Connect with us

News

GL frowns on Prez downplaying importance of elections before judges

Published

on

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Rebel SLPP MP Prof. G. L. Peiris yesterday (12) questioned the propriety of President Ranil Wickremesinghe recently dismissing the importance of elections at the recent National Law Conference, at the Grand Hotel, Nuwara Eliya.

Addressing the media at the Nawala Office of Nidahasa Janatha Sabhawa, the former External Affairs Minister said that President Wickremesinghe had declared at the BASL (Bar Association of Sri Lanka) event that the people had no faith in elections.

Prof. Peiris pointed out that among the distinguished gathering were judges of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal hearing petitions filed against the indefinite postponement of Local Government polls. The former minister alleged that President Wickremesinghe had ignored the 19th March, 2023, deadline for the holding of LG polls.

Prof. Peiris pointed out that there had never been a previous instance of a President declaring elections weren’t important as the vast majority of the population including the youth had lost faith in elections and the political party system.

President Wickremesinghe’s move at the BASL event should be examined, taking into consideration how the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government had disregarded the specific Supreme Court ruling issued on 03rd March, this year, Prof. Peiris said.

Instead of making available required funds to the Election Commission, as directed by the Supreme Court, the government had sought to haul judges up before parliamentary privileges and ethics committee, Prof. Peiris said, referring to statements made in Parliament by State Finance Minister Shehan Semasinghe and MP Premanath Dolawatte in respect of the 03rd March Supreme Court ruling.

President Wickremesinghe, in his capacity as the Finance Minister, and Secretary to the Treasury Mahinda Siriwardena, owed an explanation as to why the SC directive wasn’t carried out.

Prof. Peiris said that President Wickremesinghe seemed to be going flat out to deprive the electorate an opportunity to exercise their franchise at any level. The recent declaration that the government intended to enact the Broadcasting Regulatory Commission Bill was meant to rein in electronic media, Prof. Peiris said. That would be a crucial part of their overall strategy, Prof. Peiris said, adding that the proposed Counter Terrorism Bill was also intended to suppress what the former minister called democratic Opposition.

Commenting on the Bill, titled ‘Central Bank of Sri Lanka,’ Prof. Peiris said that the government was pursuing a disputable strategy, regardless of the developing crisis that made the country vulnerable for further shocks.

Contrary to speculation that President Wickremesinghe was contemplating advancing the date for the next presidential election, scheduled for October next year, Prof. Peiris said the possibility of the interested parties seeking to put off presidential polls, too, couldn’t be ruled out.

In case President Wickremesinghe wanted to advance the presidential election, the Nidahas Jathika Sabhawa would vote for the required constitutional amendment, Prof. Peiris said. In fact, the genuine Opposition would support the President’s initiative, the former minister said, urging the government to grant the public an opportunity to exercise their franchise.

Responding to media queries, Prof. Peiris said that if President Wickremesinghe genuinely believed the public really appreciated his leadership, the UNP leader shouldn’t hesitate to conduct elections. Pointing out that President’s Wickremesinghe’s distorted assessment on public response to elections indicated his fear of facing the electorate at any level.

Prof. Peiris said that the joint Opposition would work together to pressure the government to conduct the long delayed Provincial Council and Local Government polls.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Fuel crunch looms

Published

on

Govt. tells fuel distributors to maintain stocks to ensure uninterrupted supplies

by Saman Indrajith and Norman Palihawadane

The government had instructed private fuel distributors to maintain minimum stocks and ensure uninterrupted supplies to the market, Energy Minister Anura Karunathilaka told Parliament yesterday (06).

Karunathilaka said the Ministry of Energy Secretary had notified the relevant companies of the requirement, following a reduction in supplies by some private distributors, amid higher international fuel prices.

The Minister said private companies had informed the government that they were facing losses because international prices had risen while fuel was being sold, locally, at prevailing prices. As a result, some companies had reduced the volumes released to the market.

The reduced supplies had increased the burden on the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC), whose share of the diesel market had risen from about 54% to 82%, the Minister said.

“The CPC currently holds an 82% share of the market,” he said, adding that it had increased its supplies, compared with February, to compensate for the reduction by private distributors.

Karunathilaka said the government could not, under the existing agreements with private companies, specify the quantities they should supply to individual filling stations. However, it could require them to maintain minimum stocks in the country.

The Minister said the Energy Ministry had already instructed companies that had failed to maintain the required stocks to take steps to prevent supply disruptions.

The Minister attributed the queues reported at some filling stations to reduced supplies from private distributors, as well as normal variations in fuel distribution. He also said demand for CPC fuel had increased because private companies generally did not provide fuel to dealers on credit, while the CPC offered a three-day credit facility.

“We expect that, as the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation takes on this additional burden, the problem will ease to some extent by Wednesday or Thursday,” Karunathilaka said.

He said instructions had also been issued to increase supplies to CPC filling stations. A special discussion on the issue is scheduled for today (07), with officials of the Energy Ministry and CPC expected to participate,

along with President Anura Kumara Dissanayake.

Meanwhile, Petroleum Dealers’ Association officials have called for an early solution to the supply issue. Association Chairman D.V. Shantha Silva said queues had been reported at many filling stations, mainly those operated by private distributors.

He said the situation was not due to an overall shortage of fuel, but was linked to reduced orders by Lanka IOC, Sinopec and R.M. Parks amid concerns over losses incurred on fuel sales.

The Ceylon Petroleum Private Tanker Owners Association has urged motorists to refrain from panic buying, saying there was no nationwide disruption to fuel supplies.

The government earlier increased fuel prices and introduced a per-litre diesel subsidy following concerns raised by distributors over rising international prices.

Continue Reading

News

Gnansara Thera to be assigned to prison printing section: Officials

Published

on

Bodu Bala Sena General Secretary Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera, who was taken into custody to serve the remainder of his prison sentence, was produced before the Colombo High Court yesterday by prison officials in connection with a warrant issued by the court. He appeared before the court in layman’s clothes. Pic by Nishan S. Priyantha.

by Norman Palihawadane

Bodu Bala Sena General Secretary Ven. Galagodaatte Gnanasara Thera, who has been ordered by the court to serve the remainder of his prison sentence, is to be assigned to the prison ‘printing work party’, prison officials said yesterday.

The monk was produced before the Colombo High Court yesterday by prison officials in connection with a warrant issued by the court.

He appeared before the court in civilian attire.

Prison sources said arrangements were being finalised for his detention and that he would subsequently be assigned to the printing work party.

The Thera initially objected when prison officials instructed him to change from his robes into the attire worn by convicted prisoners.

He later agreed to wear the prescribed prison clothes, sources said.

The Supreme Court, in September, annulled the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera in 2019. He had been serving a six-year prison sentence imposed following his conviction for contempt of court but had served only about nine months when then President Maithripala Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon in May 2019.

Following the Supreme Court ruling, the Thera was required to serve the remainder of his sentence. He was subsequently reported missing, prompting the Court of Appeal to issue an open warrant for his arrest.

The Court of Appeal on Monday ordered the authorities to enforce the remainder of his prison sentence.

Continue Reading

News

Speaker rejects Ajith Perera’s privilege complaint

Published

on

Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne yesterday ruled that a privilege complaint submitted by SJB Kalutara District MP Ajith P. Perera did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege.

The ruling was made in response to a notice of privilege submitted by Perera on October 02.

Perera alleged that his parliamentary privileges had been breached over the failure to take formal action or reach a final decision on a written request submitted on August 03 by 18 Opposition MPs seeking the appointment of a Special Select Committee to investigate delays in the judicial system and prison overcrowding.

He had also requested that the matter be referred to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges for investigation and recommendations.

In his ruling, Speaker Wickramaratne said the Speaker, as the Presiding Authority and guardian of the powers, rights and privileges of Parliament, could not be subjected to a privilege complaint or disciplinary inquiry by a committee subordinate to the Chair in respect of actions taken in an official capacity.

He said that, under the Standing Orders, the Speaker was required to independently determine whether a prima facie case of breach of privilege existed.

Referring a complaint against the Speaker to a committee functioning under the Speaker’s authority would, therefore, create a procedural contradiction, he said.

Accordingly, the Speaker ruled that Perera’s notice did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege and disallowed the request to refer the matter to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges.

Continue Reading

Trending