Connect with us

Features

US SUPPORT OF ISRAEL “ROCK SOLID” – PRESIDENT BIDEN

Published

on

President Joe Biden presides over a White House meeting on Israel – Hamas war.

HAMAS-ISRAELI CONFLICT EXPLODES WITH BRUTAL HAMAS ATTACK ON ISRAEL

by Vijaya Chandrasoma

The vicious attacks against Israel last week by Hamas, the military group which virtually governs the Palestinian enclave of the Gaza strip, a sudden and well planned incursion, caught even the usually canny Israeli intelligence community completely by surprise. A terrorist attack, which on the first day alone, killed at least 700, including 11 Americans, wounded thousands and resulted in taking hostage of over 150 Israelis and Americans.

The fate and whereabouts of these hostages, including at least 25 Americans, are unknown at the time of writing. It is likely that Hamas is holding them underground, in terrible conditions.

The sophistication of these attacks, which enabled 2,000 Hamas terrorists to successfully breach the highly guarded borders of Israel has caused extreme consternation amongst the Israelis. Hamas has always had the support of the Russians and Iran, who have provided funding, training and weaponry, and who may have assisted Hamas in the planning of these attacks.

However, it has now been discovered that Hamas had been training their men for these attacks at camps near Israel’s most fortified border, one of them a mere 70 meters from the border. It seems inconceivable that the Israeli Defense Forces were unaware of the training conducted at these camps. The Israeli government is conducting an inquiry into the reasons for these unprecedented military and intelligence failures, describing them as a “complete collapse”.

Two thousand Hamas terrorists breached this highly fortified border between Israel and Gaza and committed unbelievably brutal acts on that first day of attack. They went from home to home in kibbutzes (communal settlements) near the border, executing innocent civilians. They killed children in front of their parents, and parents in front of their children.

They opened fire on about 3,500 teenagers enjoying a night of celebration of the Jewish holiday of Sukkot (the fall harvest) in a field near the border, many shot in the back as they were fleeing. Paramedics recovered at least 260 bodies in that area. The Israeli government released sickening pictures of children, some burnt alive, others beheaded, of butchered elders, of pregnant women with their babies ripped out of their bodies. “Savagery not seen since the holocaust”, according to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Brutal acts which cannot and will not justify any cause, however urgent, however valid. No peace settlement can even be considered in the light of such barbarism.

In his first public statement since the Hamas attacks last Tuesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the “explosion of violence” between Israel and Hamas, “is a vivid example of the failure of US policy in the Middle-East”. He added that Washington “had ignored the interests of Palestinians, including their needs for their own independent Palestinian state”. A statement which cannot be denied. Though Russia’s complicity in muddying an already convoluted crisis is also undeniable.

The Israelis retaliated the following day, last Sunday, with attacks which killed at least 650 Palestinians in Gaza. A state of war against Hamas and a “complete siege of Gaza” have now been declared by the Israelis. A complete blockade of food, water and power was imposed on Gaza.

President Biden has guaranteed “rock solid” American support of the Israeli people against the current Hamas attacks. Americans have always deemed Hamas a terrorist, even barbarous organization, with its stated ambition of destroying the State of Israel, a common goal of much of the Arab world since the end of World War II.

In turn, Hamas, along with the rest of the Arab world, consider Americans to be the embodiment of Satan, who have destroyed the geophysical and ethnic integrity of the Middle-East with the creation of the Jewish State of Israel and their insatiable thirst for the vast oil reserves in the Middle-East.

Both descriptions have their elements of truth, based on atrocities committed by Israelis and Arabs. Violent struggles for freedom based on barbarous atrocities and ethnic cleansing can never be the answer to the achievement of a durable peace in the region.

Europeans have been guilty of organized massacres (pogroms) of ethnic groups, especially the Jews, since time immemorial. The climax of the “Jewish Problem” came with Hitler’s “Final Solution”, the eradication of European Jews and others of “Impure blood”. The holocaust claimed six million Jews and five million other “sub-human beings”, baked and gassed in Hitler’s ovens and gas chambers.

In the aftermath of the holocaust and the end of World War II, the survivors of the holocaust, whose ancestors had suffered centuries of persecution in Europe and Russia, pursued the dream of a homeland where they would no longer be a vulnerable minority.

In 1947, the United Nations voted the British governed Mandate of Palestine be partitioned into two new states, one Jewish, the other Palestinian, a proposition accepted by the Jews but rejected by the Arabs. The resulting civil war ended with the formation of the new entity of “the Ancient Land of Israel”, the legitimacy of which was established by the title deeds as laid down in the Bible, based entirely on the unilateral interpretation of the Word of the Christian God.

The creation of a Jewish State from land occupied by the Palestinian people for centuries has caused conflict between the Arab states and Israel from 1948 to the present day. From the first Arab-Israeli war, ending in 1949 to the present day, there have been a series of military conflicts between Israel and various Arab forces, all ending in Israeli triumph. An estimated 15,000 Palestinians have been killed and 750,000 dispossessed and rendered homeless during this period of conflict.

After the war of 1949, Israel captured 78% of the historical homeland of the Palestinian people. The remaining 22%, composed of the Gaza Strip (140 square miles), and part of the West Bank of the Jordan river (2,100 square miles), is now home to 1.8 million and 1.7 million Palestinians, respectively. The Gaza Strip is one of the most densely populated territories in the world.

Of course, Trump made the attacks on Israel all about himself, when he posted on his social media, in all caps, “THIS HORRIBLE ATTACK ON ISRAEL, MUCH LIKE THE ATTACK ON UKRAINE, WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED IF I WERE PRESIDENT – ZERO CHANCE”.

In a recent interview with right-leaning news site The National Pulse, Trump said, “Nobody has ever seen anything like we are witnessing now. It (immigration) is a very sad thing for our country. It’s poisoning the blood of our country. It’s so bad, and people are coming with disease. People are coming with every possible thing you could have”.

Trump’s words were completely in harmony with Hitler’s racial ideology, which stemmed from what the Fuhrer called the “basic principle of the blood”, the infestation of the impure blood of Jews causing disease in Germany.

The Israeli – Hamas conflict continues. After nearly a week of fighting, at least 1,250 Israelis and 1,500 Palestinians have been killed, many thousands wounded. Over 3,000 Palestinians have already been rendered homeless, with nowhere to go. These numbers will keep increasing exponentially as the Israeli attacks continue. Ultimately, tens of thousands of Palestinians will have to seek refuge in Egypt and other Arab nations willing to accept them.

Israel has formed an Emergency Government and War Cabinet, and retaliated with airstrikes bombarding Gaza, blockading food, water and electricity, causing a deep humanitarian crisis. The blockage is causing severe suffering of the Palestinian civilians living in Gaza. The hospitals in Gaza are turning into morgues as their generators run out of fuel, qnd the power needed to keep patients alive fail.

The Israelis have amassed a massive military build-up of 350,000 reservists near the Gaza border. They have also advised the United Nations to order the evacuation of the northern section of Gaza, which likely means an imminent, boots on the ground invasion of the Gaza strip. An invasion which will put every Palestinian life in the Strip in peril, every Palestinian child in the crossfire, as Hamas uses innocent civilians as human shields against the Israelis seeking revenge for the butchery committed by Hamas against their men, women and children.

At least 20 Americans, among about 150 hostages held by Hamas, still remain unaccounted for. The Israeli government has vowed that the blockade of food, water and power would remain in force until every hostage has been returned.

Any kind of settlement of the “Middle-East problem” is far into the horizon, as long as the Israelis, backed by the Americans, will always refuse to entertain a just and equitable two-state solution in Israel, which will be acceptable to the Palestinians and its Arab neighbors, but devoid of complete advantage to the Israelis.

As Secretary of State, Antony Blinken said at a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in Israel last Thursday: “The United States will stand firmly by Israel as the nation continues to strike back against the militants in the Gaza Strip following the attack on Israeli soil. The message I bring to Israel is this. You may be strong enough on your own to defend yourself, but as long as America exists, you will never, ever, have to”.

And they have Americans at their side while they destroy Hamas and any other terrorist organizations seeking revenge for the suffering caused in the region by their ambitions of expansionist aggression.

This conflict, with depressingly regular atrocities, is likely to remain unsettled for generations to come.

Apart from the Israel – Palestine conflict, the “Middle East problem” will remain unfulfilled until the unquenchable thirst of the Superpowers for the control of the vast reservoirs of black gold in the region is finally slaked. And once these wells dry up, once the black gold becomes worthless, the European and American predators will disappear, having caused myriad economic, geopolitical and demographic crises in the region as a result of their colonial cruelty and capitalist greed.

As the Europeans bled other countries to poverty, stole their wealth and resources, leaving in their wake internal ethnic, cultural and religious strife and confusion; and disappeared, wealthy and unscathed, after centuries of brutal colonial plunder.

Today, these same colonial marauders of the past have almost magically transformed themselves to be the guardians of human rights in the world, making sanctimonious judgments on other admittedly evil, authoritarian nations which are now acting as barbarously and disgustingly as they themselves did, not so long ago.



Features

‘There are no private universities in Sri Lanka’ – some considerations for higher education reform

Published

on

Academics involved in education policy like to say that there is no such thing as a private university in Sri Lanka. The only ‘universities’ in the country are state universities; anything else offering degrees is a private higher education institution (HEI). This position is technically accurate. Yet, in the discourse and imagination of the public, private universities are very real – people teach in them, students register in them, families pay fees, and such degree holders enter job markets in Sri Lanka and outside.

For decades, activists concerned for public higher education have ignored or resisted looking at private HEIs, as if such scrutiny would taint them. Others have worked in both types of institutions, carrying practices from each to the other. The apex body governing state universities, the UGC, has, meanwhile, ignored the concept of conflict of interest and appointed individuals in private higher education in committees and leadership positions. It is unsurprising then that some of the ideologies informing private higher education appear in reform agendas in the state sector.

This is a good time then to consider the varying types of private HEIs around us, and to take a look at some of the issues within them in the hope that higher education reform agendas will include private, as well as state higher education.

What is a ‘private university’?

First, some clarifications. In the public imaginary, a ‘private university’ is typically an institution that provides a foreign or local degree for which the student makes a payment. But this broad classification encompasses a host of diverse institutions and types of degrees which I detail below.

The Non-State Higher Education Division (NSHE) of the Ministry of Education has recognised 295 degrees by 32 institutions. Most of these are private companies and include a handful of established, well-known private HEIs that are ‘university like’. The degrees are local degrees conferred by the institutions accredited by the NSHE Division. While private HEIs conferring local degrees must be accredited by the NSHE Division, there appears to be no legal consequence for not doing so. In addition, there are several permutations of the private degree that miss the net of this Division and the Standing Committee on Accreditation and Quality Assurance (SCAQA) that assists this Division.

For one, degrees conferred by foreign universities offered, via these same private HEIs, are not vetted by the NSHE Division. Secondly, there is a growing plethora of private HEIs which have either no physical presence locally or only a dubious presence. The University Grants Commission has notified the public, through their website, that foreign universities listed in the Commonwealth Universities Yearbook and the World Higher Education Database are recognised, but refrained from giving any other details – which degrees? Offered by what modes? These details are not known. Some of the foreign universities in the lists may be legitimate entities in their own land but the degrees conferred locally, in their name, may not adhere to curriculum or teaching specifications of the NSHE Division or the UGC.

Another troubling phenomenon is the ‘top up degree’, which appears to work on the same principle as that of a pre-paid mobile connection: if I have a Diploma or an HND of a sort, I am eligible to complete a course of study which provides me with a degree, usually from a foreign university. The idea that someone who does not initially qualify for a degree programme should be able to work their way towards one is a progressive notion. This is the concept that open and distance learning (ODL) was based on initially, but which is now sadly exploited. ODL models are expected to provide opportunity for learning for those who may be excluded from traditional learning institutions. In Sri Lanka, however, we have seen ODL become a marketplace offering easy to obtain, for-fee qualifications by institutions with little commitment to superior teaching and learning.

Finally, a perusal of the many types of private HEIs and their varied degrees bring to mind another question – how should the private degrees, provided by state institutions (that are not educational institutions), be regulated? Who should do so?

All of these create a host of problems for the public – for hopeful students and parents and trusting employers. For the higher education sector, recruitment of academic staff, too, has become difficult due to this plethora of ambiguous higher education qualifications, as I discussed in a previous Kuppi article (‘Recruiting academics to state universities’).

Some issues in private HEIs – a bellwether for change in state universities

In this second part of this article, I will discuss some aspects of work in private HEIs – albeit the more established institutions – given that such issues may appear in reform agendas in future.

Across state universities, all permanent staff of a specific category are paid according to the same criteria. The picture is not so clear when it comes to private HEIs since they are different entities legally, typically companies. Private HEIs have salary scales and financial incentives that are different to each other. The more established private HEIs reportedly have attractive renumeration packages, possibly a reason for academics of state universities migrating eagerly to such institutions during sabbatical years and on retirement. This may not of course be the case with other less established, or improperly registered HEIs of which we know little. Academic staff of these more accepted private HEIs seem to value the high financial remuneration they receive (in comparison to state universities) as something that makes their work rewarding.

Attractive remuneration is important to sustain the good life and is at times seen as the institution’s way of encouraging good work. Yet, this has implications for the future of the institution: to continue to deliver on promised financial packages, institutions must continue to have large profit margins. One strategy has been to enroll multiple cohorts of students per year, even up to three or four intakes per year. This can result in exploitative work conditions, since staff must cater to all these cohorts in that same year. If there is inadequate staff, employees are further burdened. On the other hand, if there is a sudden drop in enrolments (degrees can go out of fashion) unexpected layoffs occur. Similar to other sectors that employ short-term contract staff – including state universities – in private HEIs, too, individual teachers, who are on short term contracts that need regular renewal, can feel pressured to work under difficult or exploitative conditions.

At the same time, even in the more established private HEIs, work norms differ from those of state universities in that they include promotional work that keeps the institution’s name in the eye of the public. The Marketing (or similarly named) unit comes up in conversations as one of the most important departments. It appears to weigh in on decision-making related to the number of staff, the amount of re-sits per exams, and other pedagogically important matters. This is a worrying example of how financial rationales interfere with pedagogically or academically sound processes, resulting in problematic results in the classroom. On the plus side, junior colleagues, who had experience in both state and private HEIs, also felt that they faced less harassment in private HEIs – primarily due to the private HEIs ability to take swift action in reported cases of harassment. This is a real indictment on state institutions and their reluctance to address chronic issues of harassment in our universities.

Yet, while we hear much about problems in state universities, we hardly hear of problems that staff in private HEIs face. One rationale for a lack of public expressions by staff is that expressions of discontent might lead to trouble given the importance of reputation for private HEIs. The worry about reputational damage is a growing concern in state universities, too, as evidenced by social media policies and internal conversations on reputational damage, consequent to negative publicity. Institutional worries of reputational damage are harmful in the long run since these impact not only freedom of expression by student and staff, but also research that is possible in and about the education sector.

Some thoughts at the end…


A close look at the private higher education sector is important given its strong presence in the country. Impending reform needs to regulate this diverse array of higher education offerings in the private sector, as well as the state institutions that offer privately-funded options of higher education (a topic for a separate Kuppi on its own). It is time we carefully considered how to build a whole system of higher education out of this broken mess.

Kaushalya Perera is a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo.

Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.

Continue Reading

Features

Ready for solo spotlight

Published

on

Nish Peiris: Excited about future plans

Singer Nish Peiris is set to take the next big step in her music journey.

The talented vocalist, who has been seen and heard in the scene here for a short while, and was also featured with the now-defunct band, Inner Vision, has announced that she will be fully committing to her solo career, after completing her degree this year.

“I’m finishing my degree this year, and after that I’ll be fully committing to my solo music career,” Nish told The Island.

“I’ve already got a few tours lined up for next year, so I’m really excited for what’s ahead.”

Fans, no doubt, will remember Nish for her smooth voice and stage presence, and the good news is that she is now ready to chart her own path and bring new music to audiences at home and abroad.

With tours already planned for 2027, the year 2026 promises to be an exciting year for the young artiste as she steps into the spotlight on her own.

We wish Nish every success in this new chapter!

Continue Reading

Features

Exclusive musical evening for Sri Lankans in Toronto

Published

on

Toronto Ceymphony Live Band, with Sri Lankans doing the needful

While Sri Lankan music lovers, in Dubai, are eagerly looking forward to being a part of the action on Saturday, 25th July, with Rajiv Sebastian in the limelight, Sri Lankans, in Toronto, Canada, are equally excited and are anxiously awaiting the arrival of Sri Lanka’s famous singer/entertainer Sohan Weerasinghe.

Having done the needful with The X-Periments, the legendary performer has now embarked on an exciting new chapter – a solo career – and Toronto, Canada, will see him do the needful, on Friday, 31st July, 2026, from 8.00 pm to 12.00 am, at the Angus Glen Golf Club.

Sohan Weerasinghe: In Canada, and ready to do the needful on 31st July

Reports indicate that it’s a ‘sold out’ event – naturally with Sohan in the spotlight.

Gamini Hemalal: Creating all the excitement for Sri Lankans in Toronto

Having built his reputation through years of unforgettable performances, and hits that became part of our musical fabric, Sohan is ready to bring his own vision, sound, and stories directly to the audience, in Toronto, Canada, backed by the phenomenal Toronto Ceymphony Live Band.

Says Gamini Hemalal, who has been instrumental in reviving the Sri Lankan entertainment scene, in that part of the world:

“The countdown begins for the most exclusive musical event of the summer! Join us for a premium night of incredible music, elite hospitality, and a lavish buffet as the legendary Sohan Weerasinghe takes the stage live in Toronto!

“This is a high-end event, designed for those who appreciate exceptional entertainment and great food.”

Gamini, who is also a member of the Toronto Ceymphony Live Band, mentioned that it’s going to be an intimate musical evening with the celebrated Sohan Weerasinghe.

From packed auditoriums to intimate shows, Sohan continues to prove why he remains one of Sri Lanka’s most beloved entertainers.

For decades, Sohan Weerasinghe has been a household name in Sri Lankan entertainment.

Known for his captivating smooth voice and charismatic stage presence, Canada will experience it all on Friday, 31st July.

Next on the list of events, Gamini Hemal is working on, is Halloween night and he says “what we plan to do will be very interesting and unique … with a surprise guest star, as well!”

Continue Reading

Trending