Connect with us

News

GL warns Speaker against meeting CJ over IGP controversy

Published

on

‘Prez, PM taking contradictory stands on CC’s status’

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Top Opposition spokesman Prof. G. L. Peiris, MP, yesterday (29) warned Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena that he would definitely face contempt of court charges in case he took up the Supreme Court suspension of IGP Deshabandu Tennakoon with Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC.

The former law academic said at his regular media briefing at Nawala that the Speaker or any other person for that matter couldn’t discuss the issue with the CJ at the behest of President Ranil Wickremesinghe. Prof. Peiris questioned the rationale behind President Wickremesinghe’s advice as the fundamental rights petitions filed against the IGP were pending and the next hearing is scheduled for November, several weeks after the presidential poll.

The former External Affairs Minister reminded the Speaker that the latter didn’t enjoy immunity and would have to face the consequences.

Prof. Peiris said that President Wickremesinghe knew the consequences as he was a lawyer by profession but pursued a destructive agenda to put off the presidential poll scheduled for September 21 this year.

Alleging that a desperate President Wickremesinghe had been trying to put off the scheduled national poll, at any cost, Prof. Peiris stressed that even if the President refrained from appointing an acting IGP, in terms of the Constitutions, the Election Commission could issue necessary instructions to law enforcement authorities. Prof. Peiris cited the relevant constitutional provisions available to the EC on the matter.

Prof. Peiris challenged the claim that President Wickremesinghe couldn’t make an acting appointment as he was a presidential candidate and already paid the relevant deposit. The former Minister declared that there was absolutely no basis for what he called the ridiculous claim propagated as an excuse for not appointing an Acting IGP.

At the onset of the briefing, Prof. Peiris said that Prime Minister Dinesh Gunawardena, too, had made a statement in Parliament last Friday (26) undermining the Supreme Court.

Acknowledging that the MEP leader had been covered by parliamentary privileges, Prof. Peiris said that the very basis of the Premier’s justification of President Wickremesinghe’s decision not to make an acting appointment was deceitful.

“The Premier declared that the Supreme Court could not dispute a decision taken by a parliamentary committee. But the issue at hand is that the Constitutional Council responsible and faulted by the Supreme Court for the appointment of the IGP is not a parliamentary committee though it is headed by the Speaker,” Prof. Peiris said, pointing out that three of the 10 members were not members of Parliament. “Therefore, the CC cannot be recognised as a parliamentary committee.”

Prof. Peiris said that the President and the Prime Minister, too, appeared to be not on the same page on this issue. The President had said in Parliament a couple of months back that the CC was an extension of the executive whereas the Premier said it was part the legislature, Prof. Peiris said, adding that fundamental rights petitions could be filed against the CC.

The former Minister cited a ruling given by a bench of seven SC judges, headed by CJ Sarath Nanda Silva, PC, way back in 2002, that CC was not part of the legislature.

Prof. Peiris urged the government to set the record straight pertaining to the CC’s status vis-a-vis the Constitution as the President and the Premier had taken contradictory stands in this regard.

Prof. Peiris dismissed President Wickremesinghe’s recent declaration that he wanted the Speaker and CJ to settle the dispute over the SC’s ruling within this week to prevent hindrance to the scheduled election.



News

Fuel crunch looms

Published

on

Govt. tells fuel distributors to maintain stocks to ensure uninterrupted supplies

by Saman Indrajith and Norman Palihawadane

The government had instructed private fuel distributors to maintain minimum stocks and ensure uninterrupted supplies to the market, Energy Minister Anura Karunathilaka told Parliament yesterday (06).

Karunathilaka said the Ministry of Energy Secretary had notified the relevant companies of the requirement, following a reduction in supplies by some private distributors, amid higher international fuel prices.

The Minister said private companies had informed the government that they were facing losses because international prices had risen while fuel was being sold, locally, at prevailing prices. As a result, some companies had reduced the volumes released to the market.

The reduced supplies had increased the burden on the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC), whose share of the diesel market had risen from about 54% to 82%, the Minister said.

“The CPC currently holds an 82% share of the market,” he said, adding that it had increased its supplies, compared with February, to compensate for the reduction by private distributors.

Karunathilaka said the government could not, under the existing agreements with private companies, specify the quantities they should supply to individual filling stations. However, it could require them to maintain minimum stocks in the country.

The Minister said the Energy Ministry had already instructed companies that had failed to maintain the required stocks to take steps to prevent supply disruptions.

The Minister attributed the queues reported at some filling stations to reduced supplies from private distributors, as well as normal variations in fuel distribution. He also said demand for CPC fuel had increased because private companies generally did not provide fuel to dealers on credit, while the CPC offered a three-day credit facility.

“We expect that, as the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation takes on this additional burden, the problem will ease to some extent by Wednesday or Thursday,” Karunathilaka said.

He said instructions had also been issued to increase supplies to CPC filling stations. A special discussion on the issue is scheduled for today (07), with officials of the Energy Ministry and CPC expected to participate,

along with President Anura Kumara Dissanayake.

Meanwhile, Petroleum Dealers’ Association officials have called for an early solution to the supply issue. Association Chairman D.V. Shantha Silva said queues had been reported at many filling stations, mainly those operated by private distributors.

He said the situation was not due to an overall shortage of fuel, but was linked to reduced orders by Lanka IOC, Sinopec and R.M. Parks amid concerns over losses incurred on fuel sales.

The Ceylon Petroleum Private Tanker Owners Association has urged motorists to refrain from panic buying, saying there was no nationwide disruption to fuel supplies.

The government earlier increased fuel prices and introduced a per-litre diesel subsidy following concerns raised by distributors over rising international prices.

Continue Reading

News

Gnansara Thera to be assigned to prison printing section: Officials

Published

on

Bodu Bala Sena General Secretary Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera, who was taken into custody to serve the remainder of his prison sentence, was produced before the Colombo High Court yesterday by prison officials in connection with a warrant issued by the court. He appeared before the court in layman’s clothes. Pic by Nishan S. Priyantha.

by Norman Palihawadane

Bodu Bala Sena General Secretary Ven. Galagodaatte Gnanasara Thera, who has been ordered by the court to serve the remainder of his prison sentence, is to be assigned to the prison ‘printing work party’, prison officials said yesterday.

The monk was produced before the Colombo High Court yesterday by prison officials in connection with a warrant issued by the court.

He appeared before the court in civilian attire.

Prison sources said arrangements were being finalised for his detention and that he would subsequently be assigned to the printing work party.

The Thera initially objected when prison officials instructed him to change from his robes into the attire worn by convicted prisoners.

He later agreed to wear the prescribed prison clothes, sources said.

The Supreme Court, in September, annulled the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera in 2019. He had been serving a six-year prison sentence imposed following his conviction for contempt of court but had served only about nine months when then President Maithripala Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon in May 2019.

Following the Supreme Court ruling, the Thera was required to serve the remainder of his sentence. He was subsequently reported missing, prompting the Court of Appeal to issue an open warrant for his arrest.

The Court of Appeal on Monday ordered the authorities to enforce the remainder of his prison sentence.

Continue Reading

News

Speaker rejects Ajith Perera’s privilege complaint

Published

on

Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne yesterday ruled that a privilege complaint submitted by SJB Kalutara District MP Ajith P. Perera did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege.

The ruling was made in response to a notice of privilege submitted by Perera on October 02.

Perera alleged that his parliamentary privileges had been breached over the failure to take formal action or reach a final decision on a written request submitted on August 03 by 18 Opposition MPs seeking the appointment of a Special Select Committee to investigate delays in the judicial system and prison overcrowding.

He had also requested that the matter be referred to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges for investigation and recommendations.

In his ruling, Speaker Wickramaratne said the Speaker, as the Presiding Authority and guardian of the powers, rights and privileges of Parliament, could not be subjected to a privilege complaint or disciplinary inquiry by a committee subordinate to the Chair in respect of actions taken in an official capacity.

He said that, under the Standing Orders, the Speaker was required to independently determine whether a prima facie case of breach of privilege existed.

Referring a complaint against the Speaker to a committee functioning under the Speaker’s authority would, therefore, create a procedural contradiction, he said.

Accordingly, the Speaker ruled that Perera’s notice did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege and disallowed the request to refer the matter to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges.

Continue Reading

Trending