Sports
Vaughan regrets ‘disgusting’ tweets but denies making ‘you lot’ comment
Historic tweets from Michael Vaughan took centre stage on the third day of the ECB’s racism hearings, as the former England captain denied having made the statement that forms the core of the ECB’s charge of bringing the game into disrepute.
As he has done publicly before, Vaughan emphatically denied ever having said, “There’s too many of you lot, we need to have a word about that” to Azeem Rafiq, Adil Rashid, Rana Naved-ul-Hasan and Ajmal Shahzad at a T20 game in June 2009. The ECB’s charge stems from Rafiq’s recollection of the remark which was, on Thursday, supported by the testimony of Rashid.
Vaughan, appearing at the Cricket Discipline Commission (CDC) hearing in London, said of the day in question that he had “a very clear mind about back in 2009” and that he knew he did not say what had been alleged. He added that he would never have gone on to the field and said something to team-mates that could “put them in a bad state of mind” before the game.
“Knowing me in 2009, that’s not the sort of thing I would’ve said.”
Vaughan was questioned by the ECB’s lead counsel Jane Mulcahy KC for nearly 90 minutes, during which she argued that some historical tweets of his were “remarkably similar in tone” to the alleged remarks.
Vaughan said the tweets were unacceptable and that he had apologised for them before and would continue to do so. But he disagreed with the suggestion that they were similar in tone. Mulcahy pointed out that both Rafiq and Rashid claimed Vaughan likely made the alleged comment as a “bad joke” and said the tweet was similar in tone because it was “lighthearted but offensive”.
Asked if he agreed, Vaughan said: “No.”
Vaughan said he was “disgusted” with the tweets. “I apologised for them. I put myself on an online course, Inclusion. I wanted to lead the game in knowing how to lead in modern times. The tweets are disgusting, awful, and other words you could use. But the most important thing is I have said sorry and I am learning from them. As I say, if I get things wrong in my life, I stick my hands up.”
He went back to his recollection of the day of the game – which he has written about in his memoir – that he “could not have been more proud [of] four Asian players, three of whom had come through the system.”
Vaughan was also questioned about his meeting with Rafiq in November 2021 saying he felt the need for it because “the whole situation was escalating out of control”. Vaughan said he was apologetic in the meeting with Rafiq because he was “disgusted” by what Rafiq had to go through at Yorkshire but did not accept he made the alleged comment.
Vaughan: ‘Team-mates fighting it out terrible for game’
Vaughan said that the CDC hearing was a “terrible look” for cricket. “It’s not been easy for anybody. This is not the right process to deal with word-against-word comments from 14 years ago. Ex-team-mates fighting it out over hearsay is a terrible look for the game and a really bad look on how cricket has dealt with this situation.”
Earlier in the morning, scrutiny fell on the ECB’s scope in the investigation of the incident as well as the rigour deployed, with Meena Botros, its director of legal and integrity, facing a three-hour grilling from Christopher Stoner, Vaughan’s lawyer.
The line of questioning took in a recent interview with Lord Kamlesh Patel, the outgoing Yorkshire chair, in Eastern Eye. In it the claim was made that the ECB had “urged” Lord Patel to “get rid of people” at the county when he took over. Talking about his role, Patel said: “I was asked by the ECB to meet a set of criteria that most people would have winced at, would have thought there’s no way we can deliver this, and I delivered it.
“I was asked by the ECB to work with them to create a framework and an environment where we would prove to the world that we want a non-racist institution, and I did all that. I was asked by the ECB to ensure some people who were there from the previous regime did not take part in that governance process, very clear about that.”
Stoner suggested those comments showed that the ECB was “actively involved” in the Yorkshire investigation, in breach of the process as described in Botros’ witness statement, that the ECB remained independent of action being taken by one of its counties in such matters.
Botros said he couldn’t talk about what Lord Patel had said but insisted that Stoner was “mistaking” the ECB’s regulatory function in getting involved, from its other roles in such cases. Stoner pointed to Botros’s witness statement which read: “In its capacity as a regulator, the ECB must remain independent of action being taken by one of its member first-class county clubs.”
“That’s just not what happened, is it?” Stoner asked.
Botros replied: “It is what happened.”
Stoner then zeroed in on the day Vaughan is alleged to have made the remark, questioning whether the ECB could and should have gone further in its investigations of events. He confirmed with Botros that the only players the ECB had spoken to about the incident were Adil Rashid and Ajmal Shahzad.
Stoner asked why all Yorkshire players that day weren’t spoken to. Botros said the ECB “did speak to the individuals where we were able to” but that “certain individuals either didn’t want to take part or engage”, or that the ECB “weren’t able” to get contact details for others.
Stoner also asked Botros why the on-field umpires that day had not been contacted by the ECB for their version of events.
“There is no suggestion that the umpires were close enough to hear it,” Botros replied. Botros added that if it was such an important point, Vaughan’s team could have taken it on themselves.
The hearing is scheduled to end next Tuesday. (cricinfo)
Latest News
World Cup contenders England and India hope to get their combinations right
With the Women’s T20 World Cup looming into view, this three-match series across the green swards of Chelmsford, Bristol and Taunton shapes as ideal preparation for two teams with designs on the trophy.
For England, it is vital that they can hone their plans and approach – in particular, role definition – after the best part of a year without playing the format (before they took on New Zealand in Derby last week, their previous T20I had been against India in July 2025). That planning has been further hampered by the absence of captain Nat Sciver Brunt through injury, though they overcame that disadvantage to see off New Zealand by a 2-1 scoreline.
High on England’s list of wants will be time in the middle for a new-look opening pair of Sophia Dunkley and Alice Capsey, as well as further opportunities for Dani Gibson and Freya Kemp to establish their credentials as all-round options after injury. Three blemish-free performances in the field would also go down nicely.
India, the reigning 50-over world champions, won a historic first T20I series on these shores last summer and – in contrast to England – have been in regular action since, although they followed up victory in Australia at the start of the year with an unexpected 4-1 reversal on their most-recent tour, to South Africa in April.
Injuries to key allrounders have changed the balance of their side slightly, but they remain able to call on a formidable group of players as they seek to follow Australia in holding the women’s ODI and T20I titles at the same time. All but three of the squad have the experience of playing T20Is in England, while the new faces include uncapped seamer Nandani Sharma, who finished as joint-leading wicket-taker at the most-recent WPL.
Sophie Ecclestone ought to be one of England’s trump cards as they target a home World Cup win. Previously the No. 1-ranked bowler in women’s T20Is (she currently sits third), Ecclestone is closing in on becoming only the fourth woman to 150 wickets in the format. But she has made a quiet start to England’s international season, with one wicket in three outings against New Zealand (two T20Is, one ODI), which included getting thumped for 18 in an over by Sophie Devine in Derby. Figures of 1 for 11 from four suffocating overs in Hove on Monday hinted at a return to her best.
Talking of totemic forces, Smriti Mandhana once again shapes as key to India’s challenge. Still only 29, but already the second-highest run-scorer of all time in the format – Mandhana is currently 427 runs behind the soon-to-be-retired Suzies Bates – she will be hoping to replicate last year’s English experience, when she was the leading run-scorer on either side across five T20Is, which included notching a maiden T20I hundred at Trent Bridge. She only made 62 runs in three innings in South Africa, but topped the run charts at the WPL earlier in the year and has lots of good memories of touring in this part of the world.
England will welcome back Dani Wyatt Hodge from parental leave, although she won’t be available for the first T20I; Charis Pavely has been released to play for Warwickshire, but Maia Bouchier will remain with the squad. Lauren Filer will also be allowed to leave for Durham’s Blast game at The Oval on Wednesday, but will rejoin England for the rest of the series. Tilly Corteen-Coleman, the 18-year-old slow left-armer, awaits her debut in this format.
Amanjot Kaur was one of the stars of India’s victory in England last year but misses this tour with a back injury – as does her understudy Kashvee Gautam (knee). The top six is pretty much locked in, although Bharti Fulmali could provide an option if India want to pack the batting. Radha Yadav is also back in contention, having last played a T20I on the England tour, and could add all-round depth.
England (probable): Sophia Dunkley, Alice Capsey, Maia Bouchier, Heather Knight, Freya Kemp, Amy Jones (wk), Dani Gibson, Charlie Dean (capt), Sophie Ecclestone, Issy Wong, Lindsey Smith
India (probable): Smriti Mandhana, Shafali Verma, Jemimah Rodrigues, Harmanpreet Kaur (capt), Richa Ghosh (wk), Deepti Sharma, Shreyanka Patil/Bharti Fulmali, Arundhati Reddy, Renuka Singh, Kranti Gaud, N Shree Charani
[Cricinfo]
Sports
Sri Lanka Cricket launch a program to enhance coaching standards of school cricket
Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC), under the direction of the Cricket Transformation Committee launched a special program aimed at educating and developing school cricket coaches in the country.
The inaugural session of the program was held on Monday, 25th May, at the High Performance Center of the SLC with the participation of 74 coaches representing Division ‘1’ and ‘2’ schools.
The Head Coach of the Sri Lanka Men’s Team Gary Kirsten conducted a two-hour session for the participating coaches.
During the session, Kirsten shared valuable insights into modern coaching methods and highlighted key areas coaches should focus on in order to nurture talented and promising young cricketers.
He emphasized the importance of creating a friendly and supportive environment for children while teaching them cricketing skills. Kirsten also noted that coaches must continuously improve their own skill levels in order to develop successful players.
He encouraged school coaches to focus more on producing good cricketers rather than simply concentrating on winning matches.
Joining Kirsten at the program were Ryan van Niekerk, National Bowling Coach, and Jordan Gregory, National Fielding and Spin Bowling Coach, who also shared their expertise and experiences with the school coaches.
Sidath Wettimuny, Chairman of the Cricket Committee of Sri Lanka Cricket, who is also a member of the Cricket Transformation Committee, made the introductory speech of the program.
The program also featured an interactive Question-and-Answer session, giving participants the opportunity to engage directly with Gary Kirsten and further enhance their knowledge.
This program will continue periodically, with the objective of developing highly skilled and knowledgeable coaches within the Sri Lankan school cricket system.
Latest News
Explosive top orders in focus as Rajasthan Royals face bogey team Sunrisers Hyderabad
Sunrisers Hyderabad’s IPL 2026 was going nowhere four games into the season. They had won just one game, their bowling looked clueless, their batting over-dependent on the top order and their regular captain was still recovering from an injury. Then they met Rajasthan Royals and a season turnaround ensued. They defeated RR by 57 runs and began their journey of five straight wins which lifted them from the lower half of the points table to playoff contention.
RR’s season began with four straight wins, with everything falling into place. Then came a dip, which began with that defeat against SRH and ultimately reached a stage where RR had to overcome two near must-win games to reach the playoffs. One might argue that having played two high-pressure games, RR are better placed coming into the eliminator as opposed to SRH, who haven’t really faced any knockout anxiety. But SRH have been the more consistent of the two teams and will bank on in-form players to get the job done in New Chandigarh.
The eliminator might end up being about the battle of the top order. The last time Vaibhav Sooriyavanshi faced SRH, he crashed a 37 ball 103 in Jaipur, despite which RR ended on the losing side. RR are the fastest scoring team in the powerplay so far this season, going at 11.5 an over. In second place are SRH, who are going at 11.02 in this phase. While Travishek as an opening duo hasn’t ticked consistently, Abhishek Sharma (563 runs), Ishan Kishan (569 runs) and Heinrich Klaasen (606 runs) are all enjoying remarkable seasons. If Abhishek and Kishan can score 37 and 31 runs respectively in the eliminator, this would be the first time that three batters from the same team would have crossed the 600-mark in a season.
SRH have defeated RR both times so far this season: by 57 runs in Hyderabad, where they defended 216 and by five wickets in Jaipur, where they chased 229 with nine balls to spare. SRH are currently on a six-match winning streak against RR and a win in the eliminator will make it their best-ever streak against an opponent in the IPL. RR are unbeaten in New Chandigarh – three wins out of three. Who makes it to Qualifier 2?
RR captain Riyan Parag has been down with a hamstring injury, while Ravindra Jadeja is also struggling with an injury. Parag, who had missed an earlier group game, suggested that he wasn’t even supposed to play RR’s final match against Mumbai Indians but would “of course” play the eliminator. Jadeja, meanwhile, came in as an Impact Player, batting at No. 9 and bowled two wicketless overs for 24, with Kumar Sangakkara later stating that Jadeja has “been nursing an injury.” Both players are, however, expected to play the SRH game.
Rajasthan Royals (probable): Yashasvi Jaiswal, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi, Dhruv Jurel (wk), Riyan Parag (capt), Donovan Ferreira, Shubham Dubey, Ravindra Jadeja, Dasun Shanaka, Jofra Archer, Nandre Burger, Yash Raj Punja, Brijesh Sharma
There are no injury concerns on the SRH front. Harshal Patel played the last game against Royal Challengers Bengaluru and there could be a toss-up between him and Praful Hinge for the final spot.
Sunrisers Hyderabad (probable): Abhishek Sharma, Travis Head, Ishan Kishan (wk), Heinrich Klaasen, Salil Arora, R Smaran, Nitish Kumar Reddy, Pat Cummins (capt), Shivang Kumar, Eshan Malinga, Sakib Hussain, Harshal Patel/ Praful Hinge
-
Business6 days agoHistoric launch of CCWE Fashion Week & International Summit 2026
-
Opinion7 days agoMurder of Ehelepola family, Bogambara Wewa and Sightings of Wangediya
-
News7 days agoSteps underway to safeguard Sri Lanka’s maritime heritage
-
News3 days agoPolice probe underway to ascertain links between criminals deported from UAE and local politicians
-
News4 days agoAll-New GRAVITE launches at LKR 6.99 Mn
-
Features4 days agoThe NPP’s pivot to the past
-
Opinion6 days agoThe need to reform Buddhist ecclesiastical order
-
Editorial7 days agoA play without its protagonist
