Connect with us

News

Church welcomes Prez’s promise to move against those named in Easter Sunday PCoI

Published

on

Maithripala Sirisena, Nilantha J, two senior AG Department officials among the culprits

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Catholic Church yesterday (25) welcomed President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s declaration that the government had the required 2/3 majority in Parliament to take action against those who had been named in the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) by introducing a new Act in Parliament.

Top spokesperson for the Church Rev Fr. Cyril Gamini Fernando told The Island that the Church had repeatedly asked for the full implementation of the recommendations made by the PCoI.

Rev. Fernando said that the Church launched a sustained campaign due to the inordinate delay on the part of the government to act on the PCoI recommendations.

The PCoI handed over its report to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa on Feb 01 this year.

Having vested the newly built Kelani Bridge with the people, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa warned the Opposition not to push the government on the issue at hand as it enjoyed the parliamentary majority needed to enact necessary legislation to punish the culprits.

Rev. Fernando emphasised that the stand taken up by the Catholic Church in respect of the PCoI recommendations was clear. Responding to a query, Rev Fernando said that the Catholic Church quite clearly accepted the composition of the PCoI, appointed on Sept 21, 2019 by the then President Maithripala Sirisena. In spite of the change of government two months later, the Catholic Church accepted the composition of the PCoI, Rev Fernando said, adding that a team of lawyers represented the Catholic Church at the PCoI.

Now that President Gotabaya Rajapaksa has assured that his administration would act on the recommendations, the Catholic Church hoped the government would go the whole hog.

The five-member PCoI consisted of Appellate Court Judge Janak de Silva (Chairman), Appeal Court Judge Nissanka Bandula Karunarathna, Retired Judge of the Court of Appeal Nihal Sunil Rajapaksa, Retired Judge of the High Court Bandula Kumara Atapattu and retired Ministry Secretary Ms. W.M.M. Adikari.

Asked whether the Catholic Church would give up its campaign both here and abroad to pressure the government over the delay in the judicial process, Rev. Fernando said the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) had so far questioned him for three days –over a period of 15- 16 hours subsequent to a complaint lodged by State Intelligence Service (SIS) Chief Maj. Gen. Suresh Salley. “The Catholic Church had no option but to seek justice whatever the consequences as we felt efforts are being made to discard PCoI recommendations,” Rev. Fernando said.

Rev. Fernando pointed out that one of those who had been named by the PCoI, Senior DIG Nilantha Jayawardena, Maj. Gen. Salley’s predecessor was a key prosecution witness now.

The National Catholic Committee for Justice in July this year urged President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to implement the PCoI’s recommendations in respect of the then President Maithripala Sirisena, who is also the leader of the SLFP and the then Prime Minister and the leader of the UNP Ranil Wickremesinghe.

The SLFP with 14-member group is the second biggest constituent in the government.

The Church released an 18-page report that had been sent to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. The report dealt with specific alleged lapses on the part of the incumbent government.

Referring to the PCoI report (PCoI Final Report Vol. 1, p 265), the Church asked why the government had refrained from initiating criminal proceedings against Sirisena under suitable provisions in the Penal Code.

The Church also found fault with the PCoI for failing to make specific recommendations in respect of UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe, though it recognized his role in facilitating Islamic extremism. Referring to PCoI assessment of PM Wickremesinghe’s soft approach towards Islamic extremism that paved the way for the Easter Sunday carnage (P CoI Final Report Vol 1, p 276-277), the Church said that they couldn’t comprehend why specific recommendation was not made.

Archbishop of Colombo Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith told a July media briefing that Wickremesinghe’s lax approach and irresponsible attitude should have been thoroughly investigated.

The Cardinal on behalf of the National Catholic Committee for Justice declared that unless the government addressed their grievances they would be compelled to resort to other means to obtain justice.

Noting that legal action had been initiated against the then Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando over his failure to thwart the Easter Sunday bombings, the Catholic Church asked why action hadn’t been taken in respect of the then Chief of National Intelligence retired DIG Sisira Mendis and Director of State Intelligence Service Senior DIG Nilantha Jayawardena. The Church pointed out that the PCoI had recommended that the Attorney General should consider criminal proceedings against Mendis and Jayawardena under any suitable provision in the Penal Code.

The Church stressed that the P CoI made the recommendation on the basis that the available evidence indicated that there was criminal liability on the part of both Mendis and Jayewardena.

The following are the P CoI recommendations in respect of the then Senior DIG Western Province Nandana Munasinghe (criminal liability), DIG Colombo North Deshabandu Tennakoon (disciplinary inquiry), SP Colombo North Sanjeewa Bandara (criminal liability), SP Chandana Atukorale (criminal liability), Director Western Province Intelligence Division B.E.I. Prasanna (criminal liability), ASP S. Kumara (disciplinary inquiry), Acting OIC, Fort Chief Inspector R.M. Sarath Kumarasinghe (criminal liability), OIC Fort Chief Inspector Sagara Wilegoda Liyanage (criminal liability) and OIC Katana Chaminda Nawaratne (disciplinary inquiry).

Rev. Fernando stressed that contrary to claims the Church hadn’t been given access to the full report. The Church spokesperson pointed out that the PCoI recommended the Public Service Commission take disciplinary action against State Counsel Malik Azeez and Deputy Solicitor General Azad Navani for their failure that may have contributed to the Easter Sunday carnage.

The PCoI also made reference to ACMC leader Rishad Bathiudeen, his brother, Riyaj Bathiudeen, Dr. Muhamad Zulyan Muhamad Zafras, Ahamed Lukman Thalib and M.L.A.M. Hizbullah.



Latest News

INS Udaygiri makes port call in Colombo

Published

on

By

The Indian Naval Ship (INS) Udaygiri arrived at the Port of Colombo on an official visit today, 8 September 2026, where it was received by the Sri Lanka Navy in accordance with time-
honoured naval traditions.

INS Udaygiri is a 149.02m long Frigate, Commanded by Captain Vikas Sood. Meanwhile, the Commanding Officer of the visiting ship is scheduled to call on Commander Western Naval
Area, Rear Admiral Harsha De Silva at the Western Naval Command Headquarters.

Captain Sood served as the Defence Adviser at the Indian High Commission in Sri Lanka from July 2020 to October 2023.
During their stay in the island, the crew of INS Udaygiri will participate in several goodwill events organized by the Sri Lanka Navy to enhance camaraderie between the two forces.

The visiting personnel are also scheduled to visit prominent tourist and cultural locations across the island.

Additionally, Sri Lanka Navy personnel are expected to visit the ship for capability observation and knowledge sharing, and will conduct onboard training during its stay.

Continue Reading

News

22A: Exclusion of 8 petitions questioned, action filed against SC Registrar, others

Published

on

The Supreme Court has been petitioned seeking an explanation as to how eight petitions filed against the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution were not listed for hearing . Two of the petitioners, namely Dias Bandaralage Ajith Shantha Kumara Jayathilaka and Gunathilakage Dakum Dulara Gunathilaka, have requested an opportunity to examine the official Registry and parliamentary records so that all material facts may be objectively established. They said that their petitions that had been registered by the Supreme Court should have been heard along with other petitions.

The Registrar of the Supreme Court, Secretary General of Parliament, Speaker and the Attorney General have been named as the respondents.

The five-member bench that heard the petitions consisted of Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, Achala Wengappuli, J, Arjuna Obeyesekere, J, Sampath B. Abayakoon, J and K.M.G.H. Kulatunga, J.

The petitioners sought the explanation in the absence of any judicial order dismissing, rejecting, striking out, terminating or otherwise disposing the said petitions. They have requested the disclosure of the complete procedural history of the unlisted cases.

The second petitioner Gunathilaka has referred to a speech by Jaffna District Independent MP Ramanathan Archuna in Parliament, on 21 August, 2026, regarding X-Press Pearl, a container carrier that sank off the port of Colombo, and related matters.

They have sought leave to proceed under Articles 17 and 126 of the Constitution and asked for a full Bench of the Supreme Court, or the widest Bench, constitutionally permissible.

They also requested that the Chief Justice and Achala Wengappuli refrain from participating in the hearing and determination of their application, having regard to the objective-appearance issue arising from their prior constitutional and judicial participation in matters forming part of the factual subject matter now requiring examination.

Meanwhile, General Secretary of Vinivida Foundation, Nagananda Kodituwakku, has requested the Supreme Court Registrar not to proceed with the determination of 22nd Amendment process, pending the hearing of fundamental rights petition filed by Chairman of the Vinivida Foundation lawyer, Sugandhika Fernando, seeking a full bench, excluding Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena, to hear the petitions challenging the 22nd Amendment Bill. She also requested that the hearing be suspended immediately until the matter was fully heard and determined.

Among the respondents are Chief Justice Surasena, the first respondent, and Attorney General Parinda Ranasinghe. Justices Yasantha Kodagoda, Shiran Gooneratne, Achala Wengappuli and Priyantha Fernando.

(SF)

Continue Reading

News

Thailand shuts door on undesirables from Sri Lanka

Published

on

Sri Lankan passport holders travelling to Thailand wouldn’t be eligible for visa-free entry from 15 September, 2026, according to a new visa notice issued by the Royal Thai Embassy in Colombo.

Under the new measures, all Sri Lankan travellers will be required to obtain a Thai visa before departing for Thailand. Visa applications must be submitted online through Thailand’s official e-Visa system.

The Royal Thai Embassy in Colombo has also clarified that it will not accept visa applications submitted in person or in physical form.

According to the Embassy, tourist visa applications submitted by Sri Lankan passport holders are expected to take approximately 3–7 working days, calculated from the date on which all required documents have been duly completed and submitted.

Processing times for Non-Immigrant Visa and DTV (Destination Thailand Visa) applications may take longer.

Foreign nationals residing in Sri Lanka or the Maldives who hold valid work or residence permits may also require additional processing time.

The Embassy has cautioned applicants that it reserves the right to request additional documents or information when necessary. Applicants may also be asked to attend a visa interview on a case-by-case basis.

The new requirement represents a significant change for Sri Lankan travellers, who will need to complete the visa process before travelling to Thailand from September 15 onward.

The Embassy has urged applicants to rely only on its official communication channels for the latest visa requirements, procedures and updates.

Continue Reading

Trending