Connect with us

News

Vote on Electricity Amendment Bill today: Will SLPP group disregard MR’s declaration?

Published

on

Ranil and Mahinda

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) will be in a dilemma today (06), when Parliament is scheduled to vote on the Electricity Amendment Bill.

Opposition sources pointed out that it would be the first vote since SLPP leader and former President, Mahinda Rajapaksa, in a statement on May 12, urged President Ranil Wickremesinghe to stop the divestiture drive pending the conclusion of the presidential election, scheduled for Sept/Oct this year.

Against the backdrop of that declaration, the SLPP parliamentary group couldn’t vote for the Bill, under any circumstances, the one-time SLPP heavyweight Prof. G. L. Peiris told The Island yesterday (05).

The SLPP’s first Chairman said that the vote would reveal how many of its members had switched their allegiance to President Ranil Wickremesinghe, elected by the party, in July 2022, to complete the remainder of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s five-year term.

Acknowledging that the SLPP is still the largest group represented in Parliament, Prof. Peiris said that the vote on the controversial Electricity Amendment Bill would decide the fate of the party.

The SLPP won a staggering 145 seats at the last General Election, whereas the SJB secured 54 and the TNA came a distant third with 10 seats. The JVP obtained three, EPDP and AITC (both Jaffna based parties) two each and nine political parties one each.

Responding to another query, Prof. Peiris said that the SC determination couldn’t have been made at a better time for the Opposition. The SLPP group could no longer engage in shenanigans in Parliament, the retired top academic declared, as it would have to take a stand whatever the consequences. “Actually, today’s vote is not only on a far reaching Bill but a reflection of the basis of the people who voted for Gotabaya Rajapaksa overwhelmingly at the 2019 Presidential Poll,” the SLPP National List MP said.

The SC ruling on the Bill proved that the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government was hell-bent on pursuing its agenda. Recalling the circumstances the Parliament passed the Online Safety Bill, in late January this year, with 108 MPs backing it, while 62 voted against it, Prof. Peiris said that the current dispensation seemed to be planning to adopt unparliamentary tactics. But unlike on that occasion, the vote on the Electricity Amendment Bill was taking place after the SLPP leader finally took a public stand.

Prof Peiris said that it is significant that the SC, in its Determination, found the Bill, as a whole, inconsistent with Article 12 (1) of the Constitution. To achieve compatibility, the SC compulsorily proposed about 12 amendments, without which the Bill cannot lawfully be enacted by a simple majority. Reasonable time is therefore required to study the amendments required and to ensure that they are incorporated, in appropriate form, at the Committee Stage. Undue haste is destructive of legislative due process.

These considerations are compelling, in light of empirical experience in the recent past. The SC required a series of amendments to the Online Bill to prevent conflict with constitutional provisions, the ex-Minister said.

The MP said: “Many competent persons and institutions, including the Human Rights Commission, were not satisfied that the required amendments, as proposed, were in fact made. Unlike in jurisdictions, such as India, it is not possible to invoke the jurisdiction of the SC, after the Bill has been certified by the Speaker. Government resolve to rush such a crucial Bill through, without adequate scrutiny, is all the more to be deplored.”

A deluge of far reaching legislation is planned to be enacted in the last 100 days of this government, he warned.



Latest News

Sun directly overhead Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura at about 12.10 noon today (31)

Published

on

By

The sun is going to be directly over the latitudes of Sri Lanka from  28th of August to 07th of September due to its apparent southward relative motion.

The nearest places of Sri Lanka over which the sun is overhead today (31) are Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura about 12.10 noon.

Continue Reading

News

BASL takes exception to Justice Ganepola being denied a place in SC

Published

on

… highlights injustice caused to Justice R. Gurusinghe

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has alleged that due to the failure on the part of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to fill the existing vacancies in the Supreme Court, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled. The BASL pointed out at the time of Ganepola’s retirement there were four vacancies in the Supreme Court.

In a letter dated 17 August, 2026, addressed to President Dissanayake, the BASL declared that the failure to promote and recognise Ganepola’s distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.

A top BASL spokesman told The Island yesterday (30) that the Bar Council, over the weekend, had decided to release the hitherto confidential letter.

The official said that they also wanted to remind the President of his assurance given to BASL, on 12 August, 2026, that vacancies in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal would be filled as soon as possible, within a month.

The following is the text of the BASL letter, signed by  Rajeev Amarasuriya, President, BASL, and its Secretary Nalin De Silva: “We write further to our letters dated 29th December 2025 and 30th June 2026 in relation to the above, to which we have not received any response.

We also refer to our meeting with Your Excellency on 12th August. As discussed during the meeting, there have been vacancies in the Supreme Court since May 2025, and the number of vacancies has now increased to four (04). There are also four (04) vacancies in the Court of Appeal. These are all matters we have already written to Your Excellency about.

Your Excellency informed the BASL Delegation when we met that you would be taking steps to make recommendations to fill these vacancies as soon as possible, within a month.

We write to reiterate the importance of giving due consideration to the criteria set out in our aforesaid letter dated 29th December 2025. We also wish to emphasise that, in making judicial appointments and promotions, seniority should be given due priority, in keeping with longstanding practice, until such time there are objective and defensible guidelines governing the assessment of merit.

The only justifiable departure to this criterion would be where there exists a specific and recognized demerit in respect of the particular Judge concerned or such other known compelling circumstances that are objectively identifiable such as where a Judge has previously been overlooked for promotion unfairly or conversely, where a Judge has been unfairly previously granted promotions above others.

This approach will safeguard both the integrity of the Judiciary and the trust reposed in it by the public.

Further, while there has been considerable discussion and representation by the Government regarding the importance of retaining experienced judges, as reminded to Your Excellency at our said meeting that, only a few months ago on 8th May 2026, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled, and in which there were four vacancies at the time.

The failure to promote and recognise his distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.

We also drew Your Excellency’s attention at the said meeting to the fact that the Senior-most Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice R. Gurusinghe, who joined the Judicial Service in 1996, who also Acted in the Office of President of the Court of Appeal (appointed by Your Excellency) on 11th May 2026, is due to retire at the end of this month. In fact, we learnt through the Media that Her Ladyship then Chief Justice Justice Murdu Fernando, PC, had previously in July 2025 recommended to Your Excellency the promotion of Justice R. Gurusinghe to the Supreme Court, but the same is pending from that time.

 He too is well deserving of promotion to the Supreme Court and has already been recommended by the former Chief Justice, and his case must also receive due and urgent consideration before his impending retirement.

We hope that Your Excellency will take due note of and give due regard to the concerns of the Bar, as well as to the established principles, practices and conventions governing judicial appointments, when taking steps to fill these vacancies.

On this, Your Excellency is already open to the accusation that these vacancies have been kept open, to fill with favourites of the Government which is yet another serious indictment on the independence of the judiciary which accusation would be confirmed if recommendations are made outside established practice.

Moreover, the BASL expresses grave concern that withholding promotions of Judicial Officers for extended periods of time places undue pressure on Judicial Officers in the discharge of their duties and constitutes both directly and indirectly, interference with the independence of the Judiciary, in addition to the strain obviously caused to the dispensation of justice in other Courts and the stifling and delay of career progression of Judges legitimately entitled to promotions.

We do hope that Your Excellency would take due note and cognizance of the foregoing when effecting these judicial promotions which have been long overdue and which have already adversely impacted the efficiency and effectiveness of the administration of justice.”

The BASL has copied the letter to Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne, Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and all members of the Constitutional Council.

Continue Reading

News

Sajith challenges govt. to hold PC polls

Published

on

Sajith

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa on Saturday (29) challenged the government to hold the long-delayed Provincial Council elections, saying the polls would provide an opportunity to gauge the level of public support enjoyed by the administration.

Addressing a farmers’ meeting in Tissamaharama, Hambantota, Premadasa also criticised the latest Rs. 17 per kilogram increase in wheat flour prices, warning that it would push up the prices of bread, bakery products and other flour-based food items and place further pressure on households already struggling with the rising cost of living.

He said Sri Lanka ranked 120th among 130 countries in an international comparison of minimum wages, arguing that wages remained inadequate to meet the escalating cost of living.

Premadasa also questioned official assessments of living standards, asking whether a person could survive for an entire month on Rs. 17,315, a figure he attributed to the Department of Census and Statistics.

He claimed that between 30 and 40 percent of the population was living in poverty and called for a clear programme to help affected families improve their economic conditions.

Turning to the proposed 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, which seeks to increase the retirement age of superior court judges, the Opposition Leader accused the government of attempting to undermine judicial independence and interfere with democratic institutions.

He also criticised the government’s handling of poverty, employment, agriculture, healthcare and investment, saying more effective measures were needed to provide relief to people facing economic hardships.Premadasa called for stronger policies to attract foreign direct investment and urged the government to formulate a national strategy for developing the tourism industry.

Continue Reading

Trending