Connect with us

Business

73rd Central Bank Annual Report gets ‘pretty honest’ about Sri Lanka’s economy

Published

on

 Says national policy package should be guarded from influences of changing political regimes

 Urges for actions to ensure the country will not suffer from a repeated debt rework episode

 Once debt restructuring negotiated, SL to resume debt servicing on a smaller scale

The seventy third Annual Report of the Monetary Board of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka released on 27 April 2023, offers candid and rare insights on the status of the country’s economy. It also professionally suggests the way forward for Sri Lankan authorities to tackle the country’s legacy issues, economic complexity and the debt restructuring process among other things, while pursuing the macro-fiscal adjustment programme under the IMF-EFF arrangement.

“The implementation of structural reforms focusing not only on restoring near term stability but also on rebuilding the nation with adequate safeguards and resilience in the post-debt restructuring and post-IMF bailout era is vitally important for permanent revival from the current economic crisis,” Central Bank’s Annual Report said.

“The persistent twin deficits experienced by Sri Lanka highlights the importance of addressing the BOP issues on a sustainable basis through a comprehensive national policy package formed in consultation with the relevant stakeholders and guarded from influences of changing political regimes. Further, non-debt creating foreign exchange generating sources need to be explored and encouraged, while reducing the need for financing of the current account deficit out of commercial external debt,” it said.

The Report pointed out that according to international experiences, the level of commitment by authorities towards the success of a reform programme is a key determinant of the outcome of debt restructuring and subsequent recovery of the economy.

“Moreover, the ongoing efforts to resolve the economic issues, including the debt restructuring process, and the macro-fiscal adjustment programme under the IMF-EFF arrangement are necessary conditions for the way forward, though these alone would not guarantee a permanent solution to the country’s deep rooted structural weaknesses and macroeconomic complications unless the financing mix of government budget deficits and external current account deficits is augmented with non-debt creating financing in the period ahead,” it emphasized.

Referring to Post-Debt Restructuring Policy Priorities for Strengthening External Sector Balance, the report pointed out:

“Sri Lanka has been experiencing persistent external current account deficits mainly driven by large deficits in the merchandise trade account and primary income account over the years. Although the trade in services account and secondary income account (mainly workers’ remittances) recorded surpluses, these surpluses have not been adequate to cushion the impact of ever widening deficits in the merchandise trade and primary income accounts in the current account.”

“Once debt restructuring perimeters are negotiated and agreed upon with Sri Lanka’s official and private creditors, the country will resume debt servicing, but on a smaller scale, with extended maturities. This first ever debt restructuring effort would offer a once in a lifetime opportunity for the country to correct past mistakes and decisively plan future actions to ensure that the country will not suffer from a repeated debt restructuring episode, as experienced by some countries.”

“This stresses the fact that not only the debt restructuring process, but also the way forward in the post restructuring economy should be well planned and executed to strengthen the country’s fiscal and external positions and build resilience in the period ahead. From the 1950s to 2010 there were more than 600 incidents of sovereign debt restructuring globally involving 95 countries (Das, Papaioannou, and Trebesch, 2012). Generally, it is expected that following successful debt restructuring, a country would manage the debt sustainably going forward and recover gradually.”

“However, out of those, not all countries were able to sustainably manage their debt after a successful debt restructuring process and those who failed experienced further defaults subsequently. There are several reasons why some countries fail to reach their potential level of economic growth and ensure external sector stability through debt restructuring, as described below:

1. Unfavourable economic conditions: The external environment and broader economic conditions of the country during the rebuilding phase are instrumental in determining the outcome of debt restructuring. For example, if the global economy is slowing down or if major trading partners are experiencing an economic contraction during the post debt restructuring phase, the country may struggle to achieve its potential level of growth and Balance of Payments (BOP) sustainability.

There are early signs that global economic stresses could heighten in 2023 amidst tight monetary and financial market conditions, making the post-debt restructuring recovery of Sri Lanka challenging.

2. Implementation challenges: Given the diversity of external lenders and their interests as well as geopolitical concerns, the negotiation and implementation phases of debt restructuring could be complex. This could make reaching agreements with creditors challenging, thereby raising the riskof delays due to lengthy negotiations. A protracted restructuring process could further erode investor confidence and be a major predicament for regaining stability of the external sector.

3. Insufficient policy measures: Recovery in the economy following debt restructuring involves adopting a policy combination that drives the economy towards a sustainable growth path in the short and medium term with emphasis on macro-fiscal reforms and required adjustments. However, if the policy responses are not planned out effectively or lack coordination in implementation, the desired outcome may not be achieved. Considering the legacy issues faced by the external sector of Sri Lanka, the reforms package needs to be sufficiently robust.

4. Political instability: The recovery in the economy following a debt restructuring process essentially depends on the success of the implementation of the reform package agreed upon with creditors and adherence to targets set out therein. As the major economic reforms lack popularity, governments come under severe pressure to implement such reforms and would possibly give into lobbying from the constituency.

Political stability would help rebuild confidence in the economy among the stakeholders, including investors, multilateral and bilateral lenders, and creditors. Further, political instability may lead to policy inconsistency, which could be a major setback to implementing sustainable macroeconomic adjustments. Thus, post restructuring economic revival and resilience would be conditional on the continuation of the political resolve as well as public support for reforms.

5. Weak institutions: Weak institutions that lead to deterioration of the rule of law, lack of transparency and accountability, and increased corruption could create an environment that is unfavourable to economic growth, while limiting the effectiveness of policy measures and eroding investor confidence.

Against this backdrop, it will be pertinent to form a vigorous policy framework that aims at restoring stability in the external sector, while creating a conducive environment for the economic activities to thrive, the report said.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Seylan Bank well-positioned for growth as core performance strengthens

Published

on

Seylan Bank PLC has delivered a resilient financial performance for 2025, surpassing market forecasts and signaling a steady recovery in its underlying credit profile, according to a recent equity research update by First Capital Holdings PLC.

The bank recorded a net profit of LKR 12.2 billion for the full year 2025, marking a significant 20.3% year-on-year increase. Performance in the final quarter was particularly notable, with net profit reaching LKR 3.8 billion, a 9.4% rise compared to the same period in 2024. This result exceeded analysts’ expectations by 5.4%, underscoring the bank’s strengthening fundamentals.

Core banking operations remained a primary driver of growth. Net interest income (NII) expanded by 18.3% year-on-year to LKR 11.3 billion in 4Q2025. This was supported by an 8.3% increase in interest income and a marginal contraction in interest expenses, reflecting highly favorable funding dynamics.

Total operating income surged by 51.1% in the final quarter, a sharp jump largely attributed to the absence of International Sovereign Bond (ISB) restructuring losses that had impacted the previous year’s performance. Fee and commission income also saw robust growth of 21.8%, fueled by increased activity in cards, remittances, and international trade.

A standout highlight for the period was the aggressive expansion of the bank’s loan book, which grew by 29.6% year-on-year to reach LKR 599.8 billion by the end of 2025. The deposit base also grew by 13.3%.

Asset quality showed marked improvement as the bank successfully navigated the tail-end of the economic recovery. The Stage 3 loan ratio, a key indicator of credit risk, fell to 1.03% in 4Q2025, down significantly from 2.10% a year earlier. This was further bolstered by a 95.1% contraction in impairment charges on loans and advances, reflecting a move toward more stable provisioning.

Seylan Bank’s capital and liquidity positions remain a source of strength, staying comfortably above regulatory requirements. The bank’s Total Capital Ratio stood at a healthy 17.89%, while the liquidity coverage ratio remained elevated at nearly 230%, providing ample buffers to support future lending.

Looking ahead, First Capital projects a more moderated pace of growth as the broader economic momentum eases and the monetary easing cycle reaches its trough. Nevertheless, analysts remain optimistic, projecting net profits to rise to LKR 15.9 billion in 2026 and LKR 18.4 billion in 2027.

While the bank’s estimated fair value for 2026 has been revised to LKR 140 per share to reflect market re-rating trends, the stock still offers a compelling total return of approximately 37%. A newly introduced 2027 fair value of LKR 155 implies an even higher potential return of 52%. Citing these strong fundamentals and the significant upside potential, the First Capital report maintains a “Buy” recommendation on Seylan Bank.

By Sanath Nanayakkare

Continue Reading

Business

Bank of Ceylon reinforces national economic vision with 2025 Annual Report presentation

Published

on

In a significant moment reflecting renewed confidence in Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and forward-looking national strategy, the Bank of Ceylon (BOC) formally presented its 2025 Annual Report to His Excellency President Anura Kumara Dissanayake. The occasion reaffirmed the Bank’s role as the nation’s leading financial institution and a key pillar of economic stability.

The report was officially handed over by Chairman Mr. Kavinda De Zoysa and General Manager/Chief Executive Officer Mr. Y. A. Jayathilaka, who outlined the Bank’s performance, resilience, and strategic direction during a pivotal phase for Sri Lanka’s financial sector.

BOC’s 2025 Annual Report highlights a strong financial performance, with PBT reaching Rs. 120.8 billion, reinforcing its position as one of the most profitable single entities in the country. Beyond profitability, the Bank made a substantial contribution to the national economy, remitting approximately Rs. 77 billion in taxes underscoring its vital role in supporting fiscal stability and national development.

Continue Reading

Business

Govt. assures policy consistency in energy sector

Published

on

Minister Anura Karunathilake assumes duties.

Despite a reshuffle at the helm of energy sector, the government has moved swiftly to reassure markets, investors, and industry stakeholders that policy continuity—not disruption—will define the road ahead.

Newly appointed Power and Energy Minister Anura Karunathilake, assuming duties at a moment of heightened scrutiny, made it clear that the administration’s core commitment remains unchanged: uninterrupted supply of electricity and fuel, regardless of political transitions.

His remarks come at a critical juncture for the country’s energy economy—still recovering from past volatility, navigating global price pressures, and attempting to build investor confidence in long-term infrastructure and generation projects.

Addressing journalists following his appointment, Karunathilake struck a notably measured tone, signaling stability rather than reformist disruption.

“The national energy policy is anchored in long-term objectives. There is no shift in direction,” he said, in what analysts interpret as a deliberate message to both domestic and foreign investors wary of policy reversals.

Energy economists note that Sri Lanka’s power and fuel sectors remain deeply sensitive to political signals. Even minor uncertainty can ripple through procurement cycles, independent power producer (IPP) negotiations, and fuel hedging strategies.

By emphasizing continuity, the government appears intent on avoiding the stop-start policy cycles that have historically plagued the sector.

The transition follows the resignation of former Minister Eng. Kumara Jayakody and Ministry Secretary Prof. Udayanga Hemapala on April 17, a move widely viewed as an attempt to ensure the independence of an ongoing Presidential Commission probing coal procurement processes.

From a governance perspective, the resignations may serve to reinforce institutional credibility—particularly at a time when transparency in energy procurement is under intense public and political scrutiny.

Karunathilake acknowledged opposition criticism regarding transparency but responded with a firm challenge: present concrete evidence to investigative authorities rather than litigating issues through media narratives.

Perhaps the most market-sensitive assurance came in the Minister’s outright rejection of imminent power cuts.

Energy supply stability remains a cornerstone of economic recovery. From export manufacturing to tourism and digital services, uninterrupted electricity is non-negotiable.

Karunathilake indicated that groundwork laid by his predecessors—including generation planning and fuel supply arrangements—has already mitigated immediate risks.

“If those plans are implemented effectively, there will be no need for power cuts,” he said, positioning his role as one of policy support and execution oversight rather than structural overhaul.

Industry observers point out that this continuity is crucial. Any disruption in electricity supply could directly impact industrial output, SME operations, and investor sentiment—particularly as Sri Lanka courts foreign direct investment in energy-intensive sectors.

On the fuel front, the minister acknowledged the reality that global price movements—exacerbated by geopolitical tensions in the Middle East—remain beyond Sri Lanka’s control.

For businesses, especially logistics operators, fisheries, and agriculture, fuel price predictability is as critical as supply continuity. Sudden spikes can erode margins and disrupt planning cycles.

Karunathilake’s assurance that supply will remain uninterrupted, regardless of external shocks, is therefore likely to be welcomed by key economic sectors.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Trending