Connect with us

Features

Turning 30

Published

on

Uditha Devapriya at the launch of Factum Foreign Policy Review: A Vision for a new Sri Lanka at Lakshman Kadiragamer Institute in Colombo recently

By Uditha Devapriya

“When I am thirty, she will be forty-five. When I am sixty, she will be seventy-five.” “Candida”, George Bernard Shaw

Last week I turned 30. This is not as important as it may sound. But it is important for me. Thirty years is not a long time, though it is not a short time either. Yet my generation has lived through, endured, and changed in the face of so many things. It is difficult to compress all of them, or to reflect on them with any equanimity. There is, after all, nothing harder than taking stock of the past, than using it as a basis for the future. This is especially so because, to paraphrase Santayana, we are forever condemned to repeat it, and to commit the same errors. We don’t seem to learn from the past. We only wallow in it. And in doing so, we have attached ourselves to a never-ending cycle, an eternal recurrence.

I belong to a rather transitionary period. When I was born, we didn’t have mobile phones, only walkie-talkies that almost passed for concrete slabs. Yet five or six years later the government privatised Telecom and, for better or worse, unleashed a communications revolution which we are still digesting. That came in the midst of a dotcom boom, which Sri Lanka was slow to catch up on, and still has not caught up properly. I also remember hours-long power-cuts, a draft constitution being burnt in parliament, the tsunami, the ceasefire, the end of that ceasefire, the end of a war. I remember the narratives we were fed about the latter, and I recall seeing through those narratives.

In short, I remember accepting something as the truth, and later realising it was all lies. That has been the history of this country, and in a way, part of my growing up.

I am what is generally called a millennial. I occupy the best and I suppose the worst of both worlds. I was 21 when we installed Wi-Fi at my home and 26 when I shifted to online banking. I grew up on Encarta, moved over to Wikipedia, and became disillusioned enough with the amount of misinformation on the web to return to paperbacks and hardbacks. In our time we don’t buy DVDs, we stream online. In my time we didn’t buy DVDs, we rented them, just like we would rent or borrow books at a library.

Computers amounted to little when I was small, though computer games were a different matter altogether. Television, though restricted, occupied a more important place. And in the late 1990s and early 2000s there was much to see on it. The dullness and predictability of the 1980s had by then given way to a more diverse, colourful array of programmes. Jackson Anthony fired my interest in history with Maha Sinhale Vamsakathawa, while Chamuditha Samarawickrama got me hooked on to politics with Jana Handa.

Since this was long before the advent of mega-serials, almost all the mini series I saw stayed in my mind. They were important for my growing up, though some of them could strike a didactic and moralistic tone. It was these serials, moreover – and I had a favourite from them, Jayantha Chandrasiri’s Akala Sandya – that first shaped my conceptions of art.

I was shielded from much of what was happening out there, the result being that like so many from my generation I came to accept what we were told by those at the top. There was hardly any alternative media, or social media. When we logged into these platforms, we began to see beyond official narratives, though they soon became breeding grounds for misinformation on their own. Though we have yet to realise this fully, I think our awakening here helped us appreciate the line between knowledge and wisdom: over the decades we have been bombarded with information, yet as a country, I do not think we have matured. What is true of this country is true of my growing up: the internet churns out an exfoliating, staggering mass of data, but that has not made us, or me, any wiser.

If I am being pessimistic here, it is because my generation has seen too many opportunities slip through our fingers. When the war ended in 2009, we felt it would provide the basis for a permanent peace. Yet this was not to be. From losing our diplomatic battles to brandishing the most hideously chauvinist and majoritarian rhetoric against other collectives, we have refused to learn from the past, and have instead moored ourselves in the mistakes of that past.

We keep latching ourselves on to the same solutions – none more persistent, I would say, than our habit of going to the IMF with a begging bowl every time our foreign reserves run dry – without searching for alternatives. We pay our policymakers to prescribe the same thing again and again, and to say no to anything else.

And yet, I remain hopeful. Idiotically so perhaps, but hopeful nevertheless. It’s easy to laud the idealism of the young and hold it up against the cynicism of the old. But over the years I have associated with, and gathered, several youngsters whose vision for the country are, if romantic and utopian, certainly radical and progressive. This is not to say they are correct on everything.

Yet who are we to judge? Have we been correct on everything? Do we hold the moral high ground? I think not. Last year’s protests and their subsequent demise tell us that more needs to be done to effect real change. The more I talk with the young, the more I am convinced they need to be at the forefront of that change. Not because our time has gone, but because theirs has come. And that ties in with the biggest takeaway I have had in the last 30 years: that the more I grow, the less I seem to know.

The writer is an international relations analyst, independent researcher, and freelance columnist who can be reached at udakdev1@gmail.com.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Acid test emerges for US-EU ties

Published

on

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen addressing the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Tuesday put forward the EU’s viewpoint on current questions in international politics with a clarity, coherence and eloquence that was noteworthy. Essentially, she aimed to leave no one in doubt that a ‘new form of European independence’ had emerged and that European solidarity was at a peak.

These comments emerge against the backdrop of speculation in some international quarters that the Post-World War Two global political and economic order is unraveling. For example, if there was a general tacit presumption that US- Western European ties in particular were more or less rock-solid, that proposition apparently could no longer be taken for granted.

For instance, while US President Donald Trump is on record that he would bring Greenland under US administrative control even by using force against any opposition, if necessary, the EU Commission President was forthright that the EU stood for Greenland’s continued sovereignty and independence.

In fact at the time of writing, small military contingents from France, Germany, Sweden, Norway and the Netherlands are reportedly already in Greenland’s capital of Nook for what are described as limited reconnaissance operations. Such moves acquire added importance in view of a further comment by von der Leyen to the effect that the EU would be acting ‘in full solidarity with Greenland and Denmark’; the latter being the current governing entity of Greenland.

It is also of note that the EU Commission President went on to say that the ‘EU has an unwavering commitment to UK’s independence.’ The immediate backdrop to this observation was a UK decision to hand over administrative control over the strategically important Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia to Mauritius in the face of opposition by the Trump administration. That is, European unity in the face of present controversial moves by the US with regard to Greenland and other matters of contention is an unshakable ‘given’.

It is probably the fact that some prominent EU members, who also hold membership of NATO, are firmly behind the EU in its current stand-offs with the US that is prompting the view that the Post-World War Two order is beginning to unravel. This is, however, a matter for the future. It will be in the interests of the contending quarters concerned and probably the world to ensure that the present tensions do not degenerate into an armed confrontation which would have implications for world peace.

However, it is quite some time since the Post-World War Two order began to face challenges. Observers need to take their minds back to the Balkan crisis and the subsequent US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq in the immediate Post-Cold War years, for example, to trace the basic historic contours of how the challenges emerged. In the above developments the seeds of global ‘disorder’ were sown.

Such ‘disorder’ was further aggravated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine four years ago. Now it may seem that the world is reaping the proverbial whirlwind. It is relevant to also note that the EU Commission President was on record as pledging to extend material and financial support to Ukraine in its travails.

Currently, the international law and order situation is such that sections of the world cannot be faulted for seeing the Post World War Two international order as relentlessly unraveling, as it were. It will be in the interests of all concerned for negotiated solutions to be found to these global tangles. In fact von der Leyen has committed the EU to finding diplomatic solutions to the issues at hand, including the US-inspired tariff-related squabbles.

Given the apparent helplessness of the UN system, a pre-World War Two situation seems to be unfolding, with those states wielding the most armed might trying to mould international power relations in their favour. In the lead-up to the Second World War, the Hitlerian regime in Germany invaded unopposed one Eastern European country after another as the League of Nations stood idly by. World War Two was the result of the Allied Powers finally jerking themselves out of their complacency and taking on Germany and its allies in a full-blown world war.

However, unlike in the late thirties of the last century, the seeming number one aggressor, which is the US this time around, is not going unchallenged. The EU which has within its fold the foremost of Western democracies has done well to indicate to the US that its power games in Europe are not going unmonitored and unchecked. If the US’ designs to take control of Greenland and Denmark, for instance, are not defeated the world could very well be having on its hands, sooner rather than later, a pre-World War Two type situation.

Ironically, it is the ‘World’s Mightiest Democracy’ which is today allowing itself to be seen as the prime aggressor in the present round of global tensions. In the current confrontations, democratic opinion the world over is obliged to back the EU, since it has emerged as the principal opponent of the US, which is allowing itself to be seen as a fascist power.

Hopefully sane counsel would prevail among the chief antagonists in the present standoff growing, once again, out of uncontainable territorial ambitions. The EU is obliged to lead from the front in resolving the current crisis by diplomatic means since a region-wide armed conflict, for instance, could lead to unbearable ill-consequences for the world.

It does not follow that the UN has no role to play currently. Given the existing power realities within the UN Security Council, the UN cannot be faulted for coming to be seen as helpless in the face of the present tensions. However, it will need to continue with and build on its worldwide development activities since the global South in particular needs them very badly.

The UN needs to strive in the latter directions more than ever before since multi-billionaires are now in the seats of power in the principle state of the global North, the US. As the charity Oxfam has pointed out, such financially all-powerful persons and allied institutions are multiplying virtually incalculably. It follows from these realities that the poor of the world would suffer continuous neglect. The UN would need to redouble its efforts to help these needy sections before widespread poverty leads to hemispheric discontent.

Continue Reading

Features

Brighten up your skin …

Published

on

Hi! This week I’ve come up with tips to brighten up your skin.

* Turmeric and Yoghurt Face Pack:

You will need 01 teaspoon of turmeric powder and 02 tablespoons of fresh yoghurt.

Mix the turmeric and yoghurt into a smooth paste and apply evenly on clean skin. Leave it for 15–20 minutes and then rinse with lukewarm water

Benefits:

Reduces pigmentation, brightens dull skin and fights acne-causing bacteria.

* Lemon and Honey Glow Pack:

Mix 01teaspoon lemon juice and 01 tablespoon honey and apply it gently to the face. Leave for 10–15 minutes and then wash off with cool water.

Benefits:

Lightens dark spots, improves skin tone and deeply moisturises. By the way, use only 01–02 times a week and avoid sun exposure after use.

* Aloe Vera Gel Treatment:

All you need is fresh aloe vera gel which you can extract from an aloe leaf. Apply a thin layer, before bedtime, leave it overnight, and then wash face in the morning.

Benefits:

Repairs damaged skin, lightens pigmentation and adds natural glow.

* Rice Flour and Milk Scrub:

You will need 01 tablespoon rice flour and 02 tablespoons fresh milk.

Mix the rice flour and milk into a thick paste and then massage gently in circular motions. Leave for 10 minutes and then rinse with water.

Benefits:

Removes dead skin cells, improves complexion, and smoothens skin.

* Tomato Pulp Mask:

Apply the tomato pulp directly, leave for 15 minutes, and then rinse with cool water

Benefits:

Controls excess oil, reduces tan, and brightens skin naturally.

Continue Reading

Features

Shooting for the stars …

Published

on

That’s precisely what 25-year-old Hansana Balasuriya has in mind – shooting for the stars – when she was selected to represent Sri Lanka on the international stage at Miss Intercontinental 2025, in Sahl Hasheesh, Egypt.

The grand finale is next Thursday, 29th January, and Hansana is all geared up to make her presence felt in a big way.

Her journey is a testament to her fearless spirit and multifaceted talents … yes, her life is a whirlwind of passion, purpose, and pageantry.

Raised in a family of water babies (Director of The Deep End and Glory Swim Shop), Hansana’s love affair with swimming began in childhood and then she branched out to master the “art of 8 limbs” as a Muay Thai fighter, nailed Karate and Kickboxing (3-time black belt holder), and even threw herself into athletics (literally!), especially throwing events, and netball, as well.

A proud Bishop’s College alumna, Hansana’s leadership skills also shone bright as Senior Choir Leader.

She earned a BA (Hons) in Business Administration from Esoft Metropolitan University, and then the world became her playground.

Before long, modelling and pageantry also came into her scene.

She says she took to part-time modelling, as a hobby, and that led to pageants, grabbing 2nd Runner-up titles at Miss Nature Queen and Miss World Sri Lanka 2025.

When she’s not ruling the stage, or pool, Hansana’s belting tunes with Soul Sounds, Sri Lanka’s largest female ensemble.

What’s more, her artistry extends to drawing, and she loves hitting the open road for long drives, she says.

This water warrior is also on a mission – as Founder of Wave of Safety,

Hansana happens to be the youngest Executive Committee Member of the Sri Lanka Aquatic Sports Union (SLASU) and, as founder of Wave of Safety, she’s spreading water safety awareness and saving lives.

Today is Hansana’s ninth day in Egypt and the itinerary for today, says National Director for Sri Lanka, Brian Kerkoven, is ‘Jeep Safari and Sunset at the Desert.’

And … the all-important day at Miss Intercontinental 2025 is next Thursday, 29th January.

Well, good luck to Hansana.

Continue Reading

Trending