Connect with us

News

External interventions in GR’s ouster: Manohara challenges HRC’s stand

Published

on

by Shamindra Ferdinando

President’s Counsel Manohara De Silva says the Human Rights Commission (HRC) has to inquire into alleged foreign interventions in Sri Lanka, as they amount to failure on the part of the government in power to safeguard the country’s national security.

Pointing out that the Speaker had disclosed not only foreign interventions but also death threats to him, de Silva said that such a failure was tantamount to the government’s ‘inaction’ to perform its constitutional obligations, and the HRC and the courts could inquire thereinto.

“Such a failure is a violation of people’s sovereignty and therefore an infringement of people’s fundamental rights,” de Silva said.

The President’s Counsel said so regarding the HRC Chairperson Justice L. T. B. Dehideniya’s recent declaration that Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena’s claim of foreign interventions could be inquired into only if he received a complaint. Justice Dehideniya was responding to The Island queries, at its first media briefing since appointment last July.

De Silva pointed out that The Island had raised a pertinent issue as the HRC was already inquiring into SLPP goon attacks on the ‘Aragalaya’ protesters on 09 May2022 and a spate of counterattacks carried out in the immediate aftermath of the failed attempt to chase out those who had been occupying Galle Face.

Responding to another query, the President’s Counsel said that the Speaker had revealed direct foreign interventions in the overthrowing of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa 20 months after the regime change. But the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government and the Opposition had remained silent though some MPs raised the issue in their individual capacity, he said.

Declaring that HRC could intervene on its own concerning issues of national importance, Justice Dehideniya asked whether the disclosure made by the Speaker could be considered as such.

Another top lawyer, speaking on condition of anonymity, explained the need to examine whether the alleged intervention made by external powers could be considered an offence under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA). He said that in terms of the Article 14 of the HRC Act, the HRC on its own could investigate an alleged infringement or imminent infringement of FR. However, such violations must be by either administrative or executive actions, he said, pointing out that third party foreign interventions weren’t covered by that particular Act.

Dissident SLPP lawmaker Gevindu Cumaratunga told The Island yesterday having disclosed foreign hand in President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s ouster, Speaker Abeywardena had apparently cold feet.

MP Cumaratunga said that he had written to Speaker Abeywardena seeking clarifications on 02 April following the latter’s denial of foreign intervention on the previous day.

The MP acknowledged that he had made a mistake when he raised the issue at hand with Speaker Abeywardena on 01 April. MP Cumaratunga said that when he asked the Speaker Abeywardena to name foreign embassies that had been involved, the latter said there was no embassy involvement at all. Acknowledging that Speaker Abeywardena in his controversial 21 March statement to Parliament after the SLPP defeated a no-confidence motion that had been moved against him didn’t make any references to embassies, MP Cumaratunga, in his letter, has requested the Speaker to disclose what he called external powers.

The government owed a comprehensive explanation to the public regarding the status of investigations into incidents that were reported during the March 31, 2022-July 20, 2022 period, MP Cumaratunga said. Chief Government Whip and Minister Prasanna Ranatunga is on record as having said that he was not satisfied with the progress in the investigations, he added.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

US embassy won’t comment on IGP’s probe into joint drug raid

Published

on

Drugs taken into custody (pic courtesy US Embassy)

… America-Pakistan developed required ‘intel’ for operation

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The US Embassy in Colombo declined to comment on a special police probe into the recent narcotics detection, jointly made at the China-managed Colombo International Container Terminal (CICT) by the US Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) New Delhi Country Office and Sri Lanka Police..

US Embassy spokesperson said that the mission wouldn’t add to their press release, issued on 2 Sept., in the immediate aftermath of the raid.

Police Headquarters, on 11 Sept., declared that the Central Crime Investigation Bureau (CCIB) was conducting investigations into the recovery of 473 kg of Crystal Methamphetamine (‘Ice’). Police never acknowledged the role played by the US in the operation.

According to Police Headquarters, on a directive given by IGP Priyantha Weerasooriya, the Special Investigation Unit has launched an internal probe into, what it called, shortcomings and irregularities in the Colombo Port raid.

The Island:

Have you (relevant US authorities) received an update of Sri Lanka’s investigations from the Police?

US Embassy:

U.S. and Sri Lankan law enforcement authorities maintain close and ongoing cooperation on counternarcotics matters, including the exchange of information that helps both countries combat transnational drug trafficking. We don’t have anything further to share on communications with Sri Lankan authorities beyond what we’ve already said publicly about the successful operation.

The Island:

Did the Police seek clarification regarding DEA, New Delhi Country Office role in the successful raid?

US Embassy:

As the Embassy noted publicly following the seizure, cooperation with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration contributed to the Sri Lanka Police Narcotics Bureau’s successful seizure of approximately 463 kilograms of methamphetamine at the Port of Colombo.

The seizure demonstrates the value of close U.S.-Sri Lankan cooperation in disrupting transnational narcotics trafficking.

The Island:

Before we raised this issue were you aware of the internal investigation into the drug bust which was also raised in Parliament last week?

The US Embassy:

We don’t have anything further to share beyond what we’ve already said publicly about the successful operation.

Our focus remains on the strong U.S.-Sri Lanka law enforcement partnership and the concrete results our cooperation can deliver—disrupting transnational criminal organisations, cutting off the profits that fuel illicit drug trafficking, and protecting our citizens from the dangers of narcotrafficking.

The US Embassy attributed the success of the counternarcotics operation to the US-Sri Lanka partnership

The US Embassy statement, dated 2 Sept: The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) New Delhi Country Office and Sri Lanka’s Police Narcotics Bureau (PNB) conducted a successful joint operation disrupting a Pakistan-based narcotrafficking network attempting to smuggle crystal methamphetamine through Sri Lanka to international markets.

Acting on intelligence developed by DEA’s Foreign Counterparts Unit Pakistan Anti-Narcotics Force Special Investigations Cell between August 14–29 on suspicious maritime containers moving from Pakistan to Colombo, PNB seized approximately 463 kg of crystal methamphetamine with a street value of $21 million, concealed in bath towels, and arrested several suspects, including Pakistani nationals. This operation underscores the strength of the U.S.-Sri Lanka partnership in dismantling transnational criminal organisations that fund terrorism and threaten communities in both our countries. This cooperation builds on long-standing training and technical assistance provided through the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) to the Sri Lanka Police and Customs. The United States remains committed to working with Sri Lanka and regional partners to aggressively pursue transnational criminal organizations, deny them the revenue from illicit drug trafficking, and protect our citizens from the dangers of narcotrafficking.”

SLPP National Organiser Namal Rajapaksa, in Parliament, raised questions about the internal investigation into the raid. However, Rajapaksa, too, hasn’t mentioned the US role in the operation. The Special Investigation Unit has recorded a statement from Senior DIG Ranmal Kodituwakku regarding the Colombo Port raid.

MP Rajapaksa questioned the rationale behind questioning the officer who led the raid against the backdrop of controversial releasing of 323 containers from the Colombo Port in January 2025. The failure to question those responsible for the releasing of 323 containers indicated who was behind that operation, MP Rajapaksa told Parliament.

Continue Reading

News

Gnanasara Thera declares outside High Court that he wouldn’t flee

Published

on

Gnanasara Thera

Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) General Secretary Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera appeared before the Colombo High Court yesterday in a case filed by the Attorney General over statements allegedly insulting Islam.

The case was taken up before Colombo High Court Judge Buddhika C. Ragala, who ordered that it be called again on September 30.

His appearance came six days after the Supreme Court invalidated the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera by former President Maithripala Sirisena in 2019.

Speaking to journalists outside the court, Gnanasara Thera said he was prepared to face the legal process and would abide by the law, rejecting reports that he had gone into hiding following the Supreme Court judgment.

“It is the weak who disappear and flee. We worked for the country and are facing the consequences for that. We are not afraid and will not flee,” he said, noting that he would surrender to the court and face whatever legal consequences following the Supreme Court decision.

The Supreme Court, on September 10, ruled that the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera by Sirisena was invalid. The judgment followed fundamental rights petitions challenging the legality of the pardon. A three-judge bench, comprising Justices Janak de Silva, Sobhitha Rajakaruna and Sampath Abeykoon, delivered the ruling.

Gnanasara Thera was convicted by the Court of Appeal in 2018 for contempt of court and sentenced to a total of 19 years’ imprisonment to run concurrently as six years. The conviction related to his conduct during proceedings at the Homagama Magistrate’s Court concerning the disappearance of Prageeth Eknaligoda.

He was released from Welikada Prison on May 23, 2019, after then President Maithripala Sirisena had granted him a presidential pardon.

The Supreme Court found the pardon to be arbitrary and invalid in law, following its consideration of the petitions challenging the exercise of the presidential power of clemency.

Meanwhile, police have said they are awaiting the Supreme Court judgment before determining what further action should be taken following the invalidation of the pardon.

The proceedings before the Colombo High Court yesterday are separate from the contempt of court case that resulted in the six-year sentence. They concern alleged statements made by Gnanasara Thera regarding Islam.

In June this year, the Colombo High Court rejected an appeal by Gnanasara Thera against a nine-month prison sentence imposed by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court in connection with statements made at a 2016 media briefing that were found to have disrupted religious coexistence.

The latest High Court proceedings, therefore, form part of separate legal action concerning his alleged remarks about Islam, while the Supreme Court ruling relates specifically to the legality of the 2019 presidential pardon granted in connection with his contempt of court conviction.

The case before the Colombo High Court will be called again on September 30.

Continue Reading

News

Namal further remanded

Published

on

MP Namal Rajapaksa being taken out from the Colombo Fort Magistrate’s court yesterday

Colombo Fort Magistrate Pasan Amarasena yesterday (16) ordered SLPP National Organiser Namal Rajapaksa, MP, to be further remanded, until September 23. The Magistrate issued the order when Rajapaksa was produced before the court as a suspect in an investigation into an alleged USD 2 million bribe case connected to the acquisition of aircraft for SriLankan Airlines.

The Magistrate issued the order following the submissions made by Deputy Solicitor General Janaka Bandara, appearing on behalf of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID).

President’s Counsel Anil Silva, along with other attorneys representing Rajapaksa, also made submissions before the court.

The Magistrate also announced that a decision on Rajapaksa’s bail application would be announced on 23 September.

Continue Reading

Trending