Connect with us

News

Trade unionist blows whistle on substandard diesel

Published

on

Ananda Palitha, Convener and spokesperson of the Samagi United Trade Union Force (SUTUF), affiliated to the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB), alleged on Thursday that permission had been granted for unloading a stock of substandard diesel at the Kolonnawa refinery although both initial and subsequent tests conducted by the Ceylon Petroleum Storage Terminals Limited (CPSTL) laboratory had proved that the fuel was of inferior quality.

Speaking to journalists in Colombo, Palitha revealed that fuel samples sent for testing at the CPSTL laboratory had been found to be substandard. However, the ship had been allowed to initiate the unloading process.

According to reports, a chemical was used to settle dust particles at the bottom of the tank, and a new fuel sample was sent to the CPSTL laboratory to obtain an approved report. Despite pending approval, the plan is to pump out the dust particles from the ship into the Kolonnawa fuel tanks, where high-quality diesel is stored. The CPSTL laboratory tests confirmed that the diesel fuel did not meet their specifications, according to Ananda.

Palitha said the Lanka Indian Oil Corporation (LIOC) had imported 20,000 tonnes of diesel to China Bay and an additional 11,000 metric tons to the Kolonnawa refinery from the ship ‘MT-FOS POWER,’ which arrived on 05 Nov. Earlier, 6,500 tonnes of petrol had been unloaded because it passed the CPSTL laboratory tests, he said.

During the ship visit by the CPSTL laboratory assistant manager and a representative from the LIOC, it was found that the diesel stock was of subpar quality. However, permission was granted for unloading at the behest of the CPC management.

Palitha noted that the deputy laboratory technician had raised concerns, stating that if the diesel stock did not meet CPSTL specifications, it should not be unloaded. He also expressed concern over the government’s failure to decide on compensation for those whose vehicles suffered extensive damage due to substandard fuel.

Ananda said the manager who had accepted the substandard fuel stock was currently serving as the deputy general manager, responsible for overseeing laboratory testing and making crucial decisions in this regard.

Palitha warned that if the substandard diesel stock was unloaded entirely, distribution would commence and vehicle owners would suffer losses.

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa recently revealed in Parliament that a stock of 40,000 tonnes of substandard diesel had been released to the market despite quality failures. He cited two LIOC laboratory test reports that had detected the inferior quality of the diesel stock.



News

Sajith accuses govt. of using data selectively in crucial report

Published

on

Sajith Premadasa

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa has said the government is attempting to paint a falsely beautiful picture of the country’s situation through the Socio-Economic Data report issued together with the Census and Statistics and the Central Bank. “They have selectively included certain information while intentionally omitting other vital facts,” Premadasa has said in a media statement. When presenting data, there must be chronological consistency and integrity. The Central Bank and the Department of Census and Statistics have no right to present outdated data to formulate a conclusion, thereby marginalising an entire segment of the population, Premadasa has argued, pointing out that their primary duty is to report accurate information to the public.

Premadasa says that up to page 18 of the report, recent data from 2023 to 2025 have been used. For main economic indicators, macroeconomic indicators, demographic data, and life expectancy, 2024 data have been used. Indicators such as external trade finance, consumer price indices, Real GDP, imports and exports, prosperity indices, and human development indices have also been compared with Asian and SAARC countries using recent data. However, for the section detailing socio-economic conditions from page 19 to page 34, the data used are exclusively from the outdated 2016–2019 period.

When discussing socio-economic conditions, the data used for household income and expenditure surveys, provincial-level conditions, housing facilities, energy consumption, cooking, and population distribution are entirely from 2016 to 2019, the Opposition Leader has said. Specifically, the data on poverty mentioned on page 33, and even the data on per capita daily food consumption capacity on page 34, belong to this old 2016–2019 timeframe. Formulating a report for the year 2026 using such outdated data is a deliberate attempt to mislead the country and its people.

Premadasa says that from page 35 onwards, fresh 2025 data have been used for sections on prosperity, demographics, the labour force, and employment. Recent data based on current market conditions have also been provided for Gross National Income (GNI) by industrial sources, food prices, imports and exports, tourism, government revenue, state debt, and interest rates.

“If the authorities can present recent data (for 2023, 2024, and 2025) for foreign debt, financial activities, financial sector trends, and money supply, why are they using 2016 and 2019 data for poverty to mislead the country?” the Opposition Leader has asked, pointing out that the main report and its summary prove that while the government uses updated data for macroeconomic aspects, it uses obsolete data regarding poverty, inequality, income distribution, and living standards. The Opposition Leader has called this a historic deception regarding the country’s poverty, asking whether the 12.11.2026 Budget will be on these false data?

Premadasa has said that the government claims that a person can survive for 30 days on Rs. 17,315, which is an absolute lie and a deception. “This Government lacks updated data or definitions for poverty. Since the country went bankrupt, a proper household income and expenditure survey has not been conducted, nor has the poverty line been accurately identified.” He questioned whether the upcoming budget, scheduled for 12.11.2026, will be based on these false and flawed data.

Continue Reading

News

75 new inmates sent to Bogambara re-establishing it as a correctional facility

Published

on

By S.K. Samaranayake

Following a gazette notification issued by Minister of Justice and National Integration Harshana Nanayakkara re-establishing the old Bogambara Prison as a correctional facility, 75 inmates were sent to the renovated prison recently. These inmates were transferred from the Colombo Remand Prison and the Magazine Prison. Meals for them are provided by the Dumbara-Pallekele Prison.

This prison was originally established in the year 1876. Under the Kandy Development Project, the Prisons Department took steps to establish the Dumbara-Pallekele Prison and transfer the Bogambara inmates there in 2014. Several plans have been drawn up to develop this site under the Ministry of Urban Development.

The government’s attention was drawn to re-converting the old Bogambara Prison into a prison facility once again, taking into consideration the space constraints encountered when transferring inmates to other prisons following the incident at the Negombo Prison. Currently, 94 rooms of this prison have been renovated, and its inmate capacity stands at is.

Continue Reading

News

Next Parliament can reverse 22A – GL

Published

on

Prof. G. L. Peiris

Convenor of the Joint Opposition Prof. G. L. Peiris yesterday (29) said that though the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution had been enacted, it wouldn’t be the end of that story.

Addressing the media at the Flower Road Office of former President Ranil Wickremesinghe, Prof. Pieris emphasised that a future Parliament could deal with the new amendment. The former Minister explained the pivotal importance of seeking approval at a referendum, depending on the amendments. Prof. Pieris said that the next Parliament would be elected in three years could take remedial measures in case it felt that the people were deprived of their right by the absence of referendum.

The ex-Minister said that it would be the responsibility of the next Parliament to give the public that right to decide on the 22nd Amendment, adopted under highly questionable circumstances.

Continue Reading

Trending