Connect with us

Sports

Wallabies vs Pumas – Stalemate!

Published

on

by Rajitha Ratwatte

This match was played in Newcastle, Sydney, between two teams who are getting a reputation for playing rough and tumble rugby rather than the silky-smooth running and passing game that is what rugby union is about, at least to this writer!

The Wallabies kicked off deep into Puma territory and were obviously looking for an early penalty to bring their placekicker Reece Hodge into the game. The Pumas’ (and the referee) duly obliged and in the second minute a gift penalty right under the posts was converted. Wallabies into the lead 0 – 3. The lead didn’t last very long and in the fifth minute, the Pumas got a slightly more difficult penalty mid-right and around 25 meters away from the post. Sanchez who scores almost all the points for the Pumas these days did the needful and 3 – 3 it was in the sixth minute.

The first scrum of the game was in the 12th minute and it was a rather messy affair, but the Aussies got the ball out and worked the line. Hunter Paisamy at no12 saw a hole in behind the Puma line – a kicked left-footed grubber that had Jordan Patai, the 20-year-old no13 haring after the ball. However, he didn’t quite make it and managed to touch down only when the ball was on the dead-ball line. This was the one and only occasion that anyone from either side (except for once when the Aussie winger went over from a forward pass) came even close to crossing the try line, in the entire game! Now, this event has been described as a tight game and even a bruising encounter, yeah sure but what was the sport? Was it boxing, wrestling, or even a new game called baiting the ref?!! It sure wasn’t rugby football that I would pay money to watch.

The Australians continued to dominate, had most of the possession (around 70%), and played most of the first-half in Puma territory but were unable to threaten the Puma line or even come close to crossing it. Fierce, uncompromising defence from the Pumas was evident for sure, but do top-class rugby union sides spend the best part of 40 minutes inside enemy territory, have 70% of the possession, and remain unable to score a try?

Argentina was able to steal the odd line out by tapping the ball with one hand away from the Aussies, but the Aussies continued to dominate the scrum. The Wallaby number three Taniela Tupou, more like a battle tank than a human was the deciding factor. However, his loose play showed a lack of discipline and control and a tendency to punch anyone near him that was unbecoming of a professional rugby player. One wonders if he was obeying orders, and all this was part of the plan? The Aussie captain kept chirping away at the referees and even got a line out call changed by his insistence. The referee kept asking Michael Hooper if he was satisfied with the referee’s decision, I never heard such a question been directed to the Puma skipper even in English, let alone Spanish!

Three quarters from both sides managed the odd break, the Aussie no 13 Jordan Pataia’s run ended in a defensive penalty but the Pumas managed to get a penalty off their no14’s, run into Aussie territory. Nicolas Sanchez slotted the kick amidst loud boos from the partisan crowd and the Pumas inched ahead 6 – 3 in the 30th minute. This didn’t last too long and in the 33rd minute, Rees Hodge made the ball come back from the left of the posts, using the wind, and gained 3 points from around 38 meters out. Scores level again 6 -6.

So, we had a kicking contest on our hands and the whim and fancy of the referee would dictate the fortunes of the game. In the 38th minute, we saw the aforesaid human tank tight-head prop Taniela Tupou take a swing at Argentina’s most valuable player (this is the sort of thing that makes one wonder and should be analyzed further by world rugby to decide if these are deliberate tactics). Nicolas Sanchez, tiny man that he is succumbed to his Latino temperament and retaliated ( like a fly against a bull) and the wise all-knowing referee decided to reverse the penalty that should have been awarded to Argentina in favor of the Wallabies. Maybe he thought that Sanchez was a tsetse fly and could cause irreparable damage to the bull?!! The resulting touch kick and the line out, saw Aussie winger Korobiete go over the line, but the last pass was blatantly forward and although the referee awarded an on-field try it was overturned by the TV official. Of course, a long advantage was being played and the Aussies got to go back to the spot and try again for touch. The Aussies were desperate for points at this stage and a series of brawls led to an easy penalty being awarded to the more skillful brawlers, the Aussies, mid-left. The gift of three points was accepted and 6 – 9 Aussies in front. At this stage, the Pumas had been warned for excessive foul play and could have a yellow card issued if and when the next offence was so deemed.

This took us into half-time in what can only be reiterated as a brawl in which an oval-shaped white ball was used as a prop of some sort! To call it Rugby Union would be to bring down the wrath of ages upon the sayer. To describe it as a “gripping contest” in which the so much superior Aussie team had been dogged by bad luck and let down by the rub of the green, was the prerogative of the Aussie commentary team. Luckily the mute switch is a feature on modern TV sets!

The Aussies started the second-half with a very deep kick into Puma territory no doubt hoping this created an incident that would trigger the warning that the Argentina team was under. Initially, they got a kickable penalty, but Tom Banks chose to go even deeper into blue and white territory with a touch kick. Lo and behold out came the yellow card and the Argentine Hooker was off for ten minutes in the sin bin. Aussies deep in Argentine territory playing against 14 men. Textbook situation and the stuff of dreams for the “lucky country”! The awarded penalty could have been kicked over even if Reece Hodge had been blindfolded and 6 -11 it was, Wallabies leading.

The Puma skipper who is such an inspirational leader chased down a kick brilliantly and forced a penalty. It was mid-right and around 25 meters out, should have been bread and butter for Sanchez but he missed amidst loud boos and the beginning of a drizzle. We were now in the 46th minute was this going to be the crucial kick? The Wallabies cleared with a massive dropkick that propelled the ball from their 22 into the Argentine 22.

The play progressed with Argentina showing fantastic line speed and an impregnable defence. Another brawl with a penalty reversion this time in favor of the Pumas. At this stage, another skill of the players indulging in this sport which was hard to describe as rugby was displayed. Artistic dives like those employed in soccer to gain penalties, where the player writhes in agony until the penalty is awarded and then recovers miraculously, were employed. The Oscar-winning effort gained a sitter of a penalty for the Wallabies and the score raced ahead to 6 – 15.

With the awarding of a scrum penalty to the Pumas in the 58th minute, we saw a change in the game. Great up and under from Sanchez saw the Pumas go into the Australian 22 but a knock-on saw a scrum with Wallabies having the put in. Another scrum penalty for the Pumas, easily kickable this time saw Sanchez duly oblige 9 – 15. Pumas a goal away from victory.

In the 65th minute, another penalty was awarded to the Pumas. This was around 47 meters away from the posts but dead in front. It was raining now, and the ball was greasy. Would Sanchez kick? He did and brilliantly too, taking the score to 12 – 15. The game was into the 65th minute or so and the Aussie starting halfback Nick White was subbed off. In the 69th minute, the Wallabies were deemed off-side and a penalty awarded on the 50-meter line, slightly left of center. Sanchez stepped up and over she went! Scores level 15 – 15.

At this stage, the inspirational Puma leader and number seven had to go off the field for an HIA. Blatant obstruction by Aussie players who do not bother to make any effort to get onside when one of their players have collected the ball behind them and are running forward, was totally ignored by the match officials but another Puma infringement was spotted and with less than two minutes to go a penalty was awarded to the Wallabies, 40 meters out, mid-left. Bread and butter for Reece Hodge? Easy Mate! Not to be, rugby has some Gods and sometimes they step in to allow fairness to prevail, kick missed, and match drawn.

No one deserved to win that brawl that passed for a game of rugby football and if this is how the game is going to be played in the future, there may not be a future. Certainly, from a spectator’s point of view.

The so-called Rugby Championship tournament is now wide open with all three participating countries level with six points each. Argentina plays the All Blacks next Saturday and the Aussies the Saturday after that. It looks to me that the silverware may have to be shared unless the points of the winning margin are taken into account.



Latest News

Bangladesh announce Women’s T20 World Cup squad, pick only two pacers

Published

on

By

Eleven cricketers from the previous edition retain their place [Cricbuzz]
Bangladesh Cricket Board picked only two pacers – Marufa Akhter and Fariha Islam Trisna – for the upcoming ICC T20 World Cup 2026, scheduled to begin in England from June 12.

Top-order batter Taj Nehar returned to the shorter-format squad that had no place for Sharmin Sultana for the global event.

Eleven players from the previous T20 World Cup edition retain their place in the squad.

“The pace bowlers pipeline in Bangladesh is very narrow and at important moments they fall into injuries. Though England wickets are expected to be pace friendly, the behaviour of the wickets in the recent past suggest that it is assisting the spinners like the sub-continent where the ball spins a lot. So taking the conditions into consideration, we have kept our faith on spinners and we must accept there are not many pacers in our pipeline,” chief selector Sazzad Ahmed told reporters while announcing the squad.

Sazzad added that they have picked Taj Nehar in place of Sharmin due to her versatility.

“Sharmin Sultana was originally considered for the ODI format. On the other hand, Taj Nehar is a versatile player who can bat anywhere from No.1 to 6 and we believe that Taj Nehar can play an effective role in solving the team’s problem of scoring runs, especially in the last 5 overs of the innings,” he said.

Sazzad added that they need to change their conservative batting approach as they prepare for the global tournament.

“Yes, the defensive batting approach is currently a major concern for the team while it is not possible to change it overnight, the selectors are working on solving this problem,” he said, adding that Nigar Sultana is still playing by managing her injuries.

“Joty has the ability to dominate world-class (opponents) but she has been dealing with injuries for a long time. Had it not been for this injury she could have gone to a much higher level,” he added.

Bangladesh are scheduled to depart for Edinburgh on May 25 for a tri-series involving Scotland and the Netherlands, designed to acclimatize the players to English conditions ahead of the main event.

The team will then travel to Loughborough for the official ICC World Cup warm-up matches before the tournament gets underway.

Bangladesh squad for the Women’s T20 World Cup 2026

Nigar Sultana Joty (Captain), Nahida Akter (Vice Captain), Sharmin Akter Supta, Sobhana Mostary, Shorna Akter, Ritu Moni, Rabeya Khan, Fahima Khatun, Fariha Islam Trisna, Marufa Akter, Shanjida Akther Maghla, Sultana Khatun, Dilara Akter, Juairiya Ferdous, Taj Nehar

Continue Reading

Sports

Senior Australia players hold off Cricket Australia deal amid BBL pay frustration

Published

on

By

The player pay concerns have intensified in Australia [Cricinfo]

At least five senior Australia players have been left unimpressed by the initial 2026-27 Cricket Australia contract offers they have received in recent days and are yet to commit to signing them.

Meanwhile, a larger group of BBL stars are considering whether to play overseas during the summer after the stuttering BBL privatisation proposal stalled pay re-negotiations that would have redressed the fact that they have been earning between A$100-200,000 less than overseas players in the league in recent years.

First reported by Code Sports on Saturday, ESPNcricinfo understands a handful of Australian players were unimpressed by the initial CA contract offers that were tabled to them in the last week.

This follows reporting in the Age on Thursday that Test and ODI captain Pat Cummins had been offered A$4 million per year over the next three years, much of which was reported to be guaranteed money.

Under the current MoU (Australian players pay deal between CA and the Australian Cricketers Association), which runs until mid-2028, up to 24 national contracts are given out by national selectors for the 2026-27 financial year (July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027) and those players share A$21,916,257 in the year in base salaries.

Players are ranked and receive contracts based on importance and the number of games they are likely to play in the cycle, with the lowest player earning a base of $360,645. In addition, players also earn nearly A$19,000 per Test appearance, nearly $8000 per ODI and nearly $5000 per T20I in match payments on top of the base. There are win bonuses on top, with a Test win worth roughly $30,000 per player in total. There is also a CA marketing pool, which contracted players share depending on appearances with commercial partners.

Player pay was already an issue in Australia and at the heart of the BBL privatisation debate. The rising money on offer in the franchise world has led players to consider whether locking themselves into a 12-month CA deal would cost them money over the year.

Players like Marcus Stoinis and Tim David have not had CA deals in recent years, knowing they would qualify for a base upgrade by playing the minimum number of T20Is in a year (six), whilst being able to sign franchise deals freely without the need for NOCs, to maximise earnings elsewhere.

CA got creative this year by offering contracts for only 21 players for for 2026-27 so that fewer players could share more of the unchanged pool despite Australia being set to play an unprecedented 17 Tests (possibly 18) in the financial year. They will only play nine ODIs and five T20Is in the period.

But the priority of paying Test players has been a source of tension for the white-ball players, who feel they can earn more than the offered CA deal if they went freelance. Meanwhile, there are three-format players concerned about what they are missing out on if they have to rest from certain series, or if more minor bilateral series are being played while lucrative franchise tournaments are on.

Cummins articulated this concern in March around playing two Tests against Bangladesh in August this year while letting go of the chance to earn upwards of A$675,000 (US$485,000) to play in the Hundred.

How the issue gets resolved in the short term remains unclear. Australia have two white-ball tours of Pakistan and Bangladesh coming up but they fall in the previous contract cycle. The first games of the 2026-27 cycle are the home Bangladesh Tests in August.

Meanwhile, a group of a dozen high-profile Australian BBL players are understood to be furious over the stalled privatisation proposal. The players had set up a WhatsApp group last October to discuss their long-term options after spending three years frustrated at CA over the pay disparity between them and overseas players. The introduction of the draft and the platinum signing of A$420,000 meant the likes of Luke Wood and Mohammad Rizwan were paid significantly more than Australian players with significantly better T20 records, who were on $200,000-$300,000.

CA was set to renegotiate the MOU with the ACA if they could move to the next phase of their privatisation plan but that fell over when two states did not want to proceed. A hybrid plan is now being devised but discussions with the players have been set aside for the moment.

The BBL stars are now considering their options. It is a unique season coming with the ILT20 moving to November before the BBL. There are Australian players who have been offered A$500,000 to play in the UAE.

Meanwhile, the SA20, which is seen as the major threat to the BBL, is rumoured to start on January 17.

The BBL is likely to run from mid-December until the last weekend in January, as it did last year. It does mean Australian players could play both but would need an NOC to go and would miss the first week of the SA20. It would lead to the farcical situation that happened a couple of years ago when several Australian players benefited from their BBL teams not making finals, which meant they could get to South Africa earlier and earn more money, as contracts are generally prorated on a games played basis. Australia’s Test players, however, would not be available for either as they have a five-Test tour of India that runs from mid-January to early March that immediately follows a four-Test home series against New Zealand in December and early January.

Australian players were furious when Dewald Brevis and Aiden Markram were bought for R16.5 million (A$1.3 million or US$940,000 approximately) at the SA20 auction last year, four to five times more than some of the top Australian contracts in the BBL.

It is understood that the senior BBL stars do not expect that type of money in the BBL in the short term but were hoping to close the gap significantly this year before privatisation redressed the situation in 2027-28.

It is understood that part of CA’s proposal to the states was to increase the salary cap by up to A$1.5 million. The issue for Australia’s players is that the bottom-end players in the BBL earn a minimum of A$52,000, whereas it is only roughly A$17,000 in the SA20, with the two salary caps reasonably similar at around A$3.2 million.

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Gill, Sai Sudharsan, Rashid power Gujarat Titans to second spot with fourth straight win

Published

on

By

Shubman Gill and Jason Holder celebrate Jofra Archer's wicket [Cricinfo]

Twenty-eight overs into the contest in Jaipur, Rajasthan Royals (RR) were keeping pace with Gujarat Titans (GT). They were 86 for 3 in seven overs, chasing 230. Dhruv Jurel looked like he had excised his slow-batting demons. He was on 24 off 9 and ready to go bigger. Then, Rashid Khan spun one past Jurel’s slog to peg back his stumps. It was the first of his four wickets. On a night of spin chokeholds by both RR and GT, Rashid’s spell of 4 for 36 was the point of difference between both sides.

At the end of it all, GT zoomed up to second spot in the points table with 14 points. It was their fourth consecutive win, as they continued their late surge in this IPL.

Earlier in the evening, half-centuries from Shubman Gill and B Sai Sudarshan – and their 118-run opening partnership – headlined GT’s biggest IPL score outside Ahmedabad. They had been greeted by an all-pink Jaipur. RR’s jerseys were the same colour, in honour of their women’s empowerment movement. By the end of the powerplay, Gill and Sudharsan couldn’t have felt more at home themselves. They had raced away to 82 for 0, and alongside Rashid’s spell, they headlined a 77-run win.

Jofra Archer took 11 deliveries to get through the first over of the match. It featured nine extras and was the longest opening over in the history of the tournament. By the end of it, Gill and Sai Sudharsan – without taking any big risks – had raced away to 18 for no loss. This was the theme of the powerplay: the opening pair kept getting balls on their pads or bouncers shooting way over their heads. They played most of their shots in the ‘V’ down the ground. By the end of the first six, they were just 18 runs away from their ninth 100-plus partnership, the second-best tally in the IPL, just behind Virat Kohli and AB de Villiers.

Despite their big start, Gill and Sai Sudharsan slowed down in characteristic fashion. Both of them reached their fifties off 30 balls. Yash Raj Punja (1 for 37) and Ravindra Jadeja (1 for 34) did not find much turn off the surface, but bowling in tandem through the middle overs, they cut off the risk-free boundary options for the opening pair.

A leg injury while running between wickets affected Gill’s running as well. Punja took out Sai Sudharsan for 55 off 36, holing out to long-on, and Jadeja speared in a delivery to Jos Buttler at 107kph to rush him on a drive straight to long-off.

After GT’s whirlwind start, 220 was a base expectation from their innings. By the end of the 19th over, they were on track to finish under it, stuck on 208 for 4. Brijesh Sharma had plucked out Jason Holder’s wicket and given away just four runs in the 19th, varying his pace and bowling into the blockhole. However, his gold-dust over was reduced to a footnote when Tushar Deshpande missed his lines in the last over. Rahul Tewatia maneuvered around the crease to leather back-to-back sixes, before Washington Sundar hit one of his own to drag GT to 229 for 4.

It is the stuff of routine now. The bowler chugs in, bowls a perfectly okay delivery, and Vaibhav Sooryavanshi sends him into the stands first-ball. Saturday night was no different, as Sooryavanshi clobbered Mohammed Siraj across the line over the long-on boundary. Next ball, a Siraj yorker rifled towards the stumps, and Sooryavanshi inside-edged onto his foot and fell to the ground.

Sooryavanshi looked set for another big start, despite limping between wickets, blasting Siraj for three fours in four deliveries. On the fifth delivery, he was rushed into a hook off a fiery bouncer that carried to square leg. In the blink of an eye, Sooryavanshi went from zero to 16-ball 36, then from the middle to the dugout.

Siraj (1 for 55) and Kagiso Rabada (2 for 33) became the first pair of IPL bowlers to bowl through the powerplay four matches in a row. Jurel ventured down the track to plunder a 22-run over against Siraj before the powerplay ended. Rashid would pluck him out soon anyway.

With Sooryavanshi and Jaiswal gone, the onus was on Jurel and Ravindra Jadeja – who clobbered six and four off his first two deliveries – to play against type and shift into fifth gear. But Rashid got the ball to jag and turn off a pitch like no other spinner on the night. He also bowled more legbreaks than googlies – a rarity for him – to keep the batters guessing.

Once Jurel perished, Donovan Ferreira saw the ball turn the other way, past an innocuous front-foot defence. Harsh Dubey soon went for another missed slog, Rashid’s third consecutive dismissal to rattle the stumps. Rashid wore a wry smile when Jadeja swiped him over backward square leg for six in the 14th over. Next ball, Jadeja was trapped lbw in front of the stumps as the ball spun into his pads.

Holder soon mopped up the tail, taking the final three wickets in five deliveries and RR had lost their third game in four matches.

Brief scores:
Gujarat Titans 229 for 4 in 20 overs  (Sai Sudharsan 55, Shubman Gill 84, Joss Buttler 13, Washington Sundar 37*, Rahul Tewatia 14*; Brijesh Sharma 2-47, Yash Raj Punja 1-37, Ravindra Jadeja 1-34) beat Rajasthan Royals 152/10 in 16.3 overs  (Vaibhav Sooryavanshi 36, Dhruv Jurel 24, Ravindra Jadeja, 38, Shubham Dubey 15, Dasun Shanaka 16; Mohammed Siraj 1-15, KagisoRabada 2-33, Rashid Khan 4-33, Jason Holder 3-12)  by 77 runs

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Trending