Features
CONTINUOUS BRICS NO-SHOW: WHAT’S SRI LANKA SIGNALLING THE WORLD?
By Sanja de Silva Jayatilleka
Since President AKD took office, Sri Lanka has not attended any of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) Summits at the political leadership level. There have been three of those: the 16th Summit in Russia in 2024, the 17th Summit in Brazil in 2025, and the 18th held in September 2026, in neighboring India.
What’s inexplicable is that Sri Lanka formally submitted an application for membership of the BRICS in 2024. The government’s decision was announced by Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath after Cabinet approval had been obtained for it in October 2024. However, President AKD who was personally invited by President Putin, declined the invitation to spend just two days at the summit. Instead, he sent the Foreign Secretary, who submitted the application. Sri Lanka failed to gain membership, but the application has not been formally rejected.
While several countries vied to get membership of the BRICS, it was surely predictable that Sri Lanka was not going to be handed membership in absentia! As the Russian Ambassador to Sri Lanka told a Colombo audience, it takes more than just an application to obtain the privilege:
“Ambassador Dzhagaryan stated that he has not seen much interest at the moment and therefore requested Sri Lanka to take some practical steps, if it is serious about joining BRICS.” He also gave some friendly advice: “He urged Sri Lankan officials to engage diplomatically with all BRICS nations, particularly Brazil, to pursue membership.” He explained that “While Russia and China support Sri Lanka’s interest in joining BRICS, the final decision rests collectively with all member countries, including Brazil, which currently chairs the bloc”. (https://pulseline.lk/uncategorized/lack-of-political-will-delays-sri-lankas-entry-into-brics-says-russian-ambassador/)
This was said at an event held at the Bandaranaike Centre for nternational Studies (BCIS) in May 2025. The next BRICS summit was to be held just a few weeks away in early July 2025, in Brazil. This sound advice fell on deaf ears. Sri Lanka decided not to go to Brazil. That’s pure genius.
In 2024, BRICS initiated a new category called BRICS Partner States, for those countries that did not obtain full membership. Since then, 10 countries have obtained partnership status: Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Uganda, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.
The full members of BRICS are Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa being the original five members, and subsequent additions, Egypt, Indonesia, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
The next BRICS summit was in India, this month. We could have lobbied for partnership status at least, had we gone to India. By this time though, Sri Lanka was truly out in the cold. There is no confirmation that there was an invitation to attend from Prime Minister Modi. In Delhi, Sri Lanka was not even outside looking in, it wasn’t there at all.
The Delhi Declaration at the 18th Summit reflects the consensus of the BRICS nations, which Sri Lanka could have endorsed had it been a partner country. Or is it the case that these aspirations, such as strengthening multilateralism, multipolarity, and the central role of the United Nations are no longer viewed as in keeping with Sri Lanka’s national interest and endorsing it was not a preference or even an option? Just a small extract gives the flavor of the declaration:
“On the landmark occasion of the 20th anniversary of BRICS, we reiterate our commitment to reforming and improving global governance by promoting a more just, equitable, agile, effective, efficient, responsive, representative, legitimate, democratic and accountable international and multilateral system in the spirit of extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits.
Bearing in mind the need to adapt the current architecture of international relations to better reflect the contemporary realities, we reiterate our commitment to strengthening multilateralism and multipolarity and to upholding international law, including the Purposes and Principles of the Charter of the United Nations (UN) in their entirety and interconnectedness in a balanced and inclusive manner, as its indispensable cornerstone, and the central role of the UN in the international system in which sovereign states cooperate to maintain peace and security, advance sustainable development, ensure the promotion and protection of democracy, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, and promote cooperation based on the spirit of solidarity, mutual respect, justice and equality while respecting national circumstances, diversity of national systems and development pathways, with the aim to build a brighter shared future for the international community based on mutually beneficial cooperation.” (https://www.brics2026.gov.in/brics-document/)
Sri Lanka has also sought membership of the new BRICS bank, for development financing. Predictably, it has not yet got very far with that either. For a country in an economic crisis, this administration is exceptionally negligent in ensuring its best chances at securing sources of funding from its traditional friends.
This laissez-faire attitude to building relationships with Global South multilateral institutions, is surely not without cost. It contrasts with the remarkable enthusiasm that the NPP government displays in rushing to establish connections with institutions in the West.
Ports and NATO: All of a piece?
Upul Joseph Fernando writing in the Mawrata reported the following:
“A few days before the BRICS Summit in India, the head of the U.S. Maritime Administration, Laura Di Bella, and Commissioner Robert J. Harvey visited Sri Lanka. After meeting senior government officials, they toured the Colombo Port and attended an International maritime conference.
“Prior to this visit, the Governor of the Western Province and the Deputy Minister of Ports had attended the U.S. Forum on Indian Ocean Ports and Supply Chains in Washington. They also held discussions with U.S. officials.
“Following these engagements, the U.S. Maritime Administration chief and the commissioner visited Sri Lanka. During their visit, the Minister of Ports requested U.S. assistance for the construction of the second West Container Terminal and to expand Colombo Port’s breakwater system. The two sides held discussions on these matters.” https://mawratanews.lk/news/while-the-usa-eyes-colombo-port-sri-lanka-misses-the-brics-summit/
Sri Lanka which is aspiring to become a transshipment hub, spotting the opportunity to better position itself as the Strait of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandab are mired in conflicts, cannot be faulted. A healthy injection of 15 million USD to digitalize the Colombo port cannot be scoffed at either.
However, if it is seen that Colombo is throwing in its lot with one part of the world at the expense of its relationship with its partners in the part of the world to which Sri Lanka actually belongs, it may signal consequences and changes that we didn’t see coming.
The request made to NATO for assistance to modernize the Sri Lankan Military by the Secretary Defence elicited much commentary, especially since this was a first for Sri Lanka. For the most part NATO countries withheld ‘offensive’ military assistance to Sri Lanka during its war against the Tigers, and the country had to turn to its Asian friends for training and equipment. NATO is also in direct confrontation now against a long-time friend of Sri Lanka and member of BRICS, Russia. This turn of events is of legitimate concern.
Sri Lanka’s experience of its recent history, and the western perception of the conduct of the war that ended in 2009, still haunts certain UN forums. Allegations of war crimes are spearheaded by the member countries of NATO. While credible cases of excesses cannot be stopped from being discussed internationally, what if some of the more exaggerated claims of the pro-LTTE diaspora trigger a sudden withholding of support? Even more worrying, what if other demands that have nothing to do with human rights but Great Power rivalry, crop up?
Despite these worries, a former officer of the military recently wrote in the Daily Mirror that this move by the NPP government “…tells us that Sri Lanka is looking beyond traditional bilateral defence relationships as it considers how to modernize its security architecture.” He continues to commend the choice:
“The United States has an established interest in maritime security, freedom of navigation, disaster response, humanitarian assistance and regional stability.
“Sri Lanka does not need strategic isolation.
“The current interest from India, China, the United States, Japan, France, Türkiye and NATO should therefore not be viewed as a competition for Sri Lanka. It should be viewed as an opportunity for Sri Lanka to build a modern, resilient and technologically capable state, while remaining firmly in control of its own strategic choices.”https://www.dailymirror.lk/news-features/Sri-Lankas-Strategic-Balancing-Act-Opportunity-or-New-Geopolitical-Trap/131-350325
While Sri Lanka has never aspired to isolation, it has been cognizant that in order to “remain firmly in control of its strategic choices”, it has to consider its policy choices carefully. Being a small island, there have been times that governments have found that they had no choice at all, such as when India objected to allowing a Chinese submarine in Sri Lankan waters.
Was it a choice for the AKD government, when it let an Iranian ship with around 100 sailors not at war with any country, to be blown to bits by an American submarine, while just off our territorial waters? Who made such a choice?
Sri Lanka knew, together with other global south countries, that in the current global and economic order, the safer option lies in partnerships and alliances within region, with similar notions of global equilibrium. Its membership of the Non-Aligned Movement for instance, helped it to punch above its weight, and prevail at certain contestations at the UN.
Human Rights and Wrongs
Sri Lanka’s foreign policy positioning affects more than just one area of concern.
Recently, a retired Ambassador, bemoaning the continuing censure of Sri Lanka at the UN Human Rights Council wrote that “The core systemic flaw of the UNHRC lies in its structural asymmetry.”
This is factually false. The voting members at the UNHRC are carefully selected according to “equitable geographical distribution”. This means that the Global South countries have a higher number of votes than those of the North! As long as our Foreign Policy establishment continues to blame non-existing structural asymmetries and obstacles to Sri Lanka’s woes at the UN, they would never be able to strategize a realistic success at those forums.
The ex-Ambassador writes that in order to avoid what he calls “diplomatic entrapment” at the UNHRC, Sri Lanka should recall the historical context and continues to elaborate on it, but avoids mentioning the one time in our diplomatic history that Sri Lanka actually got the better of efforts to censure it at the same venue. Instead, he writes:
“Rather than receiving international validation for this massive rescue mission, the nation that ended the largest-ever humanitarian hostage crisis was later penalized by external critics who completely inverted the narrative.” https://www.ft.lk/columns/Geneva-double-standard-Why-Sri-Lanka-remains-in-UNHRC-crosshairs/4-797283
In 2009, at the 11th Special Session on Sri Lanka, days after the war ended, some countries of the Global North did try to “invert the narrative” but despite that, Sri Lanka did in fact receive “international validation for this massive rescue mission” and also a commendation for “the nation that ended the largest-ever humanitarian hostage crisis”.
As long as retired Ambassadors and the foreign policy establishment, for whatever reason, are reluctant to acknowledge the singular diplomatic victory at the most difficult time, they will not study the process that led to that overwhelming victory, glean its lessons and therefore be able to strategize similar victories in Geneva.
They will not learn that our membership of NAM and the active lobbying of its members in Geneva ensured that the winning resolution was submitted not in isolation, but indeed as a NAM resolution with all its 118 members signing off on it.
They will not know that the Sri Lankan Ambassador/Permanent Representative worked actively to ensure that all member countries of the BRICS, which only had its inaugural meeting in June 2009, supported Sri Lanka’s resolution. They will not learn that the UN Permanent Representative of South Africa, battled her own Foreign Ministry under pressure from the Tamil Diaspora, to vote for Sri Lanka. She had personally urged the Sri Lankan Ambassador to take on the difficult task of chairing the Durban Review Conference on Racism, because she trusted his integrity and negotiating skills at a tricky moment of the Conference. Having done so, she also trusted the Ambassador’s narrative on Sri Lanka at the Council, however hard the West tried to invert it.
Those who ignore that win, will not accept that the UN is not an abstract entity that is structurally incapable of being persuaded of a different point of view, even when there is evidence of an unambiguous victory by a Sri Lankan team at a vote, to prove the contrary.
Policy decisions made by governments affect people, ordinary people. Perceptions of our human rights record affect our economics, GSP plus facility, being just one, military assistance being another. When we do not make use of every global forum to build relationships, to intervene in the system of global governance to ensure better decisions, put a face to the name and persuade other leaders at every forum of Sri Lanka’s case in whichever domain, there is a cost. Having incurred it, it is a pity that Sri Lanka is reduced to offering excuses, rather than course correct to win.
Features
El Niño and Sri Lanka: Safeguarding food security in uncertain times
by Prof. Janaka Wijesinghe, Dr. Nishala Wedamulla and Gayathma Weerawanni
As climate variability becomes an increasing challenge for nations worldwide, Sri Lanka faces growing concerns over the impact of El Niño, a natural climate phenomenon that can disrupt rainfall patterns, increase temperatures, and place additional pressure on agricultural production. For a country where agriculture remains a vital part of the economy and rural livelihoods, preparing for climate uncertainty has become essential to safeguarding food security. Food security includes not only the availability of food but also access to nutritious and affordable food.
Climate-induced disruptions to agricultural production can affect all dimensions of food security. Vulnerable populations, including low-income households and rural communities, are often the most affected by fluctuations in food supply and market prices.
Cause of the phenomenon
El Niño occurs when sea surface temperatures in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean become unusually warmer than normal, influencing global weather patterns. Although the phenomenon originates thousands of kilometres away, its effects are felt across many regions, including South Asia. According to experts, in Sri Lanka, El Niño events can contribute to irregular rainfall, prolonged dry periods, higher temperatures, and changes in the timing and intensity of monsoon rains.
Sri Lanka’s agriculture sector is particularly vulnerable to these climate fluctuations and faces increasing challenges from climate variability, with the El Niño phenomenon emerging as one of the most significant threats to national food security. As global temperatures continue to rise, understanding and preparing for the impacts of El Niño has become essential for ensuring a stable food supply and protecting the livelihoods of millions of Sri Lankans. Mainly, rice, the staple food of Sri Lanka, depends heavily on reliable water availability.
Reduced rainfall during critical cultivation periods can lead to drought conditions, lower reservoir levels, and can affect paddy yields, while excessive rainfall at unexpected times can damage the crop through flooding, diseases, and poor field conditions. In addition, other crops, including vegetables, fruits, and plantation crops, may also experience productivity losses due to heat stress and water shortages. These impacts can result in food shortages, rising food prices, and reduced incomes for farming communities.
The consequences of climate-related agricultural disruptions extend beyond farmers. Reduced crop production can lead to increased food prices, greater dependence on imports, and challenges in maintaining a stable food supply. For vulnerable communities, especially small-scale farmers and low-income households, these impacts can significantly affect nutrition and livelihoods.
Need to reduce postharvest losses
In such circumstances, reducing postharvest losses becomes a critical component of national food security strategies. Food that is produced but lost after harvesting represents wasted land, water, energy, labour, and financial resources invested in the production. In Sri Lanka, significant quantities of fruits, vegetables, grains, and other agricultural commodities are lost due to inadequate harvesting practices, poor postharvest handling, unsuitable storage conditions, inefficient transportation, and limited processing facilities. During periods of climate stress, such as El Niño-induced droughts, these losses become even more serious because the available food supply is already under pressure. Minimising postharvest losses can, therefore, increase food availability without requiring additional land or agricultural inputs. Hence, strengthening postharvest management can make a major contribution to climate resilience. Improved harvesting techniques, better packaging, temperature-controlled storage, efficient transportation systems, and modern processing technologies can extend the shelf life of agricultural products and reduce wastage.
How to face challenges
Promoting small-scale processing and value addition can also help farmers preserve surplus production and maintain income during periods of market fluctuations. Achieving food security in an era of climate uncertainty requires a comprehensive approach that considers both production and preservation. Increasing agricultural productivity alone is not sufficient if a significant portion of harvested food is lost before reaching consumers. Reducing postharvest losses should be recognised as one of the most practical, cost-effective, and sustainable solutions for ensuring food availability.
Moreover, Sri Lanka has opportunities to strengthen its resilience against El Niño-related challenges. Improving climate forecasting systems and ensuring that farmers receive timely weather information can help communities make better decisions on planting dates, crop selection, and water management. Climate-smart agricultural practices, such as drought-tolerant crop varieties, efficient irrigation methods, soil conservation, and improved water storage, can reduce risks associated with changing weather patterns. Water management remains one of the most important strategies for climate resilience. Expanding rainwater harvesting, maintaining irrigation systems, and protecting watersheds can help communities manage water shortages during dry periods.
Importance of climate-smart agriculture
At the same time, Sri Lanka must continue to promote climate-smart agricultural practices. The use of drought-tolerant crop varieties, efficient irrigation systems, soil conservation methods, and improved weather forecasting services can help farmers adapt to changing climate conditions. Providing timely climate information enables farmers to make informed decisions regarding crop selection, planting schedules, and resource management.
Investment in research and innovation will also play a key role. Agricultural institutions and researchers can support farmers by developing technologies and practices suited to changing climatic conditions. Promoting crop diversification can further reduce dependence on a limited number of crops and provide alternative sources of income during periods of climatic stress.
Food security in the face of climate change requires cooperation among government agencies, farmers, researchers, private-sector stakeholders, and communities. Early warning systems, disaster preparedness plans, and supportive agricultural policies can help minimise the effects of extreme climate events. As climate uncertainty becomes the new normal, proactive measures are essential to protect Sri Lanka’s food future. While El Niño presents significant challenges, strategic planning, innovation, and collaboration can help the nation build resilience and ensure that every citizen has access to safe, nutritious, and affordable food. More importantly, policy support is crucial in building a resilient food system. Government agencies, research institutions, and the private sector must work together to develop sustainable agricultural practices and strengthen food supply chains. Diversifying food production and reducing post-harvest losses can also contribute to greater food security.
El Niño as a stark reminder
El Niño is a reminder that climate challenges do not respect geographical boundaries. While Sri Lanka cannot control global climate phenomena, it can strengthen its ability to adapt and respond. By combining scientific knowledge, sustainable farming practices, and effective planning, the nation can protect its food systems and ensure a more secure future in an era of increasing climate uncertainty.
As the climate continues to change, preparedness is no longer an option; it is a necessity for protecting Sri Lanka’s food security and the livelihoods of generations to come.
Features
Getting organised for the new arrival
BY Dr B. J. C. Perera
MBBS(Cey), DCH(Cey), DCH(Eng), MD(Paediatrics), MRCP(UK), FRCP(Edin), FRCP(Lond),
FRCPCH(UK), FSLCPaed, FCCP, Hony. FRCPCH(UK), Hony. FCGP(SL)
Specialist Consultant Paediatrician and Honorary Senior Fellow,
Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
An independent freelance medical correspondent
KEY POINTS
=Being parents of a newborn baby is a tremendous responsibility.
=To attend to the necessary chores and duties at home, the home set-up must be well organised.
=The routine care of a baby, throughout 24 hours, is a demanding one. But if things are well looked after and prearranged, it would make the task that much easier.
=It is a joint responsibility of the mother, as well as the father, and all other inmates of the same household.
At long last, the baby has arrived, and the parents will be taking him or her home. Usually in uncomplicated deliveries, even after Caesarean operations, the baby is sent home in a couple of days. It is generally a hectic time, and if steps have not already been taken to get things organised at home, it can be quite difficult for new parents. Getting things in shape should have started well before the baby’s birth, but even if he or she arrives earlier and unexpectedly, getting organised at that stage is important to make life easier for both parents. This is perhaps easier said than done, especially for a young couple, but it is a process that would pay dividends. All that is required is plenty of common sense. Getting organised for the newborn baby well in time will make life that much easier in the subsequent months and years to come.
An important thing to do is to arrange everything in the bedroom so that the ‘baby things’ are easily accessible and you know where to find each item. As an example, it should not be necessary to look high and low for nappy pins once a nappy has been put on the baby. What is advocated today is to keep the baby in the same bed as the parents, and this means an extra cot may not always be necessary. It would also provide a little more space in the room, which would otherwise have been taken up by a cot. However, a small baby cot is sometimes useful to put the baby to sleep and provide some rest and relaxation to the mother.
If the baby is kept on the same bed as the mother, there is no danger of the mother rolling over the baby during sleep, as the natural in-built maternal instincts would wake her up at the slightest touch from the baby or the tiniest noise from the baby.
Clothes and nappies
The clothes and nappies of the baby should be easily accessible and available at all times. It is not necessary to buy a new almirah or a cupboard for the baby. A couple of shelves of a cupboard that is already in the bedroom would do nicely. Even a small separate wooden or cane rack with shelves too would be more than adequate for this purpose. The secret is to still have sufficient room in your own bedroom to move about even after getting the baby’s things organised. Sweeping and cleaning the bedroom should be done every day. Some people elect to wet-mop the floor, which is a really good thing. These tasks should not take too much time and could be quickly attended to when the baby is resting quietly after a feed.
Other people in the household and perhaps the father of the baby could help in this regard. Battery torch lights and emergency lights for power failures should be kept in places that are easily accessible, even in the dark. It is no joke to start looking for these things when there is a loss of electrical power. One needs to be prepared, as such unexpected power failures are so very frequent in certain areas of the country. Incidentally, there is nothing against the use of electric fans in the bedroom where the baby is.
During very warm days, it will only make the baby more comfortable. It will not cause any illness. The same applies to air conditioners, provided they are maintained well and serviced regularly. If there is a telephone in the house, it would be worthwhile getting a cordless extension so that the mother does not have to run around in circles to answer the phone while attending to the needs of the baby. This is of course minimised completely today with the use of modern mobile phones.
Feeding the baby should not cause any problems at all. The need of the hour is to exclusively breastfeed for the first six months. THERE IS NO OTHER MILK THAT COMES EVEN CLOSE TO THE GOODNESS OF MOTHER’S MILK – FULL STOP; NO ARGUMENTS AND NO BUTS. There is extremely convincing and overriding scientific evidence for breast milk being the very best form of nutrition for a new arrival. It is the golden elixir of life, and there is nothing else, absolutely nothing else, that is as good as mother’s milk for a baby. The infant milk-food companies can even shout from the rooftops but they have no chance, whatsoever, against proven scientific medical evidence. It is also important to stress that babies need to be fed on demand and very definitely NOT BY THE CLOCK. All babies will indicate by various actions when they are hungry and feel the need to be fed.
Breastfeeding obviates need for bottles, etc.,
Exclusive breastfeeding would obviate the need for bottles, teats, cups, spoons, formula milk powder, sterilising equipment, etc. There is no extra cost involved as well. Government legislation has provided working mothers with sufficient maternity leave to feed their babies with human milk for at least the first four months. If there are ways of getting a little bit more leave to stretch it to six months, this should be explored to the fullest, as the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding are worth a lot more than money could buy. There are added benefits of breastfeeding such as control of the mother’s weight and figure as she burns up a significant number of calories in producing her milk.
When it is time to give the baby a bath, arrange everything you need around the place where you are going to bathe the baby. Towels, soap, etc., should be at arm’s length. If there is help available at home in the form of members of the extended family or domestic aides, this is the time you could really make use of them. When the mother gets used to the procedure, bathing a baby is no big deal. In most instances, it is a thing that both mother and baby would enjoy. Get the baby used to bathing as early as possible. This will prevent him or her from making an almighty fuss at bath time later on. Almost all babies love to be in water provided they are introduced to bathing very early in their lives.
The mother must arrange her mealtimes and resting periods to coincide with the times when the baby is quiet or is sleeping. Mother’s meals just need to be nutritious, and everyday foods are more than adequate. It is not necessary to go out of the way to provide her with expensive supplementary foods or additional forms of nutrition. There is no scientific evidence to say that certain foods are not good for nursing mothers. The notions of “heaty” foods and “cooling” foods have no scientific rationale.
Most authorities believe that a nursing mother could and should eat anything and everything. The only thing necessary is to provide a nicely balanced and adequate diet. The mother needs to get a sufficient and acceptable amount of sleep, especially during the day. This is particularly important because she may have to get up several times during the night to feed and change clothes of the baby. Steps must be taken to provide her with these essential periods of rest. Organising a routine to help her with this aspect would be most desirable.
Father’s work schedule
It is also advantageous for the father to get his work schedules and duties rearranged as much as possible and in such a manner so as to provide sufficient time at home to help in caring for the baby. This, of course, depends on the exact type of work that he is involved in. In each and every case, a genuine effort should be made to have quality time with the mother and the baby. This is particularly useful for the first few months of the baby’s life. As far as possible, the father should be equally involved with the rearing practices of the baby. Looking after a baby should be a shared responsibility. This process also enhances the baby developing a very beneficial and desirable bond with both parents.
The arrival of a new baby should not lead to a complete social embargo for the family. One could travel outside the home with the baby, especially if the times of travel are carefully planned to suit the requirements of the baby, such as feeding times. Even then, if the baby is breastfed, he or she could be fed almost anywhere. Some babies are, however, prone to throwing up while travelling immediately after a feed. It is generally better to avoid intensely overcrowded social gatherings, but social visiting, attending weddings and parties, with the baby in tow, are quite in order, even when the baby is just a few weeks old.
If the parents own a car, it is a good idea to get a commercially available baby car seat that is fitted to the rear seat of the car. The sooner you get the baby used to travelling in this baby seat, the better it is for all around. It is the safest way to take the baby in the car. In some of the Western countries, newborn babies are not discharged from the hospital till a car seat is fitted to the car. Unfortunately, baby car seats are not that popular in this country, but it must be pointed out that they contribute a great deal towards the safety of a baby in the case of a traffic accident.
Unnecessary expenditure
Many parents spend unnecessary amounts of money on a baby. All kinds of expensive items, such as perfumes, colognes, powders, etc., are not quite essential for a baby. The natural milky smell of a baby is quite unique. The clothes that one buys for a baby should be simple, uncomplicated, light and preferably of cotton origin. Their design should be very safe for the baby. It is best to remember that babies grow up very fast, especially in the first two years of life and tend to outgrow clothes in next to no time. Even the toys for the baby should be appropriately selected and should be very safe and eminently affordable.
There is no reason whatsoever that the expenses for a little newborn baby should be more than what one would normally need to spend on an adult.
A newborn baby should be such a joy for the entire family, including the extended family. Grandparents would usually dote on the baby. If there are other children, it is important to provide the necessary attention to them as well so that they would not feel neglected. It would prevent sibling rivalry, and the other kids would go on to love the new arrival. All newborn babies are quite a delight and not a burden, and it is definitely their right to be treated as such.
Features
Shouldn’t foreign expert be appointed MD of SLP?
by J. A. A. S.R anasinghe,
Productivity Specialist
rathula49@gmail.com
The recent appointment of Vipul Misra, an Indian national, as Acting Chief Executive Officer of Sri Lankan Airlines deserves to be viewed from a much broader perspective than simply as an appointment to a vacant position. In my view, it is a sensible and courageous decision by the Government.
Sri Lankan Airlines is a national asset operating in an intensely competitive international aviation industry. It requires specialised aviation knowledge, commercial acumen, operational discipline and international exposure. According to the report on his appointment, Misra brings more than two decades of aviation engineering and leadership experience, including experience with major Indian carriers such as Air India, Vistara, IndiGo, SpiceJet, Kingfisher Airlines and Air Deccan.
Dr. Sarath Obeysekera, a high-profile CEO and the former Managing Director of Colombo Dockyard PLC contends the appropriateness of filling senior corporate positions of the public sector from foreign nationals, when positions of high-calibre CEOs are not locally available. He says that Sri Lankan Airlines has previously benefited from expatriate professional leadership. During the Emirates management period from 1998 to 2008, British aviation professional Peter Hill led the airline through rebranding, fleet modernisation, network expansion and improvements in service standards.
The airline reported profits during several of those years, although later analysis showed that gains from aircraft sales and leaseback transactions contributed significantly to some results. Nevertheless, the airline was run with greater commercial discipline, clearer accountability and considerably less day-to-day political interference.
Following the end of Emirates management, due to direct intervention by the then President, Sri Lankan Airlines faced turbulent situations and passed through numerous chairmen, chief executives, restructuring proposals, procurement controversies and political interventions while taxpayers continued to carry its debts and losses.
It would be unfair to suggest that every Sri Lankan chairman or CEO was incompetent or corrupt. Sri Lanka has produced many outstanding aviation professionals. The deeper problem has been a governance system in which even capable executives can be weakened by political appointments, interference in commercial decisions, frequent leadership changes and the absence of measurable accountability. He says that the arrival of Indian professional leadership is not limited to aviation.
Colombo Dockyard presents another significant example. Following the acquisition of a controlling interest by India’s state-owned Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders, Capt. Jagmohan was appointed its non-executive chairman. He is a naval architect with extensive experience in warship design, naval dockyards, shipbuilding and major maritime projects. (Mazagon Dock leadership)
This partnership could give Colombo Dockyard access to capital, technology, Indian and international orders, specialised naval work and a much larger supply chain. However, because the Dockyard is an important national maritime asset, success must be measured by the creation of skilled Sri Lankan employment, expansion into commercial and offshore engineering, growth in exports, transfer of technology and development of local managerial successors—not merely by a change of ownership or boardroom nationality.
The rise of Indian professionals should not surprise us. Sundar Pichai leads Alphabet and Google, while Indian-born executives have led several other globally important technology and industrial corporations. India has built an enormous pool of engineers, scientists, accountants and managers through technical education, English-language capability, exposure to large competitive markets and international professional mobility.
India’s formal national ambition is Viksit Bharat 2047—to become a developed nation by the centenary of its independence. The target is 2047 rather than 2040, and its vision specifically combines economic growth, skills, social progress, sustainability and good governance. (Government of India)
The important lesson is that nationality should not be the principal criterion for selecting the person to lead a strategically important State enterprise. Competence should be, according to Dr. Obeysekera. This principle should now be extended to another equally important national institution — the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA), as this post has fallen vacant and an advertisement has appeared in the newspapers calling for applications from suitable applicants.
The recent discussion surrounding the vacant substantive post of Managing Director of the SLPA, including Dr. Sarath Obeysekera’s call for the appointment of a “developer, not merely an administrator”, raises a fundamental question: Are we looking for someone merely to administer the existing machinery of the Ports Authority, or someone capable of transforming Sri Lanka’s ports into major engines of investment, industry, employment and foreign-exchange earnings?
The distinction is crucial. On the other hand, one should not be over excited for the manner in which foreign nationals are employed not in hundred perhaps in thousands in manual operational activities in heavy industries in Sri Lanka. In the case of Shipbuilding and Construction industries, the deployment of welders and skilled workers have now become a norm rather than an exception.
Sri Lanka possesses enormous maritime advantages. Colombo is strategically located on one of the world’s busiest shipping routes, while Hambantota and Trincomalee offer substantial possibilities for future development. Yet the challenge is no longer simply to operate ports efficiently. The country must develop the ecosystem around them — logistics, ship repair, shipbuilding, offshore services, maritime industries, warehousing, bunkering, technology, investment and related export-oriented activities.
This requires a different type of leadership. The government should therefore consider applying the same bold thinking demonstrated in the Sri Lankan Airlines appointment to the SLPA. If the best person to transform the Ports Authority is a Sri Lankan, appoint that person. If the best candidate is an internationally recognised professional from India, Singapore, Dubai, Europe, Japan or elsewhere, why should nationality become a barrier?
Indeed, the Sri Lanka Ports Authority Act itself provides that the Minister shall appoint a “competent and experienced person” as Managing Director, whose responsibility includes directing the business, exercising the Authority’s functions and controlling its employees. That statutory emphasis on competence and experience should guide the selection.
What Sri Lanka needs is not another appointment based primarily on seniority, institutional familiarity or traditional public-sector credentials. It needs a leader with a proven international track record in port development, maritime logistics, commercialisation, investment attraction and large-scale project execution. Such a person should be given clear targets and held accountable for delivering them.
The appointment of an international professional should not be regarded as an admission of failure on the part of Sri Lankan professionals. On the contrary, it would demonstrate confidence in the principle that Sri Lanka’s national assets deserve the best available talent, wherever that talent may be found.
The government has already demonstrated this new approach through the Sri Lankan Airlines appointment. I respectfully suggest that it should now have the courage to apply the same principle to the Sri Lanka Ports Authority.
Our national assets are too valuable to be confined to a search for talent within national boundaries. The best person for the job should be given the job irrespective of nationality.
-
News4 days agoUS embassy won’t comment on IGP’s probe into joint drug raid
-
News3 days agoBid for Basil’s extradition nears final stage: Police
-
Features6 days agoThe emptying university: why are academics leaving?
-
Business4 days agoAll-new Bolero MaXX unveiled in Sri Lanka
-
News2 days agoShanakiyan urges urgent action over reported death sentence for Lankan in Saudi Arabia
-
Opinion6 days agoWho committed genocide and created mass graves in Sri Lanka?
-
Opinion4 days agoA journalist who wrote across the divide
-
Weather6 days agoShowers above 100 mm expected at times in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva and Southern provinces, and in Ampara and Batticaloa districts
