfamiliar, the best way to understand them is to consider them as a comic strip. In the case of the ongoing exhibition, since the bards or the live songs are not a part of it, the word and voice elements are missing. However, the curators have endeavoured to address this gap by displaying a series of video presentations of the songs, how they are performed and the history of the Patuas as part of the exhibition itself.
The unfamiliarity of the art on display and their histories, necessitates broader explanation. The Patua hail from Medinipur District of West Bengal in India. Essentially, this community of artisans are traditional painters and singers who compose stories based on sacred texts such as the Ramayana or Mahabharata as well as secular events that can vary from the bombing of the Twin Towers in New York in 2001 to the Indian Ocean Tsunami of 2004. Even though painted storytelling is done by a number of traditional artisan groups in India, the Patua is the only community where performers and artists belong to the same group. Hence, Professor Chatterji, in her curatorial note for the exhibition calls them “the original multi-media performers in Bengal.”
‘The story of the Patuas’ also is an account of what happens to such artisanal communities in contemporary times in South Asia more broadly even though this specific story is from India. There was a time before the 21st century when such communities were living and working across a large part of eastern India – each group with a claim to their recognizably unique style of painting. However, at the present time, this community and their vocation is limited to areas such as Medinipur, Birbhum, Purulia in West Bengal and Dumka in Jharkhand.
A pertinent question is how the scroll painters from Medinipur have survived the vagaries of time when others have not. Professor Chatterji provides an important clue when she notes that these painters, “unlike their counterparts elsewhere, are also extremely responsive to political events.” As such, “apart from a rich repertoire of stories based on myth and folklore, including the Ramayana and other epics, they have, over many years, also composed on themes that range from events of local or national significance such as boat accidents and communal violence to global events such as the tsunami and the attack on the World Trade Centre.”
There is another interesting aspect that becomes evident when one looks into the socio-cultural background of this community. As Professor Chatterji writes, “one significant feature that gives a distinct flavour to their stories is the fact that a majority of Chitrakars consider themselves to be Muslims but perform stories based largely on Hindu myths.” In this sense, their story complicates the tension-ridden dichotomies between ethno-cultural and religious groups typical of relations between groups in India as well as more broadly in South Asia, including in Sri Lanka. Prof Chatterji suggests this positionality allows the Patua to have “a truly secular voice so vital in the world that we live in today.”
As a result, she notes, contemporary Patuas “have propagated the message of communal harmony in their compositions in the context of the recent riots in India and the Gulf War. Their commentaries couched in the language of myth are profoundly symbolic and draw on a rich oral tradition of storytelling.” What is even more important is their “engagement with contemporary issues also inflects their aesthetics” because many of these painters also “experiment with novel painterly values inspired by recent interaction with new media such as comic books and with folk art forms from other parts of the country.”
From this varied repertoire of the Patuas’ painterly tradition, this exhibition focusses on scrolls portraying different aspects of the Ramayana. In North Indian and the more dominant renditions of the Ramayana, the focus is on Rama while in many alternate renditions this shifts to Ravana as typified by versions popular among the Sinhalas and Tamils in Sri Lanka as well as in some areas in several Indian states. Compared to this, the Patua renditions in the exhibition mostly illustrate the abduction of Sita with a pronounced focus on Sita and not on Ravana, the conventional antagonist or on Rama, the conventional protagonist. As a result, these two traditional male colossuses are distant. Moreover, with the focus on Sita, these folk renditions also bring to the fore other figures directly associated with her such as her sons Luv and Kush in the act of capturing Rama’s victory horse as well as Lakshmana.
Interestingly, almost as a counter narrative, which also serves as a comparison to these Ramayana scrolls, the exhibition also presents three scrolls known as ‘bin-Laden Patas’ depicting different renditions on the attack on New York’s Twin Towers.
While the painted scrolls in this collection have been exhibited thrice in India, this is the first time they are being exhibited in Sri Lanka, and it is quite likely such paintings from any community beyond Sri Lanka’s shores were not available for viewing in the country before this. Organised with no diplomatic or political affiliation and purely as a Sri Lankan cultural effort with broader South Asian interest, it is definitely worth a visit. The exhibition will run until 10 January 2026.
Midweek Review
Spoils of Power
Power comes like a demonic spell,
To restless humans constantly in chains,
And unless kept under a tight leash,
It drives them from one ill deed to another,
And among the legacies they thus deride,
Are those timeless truths lucidly proclaimed,
By prophets, sages and scribes down the ages,
Hailing from Bethlehem, Athens, Isipathana,
And other such places of hallowed renown,
Thus plunging themselves into darker despair.
By Lynn Ockersz
-
News5 days agoMembers of Lankan Community in Washington D.C. donates to ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka’ Flood Relief Fund
-
News3 days agoBritish MP calls on Foreign Secretary to expand sanction package against ‘Sri Lankan war criminals’
-
Business7 days agoBrowns Investments sells luxury Maldivian resort for USD 57.5 mn.
-
News6 days agoAir quality deteriorating in Sri Lanka
-
News6 days agoCardinal urges govt. not to weaken key socio-cultural institutions
-
Features7 days agoHatton Plantations and WNPS PLANT Launch 24 km Riparian Forest Corridor
-
Features7 days agoAnother Christmas, Another Disaster, Another Recovery Mountain to Climb
-
Features5 days agoGeneral education reforms: What about language and ethnicity?

