News
Controversy over public sector salary hikes: Expert Committee Chief contradicts govt.’s claim
‘No harm in discarding our proposals if not acceptable to new leaders’
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Chairman of the Expert Committee on Public Service Salary Disparities, Udaya R. Seneviratne yesterday (17) contradicted cabinet spokesperson Minister Vijitha Herath declaration that the substantial public sector salary increase announced by the then government in the run-up to Sept 21 presidential election had not received proper approval of the Finance Ministry.
Retired SLAS officer Seneviratne who had held several top posts, including Secretary to the President during Maithripala Sirisena’s tenure emphasised that the relevant Cabinet paper had been presented by the then President Ranil Wickremesinghe, in his capacity as the Finance Minister. “Therefore, there cannot be absolutely no basis for the new government’s claim,” Seneviratne said, pointing out both Director General National Budget and Director General Management Services were members of his committee.
The Island raised the issue with the expert committee Chairman in the wake of the government discarding the Seneviratne report.
Minister Herath told a post-cabinet media briefing on Tuesday (15) that the cabinet made an unilateral announcement without consulting the Finance Minister. Seneviratne said that he sincerely hoped the cabinet spokesman sought an explanation from the expert committee.
“In fact, Chairman of the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce, Duminda Hulangamuwa who recently received appointment as Senior Economic Affairs Advisor to AKD government was a member of my committee. I’m sure, Hulangamuwa will be able to set the record straight,” Seneviratne said.
Seneviratne’s committee proposed that the basic salary of public service employees would be increased by a minimum of 24% for primary-level service categories. Salaries will gradually increase from an average of 24% to 50%, for all government officials depending on current fiscal feasibility, Seneviratne said, reiterating the need to increase public sector salaries.
Responding to another query, Seneviratne suggested that Deputy Secretary to the Treasury A.K. Senavirathna could explain the salary hikes proposals as he with the support of his team prepared them. “We provided the policy framework, Deputy Treasury Secretary and his team prepared the relevant proposals,” Seneviratne said.
The expert committee undertook the project taking into consideration the ongoing IMF-led programme in which debt restructuring was a key component, Seneviratne said. Whatever various interested parties say for their benefit or in a bid to undermine others, the country is not out of the woods yet, Seneviratne said, adding that the implementation of the salary proposals entirely depended on the new government’s ability to meet revenue targets as recommended by the expert committee.
Perhaps, the recommendations should be divulged by the government to pave the way for public discussions on the issues at hand, Seneviratne said that the JVP-led Jathika Jana Balawegala (JJB) couldn’t side-step the issue by declaring the previous cabinet acted sans Finance Ministry approval.
Seneviratne warned that the country should be prepared to face the consequences of possible delay in securing the next tranche of the IMF’s Extended Fund Facility (EFF) due to the change of government and forthcoming parliamentary election. The former top official asserted that the powers that be and those contesting parliamentary elections should be aware of the gravity of the situation. “Do not forget that debt-repayment of foreign debt is on hold. But, it wouldn’t be fair to discard proposed salary increases and revenue proposals on false grounds,” Seneviratne said.
Commenting on massive local borrowings this month, Seneviratne said that revealed the developing crisis on the public finance front. Matale district SJB leader Rohini Kaviratne recently declared that the new government between Oct 02 and 15, had borrowed as much as Rs. 419,000 mn as it struggled to cope up with falling state revenue.
During the campaign the SJB, too, declared a substantial salary increase though the JJB refrained from doing so.
Seneviratne said that Rs.3,000 interim allowance that had been recently granted to pensioners, too, was proposed by his committee. The government couldn’t deny that, the ex-official said, urging President Dissanayake, who is also the Finance Minister, to seek an explanation from the Treasury regarding the status of the expert committee report.
News
Geneva takes up Sallay’s case and govt. ignores opportunity to answer accusations
The government has chosen not to respond to questions raised by the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) regarding the detention of retired Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay in connection with the ongoing investigations into the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks.
The Criminal Investigation Department (CID) arrested the ex-official in late February this year. The Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health and the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers have jointly raised the issue on 20 July, 2026.
Drawing attention of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to what they called alleged arbitrary detention of Sallay, former Director General of the State Intelligence Service (SIS) and former Director of Military Intelligence (DMI), under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), as well as allegations of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment while in custody, resulting in the grave deterioration of his health, and imminent risks of retaliation through further torture and ill-treatment resulting in irreparable harm, should he be released from hospital and returned to custody, the UN sought the government explanation with a 60-day period.
The UN has stated: “This communication, and any response received from your Excellency’s Government, will be made public via the communications reporting website at the 60 days mark. Should your Excellency’s Government respond within 60 days, both the communication and the response, may be published before the 60 days mark. The communications and responses
will also be made available in the subsequent periodic report to be presented to the Human Rights Council.”
In the absence of the government’s response, the UN posted the letter, dated 20 July, 2026, addressed to President Dissanayake. The full letter can be accessed https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=31125
News
Section of wartime KKS High Security Zone vacated to facilitate economic development in the area
The Army, last week, vacated an area, within the wartime high security zone in the Jaffna peninsula. The Defence Ministry said that an extent of 187.56 acres of land, belonging to the Cement Corporation in Kankesanthurai, Jaffna, has been released by the military. The released land, located in Grama Niladhari Division J/233, Kankesanthurai West, within the Valikamam North (Tellippalai) Divisional Secretariat Division, had been utilised by the Sri Lanka Army since the middle of 1997.
The release of the 187.56-acre extent forms part of the initiative to make State land available for the proposed investment zone in Kankesanthurai, thereby facilitating future investment and economic development in the area.
News
Lawyer lodges complaint against Govt. Printer, Media Ministry Secy.
A complaint has been lodged with the Colombo Fraud Investigation Bureau against the Government Printer and the Secretary to the Ministry of Media regarding the online release of falsified documents bearing a forged Speaker’s certificate.
Attorney-at-Law Aruna Laksiri has lodged a complaint with the Colombo Fraud Investigation Bureau requesting legal action against the Government Printer of the Department of Government Printing (No. 118, Dr. Danister de Silva Mawatha, Colombo 08), Prasanna Jayaratne, and the Secretary to the Ministry of Mass Media (Asidisi Medura, 163, Kirulapone Mawatha, Polhengoda, Colombo 05), Dr. Anil Jasinghe.
The complaint alleges the commission of offences by forging and uploading falsified documents online using a forged Speaker’s certification, failure to perform statutory duties, and misappropriation of public property.
The complaint states that a copy of the English translation of the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution was downloaded and printed from the official website of the Government Printing Department (www.documents.gov.lk), which operates under the Ministry of Mass Media. On its outer cover and on page 1, the text “certified on 25th of September, 2026” is inscribed inside brackets.
The complaint pointed out that the Speaker has certified an English translation. Under Articles 23, 79, 83, and 80 of the Constitution, Parliament enacts laws and the Speaker certifies bills strictly in the Sinhala and Tamil languages; under the Constitution, therefore the Speaker cannot apply such certification to an English translation.
-
Latest News5 days agoGold winner Tharanga gets brand-new Honda Vezel from SLAAJ
-
Features6 days agoWhy Sri Lanka needs an Inclusive Civic Nationalism – urgently
-
News5 days agoUS-assisted ‘Ice’ detection: NPC to examine IGP’s move to transfer drug-busting team
-
Features7 days agoThailand’s biggest new global star …
-
News7 days agoFirst cases taken up by SC after enactment of 22A dismissed
-
News6 days agoCivil society activist accuses govt. of favouring Ven. Gnanasara
-
Editorial4 days agoColombo Port drug bust: The plot thickens
-
Editorial7 days agoAftershocks of 22A
