Connect with us

News

Delisting of Tamil Diaspora groups irks some; explanation sought

Published

on

Decision based on GoSL assurance given in Geneva last June

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Dr. Gunadasa Amarasekera yesterday (14) said President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s government should explain the rationale behind delisting several Tamil Diaspora groups and individuals.

“The timing of the government announcement really worries us,” Dr. Amarasekera said on behalf of the Federation of National Organizations (FNO). He said such moves couldn’t be simply justified on the basis of the forthcoming sessions of the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council. The next UNHRC sessions are scheduled for September.

Recalling that he too strongly backed the stand taken by President Wickremesinghe with regard to US Ambassador Julie Chung’s opposition to measures the government adopted to counter violent protests, Dr. Amarasekera emphasised national security couldn’t be jeopardised by politically-motivated decisions.  The Defence and Foreign Ministries owed the public an explanation as regards the procedure adopted in delisting some Tamil diaspora groups and individuals.

The UK-based Global Tamil Forum (GTF), the British Tamil Forum (BTF) and the Canadian Tamil Congress (CTC) had been among those delisted, through an Extraordinary Gazette issued by the Ministry of Defence.National Freedom Front (NFF) spokesperson Mohammed Muzammil, MP, too, echoed Dr. Amarasekera’s concerns. Addressing a hastily arranged media briefing at NFF’s Pita Kotte party office, lawmaker Muzammil asked whether the government had received an undertaking from those delisted groups, and individuals, whether they would abandon the separatist agenda. Lawmaker Muzammil said President Wickremesinghe, who holds the defence portfolio, should address the concerns of those who felt betrayed by the disputed de-listing of those who propagated separatist ideology though the armed forces eradicated the LTTE in 2009.

Both Dr. Amarasekera and MP Muzammil pointed out that Tamil Makkal Theshiya Kutani leader C.V. Vignewaran, following a recent meeting with President Wickremesinghe, had declared that he received an assurance with regard to several of their demands.  They asked whether the de-listing of these organizations, and individuals, had been part of the agreement between Tamil political parties and President Wickremesinghe.

The Island

sought the views of Suren Surendiran of the GTF, who is among those delisted. The UK-based GTF spokesperson alleged that the entire process of designation of groups and individuals was arbitrary, irrational, and an outright abuse of the United Nations Regulations – aimed at suppressing freedom of speech and dissent, not just within Sri Lanka but also across the borders.

 “GTF and I were listed in 2014, delisted in 2015, re-listed in 2021 and re-delisted in 2022,” Surendiran said, declaring they remained committed to their original ideals meant to achieve justifiable aspirations of the Tamil-speaking people, and implementation of the 2015 accountability resolution.

Surendiran has sent us the following response:   “Every time when a resolution is passed at the UNHRC, calling for Accountability and Reconciliation, the Rajapaksas, be it Mahinda or Gotabaya, will proscribe us as an angry reaction and then realise that no other government or international institution, including progressive Sri Lankans of all communities, and the wider media, recognise these proscriptions and just before another UNHRC session, the sitting government will de-proscribe us. This has been the case since 2014.”

“GTF is grateful that the international community and many Sri Lankan stakeholders (including the media) ignored this listing for what it truly was.

“We did an estimation on the loss of foreign currency inward flow into Sri Lanka directly related to these proscriptions of 2014 and 2021, at least per annum the loss has been USD 300 mn to   half a billion dollars.

Former Presidents Mahinda Rajapaksa, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, Secretary of Defence Kamal Gunaratne, Former Foreign Minister G L Peiris and the notorious so called “terrorism expert” Rohan Gunaratna must explain these losses to the Sri Lankan people and held accountable for their arbitrary decisions and explain what benefits these proscriptions achieved.”

Authoritative sources said that contrary to concerns expressed by various iparties as regards the delisting of organizations and certain individuals, the decision to do so was announced by the former Foreign Affairs Minister Prof GL Peiris in mid-June this year at the 50th Geneva sessions. The Foreign Ministry quoted Prof. Peiris as having said: “The list of designated individuals, groups and entities under the United Nations Regulation No. 1 of 2012 is being reviewed. As of now 318 individuals and 04 entitles are proposed to be delisted. This is a continuing exercise.”

Sources said that it wouldn’t be fair to seek explanation from the incumbent government for a decision taken by the previous administration.



News

Fund issues may leave counting centres without back-up power tomorrow: GNs’ trade union

Published

on

“Power failures on election day could occur due to natural causes or sabotage”

Funds allocated for hiring power generators for the counting centres were inadequate, and the Grama Niladaris (GNs) would not be able to ensure a back-up power supply to those places, President of the Sri Lanka United Grama Niladhari Association, Nandana Ranasinghe warned yesterday.

Addressing a press conference, Ranasinghe said: “Under these circumstances, it will not be possible to provide the counting centres with generators. Funds must also be allocated for hiring electric bulbs, cables and transporting generators as well.

“Unless funds are made available immediately, the GNs must not be held responsible if something goes wrong in the event of a power failure, either due to natural causes or sabotage. The GNs must not be asked to bear the cost of supplying back-up power to counting centres.

“In some areas, the District Returning Officers are pressuring the GNs to bear the cost of hiring power generators. The GNs must not be forced to spend their personal funds to provide facilities to counting centres.

“If a power outage occurs, it will definitely cause issues at counting centres. In the event of disruptions to the vote counting process, the results in the polling divisions under the centres may have to be annulled.”

Continue Reading

News

LG polls: More than 65,000 cops and 8,500 military personnel deployed

Published

on

More than 65,000 police officers would be deployed for the 06 May local government (LG) elections from today (05), Police Media Spokesman SSP Buddhika Manatunga told The Island, yesterday. The police personnel will include members of the Police Special Task Force, intelligence units, security divisions, and mobile patrol teams.

Army Media Spokesman Brigadier Varuna Gamage told The Island that 8,500 military personnel would be deployed on the roads across the country in view of the LG elections.

He said the Army would coordinate with the police, and that troops in all military camps had been placed on standby to face any situation.

By Norman Palihawadane and Chaminda Silva

Continue Reading

News

FSP: Govt. creating conditions for procurement malpractices

Published

on

Pubudu Jayagoda

The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) has alleged that the NPP government, too, like its predecessor, was creating a situation where medicines can be purchased at higher prices outside tender procedures.

The Education Secretary of the FSP Pubudu Jayagoda yesterday (04) alleged that the NPP Cabinet was planning to endorse the Health Ministry move. Addressing the media at the party office in Nugegoda, Jayagoda alleged that the NPP had adopted a strategy similar to that of Keheliya Rambukwella to procure medicines.

The FSP said: “The status quo ante has been restored in respect of health sector procurements. Time was when tenders were deliberately delayed. Orders weren’t placed on time, creating artificial shortages. Then, emergency purchases were made at higher prices; often substandard drugs were purchased. This government came to power promising reforms, but now the question is whether it is doing what it blamed its predecessor for.

“We have received information about a cabinet paper that Health Minister Nalin Jayathissa is going to present to the Cabinet tomorrow. According to an audit report dated March 29, 2025, Sri Lanka faces a shortage of 313 essential medicines over the next three months and 202 of these drugs can be procured through regular means.

“For the remaining 101 medicines, the Health Minister proposes in Sections 2.3 and 2.4 of the Cabinet paper standard procurement procedures should be bypassed and procurement should be done as government-to-government (G2G) deals in violation of the fundamental procurement regulations of transparent competitive bidding processes and the selection of the lowest bidder. Further, the Minister proposes to appoint a seven-member committee to formulate the new procurement methodology and to delegate the selection of supplier countries for medicine procurement to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

“According to Section 8.1 of the Procurement Guidelines, direct procurement without calling for tenders is permitted only under four specific circumstances. That is when the medicine is produced by only one manufacturer, during emergency situations such as pandemics; when there is a severe shortage of the medicine and when the medicine is produced by the State Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Corporation. The justification being used now is the ‘medicine shortage’ clause.

“But how did this shortage occur in the first place? Under the Ranil Wickremesinghe government in August 2024, then-Health Minister Ramesh Pathirana attempted to replace existing medicine suppliers with a group of cronies. When that move drew heavy criticism, the Ministry got cold feet.

“Under pressure from the Indian High Commission, the government tried to procure medicines directly from India without calling for tenders. The current NPP government is now following in the footsteps of the previous Ranil-Ramesh administration. While working on procurement methodologies for 2026, they did not take action to place orders for essential medicines for 2025 even by November-December 2024.”

Continue Reading

Trending