Connect with us

News

Avant Garde prosecution fiasco: Ukrainian Captain of the ship finally released

Published

on

Unsuccessfully moved SC in 2017 in FR case

By Shamindra Ferdinando

A Ukrainian national Gennardily Gavrylov is among eight persons acquitted by the Permanent High Court Trial-at-Bar in a high profile case filed against them over operation of a floating armoury  (MV Avant Garde) chartered by Avant Garde Maritime Services (AGMS).

The vessel belonging to Sri Lanka Shipping Company Limited has been chartered in terms of an agreement between AGMS and Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Limited (RALL), a government-owned business undertaking affiliated to the Defence Ministry, for deployment in East Africa to help fight sea piracy.

The AGMS vessel has been deployed to provide services in support of international naval operations meant to protect shipping off the Somali coast

Having chartered MV Merou, the AGMS, a subsidiary of Avant Garde Security Services (Pvt) Limited, named it MV Avant Garde.

Sources said that though Gavrylov has been granted bail during the proceedings, he wasn’t allowed to leave the country. Gavrylov, Captain of the vessel, in spite of being released on May 21 is yet to leave the country.

The other seven released were Avant Garde Chairman retired Commando Major Nissanka Senadhipathi, Retired Navy Commodore Vishvajith Nandana Diyabalanage, Don Albert Tillakaratne, Victor Samaraweera, who served as Chairman of RALL, Nilupul de Costa, Retired Air Vice-Marshal Ponnathurai Balasubramanium Premachandra and Former Additional Defence Secretary Saman Dissanayake

The case was heard before a three-judge bench comprising Justices Aditya Patabendige, Manjula Tillakaratne and Mahen Weeraman.

Declaring the May 21 verdict Justice Patabendige said that one-time Defence Secretary Karunasena Hettiarachchi, who subsequently served as Sri Lanka’s Ambassador to Germany told the court that the Defence Ministry issued permission to AGMS and RALL to deploy the vessel carrying arms and ammunition in the Red Sea.

In January this year  the court released five suspects namely the RALL (first accused) , AGMS (second accused), former Rakna Lanka Chairman, retired Major General Waduge Palitha Piyasiri Fernando (third accused), former Rakna Lanka CEO, retired Major General Karunaratna Banda Adhikari Egodawele (fourth accused) and the twelfth accused former Senior Additional Defence Secretary Damayanthi Jayaratne owing to the inability to maintain the charges under the Firearms Ordinance and the Explosives Ordinance.

Gavrylov during the previous administration moved the Supreme Court against what the petitioner called his wrongful, unjustifiable and illegal arrest off Galle on the morning of Oct 6, 2015 and the continuing detention. There hadn’t been a previous case of a foreigner filing a fundamental rights violation application here under such circumstances in terms of Article 11, Article 12 (1), Article 13 (1), and Article 13 (2) of the Sri Lanka Constitution.

The petitioner alleged he was subjected to cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment through the false accusation that he had entered Sri Lankan territorial waters. Gavrylov took over the command of the vessel on July 24, 2015.

The petitioner alleged that SLNS Nandimithra, a fast missile vessel (FMV), had taken ‘MV Avant Garde’ into custody in international waters 15 nautical miles from the baseline. According to him, though the vessel was to be delivered to Sri Lanka Shipping Company as per instructions received in Aug 2015, he received subsequent instructions through proper channels to reach Galle port.

Gavrylov claimed that a seven-member squad of SLN personnel had boarded the vessel at 7.15 am, on Oct 6, 2015, after he refused directives issued by the SLN to proceed towards the Galle port and drop anchor near the Galle port. Initially, Gavrylov had been directed to proceed towards Panadura and drop anchor.

The Deputy Harbour Master of Galle who is also the Acting Residential Manager of the Galle port in his statement too had admitted that the vessel was seized outside territorial waters of Sri Lanka, the petitioner alleged. The then 49-year-old Gavrylov, father of one, filed the FR petition in the wake of Ukraine intervening on his behalf.

On a directive given by the Galle Magistrate’s court the vessel was handed over to Sri Lanka Shipping Company on Dec 16, 2016 and left for India on the following day. The vessel was scrapped at Alang scrapyard in Gujarat.

The vessel had been chartered for a period of two years with effect from April 1, 2014 to operate in the Red Sea.

The Sirisena-Wickremesinghe administration alleged that the then Defence Secretary now President Gotabaya Rajapaksa handed Senadhipathi a lucrative contract to provide maritime security services to protect international shipping passing the region from pirates, without following proper procedures, a charge denied by Rajapaksa.

The seizure of MV Avant Garde sharply divided the yahapalana administration. The then Law and Order and Prisons Reforms Minister Tilak Maparana, PC, quit the Cabinet after strongly criticizing the action taken against Senadhipathy’s operation. The then Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakse, too, opposed the move whereas Messrs Patali Champika Ranawaka, Dr. Rajitha Senaratne, the then leader of the Democratic Party Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka, the JVP and civil society groups campaigned against Senadhipathi’s outfit. The then Minister and present UNP Chairman Vajira Abeywardena and Solicitor General Suhada Gamlath were also accused of backing what they called an illegal operation.

Before giving up ministerial portfolio, one-time Attorney General and UNP National List lawmaker Marapana compared the seizure of MV Avant Garde with the exposure of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) run safe house at Aturugiriya in January 2002.

The former Attorney General Dappula de Livera, PC, alleged during the period from 07 August 2012 to 8 January 2015, the government suffered a financial loss of Rs. 11.4 billion rupees as a result of AGMS being given an opportunity to operate a floating armory. The AG on August 21, 2019 requested the Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya (his predecessor as AG) to nominate a three-judge Trial-at-Bar in the Colombo High Court with no jury, to hear the case.

At the time the SLN seized the vessel Yuvanjana Wijetillake, PC, functioned as the AG.

The AG was to prosecute the 13 accused on 7,573 charges. However, the Permanent High Court Trial at Bar said of the 7573 counts filed against the accused, only 19 could be carried forward in the case.

The Permanent High Court Trial at Bar told AG to consider proceeding with the case under the 19 charges filed against the 08 accused (those acquitted on May 21, 2021)

The amended indictment filed by the AG, too, was dismissed on the basis it was contrary to the law and the trial could not proceed even with the amended indictment.

 

 



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

CEB seeking tariff hike while making huge profits, says opposition trade union leader

Published

on

Ananda Palitha

Convenor of the Samagi Joint Trade Union Alliance affiliated with the Samagi Jana Balawegaya, Ananda Palitha, yesterday (16) said that the Ceylon Electricity Board was seeking to raise electricity tariffs by 13.56% percent although it had earned a profit of more than Rs 22,000 mn.

The CEB recently submitted its proposal to the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for an electricity tariff revision for the second quarter of this year – the period effective from April 1 to June 30.

Palitha alleged that the PUCSL, in spite of knowing the massive profit earned by the CEB, at the expense of the hapless public, had chosen to allow the state enterprise to propose an additional burden.

The economic, technical and safety regulator of the electricity industry, and the designated regulator for petroleum and water services industries, should exercise its powers in terms of the PUCSL Act No. 35 of 2002 and the Sri Lanka Electricity Act No. 20 of 2009 to provide relief, the veteran trade unionist said.

Palitha emphasised that the PUCSL had the right to intervene on behalf of electricity consumers but, unfortunately, chose to facilitate the CEB’s despicable strategy. “The proposal to increase tariffs by 13.56% was meant to divert attention. The real issue at hand is the percentage of electricity tariff reduction,” Palitha said. The former UNPer found fault with the Opposition for failing to expose the CEB.

Taking into consideration the Rs 22,000 millionplus profit, the PUCSL could order the CEB to grant relief to consumers, Palitha said, adding that the CEB and PUCSL, together, deprived electricity consumers tariff reduction in the first quarter of this year, too.

In January this year, the CEB asked for a 11.59% tariff increase though it was enjoying Rs 22,000 mn profit at that time, the trade unionist said.

Palitha said that as the PUCSL received all data available to the CEB it was fully aware of the finances of the state enterprise.

In January, 2025, regardless of the NPP government floating the idea regarding as much as a 37% tariff increase, the PUCSL granted a 20% tariff reduction (25% of Rs 22,000 mn profit), Palitha said.

According to him, as a result of relief granted to the consumers, the profits had been reduced to Rs 16,000 mn but by June 2025 profits had increased to Rs 18,000 mn and there was a need to grant tariff reduction. But, the NPP, having always lashed out at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in the run up to the presidential election, held in September 2024, started playing a different tune.

Responding to The Island queries, Palitha said that contrary to claims that the CEB proposed a 13.56% tariff increase to cover up losses caused by the importation of low-quality coal for the Norochcholai Lakvijaya coal-fired power plant, the current strategy seemed to have been adopted at the behest of the IMF.

Instead of granting tariff reduction for the third quarter in 2025, the PUCSL ordered an 18% increase, Palitha said. The trade unionist claimed that the Finance Ministry, at the behest of the IMF, directed both the CEB and the PUCSL to increase electricity tariffs by 20% in violation of the relevant Acts, he said.

Then in Oct, 2025, the CEB proposed a 6.8 % tariff increase at a time its profits were around Rs 22,000 mn. The CEB and PUCSL staged a drama over that proposal and finally, on the false pretext of the CEB’s failure to furnish its proposal on time, the revision was dropped, Palitha said. The SJB activist pointed out that the Opposition failed to highlight that consumers had been deprived of downward revision in spite of massive profits earned by the Board. “In fact, when Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody met trade unions, he very clearly declared that they were considering electricity power reduction, perhaps by 10%, 12% or 15%. But in the end nothing happened.”

Now the same drama is being enacted by the government, the CEB and the PUCSL, Palitha said.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

BASL protest march

Published

on

BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya addressing the media at the BASL Head Office, Colombo, yesterday (16). He demanded that the government apprehend those responsible for the killing of a lawyer and his wife at Akuregoda, close to the tri-forces headquarters on Friday (13). Pic by Nishan S. Priyantha

Members of the BASL yesterday (16) staged a protest march over the murder of a lawyer and his wife in Akuregoda, Thalangama, last week. The BASL staged a protest march from the Supreme Court Complex to the BASL Head Office.

Continue Reading

News

IMF MD here

Published

on

Kristalina

Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Kristalina Georgieva arrived in Colombo yesterday (16) for top level discussions with the government. She is scheduled to leave tomorrow (18) after meeting government authorities and key stakeholders, observing firsthand the impact of Cyclone Ditwah, and discussing ways in which the IMF could support recovery efforts and contribute to building a more resilient future for all Sri Lankans, sources said.

Continue Reading

Trending