Connect with us

Latest News

White House defends freezing funds as ‘reasonable’ while Democrats express ‘extreme alarm’

Published

on

US President Donald Trump has paused grants, loans and other federal assistance, according to a leaked government memo, later confirmed by the White House.

The two-page memo, from the acting head of the White House budget office, instructs agencies to “temporarily pause all activities related to obligations or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance”.

Much about the order, which went into effect on Tuesday afternoon, and its scope remain unclear, sowing widespread confusion.

The directive could paralyse billions of dollars meant for federal programmes, from disaster relief to cancer research.

Democrats have warned it may have brutal and far-reaching consequences.

In her first news conference as White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt defended the directive, saying the motivation for the freeze is being “good stewards for tax dollars”.

“I think this is a very reasonable measure,” she said on Tuesday, adding that the pause would allow the government to weed out spending for “woke” gender issues and diversity programmes that conflict with Trump’s executive orders.

Medicare and Social Security benefits will not be affected, nor will any programme “that provides direct benefits to individuals”, including Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP or food stamps, the White House said.

But Leavitt did not clarify how aid to individuals would be protected in practice, as much of it goes first to state governments and other organisations, which then pass the assistance on to individuals. Leavitt also did not rule out Medicaid, a jointly run federal and state program which provides health insurance to low-income Americans, being cut off.

On Tuesday, hours after the late-night order was issued, the White House issued a second memo, with further information.

The pause is not “across the board”, the second memo said, but applies only to projects implicated by Trump’s various executive orders, including those that aimed at scraping diversity programmes in the federal government.

Democrats have assailed the freeze, saying it will bring chaos and harm to millions of Americans and warning it violates federal law.

In a letter to the White House, top Democrats expressed “extreme alarm”.

“The scope of what you are ordering is breathtaking, unprecedented, and will have devastating consequences across the country,” wrote Washington Senator Patty Murray and Connecticut Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro.

“We write today to urge you in the strongest possible terms to uphold the law and the Constitution and ensure all federal resources are delivered in accordance with the law.”

A coalition of Democratic states attorneys general said they will file suit to block the order, calling it unconstitutional.

“My office will be taking imminent legal action against this administration’s unconstitutional pause on federal funding,” New York Attorney General Letitia James wrote on social media. “We won’t sit idly by while this administration harms our families.”

In the Monday evening memo, which comes days after the US halted nearly all foreign aid, the acting head of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Matthew Vaeth called on government agencies to ensure spending is consistent with Trump’s priorities.

Federal agencies must “temporarily pause all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all federal financial assistance,” and any other programs that included “DEI, woke gender ideology and the Green New Deal,” Vaeth wrote.

DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) programmes aim to promote participation in workplaces by people from a range of backgrounds.

Their backers say they address historical or ongoing discrimination and underrepresentation of certain groups, including racial minorities, but critics argue such programmes can themselves be discriminatory.

The Green New Deal, a proposal to prevent climate change through public policy, was never signed into law.

Vaeth suggested that the pause would last until at least mid-February, asking agencies to provide a detailed report on the programmes that have been affected by 10 February.

It remains uncertain how much money is involved. The memo suggests that the federal government spent $10tn (£8tn) in fiscal year 2024, more than $3tn of which went to federal financial assistance. But the source of those numbers is unclear. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported that the government spent $6.7tn that year.

Nonprofit groups have responded in distress.

“This order is a potential five-alarm fire for nonprofit organizations and the people and communities they serve,” Diane Yentel, the chief executive of the National Council of Nonprofits, said in a statement.

“From pausing research on cures for childhood cancer to halting food assistance, safety from domestic violence and closing suicide hotlines, the impact of even a short pause in funding could be devastating and cost lives,” she added.

The move follows last week’s news that the Department of State had issued a halt to nearly all existing foreign assistance and paused new aid, according to an internal memo sent to officials and US embassies abroad.

It appeared to affect everything from development assistance to military aid, making exceptions only for emergency food aid and for military funding for Israel and Egypt.

Trump earlier issued an executive order for a 90-day pause in foreign development assistance pending a review of efficiencies and consistency with his foreign policy.

The US is the world’s biggest international aid donor, having spent $68bn (£66bn) in 2023 according to government figures.

(BBC)

 



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

West Indies wrap Sri Lanka up for 308 despite Dhananjaya 120

Published

on

By

Dhananjaya de Silva played some elegant shots before getting to his milestone [Cricinfo]

Dhananjaya de Si;va’s 120 off 168 deliveries formed the centrepiece of Sri Lanka’s fighting batting efforts on day one of the Test series against West Indies. Sri Lanka lost three wickets in the first hour, Kemar Roach breaking through in the first over of the game, before Alzarri Joseph struck twice in three balls in the 10th over.

But on a pitch with some assistance for the quicks, Sri Lanka fought back, first through a counter-punching half-century to Dinesh Chandima, before de Silva imposed himself on the match, scoring briskly through the middle and evening sessions.

The innings was largely built upon three partnerships that de Silva was part of: a 68-run stand with Chandimal, a 99-run stand with Snal Dinusha, and a 64-run seventh-wicket stand with Milan Rathnayaka.

A total of 308, however, was only a competitive first-innings total, rather than a commanding one. West Indies’ seamers were menacing in patches throughout the day, particularly Roach, Alzarri Joseph and Shamar Joseph, who tested the batters whenever they were operating. However, it was the medium pace of Justin Greaves that wreaked the most damage in the end. He dismissed de Silva midway through the final session and would claim two further tail-end wickets to finish with figures of 3 for 39. Roach, Alzarri, and Shamar all claimed two wickets apiece.

Having bowled Sri Lanka out for 308, West Indies had one over to bat before stumps, and survived it without loss. Their over rate through the day had been exceedingly slow, however. Only 72.5 overs were bowled on day one, though all six-and-a-half hours of play were utilised.

De Silva had been confident from the outset. In the morning session he had defended well, and had played some assured straight drives to get himself moving, as Sri Lanka strove to recover from 42 for 3. Chandimal was the primary aggressor in his first partnership, as he found boundaries through cover and point in particular. Chandimal hit 41 of the 68 runs they made together and, although not fluent in this particular innings, had kept Sri Lanka ticking through a difficult period. He appeared to be finding his touch as he crossed 50, but was bowled by an excellent Shamar yorker soon after.

Kusal Mendis, reaching for a full wide one, was caught at second slip later in that same Shamar over. This was the second occasion Sri Lanka lost two in an over, with Alzarri having earlier dismissed Nishan Madushka and Kamindu Mendis in the 10th over of the day.

De Silva got Sri Lanka out of that immediate danger with some sparkling shots square of the wicket, spanking one from Alzarri through point before pulling the same bowler imperiously through square leg two balls later. He had his outside edge beaten frequently, but also found singles and twos into the outfield to keep himself moving. Disdainful pulls would become a hallmark of this innings, though he also scored heavily through cover and deep third. Dinusha, who played a restrained innings, also dug deep to lift Sri Lanka out of trouble. He scored heavily through the backward point region, pouncing on the short wide deliveries whenever they were offered up. He hit 43 off 75.

Soon after tea, de Silva moved smoothly to a 13th Test hundred, off the 150th ball he faced, reaching the milestone with a sumptuous flick through midwicket. In the end, a tame length delivery from Greaves claimed his wicket, as de Silva gave a catch off the leading edge to point as he attempted to clip through midwicket. Sri Lanka were 273 for 7 at that point, and a little lower-order hitting propelled them past 300, Rathnayake scoring 27.

The first hour of the day, however, had belonged to West Indies. Pathum Nissanka was caught off Roach at short leg, when he failed to keep a leg-side flick down. Alzarri then nailed Nishan Madushka in front with a ball that nipped off the surface, and had Kamindu Mendis caught at first slip with a delivery in the channel outside off. Sri Lanka were 42 for 3 after that first double strike. Shamar would also take two wickets in an over, soon after lunch.

Scores:
West Indies 0 for 0 in 1 over  (John Campbell 0*, Brandon King 0*) trail Sri Lanka 308 in 71..5 overs (Dhananjaya de Silva  120, Dinesh Chandimal 54, Sonal Dinusha 43; Kemar Roach 2-32, Alzarri Joseph 2-60, Shamar Joseph 2-79, Justin Greaves 3-39) by 308 runs

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Sri Lanka seek big win against Scotland to keep semi-final hopes alive

Published

on

By

Chamari Athapaththu heroics against Ireland revived Sri Lanka's hopes (Cricinfo)

Sri Lanka take on Scotland in Manchester at 18:30 local time (17:30 GMT) in the Women’s T20 World Cup. Scotland, with three losses in four matches, are out of the semi-final race. With England having already booked a spot in the semi-finals, Sri Lanka’s only hope is to beat Scotland by a big margin and then hope for a few other results to go their way.

Sri Lanka are coming off a confidence-boosting win against Ireland, powered by Chamari Athapaththu’s century, while Scotland lost to New Zealand despite a spirited performance. The teams have met three times in T20Is with Sri Lanka winning all three. In their last meeting, in the 2024 T20 World Cup Qualifier in Abu Dhabi, Athapaththu made a 63 ball 102.

Sri Lanka strengthened their batting against Ireland by bringing in an extra batter in Hansima Karunaratne and replacing Vishmi Gunaratne with Hasini Perera. Even though Athapaththu single-handedly won the previous match, Sri Lanka could stick with the same XI.

Sri Lanka (probable): Chamari Athapaththu (capt),  Imesha Dulani,  Hasini Perera, Harshitha Samarawickrama,  Hansima Karunaratne, Kaveesha Dilhari,  Nilakshika Silva, Kaushini Nuthyangana (wk),  Sugandika Kumari,  Nimesha Meepage,  Mithali Ayodhya

For Scotland, Ailsa Lister and Rachel Slater, who had both been unavailable due to injury, returned against New Zealand, with Chloe Abel and Gabriella Fontenla making way.

Scotland (probable):  Darcey Carter, Katherine Fraser,  Kathryn Bryce (capt),  Sarah Bryce (wk), Ailsa Lister,  Pippa Sproul,  Priyanaz Chatterji,  Kirstie Gordon,  Megan McColl,  Rachel Slater,  Hannah Rainey

Seamer Mithali Ayodha  had a nervy start to her World Cup campaign, conceding 40 runs in four overs against England in Sri Lanka’s opening game. However, she bounced back with figures of 1 for 24, 0 for 7 and 1 for 18 against New Zealand, West Indies and Ireland respectively. Sri Lanka will be hoping Ayodhya continues her form and makes early inroads against Scotland.

In Scotland’s only win of the tournament, left-arm spinner Kirstie Gordon  starred with three wickets to derail Ireland’s chase in Manchester. Having made her debut for Scotland this year, the former England player has taken 11 wickets in eight matches the joint third most for the team. Scotland will seek a repeat of that display at the same venue on Friday

Weather and conditions

Manchester is expected to be hot, with a slight chance of an afternoon shower. Spinners are expected to have a significant role to play.

(Cricinfo )

Continue Reading

Latest News

Oil price falls back to pre-Iran war levels

Published

on

By

The price of oil has fallen to levels not seen since before the Iran war as traffic through the key Strait of Hormuz shipping route gradually resumes.

Global benchmark Brent crude briefly fell below $72.48 (£55) a barrel, the price it was at the day before the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran on 28 February, before edging up to $73.23.

Energy prices have been on a wild ride since Iran responded to the strikes by effectively closing the strait, a critical waterway for oil and gas shipments.

The cost of crude has been moving sharply lower since the US and Iran signed a  Memorandum of  Understanding (MOU) on 17 June which set out a 60-day period for negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear programme and other measures to end the war.

Representatives from the two sides met in Switzerland last weekend for talks to end the war, which resulted in the US partially lifting sanctions on Iranian oil exports.

The number of vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz has risen significantly since the MOU was signed, according to maritime intelligence firm Kpler.

Its latest data suggests 284 vessels have made the transit from 18 June, the day after the deal was signed, although that is is still well below the pre-conflict average of some 138 crossings each day.

The ships passing through the waterway in recent days include those carrying crude oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG), fertiliser and other goods, Kpler told the BBC.

The US and Iran had also formed a “communication line” to prevent misunderstandings “with the aim of safe passage for commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz”, mediators Qatar and Pakistan said in a joint statement on Monday.

There has been a “tremendous shift” with far more ships using the strait in recent days, said Dimitris Maniatis, the chief executive of Marisks, a maritime risk advisory firm working with ships stuck in the region.

A limited number of ships can cross a northern passageway with the permission of Iranian authorities, he said.

The US navy has also provided guidance for vessels to travel through a southern route that is safe from mines and other obstacles that has been laid out since the war, Maniatis said.

But the number of ships crossing the strait is still below levels seen before the war, when it was used by more than 100 ships a day.

Hundreds of ships still appear to be waiting in the Gulf.

A line chart showing how Brent crude oil prices have fluctuated since the USA and Israel attacked Iran on February 28th. The price rose rapidly above $80 from early March and peaked at just below $120 in April. The current rate as of 25 Jun 2026 is back down to below $80, similar to before the Iran war began.

Fuel prices at the pump rose sharply when the Iran war began, and now the focus is on how quickly they will fall.

“On the back of the lowest oil price since before the Iran war started, drivers should see the average price of petrol fall below 150p [a litre] in the next week or so,” said Simon Williams, head of policy at UK motoring group the RAC. He added the price of diesel “ought to go back under 160p.

Petrol peaked at 159.53p a litre on 28 May, according to the RAC, while diesel has fallen from a high of 191.54p on 15 April.

The average price of regular gasoline in the US has dropped to around $3.93 a gallon after reaching $4 a gallon in April, its highest since 2022, but is still well above pre-war levels.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday ordered an investigation into major energy companies, accusing Shell, ExxonMobil and other firms of “gouging” drivers by not reducing fuel prices even as oil costs fell.

“Oil prices have come down so much and we are not seeing anything at the pump by comparison the way they should be,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

The American Petroleum Institute, which represents the oil and gas industry in the US, said fuel prices “don’t move in lockstep with crude oil”.

British energy firms have faced similar accusations of unfairly hiking petrol prices since the Iran war.

The UK competition watchdog said last month  that there was no widespread evidence of this, adding that average profit margins were “broadly unchanged” between February and March

(BBC)

Continue Reading

Trending