Connect with us

Features

Twenty-year prison term reduced to six and hijacker ran for Parliament under plane symbol!

Published

on

Continuing the June 1982 Alitalia hijack drama as seen by our ambassador in Bangkok

(Excerpted from “Madame-Sir”, Manel Abeysekera’s memoir of SL’s first woman career diplomat. This book was first published in 2010)

(Continued from last week)

I also asked Foreign Secretary WT Jayasinghe, as I had done in my report on the Garuda hijack, whether we had passed national legislation in line with the Montreal Hi-jack Conventions to which we were Party; to my disgust, he asked me to telephone our Legal Adviser and find out, to which I curtly informed him that I had no recourse to a direct line and asked him to find out and let me know at the Airport or through our Embassy!

When he did call, the Thai Minister, the Italian Ambassador, the Alitalia staff and I were in a coach on the tarmac for the final stages of the episode, and it was only later that I learnt that, despite the lapse of one year since I had alerted the Foreign Secretary to the need for it, the necessary steps to passing anti-hi-jack legislation had not been taken, which proved to be a major problem for Colombo.

Before I worked things out regarding what strategy I should adopt vis-a-vis Ekanayake for defusing the situation, I wondered whether there could be some collusion between him and the Alitalia Captain; to add to the jig-saw Ekanayake had said that it was his collaborators that had brought the explosive material on board as I have recounted; he had also said that he had flushed down the toilet the gas explosives in case they reacted to something and exploded, retaining only the electrical ones. Later, the Thai Air Force, which took charge of the battery linked “collar” and shawl that had covered it, declared that there were no explosives, when they handed them over to the Embassy to be sent to Colombo as a production in the case but, at the time of the episode, neither the Alitalia officers, the Captain nor I dared to disbelieve Ekanayake for fear of endangering the passengers and crew aboard.

Finally it was around 3 pm the next day when, from the coach I spoke to Ekanayake and told him that I would be speaking to him in English so that everyone would understand, and asked him to disembark from the ‘plane with the Captain which they did; the day was so hot and the glare of the sun reflected off the tarmac was almost blinding especially for Ekanayake and the Captain who had been on board for so many hours.

We were standing a little away from the tarmac and despite my being obvious in a saree, Ekanayake, who carried the satchel of money, did not realize that it was I and walked past me. Once we were all in the coach, I went up to him and introduced myself and asked for his passport at which he leaped to his feet and greeted me as “Excellency” and extended his hand which I took as one human being to another.

When I asked him for his son’s passport he said that it was in Sri Lanka. [Free, as the boy was named, had a Sri Lankan passport through eligibility for citizenship through his father and his mother had taken him to Modena without his father’s knowledge and included the child’s name in her own Passport]. I recall the Thai Minister of Communications, who was elated that everything had ended peacefully, telling me that he felt it would be so as Ekanayake was a Buddhist!

Sepala Ekanayake

Later the Minister and the Thai Government were criticized in several quarters for giving Ekanayake safe passage and thereby giving Thailand the image of a hi-jack haven. But when interviewed by a journalist, he categorically said that if he had to go through the episode all over again, he would do the same, and he paid me a compliment by saying: “I would like to work with her again in that kind of situation – she and not anybody else deserved the credit”, as I had kept my cool and dealt with a very difficult situation in a way he admired.

The coach took us to the Air Force Building Lounge and Air Force officers were there with guns and kept Ekanayake under surveillance, following him even to the toilet. In the lounge I met for the first time Free, his little son of about four years whom he had named thus perhaps significantly. As I could not communicate with him in words I sounded “notes” on the glasses of cool drinks that had been brought for us and he liked the musical sounds I produced and made friends with me!

I asked his mother what we should get for him and she suggested a glass of milk and when I asked her what she would like, she said coffee while Ekanayake asked for a beer, all of which I ordered.

Ekanayake was quite chatty and also showed me photographs of his son in the Montessori school where his mother was a teacher.

Speaking to me in Sinhala he told me of his strong dislike of the Italians who he felt pushed him from pillar to post. I suspect that, not having been able to get a steady job, he may have tried to earn money commensurate with his wife’s earnings by peddling heroin. He said that it was only I and Premaratne who had spoken to him politely and kindly and, to my amusement, he asked whether he could not go to my Residence! I had visions of my being held to ransom if he did!

I pointed out to him that he must realize that he had carried out a criminal act and that he would not be allowed to leave the lounge except to board the Air Lanka Flight to Colombo a few hours later in which I had arranged for the three of them to depart having obtained the Government’s permission through the Foreign Ministry. I observed that he took scant notice of the satchel of money which made me feel that his real objective in hi-jacking the ‘plane was to get his son back and to teach the Italians a lesson.

He asked me what would happen to him when he arrived in Sri Lanka and I truthfully said that I did not know, After awhile, I said goodbye to the family and went home with Hector leaving Premaratne to watch the situation and ensure that no harm cane to them and that they boarded our flight without the other passengers being aware that they were on board. I also told him to get Ekanayake to purchase three first class tickets so that they would be out of sight of most of the passengers.

From home I called the Foreign Secretary and informed him of the arrangements that I had made, said that he would be bringing the $300,000 with him in a satchel and to make the necessary arrangements to receive him. Later, when I checked with Premaratne as to whether Ekanayake had paid for his tickets with some of the money in the satchel, he said that it was from money he took out from his purse.

Subsequently I was simply amazed at the problems caused by Ekanayake’s arrival consequent on action not having been taken to pre-empt and prevent them:

(1) The anti hi-jack national legislation had not been enacted which could have been invoked against him for his arrest and trial.

(2) Despite my briefing about the dollars being brought, no attempt appears to have been made to arrest him on bringing cash way above the amount permitted under Exchange Control Regulations. In fact, he found it impossible to deposit the money in a bank without a guarantor with the result that he had given quite a bit of it to his wife and members of his family in the South, who had arrived at the Airport to give him a hero’s welcome for the feat he had performed quite oblivious of the fact that it was a crime.

Thus it was only after the Italian Ambassador in Colombo lodged a plaint of extortion against him with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs that it became possible to arrest him; by that time he and his family had spent a couple of nights at the Hotel Ceylon Intercontinental until the airline pilots who normally stay there staged a walk out in protest against a hi-jacker being housed there; at which the hotel asked him to leave. He then went to stay with his relatives in the South.

At my end I could only marvel at the unpreparedness of the Sri Lankan Authorities over the handling of his arrival which was after they had been given adequate notice by me whereas, in sharp contrast, in my case, I had absolutely no advance notice of the hi-jack nor anyone to advise me to handle it as successfully as I did. An aspect of the whole episode I did not like was that the anti – hi-jack legislation was rushed through Parliament and used retro-actively to try Ekanayake who was jailed to a sentence of 20 years but was released after six years for good behaviour! The unspent amount of the $300,000 was frozen in a bank, probably temporarily before being disposed of legally.

A few days after the event, the telephone at my Residence had gone out of order and I asked Hector to go down the Sol to our friend the Egyptian Ambassador’s Residence and give me a call as quite often this would result in the telephone becoming operational. Well, the telephone did ring and thinking it was Hector calling me I answered it and, to my surprise it was the Foreign Secretary calling from Colombo to find out who paid for the ticket and I told him it was Ekanayake and that too from his pocket and not from the satchel.

When the Sri Lankan newspapers arrived at the Embassy, I noticed an interview given in one of them by Foreign Minister Hameed saying that he had contacted his Ambassador in Bangkok and requested that the situation not be allowed to escalate but to diffuse it. I was quite annoyed seeing this because he had not contacted me at all – nor had anyone else in authority! So I sent the Foreign Secretary a telex referring to the news item and stating [sarcastically of course!] that I was sure that the reporter was misreporting the Minister as he had not contacted me and that in any case Ambassadors were appointed to diffuse not escalate difficult situations!

A few days later I received a copy of the Parliamentary Hansard sent me by my friend Nihal Seneviratne [popularly known as “Galba”] Secretary General of Parliament, in which the Government was being accused by the Opposition of paying for the air tickets to Colombo of the hijacker and his family. However, the two Opposition MPs spearheading the accusation–Mr. Maithripala Senanayake and Mr.Anura Bandaranaike – were quoted as saying that they knew me well enough and could vouch that I would not have done such a thing unless instructed by the Government to do so.

I then realized why the Foreign Secretary had telephoned me to ask with what money Ekanayake had paid for the tickets and I thought that it was quite unfair of him not to have told me the reason was the Opposition’s accusation in parliament during the debate on the hijack.

As is my habit as a professional, I sent a detailed comprehensive report on the hi-jack incorporating a ball by ball account of it, my impression of the hijacker and the reasons for his act, the Thai reaction to the hi-jack and the reason they decided to give him safe passage to Colombo because as in the case of the Garuda they tried their best to send off the hi-jacked ‘plane to Colombo, namely, not to have blood spilt on their soil.

When the hi-jack case was being heard in Court, the Defence wanted me to come to give evidence, but the Government refused to let me go. Consequently, the Defence Counsel was able to allege that I had told Ekanayake that no action would be taken against him and that it was wrong that action had been taken against him despite the “assurance” given by me to the contrary. This I felt was most unfair by me as I had not given any such assurance and the Foreign Secretary had my detailed reports.

It is unbelievable that my reports were sent to the Attorney General only at my insistence on my return to the Ministry in 1983 [naturally I had assumed that they had been before the trial]. I bluntly told the Foreign Secretary that he, as an official, had let me, a fellow official down very badly and unfairly. Later, when the case went into Appeal, Dr. Colvin R. de Silva. used the same argument.

What was most galling was the fact that after all my efforts at resolving the hi-jack without harm to any of the crew or the 169 passengers, the only appreciation shown me was by the Thai Minister of Communication but sadly not by my officialdom, resulting in the general public being given a wrong impression of me. In fact, more than 29 years later, I have had to respond to articles in the newspapers regarding the “assurance”, presenting the true facts of the case, known to us who were in Thailand.

Meanwhile, our Embassy in Bangkok received several insulting letters accusing Sri Lanka of allowing the hijacker to go free and dubbing us a “Banana Republic” – all this of course before Ekanayake was tried and sentenced.

A sequel to the Ekanayake hi-jack episode was that, on his release from prison, he contested a parliamentary election [probably after, having served the prison sentence and his symbol was of a ‘plane!]. Again, he had gone to the Foreign Ministry and entered the room of the then Foreign Secretary who was my senior colleague and Uncle, Bernard Tilakaratna to whom I have already referred as having unconsciously roused my interest in the Foreign Service and again during my recounting of Premier Premadasa’s visit to Thailand; he had been considerably alarmed and had ordered his staff never to let him into the Ministry again!

Later, on my return to the Ministry in 1992 after my assignment as Ambassador to Germany, Austria and Switzerland, Ekanayake telephoned me to my desk as Director General Political Affairs and when I inquired how he was and what he was doing he said that he had a lucrative business up-country, growing and selling vegetables. Of course, I did not have to ask him what he wanted of me – I guessed it was to help him get a visa to visit his son in Italy!

I asked him to perish the thought as no country especially Italy would give him a visa because of the international crime he had committed. Instead, I told him that, if his son loved him as much as he loved the boy, he should invite him to come over to Sri Lanka. He and Free’s mother were divorced and he was married to a Sri Lankan and they had two children; about a month later I had the pleasure of seeing a picture in a newspaper of a happy family gathering in Sri Lanka. From the picture I noticed the uncanny resemblance the boy had to his father when he was a young hijacker; hopefully, it was a happy ending to a traumatic episode.

In lighter vein was the “Island” columnist Amitha Abeysekera’s amusing account of how I really got Ekanayake to cooperate with me and that was when he had asked whether I was Mr. E.W. Kannangara’s daughter and when I replied in the affirmative, saying that he is one of his great admirers as Chief Scout Commissioner and that therefore it was an honour to deal with his daughter! Then again there had been cassettes of “Viridus” on the Ekanayake hi-jack, some complimentary of me and others not! Unfortunately none were available for me to buy on my return.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Day of Judgements and Political Fallouts

Published

on

Supreme Court

Rajan Philips

The second anniversary of Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s election as President has come and gone, but not before getting marked by a spate of judgements delivered and announced on a single day following the anniversary. Far away in New York, it has been a week of speeches by state and government leaders making their pilgrimage to the 81st Annual Sessions of the United Nations that is entering its ninth decade. President AKD did not make the trip this year to the UN Sessions, which are now reduced to being a convenient meeting place for world leaders to hold sideline meetings on bilateral as well as other contentious matters.

Sri Lanka is not in the crosshairs of any such contentions, but there are enough internal crosshairs that the NPP government and a feckless opposition are constantly trying to avoid. The day of judgements too has come and gone. All in all, it was a good day for the NPP government, at least in the sense that the government suffered no reputational damage from any of the three judgements. There were two Supreme Court rulings, one on the bill for the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution and another on the constitutionality of the Anti-Corruption Amendment Bill. The third court ruling was the verdict given by the Colombo Permanent High Court following the Trial-at-Bar of 24 people accused for their role in the 2019 Easter attacks.

Easter Justice

The three trial-at-bar judges, Navaratne Marasinghe, Ramanathan Kannan and Sujeewa Nissanka, reached a unanimous verdict and found 15 of the accused guilty and found the other nine not guilty and released them forthwith. The accused were spared of the death sentence, but the lengths of rigorous imprisonment sentences are just as bad. One was sentenced to 260 years, four got 240 years each, five 220 years, and another five 200 years. In addition, the court ordered the instant confiscation of the movable and immovable assets of all 15 found guilty.

The verdict marks a substantial milestone in the search for justice on behalf of the victims of the Easter attacks. The government can claim some political credit for the conclusion of the trial after seven years of fits and starts, and high level stymying under three presidents who preceded President AKD. Much greater credit of course belongs to the hundreds of law enforcement officials who built up a mammoth case of 23,270 charges against 25 suspects (one of whom died in hospital during the trial) and won convictions of 15 of them.

But this is not the end of the journey for those seeking Easter justice based on the whole truth. There are other trials going on and the elusive mastermind is yet to be found. Mohammed Ibrahim Mohammed Nawfar (alias Naufar Moulavi) is one of the 15 convicted by the Permanent High Court. Naufar Moulavi was identified in May 2021 as the mastermind by the Gotabaya Rajapaksa government. The government claimed that FBI investigation had confirmed it. This claim is not supported by the FBI affidavit filed by agent Merrilee R. Goodwin in a US Court in California, in December 2020.

The purpose of the FBI affidavit was to support the indictment of Mohammed (Moulavi) Naufar, Mohamed Anwar Mohamed Riskan and Ahamed Milhan Hayathu Mohamed “for conspiring to provide, providing, and attempting to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization, namely ISIS” (Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham), in violation of US laws. But neither Naufar nor the other two were identified as masterminds. The only mastermind identified in the affidavit is “Jahran Mohamed Cassim, also known as (“aka”) Mohamad Cassim Mohamad Zahran, aka Zahran Hashim (“Zahran”). Zahran killed himself in the suicide bomb he detonated, along with scores of victims, and spared himself from earthly trials.

To close the loop on this, the three men identified in the FBI affidavit, namely, Moulavi Naufar, Mohamed Riskan and Ahamed Milhan, are among the 15 convicted by the trial-at-bar High Court. But their conviction does not bring closure to the enduring question whether there was a political mastermind(s) behind the 2019 Easter attacks. There is still no clarity on what the former Attorney General Dappula De Livera publicly alluded to as evidence of “a grand conspiracy behind the attacks that killed 269 people and injured over 500.”

That was on 18 May 2021, and the statement was a follow up to the letter that Mr. De Livera had written on the state of the police investigations, to then Inspector General of Police (IGP), the late C. D. Wickramaratne. Mr. De Livera soon went on to retire after a remarkable prosecutorial career, and reportedly turned down the government’s offer of appointment as High Commissioner to Canada. Mr. Wickramaratne himself has since died under rather tragic circumstances.

Those who allege that the Catholic Church is making unproven allegations about Easter attacks masterminds, conveniently gloss over the fact that the Church is not accusing anybody of being a mastermind, but is only asking for a thorough inquiry that will put to rest, once and for all, the perennial question about the Easter mastermind. The difference now is that after suffering frustrations with three presidents and their governments, the Church is experiencing a positive response from the current president and his NPP government.

Amendment Politics

Aside from the lawfare politics of the Easter attacks, the politics of the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution is running its course after the Supreme Court ruling that a referendum is not required for the amending bill to become law, but only a two-thirds majority in parliament. The ruling was widely expected but not because of some ‘fix’, but because it would have been silly to find a judicial reason to have a referendum on the retirement ages of judges. This is not to absolve the government for its missteps on this matter and for putting everyone through months of constitutional contortions. Rather it is to highlight the absurdity of getting exercised virtually over every constitutional amendment and insisting that enacting the amendment without a referendum is tantamount to an assault on democracy. The referendum requirement has become a constitutional curse.

The 1972 Constitution of the First Republic had a very straightforward amending procedure with no referendum requirement, so straightforward that JR Jayewardene was able to throw out a whole (1972) constitution lock, stock and barrel, and replace it with his new constitution of a totally different (presidential) persuasion, simply through a parliamentary select committee process and a two thirds majority in parliament. No one called for a referendum to justify so momentous a change, but now a referendum is required to determine at what age a superior court judge can retire. Nonetheless, as President Jayewardene’s admirers and followers celebrate his 120th birth anniversary, there is no gainsaying that regardless of whether one agrees or disagrees with his presidential achievements and legacies, JR Jayewardene was without question the most consequential political leader of Sri Lanka in the 20th century.

In the 21st century and on the 22nd amendment, with no referendum required, the Bar Association is changing tack and calling on parliamentarians to vote with their conscience, without toeing the party line. After Friday’s vote, it may want to poll the MPs to find out who among them voted listened to their conscience, and who toed the party line. The Association may be having a difficult time going through the withdrawal syndrome after months of heightened exertions. As for the opposition and Sajith Premadasa, the latter has simply promised that a future SJB government will repeal the 22nd Amendment. To what end? To reenact another episode of confusion and distraction.

An Economynext commentator has described the Supreme Court ruling on the referendum requirement for 22A, as being “surgical in its constitutional analysis.” Well said. The ruling plausibly addresses every good and bad argument that was flung at the judges and demonstrates, citing copious precedents, that at the end of the day, no matter who the individual judges and their abilities are, and what anyone thinks of them, the ‘Court’ can find its collective voice and express itself with clarity and authority.

The same Economynext commentary interprets the 22nd Amendment as “a foundational prerequisite for operationalizing the newly enacted, stringent Anti-Corruption Act, which is a key commitment of the government era for the IMF.” The commentary suggests that “multiple clauses in the 22nd Amendment are designed to satisfy governance and anti-corruption structural benchmarks within the ongoing IMF Extended Fund Facility (EFF) agreement.” While noting the risk of scaring investors who might view 22A as being anti-democratic and antithetical to judicial independence, the commentary goes on to opine that the passage of 22A combined with a strong and systematic anti-corruption drive could be a boost to investor confidence, especially in the critical sectors of logistics, renewable energy and technology.

The above is an interesting interpretation even though I am not sure whether anyone associated with the government has formulated the intentions of the 22nd Amendment quite this way. Objectively, the argument is plausible and will justifiably rile the ire of the left opposition to the NPP government and its inclination towards the IMF. At the same time, there is no mistaking the government’s intention and determination to fight corruption in politics and public life. Apart from, or rather as part of, its arresting politics, the government is also going ahead with the passage of the Anti-Corruption (Amendment) Bill, which too has had its determination by the Supreme Court, albeit by a different three-judge Bench, almost concurrently with the 22A ruling by the five-judge Bench. The Supreme Court’s determination on the Anti-Corruption Bill was triggered after it was challenged by Transparency International Sri Lanka.

But unlike the SC ruling on 22A, the ruling on the Anti-Corruption Bill singles out a provision as requiring approval in a referendum for its enactment. The provision involves Clause 17 of the Bill which elevates the bail granting threshold for determination by a High Court and not a Magistrates Court as currently practised. The subject offence involves a bribe not less than Rs. 100,000, or causing a government loss of not less than Rs. 500,000. The Court held that such a change infringes the fundamental rights of citizens against arbitrary detention and will require a referendum approval. The Bill of course could be passed without a referendum after removing the specific provision. Remarkably, the government argued that the proposed amendments to the Anti-Corruption Act are necessary to remove current bottlenecks, achieve conformance with UN standards, and comply with the IMF program in Sri Lanka.

Continue Reading

Features

Father’s horoscope reading on the worst time in my life seemed coming true

Published

on

Vidyodaya University

Little breathing space between papers at the final exam and my mind goes blank answering Sinhala paper

(Excerpted from The Art of Governance, autobiography of MDD Pieris)

Then came the final blow. When the time table for the final examination was out, I discovered that I would have to answer all my nine papers, of three hours each at one continuous stretch without even a half days break! I was due to answer the European history paper one afternoon; then go on next morning to British history; afternoon to Ceylon history; the next morning to English Poetry; afternoon to English drama; the following morning to English prose; and that same afternoon to suddenly switch from thinking and writing in English to thinking and writing in Sinhala, answering the first of the three papers in Sinhala, with the other two coming morning and afternoon the following day! Several of my friends urged me to go and speak to the university administration about a change, but at the same time, others who had had difficulties and sought recourse reported that they were rather rudely treated by the officers concerned.

This deterred me from going. I was a polite person by nature and just as in the case of Mr. Athulathmudali about whose insistence on politeness I have already written about, I too resented the prospect of being treated rudely. Therefore, I decided, quite foolishly no doubt, and come what may to go through and sit for the nine papers in four and half continuous days. Thus began the most difficult and harrowing period of my life, a period even worse than the experience at the university entrance examination.

In that instance, there was certainly disappointment and frustration but since I was attempting a near impossibility, there was less stress because mentally I was prepared for failure. This was reflected in a reasonably good appetite, and the ability to sleep. This time, at the final examinations, I lost both. Normal eating was impossible. My stomach was in knots. I just went through the motions and nibbled something and basically sustained myself with a combination of powdered milk and Ovaltine. Sleep became disturbed. After six hours of strenuous concentration a day answering question papers, there was little the mind could absorb by way of preparation for the next day.

During the day, nothing was possible since the morning’s paper was over at noon, and by the time you walked back from the Arts block to Marrs Hall just to look at the food and freshen up and then walk back to the examination hall to be there about 10 minutes before the 2 p.m. start of the next paper, there was neither time nor inclination to look at or absorb anything. I did try to look through whatever I could for the next days two papers during the night whilst keeping in mind the necessity to get some rest and sleep. Therefore, I did try to get six hours of sleep in the night. But it turned out to be an unhealthy and disturbed sleep leaving you not fresh, but jaded in the morning.

The mind was overactive. By this time, the numbers in the hall had dwindled due to the vacation. Only the few sitting for their final examination were in residence, and they were busy with their studies. There was therefore also a sense of loneliness and isolation prevailing. Added to all this was the horrible thought of failing and having to repeat all nine papers the following year. One had very much to try to find some degree of good cheer from within one’s own resources. Given my predicament I had precious little of that.

In these almost nightmarish conditions, I struggled through eight of the nine papers. The last paper during the final afternoon was the third paper in Sinhala literature, which was on prose. I still have a vivid memory of that afternoon. Rain clouds were building up and as we got down to answering the paper, it was getting quite dark. The lights shone brightly in the examination hall. There were five questions to be answered and I had just finished answering one, and had barely started on the next, when my mind went completely blank. I have never experienced such a thing before or since. The thinking processes suddenly stopped as if a plug had been pulled out from an electricity supply. I was in the middle of a sentence, I found impossible to complete. It was total disconnection.

There was just nothing I could do except to lay down my pen and gaze out of the window. There were two things in my favour at this critical moment. I possessed a temperament that didn’t panic easily or once embarked on a course, give up easily. I therefore calmly decided to stop trying to struggle, and relax. I was aware that precious minutes were ticking by. But I knew that what could not be cured must be endured, and that any attempt at force and struggle would only serve to aggravate the situation. That part of my mind was clear and rational. I spent almost 20 precious minutes doing nothing. Then gradually I found that I was able to focus once again.

I cautiously and with a degree of fear took up my pen and leaving room to complete the question I had begun to write on, started on a new question. The ideas flowed once again. I had however to be careful. There was no guarantee that everything would not come to a stop once again. I had already lost valuable time. Any further problem now would be the end of the paper and the end of perhaps the whole examination. I therefore deliberately slowed down my pace of writing and wrote slowly and steadily not pushing myself.

When the time came for the papers to be collected I had been able to answer only three out of the five questions in full. For the balance two, I was only just able to write down a few points. Answers in continuous prose were not possible. Up to this time, I had hope of at least passing the whole examination and obtaining my degree. Now, I was not so sure. There was a distinct possibility, I would fail the last Sinhala paper.

The next day I went home to Colombo, utterly drained. It appeared that my father’s prediction after reading my horoscope was not only accurate but frighteningly so. I too believed with him that there could not possibly be a worse period in the future. Starting from the stress of suddenly having to change schools in mid university entrance course to the end of my participation in school cricket through contracting measles, to the enormous trials and tribulations of the university entrance, to the disappointment of not being able to read for English “honours,” and now this situation at the final examination was almost too much for one person to take.

I was in a state which perhaps verged on a nervous breakdown, For a good two weeks at home, I was listless, unable to concentrate on anything. I could not read anything. Even the newspapers repelled me. The sound of music was irritating, and sleep desultory. I was taken to see the doctor, who advised complete rest. He did not give medicine. It was clear that I had severely overtaxed the system, and time would be the healer, as indeed was so gradually much to the great relief of my parents and myself. The newspaper once again began to interest me, and gradually books. Even then, I could not read for long periods for some time. I used to lose concentration and the mind began to wander.

In due course, I received a letter from the university, inviting me to teach an English course to the new batch of students about to enter the university. This was the vacation course in English for them. But I was just in no mood to teach. I was now back to normal, but did not wish to take upon myself the responsibilities of a teaching assignment. Therefore, I wrote back politely declining. But the letter from the university was a boost to my confidence. I knew that I would not have been called unless I had fared reasonably well, at least in my English papers, and got at a minimum a “B.” But what of the rest? I was still apprehensive. What came to mind was the unfinished Sinhala paper, and its possible impact on the whole examination.

Assistant Librarian Vidyodaya University

When the results came in due course, to my great relief I had passed. There was no question of a class. Nor was I expecting one. What I dreaded was sitting for the whole examination once again. I could now get this episode of my life out of the way and decide how to proceed. By this time the new Vidyodaya University had just begun to function. My father was a member of the Governing Council of the Vidyodaya Pirivena, the Vidyadhara Sabha and for long an associate and a friend of the renowned scholar Ven. Weliwitiye Soratha, the head of the Pirivena, who was the first Vice Chancellor of the new university.

Our family had many connections with Vidyodaya, including my maternal grandfather Mr. C. Don Bastian Jayaweera Bandara, himself a renowned scholar, writer, publisher and social worker, having had his higher education there. I for my part, for a period studied Sinhala under Ven. Soratha. Busy as he was, he found the time to teach me because of these family connections. I must have been a good student in his opinion, because he very graciously presented me a two volume set of his monumental work of the Sinhala dictionary, a task which he undertook and completed all by himself, a set which is one of my valued possessions even today.

When it became known that I had passed out, Vidyodaya was keen to have me and my father was equally keen that I should help out in whatever capacity. Finally, I was appointed as an Assistant Librarian and along with others, plunged into the task of setting up a proper library for the new university. At this time, the university functioned in the premises of the Vidyodaya Pirivena at Maligakande and it was rapidly becoming apparent that space was becoming a serious problem.

One of the most important tasks of a librarian is to classify knowledge accurately and correctly and this had to be carefully done. The system of classification adopted at the time was the Dewey Decimal System, and I spent much time at home poring over the volumes containing the system, so that during the working day classification and the typing of the card indexes, etc., could proceed with speed. Accuracy and speed were both necessary, accuracy, because a misclassified book is a lost book, speed because hundreds of books were lying on the floors, in cartons, in crates, on windowsills and all over the place.

I found the wide reading that I had done whilst at Peradeniya now of great assistance. With a quick perusal I was able to determine the classifications and sub-classifications. This was important. For instance, if one took up a book on European history, one had to determine whether it should be classified and appear on the shelves as general history; a history of a period; diplomatic history; economic history; social and cultural history; military history; a history of important treaties, and so on. This was so for all subjects and the wider your reading the easier it was.

But always at the end of the day was a general conference at which we took up for discussions amongst other matters, certain books which were exceedingly difficult to classify, partly because their contents approached the borders of many different subjects. Titles were frequently misleading. For instance, the book “Two eggs on my plate,” had nothing to do with cuisine. It was a tense memoir of certain military activities during World War II.

Continue Reading

Features

The Cinnamon Captain’s Circuit

Published

on

Three Maps of Ceylon Cinnamon

From the Pathfinder Collection

By Jennifer Moragoda
jennifermoragoda787@gmail.com

A remarkable Dutch map of Ceylon made in 1719 allows us to follow cinnamon through the country almost village by village.

Part of a series of thirty-six maps showing territories of the Dutch East India Company, it was drawn by Joannes van Campen and shows mainly the south-western portion of the island then under Company control. The twelve korales or provinces are distinguished by colour and extend, in the map’s description, from the river Caymelle to the Valave. Brohier notes that Caymelle was the Dutch name for the Maha Oya. A brown line marks the boundary of the Kandyan king’s territory. Within this political geography, a red line encloses what might otherwise be described simply as ‘Canelle Landen’: “the expanse of the luxuriant cinnamon bushes from the Chilaw river to the hook of Dondra.”

What makes the map extraordinary, however, is its detail. It marks the old administrative divisions through which the cinnamon country extended; villages and places associated with the seasonal work of the peelers; the forty-six numbered points along the annual route of the Cinnamon Captain; and the five coastal places to which the peeled bark was delivered.

Two further Dutch maps narrow the lens. A plan of Salpiti Korale maps cinnamon gardens and grounds among localities that are now part of greater Colombo and its suburbs. At an even more microscopic level, three drawings of a single chena near Hanwella represent individual trees by letters and colour and enumerate them.

Together they preserve an unusually detailed geography of Ceylon cinnamon and the enterprise built around it under the Dutch.

Van Campen’s map in facsimile M. F. N. Rotteveel’s 1901 facsimile of Van Campen’s 1719 map.

Much of that detail can be recovered today through the meticulous work of R. L. Brohier and J. H. O. Paulusz. Their descriptions and translations of Dutch maps and records provide the context that makes otherwise cryptic routes, symbols and localities intelligible.

A Circuit Through Cinnamon Country

Van Campen’s map immediately provides an overview of the country from which cinnamon was obtained. It is divided according to the old Sinhalese territorial and administrative divisions of korales and pattus. Many of their names, and the places associated with them, remain recognizable today, although their old boundaries are now less familiar. The map may surprise modern readers who are unaware that its cinnamon country extended as far north as the Chilaw River and south to Dondra.

The map also makes clear that the geography of cinnamon did not coincide neatly with political boundaries. It marks the limits of Dutch territory and the adjoining lands of the Kandyan king, while cinnamon also grew beyond Dutch-controlled territory. Access to cinnamon in Kandyan territory could therefore depend upon relations with the Kandyan court.

The most striking feature of the map is the minute detail with which this cinnamon geography is recorded. Forty-six numbered points trace the ordinary land route followed by the Cinnamon Captain, head of the Mahabadda or Cinnamon Department, on his annual general visitation at the commencement of the harvest. Starting from Colombo, his circuit took him north and then through a succession of korales to the south before he returned along the coast to Colombo.

The route recorded in Brohier and Paulusz runs through Negombo, Pittigal Korale, Hapitigam Korale, Sinna Korale, Rayigam Korale, Pasdun Korale, Wallalawiti Korale, Galle Korale, Beligama Korale, Morawa Korale and Dolosdas Korale, the latter embracing the Gangaboda and Welaboda Pattus of Matara and the eastern and western Giruwa Pattus of Hambantota.

On the map, the numbered stations allow that journey to be followed across the country. Even where individual names become difficult to decipher on a reduced reproduction, the extent of the circuit can be grasped.

But another set of small red circles gives the map an even more unusual human geography. In the words of its description, these indicate the villages and places “in which and near which” the cinnamon peelers commonly pitched their tents during the peeling season “in order to gather that costly bark.” These temporary encampments belonged to the older system of harvesting in which parties of peelers travelled through the cinnamon country, cutting suitable stems and bringing them back in bundles to be peeled and fashioned into quills.

The red circles are scattered through the cinnamon country densely enough that the map gives a visual impression of the scale of the seasonal harvest before one has deciphered every locality. J. H. O. Paulusz considered the map “of unusual value, indeed indispensable for studying the history of the Salagama community because it illustrates their manner of life, the districts in which they lived, and the hardships and dangers they endured.”

The Captain’s numbered route and the peelers’ encampments therefore record two related geographies. One is the official circuit of inspection. The other is the far more dispersed geography of the people actually gathering and preparing the cinnamon.

The map completes the picture by identifying five coastal delivery points—Negombo, Colombo, Beruwala, Galle and Matara—to which the peeled bark was “carried on their shoulders and transported with great labour.” Taken together, these details allow the old cinnamon enterprise to be visualized almost in motion: the Captain moving between his 46 stations; peelers establishing seasonal camps in and near particular villages; cinnamon being gathered and prepared in the surrounding country; and the finished bark moving towards five points on the coast.

The map also bears the letters A–H on a smaller circuit associated with Maradana, “where the best of that fragrant bark is peeled.” Brohier’s explanatory note identifies the area within this orbit as including Maradana, Wellicadde, Kirilepona and Bamblepitie—names recognizable today as Maradana, Welikada, Kirulapone and Bambalapitiya. These are now parts of a densely built city; on Van Campen’s map they belonged to the geography of cinnamon.

That juxtaposition is one of the pleasures of reading the old maps. Familiar names survive, but the landscapes attached to them have changed almost beyond recognition.

Salpiti Korale, Plot by Plot

A second map sharpens the focus further.

Where Van Campen’s map provides an overview of the geographical reach and movement of the cinnamon enterprise, the detailed plan of Salpiti Korale attaches cinnamon more closely to individual grounds and localities in and around what is now greater Colombo. Similar detailed plans were drawn for other korales and areas in which cinnamon grew.

The plate itself carries a striking collection of names familiar to a modern resident: Kotte, Mirihana, Welikada, Nawala, Pepiliyana, Kollupitiya, Wellawatte and Galkissa, or Mount Lavinia, among others. They appear beside or among numbered and outlined cinnamon grounds. The importance of the map is not that all of modern Colombo lay within Salpiti Korale—it did not—but that it allows particular 18th-century cinnamon localities around the expanding city and its eastern and southern approaches to be set against places we know today.

A related survey shows how closely Dutch mapping followed Colombo’s expansion. Brohier notes that, as settlement spread beyond the Fort and Pettah, a map made about 1766 by Lieutenant C. D. Wentzel surveyed the Colombo district for a radius of five miles in all directions from the Fort. Particular care was taken to mark the cinnamon-growing districts, partly for the information of the authorities and partly as a warning to inhabitants.

The records preserve some striking glimpses of areas we do not normally associate with cinnamon. A Dutch governor deplored the number of valuable bushes being “pitifully cut down for firewood especially near Liveramentu (Thimbirigasyaya-Narahenpita) where it grows luxuriantly.”

It is difficult now to associate Thimbirigasyaya and Narahenpita with luxuriant cinnamon, yet that is precisely why this cartographic detail matters. Pepiliyana, Nawala, Welikada, Wellawatte and other familiar names cease for a moment to be simply modern suburbs and become part of an older cinnamon geography.

In this sense, the Salpiti map performs a different task from Van Campen’s. The first shows the astonishing geographical reach of the cinnamon enterprise. Salpiti brings us down almost plot by plot.

Down to the Individual Tree

A third example reduces the scale to a single piece of ground. Three charts dated 1720 depict a chena called Katugalavila in the village of Degambedda in Hevagam Korale, about half an hour’s journey from the fort at Hanwella. The original survey was by L. Boomgart; the version reproduced by Brohier and Paulusz is an 1899 facsimile by M. F. N. Rotteveel.

The three drawings show the same ground before clearing, after cutting and burning, and after planting and regrowth. Seventeen kinds of tree are identified by letters, with their Sinhala names recorded in Dutch spelling. Before clearing, the plot contained five cinnamon trees; in the third stage it contained 229 cinnamon shoots and young trees. Brohier called the plan both “a picture of the ground” and a “working-plan,” and remarked on its striking representation of detail and use of colour.

This small survey is useful here chiefly because it shows just how far Dutch cartographic attention could descend: from an extensive cinnamon country, to individual grounds, and finally to individual trees.

The 1719 map shows the cinnamon country extending from the Chilaw River to Dondra. The Salpiti Korale map brings us into recognizable localities around Colombo and its suburbs. At Degambedda, near Hanwella, the cartographic lens descends to a single chena and finally to individual cinnamon trees.

Taken together, the three maps turn the broad designation Canelle Landen into something much more precise: a country of rivers, political boundaries and old administrative divisions; roads, villages and seasonal encampments; identifiable cinnamon grounds; and, finally, individual plants.

They also help explain the practical appeal of later attempts to concentrate cinnamon production in more accessible and systematically cultivated grounds. Van Campen’s map makes visible the enormous geographical reach of the older, dispersed system—the distances travelled, the seasonal encampments and the labour required to bring the prepared bark to the coast. The hardships of that system are less visible on the map itself, but they are amply recorded in the contemporary documentation. The later transformation of cinnamon cultivation is another chapter. These maps preserve the geography that preceded it.

Retracing the Circuit

There is a modern postscript to this story. In recent years, the Pekoe Trail, a long-distance walking route through the tea estates of the hill country, has offered a new way of experiencing Ceylon’s montane landscape and tea heritage. The Cinnamon Captain’s circuit suggests the possibility of a low-country counterpart.

It need not be a walking trail. Selected stages of the forty-six-point circuit could be retraced largely by road, linking surviving place names and old cinnamon localities with places where cinnamon is still cultivated today. The korales no longer function as administrative divisions, roads have changed and much of the old cinnamon country has been transformed or built over, but enough of the underlying geography survives to make the old route intelligible.

Three centuries ago the circuit was travelled at the commencement of the harvest by an official inspecting the cinnamon country. Retraced today, it could offer a way of rediscovering a geography that these extraordinary maps have preserved in remarkable detail.

Notes: This article draws extensively on Volume II of R. L. Brohier and J. H. O. Paulusz’s Land, Maps & Surveys: A Descriptive Catalogue of Historical Maps in the Surveyor General’s Office, whose detailed descriptions, annotations and translations of Dutch maps and records make it possible to reconstruct much of the geography discussed here.

Images 3–5 reproduced from R. L. Brohier and J. H. O. Paulusz, Land, Maps & Surveys, Vol. II (1951).

Continue Reading

Trending