Connect with us

Features

Too many irons in presidential fire as frustration explodes on German television

Published

on

by Rajan Philips

The stress of presidential caretaking is showing. That is the only explanation that I can think of and that is also what I have heard from others who saw President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s interview this week, with Martin Gak of the German state-owned television Deutsche Welle (DW). Mr. Wickremesinghe uncharacteristically turned truculent when Mr. Gak started pressing him on the question of international investigation of the 2018 Easter Sunday bombings. The interview was going well up to that point with the focus on economic matters, and the President who was in Berlin to attend the inaugural summit of the Berlin Global Dialogue, seemed pleased to recount the progress he has been making in Europe.

The President said that he was getting Europe to better understand the Sri Lankan situation. He specifically mentioned Germany and France. Germany, where he was attending the Global Dialogue and was also able to meet with Chancellor Olaf Scholz and some of his Ministers. He was in France in June to attend the global debt summit convened by French President Emmanuel Macron. On his way to the debt summit in Paris, the President had stopped over in London to attend the 40th anniversary gathering of the International Democratic Union (IDU), the mutual admiration society of the global right. We have gone over this before.

In Germany now and at the Deutsche Welle interview, what seemed to get the goat of the President was Mr. Gak’s mentioning ‘the Cardinal,’ and the call(s) for international investigation of the Easter Bombings. Out of the blues, the President went on the attack and asked Mr. Gak if he knew or had spoken to the Bishops Conference in Sri Lanka. The President was obviously alluding to the Church hierarchy in Sri Lanka (or any other country outside the Vatican) with the Bishops Conference taking precedence over individual cardinal or cardinals.

In Sri Lanka, there is the added peculiarity given the known differences between the Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith and the Bishops Conference, not on spiritual questions but on matters temporal, especially involving the Rajapaksas. The old wisecrack – MR 1 (Mahinda Rajapaksa) and MR 2 (Malcolm Ranjith) – is now all forgotten and buried in the Easter debris. There is only one MR of consequence left, anyway, and the one whom the current President will do anything to avoid.

As for the poor Martin Gak of the German TV, he seemed well prepared for the interview, but he was quite stumped by the President’s reference to the Cardinal and the Bishops. It was not a googly that was thrown by the President at someone with no cricket background, but an underarm no ball. The main takeaway from the President’s outburst, however, is the categorical rejection of any international investigation into the Easter bombings.

If there was any implication that this sudden rejection by the President may have had some understanding with the Catholic Bishops of Sri Lanka minus the Cardinal, that notion was put to rest quite swiftly by the President of the Bishops’ Conference in Sri Lanka, Bishop Harold Anthony Perera.

In a statement to the media issued by the Church, Bishop Perera is quoted as saying that “the President has made an effort to show that there is a division between Cardinal Ranjith and the Bishops’ Conference,” after asserting that “the Cardinal and the Bishops hold the same view that an impartial local probe could be conducted into the Easter Sunday bomb attacks with the presence of foreign observers.”

A second takeaway from the Deutsche Welle interview is the President’s quite unexpected assertion that his government (not just the Rajapaksa government) also rejects the conclusions of the UNHRC in Geneva. That is a total about-turn from the positions Mr. Wickremesinghe took as Prime Minister in the yahapalanaya government, a gross insult to the memory of Mangala Samaraweera, and an unfitting follow-up to the photo opportunity that the President had with Samantha Power in September, at the UN, in New York.

The President did not need new controversies after returning home from his many ports of call. His categorical rejections in Germany are not going to close the books on Easter Sunday in Sri Lanka, or UNHRC in Geneva. They will remain among many other continuing political fires that the President will have to deal with even as he continues to grapple with all the economic problems.

Whether it is too many irons in the fire, or too many nagging fires, the President has taken almost all of them on his shoulders with very little sharing of responsibilities in the cabinet. That is why even his well-wishers are saying that the presidential stress is showing, while it took a professional German TV interviewer to take the brunt of Mr. Wickremesinghe’s unnecessary outburst.

Too many irons, too many fires

If it can be said that President Wickremesinghe’s economic problems are mostly inherited, by the same token it must be said that his political problems are mostly self-created. As I have been arguing recently, the prospects for political reforms under Mr. Wickremesinghe’s caretaker presidency that were pretty bright at the start are now totally dead.

The villain of the piece is of course Mr. Wickremesinghe’s ambition to become an elected president. The moves that he has been making to that end have veered from being banal to becoming quite tedious.

The latest of the maneuvers is said to be Basil Rajapaksa offering Ranil Wickremesinghe full (SLPP) support for the latter to be a candidate at the next presidential election, provided Mr. Wickremesinghe stops poaching SLPPers through two-timers bypassing the Rajapaksas. That is quite a Catch-22 between onetime allies.

The banality of this politics is disgusting, but what is really disturbing is the diversion it causes from what should be total commitment by the President and his administration to dealing solely with the economic problems.

On the economic front, an IMF Mission to conduct the First Review of the program under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) arrangement has come and gone. The September review was about the country’s performance after the start of EFF arrangement in March based on a USD 2.9 billion bailout package and a first tranche payment of USD 330 million. The September visit was expected to result in the release of the second tranche of the same amount. But the second payment is being delayed because of snags facing the country’s external debt restructuring process.

The departing statement of the IMF Mission said all the nice things about the people of Sri Lanka and their resilience but stopped short of recommending the second payment until there is some conclusion about debt restructuring. In addition to the First Review and statement, the IMF has also released its report on the Governance Diagnostic Assessment (GDA) of Sri Lanka that the IMF had conducted in March this year. Sri Lanka apparently is the first Asian country to undergo a governance assessment as part of the IMF’s lending programs.

The report highlights all the key, but not unknown, problems ranging from corruption, weakness of government, failing state owned enterprises, compromised taxation and revenue system, flawed procurement processes, and a weak legal framework and enforcement mechanisms.

The report pointedly notes that despite last year’s protests, the government is still beholden to the same powers and their beneficiaries who were dislodged by the protesters. The GDA report also recommends 16 priority actions to address widespread corruption and weaknesses in government.

The IMF’s Review Mission, withholding of the second payment, and instructions on 16 action items have rekindled the political debate over IMF. Participating at the Berlin Global Dialogue, the President spoke of the difficulties that indebted countries like Sri Lanka with multiple creditors have to go through to reach agreements on debt restructuring. There is the Paris Club of creditors, and then there are India and China who are not part of the club but are becoming strong creditors on their own terms.

“There is no mechanism,” the President said, “to co-ordinate between the creditors and debtor country.” He also noted at the gathering in Berlin, somewhat echoing the criticisms he gets at home, “there’s a point beyond which you can’t burden these people. Now we are going beyond that point.” He went on, “You have to work on the basis of a solution which also ensures stability. Some of the proposals put forward do not enforce stability.”

He was candid enough to admit, unlike some of his critics at home, that it was fundamentally Sri Lanka’s fault to have incurred a mountain of debt that ultimately drove the country to bankruptcy. Fundamentally, as well, it is Sri Lanka’s responsibility to find is own way out its debts and difficulties. There are no convincing signs that the caretaker government of President Wickremesinghe is doing the best it could under the circumstances.



Features

The challenge of being positive about SAARC

Published

on

The RCSS forum addressed by SAARC Secretary General Ambassador Md. Golam Sarwar in progress. (Pic courtesy RCSS)

It was a few years back that a former President of Sri Lanka took it on himself to pronounce SAARC ‘dead’. Since then there have been other sections of Sri Lankan opinion that have joined the critics of SAARC and taken the solemn stance that SAARC has indeed died what may be called a natural death.

Their fatalism is understandable. SAARC has failed to meet at heads of government or state level for the past several years to take the SAARC process notably forward. Regional cooperation has more or less been only an appealing idea. No substantive concrete projects have taken off to make the idea a hard reality. ‘Inner paralysis’ seems to be SAARC’s lot. Hence the fatalism in these circles.

However, being one of the worst cash-strapped regions of the world and a teemingly populated one with people virtually left to their devices, what choices do the ‘SAARC Eight’ have other than to try their best to band together and continue with their cooperation efforts, however small they may be?

There is no escaping the mounting debt trap for many of these countries and bankrupt Sri Lanka is a glaring example, but ‘throwing in the towel’ and abandoning themselves entirely to the diktats of the strongest economies and their agencies will prove a ‘living death’ for many countries in the SAARC fold.

The gains may be meagre but giving-up on SAARC cooperation in full would prove self-defeating for the organization and South Asia. Right now, the collective intention ought to be to salvage what the region could from the tenuous cooperative efforts. Moreover, such initiatives could go some distance to generate a degree of goodwill among the Eight and help in sustaining a dialogue process.

Given this backdrop it proved ‘a stich in time’ for the Regional Centre for Strategic Studies (RCSS), Colombo, to recently host the SAARC Secretary General Ambassador Md. Golam Sarwar to a round table discussion on the unifying potential of SAARC and its future possibilities, besides other related issue areas.

Held on June 24th and moderated by RCSS Executive Director and former ambassador Ravinatha Aryasinha, the forum brought together a vibrant, wide ranging audience comprising academicians, diplomats, senior public servants, civil society activists and many others. Following the presentation by Ambassador Golam Sarwar titled, ‘Reigniting SAARC: Achievements, Challenges and the Way Ahead’, a lively Q&A followed.

The above forum could be described as an act of lighting the proverbial ‘candle’ rather than ‘cursing the darkness.’ It surely is a ‘darkness’ that could be seen as daunting considering that the region’s pivotal powers, India and Pakistan, are failing to act in a spirit of accord but are engaged in bitter finger-pointing on a number of questions of vital importance to SAARC.

On the other hand, what is the rest of the region doing to bring the above sides together? It is disappointing that to date the rest of SAARC has failed to launch a major diplomatic drive to bring peace between the feuding regional heavyweights. It needs to act without delay and establish its earnestness and this effort would need to prove SAARC’s staying power in the unfolding months and even years.

In assessing SAARC’s seeming failure local opinion in particular has failed to factor in what could be described as weak leadership. Since Sheikh Mujibur Rahman of Bangladesh, the founding father of SAARC, the region has failed to produce a visionary leader who could advance the SAARC cause with charisma and drive.

Among other reasons, weak leadership accounts considerably for the faltering and stuttering status, as it were, of SAARC. Badly needed are leaders who could go the extra mile, think less of narrow national interests and work diligently towards the collective well being of the region but SAARC’s millions of ordinary people have been made to wait in vain for leaders of such stature. Instead, they have been burdened with politicians who seem to be relishing the apparently moribund state of SAARC.

Looking back, it could be said that it was the dynamic leadership factor that led to the launching of the Non-Aligned Movement and for its sustenance for a few decades. True, it could be seen in some quarters that NAM is no more, but as in the case of SAARC, the former too has been unfortunate to be burdened over the years with politicians who lack the vision and drive to unflaggingly advance the fortunes of the South. NAM and SAARC lack the dynamism and vision of leaders of the stature of Jawaharlal Nehru, for example, to give them the required guidance and intellectual depth.

The reasons are complex for there not being among us currently political leaders with the vision and the steadfast commitment to advance the legitimate interests of the South. However, it could be stated with conviction that the majority of Southern leaders have too easily caved in to the demands of the global North and its financial agencies.

These leaders have failed to see, for instance, that the largely market economy oriented Northern governments would not view with favour a centrist economic model that attaches priority to the interests of the dis-empowered publics of the South. This realization ought to have dawned on the current government in Sri Lanka, for instance, some while ago but it has no choice but to abide by IMF dictates since economic survival at present is unthinkable without the latter’s succour.

Accordingly for SAARC this should be the time for some soul-searching. Priority needs to be attached to ending the feuding between India and Pakistan since at present the material fortunes of the region hinge largely on these regional giants giving peaceful relations among them a try. This is no easy challenge to meet but some daring, visionary diplomacy needs to take hold among the rest of SAARC.

There is some sense in SAARC bringing the peoples of the region together through programs that address their best collective interests. A meeting of minds among SAARC nations could enable SAARC and its agencies to build a region-wide people’s movement for progressive political and economic change that could in turn lead to the region’s political leaders sensitizing themselves more to the neglected needs of their publics.

However, the time is ‘now’ for the initiation of these progressive changes and the voice of SAARC well wishers would need to drown out those of their critics.

Continue Reading

Features

OPA seminar examines Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and growth pathways

Published

on

(L to R) Dr Achinthya Koswatte, Anushan Kapilan, Dr Harsha Aturupane, Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President, OPA and moderator of the discussion, and Eng Chamil Edirimuny, General Secretary, OPA, at the head table.

A seminar, “Sri Lanka’s Economic Crossroads: Navigating Recovery, Resilience and Growth” was recently held by the Organisation of Professional Associations of Sri Lanka (OPA) at the OPA Auditorium, bringing together economists, OPA members, and professionals from diverse fields for an insightful discussion on Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and future growth prospects.

The event was held under the patronage of Jayantha Gallehewa, President of the OPA, and was jointly organised by the National Issues Committee (NIC) and the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee of the OPA. The event reaffirmed the organisation’s commitment to advancing professional excellence, fostering insightful intellectual engagement, facilitating interdisciplinary knowledge exchange and creating a constructive platform for informed dialogue on issues of national importance.

The panel of speakers comprised Dr. Harsha Aturupane, Lead Economist and Programme Leader for Human Development at the World Bank for Sri Lanka and the Maldives; Dr. Achinthya Koswatta, Senior Lecturer in Economics at the Open University of Sri Lanka, and Anushan Kapilan, Lead Economist at Verité Research.

In his welcome address, the President of the OPA emphasised that Sri Lanka was at a critical juncture in its economic recovery journey where sustained reforms, effective implementation, and collective national commitment are essential to achieving long-term stability, resilience and inclusive growth. He noted that the country had experienced one of the most severe economic crises in its history with the economy contracting by 7.8 percent in 2022 and a further 11.5 percent in 2023, resulting in significant economic and social challenges.

Delivering his introductory remarks Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee, underscored the need to move beyond short-term economic stabilisation towards a comprehensive agenda of structural transformation. He observed that the economic crisis had revealed deep-rooted weaknesses within the economy, including persistent fiscal pressures, rising public debt, foreign exchange limitations, and insufficient diversification of the export base. He stressed that addressing these challenges through strategic reforms, institutional strengthening and long-term economic planning would be essential to establishing a more resilient and competitive economy.

While acknowledging recent positive developments, including improved inflation management, tourism recovery and signs of economic stabilisation, Wijeyaratne stressed the need to advance reforms aimed at strengthening fiscal discipline, enhancing productivity, improving competitiveness, developing human capital and reinforcing governance and institutional effectiveness.

He further highlighted the important role of professionals, businesses, academia and other stakeholders in contributing to evidence-based dialogue and supporting Sri Lanka’s journey towards a resilient, inclusive and sustainable economic future.

Delivering the keynote presentation, Dr. Harsha Aturupane provided a comprehensive assessment of Sri Lanka’s economic prospects within the broader context of global economic transformation. He argued that Sri Lanka functioned as a small open economy whose performance is significantly influenced by developments in the global marketplace. External factors could not be controlled, and the country must strengthen its domestic capacity and resilience to respond effectively to international economic shifts, he noted.

Tracing the evolution of global economic systems, Dr. Aturupane highlighted the transition from ideological divisions between state-controlled and market-oriented economies towards increasingly pragmatic approaches focused on growth, competitiveness and development. He noted that Sri Lanka’s own economic journey reflects a similar evolution, with contemporary policy debates now centred on practical solutions for sustainable economic progress.

The presentation also examined the transformative impact of globalisation. Dr. Aturupane observed that global economic integration had enabled several East Asian economies, including South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong, to achieve remarkable economic advancement through export-led growth strategies. Sri Lanka similarly benefited from this process through the expansion of its apparel industry and increased integration into global value chains.

Turning to Sri Lanka’s recovery programme, Dr. Aturupane emphasised that the ongoing stabilisation process should be viewed as a national programme supported by the International Monetary Fund rather than solely as an IMF initiative. He observed that strong worker remittances, improved tourism earnings, enhanced government revenue mobilisation and prudent import management have contributed significantly to economic stabilisation.

Despite this progress, he cautioned that rebuilding foreign exchange reserves and meeting future debt obligations remain major challenges. He underscored the need to strengthen export performance, attract investment and generate sustainable foreign exchange earnings to ensure long-term economic resilience.

The discussion also focused on monetary stability, inflation management and exchange-rate policy. Dr. Aturupane stressed that maintaining price stability was fundamental to sustainable growth and household welfare, while sound monetary policy remains essential for preserving economic confidence.

Looking beyond stabilisation, he argued that Sri Lanka must transition towards a broader economic transformation agenda. Sustainable growth, he noted, will depend on expanding productive capacity through investment, technological advancement, innovation, skills development and structural reforms.

Among the key constraints identified was the high cost of energy, which continues to affect competitiveness and investment attractiveness. Dr. Aturupane emphasised the importance of improving efficiency and affordability within the energy sector to enhance Sri Lanka’s business environment.

He further highlighted the social dimensions of the crisis, noting the rise in poverty and economic vulnerability among households. Strengthening social protection systems and ensuring inclusive growth, he argued, must remain central components of the national development agenda.

Another critical challenge identified was Sri Lanka’s demographic transition. With an ageing population, outward migration and evolving labour market dynamics, the country is increasingly confronting labour shortages in several sectors. Dr. Aturupane suggested that greater automation, increased labour-force participation and strategic workforce planning would be necessary to address these emerging realities.

Concluding his presentation, he emphasised the need to improve governance, strengthen institutions, enhance competitiveness and create an enabling environment for private sector investment. Sri Lanka’s future success, he noted, will depend on its ability to move decisively beyond crisis management towards a development model founded on resilience, innovation, productivity and inclusive growth.

Dr. Achinthya Koswatta reiterated the importance of policy consistency and predictability in fostering investment and industrial development. She observed that frequent policy changes create uncertainty and discourage long-term investment decisions, whereas stable and coherent policy frameworks build confidence and support sustainable economic transformation.

Meanwhile, Anushan Kapilan highlighted the substantial progress achieved in restoring macroeconomic stability following the recent crisis. He noted significant improvements in fiscal performance, including increased government revenue, reduced reliance on debt financing and a historically low fiscal deficit.

He further observed that public debt levels are declining faster than anticipated, economic growth has exceeded expectations and inflation has been brought under control more rapidly than forecast. Nevertheless, he cautioned that the recovery remains uneven, particularly within the industrial sector and that many households have yet to experience a meaningful improvement in living standards.

The seminar was expertly coordinated by Eng. Chamil Edirimuni, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee, while the technical moderation and interactive discussion session were facilitated by Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee.

The event was attended by Tisara De Silva, President-Elect of the OPA, Eng. Ravi Rupasinghe, General Secretary, Past Presidents, members of the Executive Council, representatives of the General Forum and professionals representing a wide range of disciplines.

The seminar concluded with a vibrant exchange of ideas and perspectives, reaffirming the importance of evidence-based policy dialogue, institutional collaboration and collective national commitment in advancing Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and sustainable growth.

Continue Reading

Features

Her roots run deep in Sri Lanka

Published

on

Samantha Kay: Now based in the UK Samantha’s biggest passion is helping people, especially women, build confidence and believe in themselves Today, her focus is on radio, podcasting and coaching women Whenever she visits Sri Lanka, she says she loves spending time on the beautiful south coast, especially Hikkaduwa and Mirissa She released a song with 90s music icon Angie Brown, which reached No. 9 in the UK Club Charts

Yes, for UK-based presenter and artiste Samantha Kay, home is where the heart – and the roots – are. And her roots run deep in Sri Lanka.

In an exclusive interview with The Island, Samantha says “I’m proud to be Sri Lankan. My mum is from Kandy and my dad is from Colombo, so Sri Lanka has always held a very special place in my heart.

“Whenever I visit Sri Lanka, I love spending time on the beautiful south coast, especially Hikkaduwa and Mirissa. It’s somewhere I always feel connected to my roots and completely at peace.”

Now living in Bournemouth, on the south coast of England, where, she says, she is lucky to be close to some of the UK’s most beautiful beaches, including the iconic Sandbanks, Samantha has built a career that refuses to fit into one box.

She is a radio presenter, podcast host, singer-songwriter, personal trainer and life coach.

“I genuinely love the variety because every role allows me to connect with people and, hopefully, make a positive difference in someone’s day.”

Of course, music has taken her far.

One of her proudest achievements, she says, was releasing a song with 90s music icon Angie Brown, which reached No. 9 in the UK Club Charts.

She also reached the final stages of The X Factor and performed at Wembley Stadium in front of thousands.

Beyond music, Samantha competed in bikini bodybuilding across the UK, winning several titles. “It taught me discipline, resilience and self-belief,” she recalls.

Today, her focus is on radio, podcasting and coaching women. Her podcast encourages people to live life on their own terms rather than feeling pressured to follow society’s expectations.

Says Samantha: “Whether someone is single, changing careers, travelling solo or simply trying to find their purpose, I want them to know that it’s never too late to create a life that feels authentic. If you’ve ever felt like you don’t fit into the box, maybe you were never meant to.”

Samantha Kay also spent a year in Dubai, performing at five-star hotels, including FIVE, and coaching at the iconic outdoor gym on Palm Jumeirah.

“I taught strength and conditioning classes, and hosted wellness retreats, combining my passion for music, health and inspiring others.”

However, with family matters calling her back to the UK, she made the choice to return. “Family comes first,” she says.

Looking ahead, Samantha plans to grow her radio and podcast work, release more music, and expand her wellness retreats.

“My biggest passion is helping people, especially women, build confidence and believe in themselves,” she says.

“Wherever my career takes me, I hope to continue inspiring others to live with courage, kindness and authenticity, while never forgetting my Sri Lankan roots.”

Continue Reading

Trending