Connect with us

Features

THE FOURTH OF JULY AND CRITICAL RACE THEORY

Published

on

by Vijaya Chandrasoma

Americans everywhere are celebrating America’s birthday, Independence Day. Americans, especially white Americans, believe that the nation was born on July 4, 1776 of a comparative painless virgin birth, to recently divorced white parents arguing about custody. The realistic fact of an excruciating and bloody natural birth, brought about by centuries of rape and abuse has been largely whitewashed and ignored.

The nation was born on July 4, 1776 for white males in America only. The Founding Fathers did not even consider the existence of slaves when framing the Constitution. As one of the greatest of Americans, Frederick Douglass, who was born a slave, said in the keynote speech of an Independence Day celebration in New York on July 5, 1852:

“What have I, or those I represent, to do with your national independence? Are the great principles of political freedom and of natural justice embodied in that Declaration of Independence, extended to us?

“I say it with a sad sense of the disparity between us. I am not included within the pale of glorious anniversary! Your high independence only reveals the immeasurable distance between us. The sunlight that brought light and healing to you, has brought stripes and death to me.

“This Fourth of July is yours not mine. You may rejoice, I must mourn”.

The Civil War and the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 were followed by 100 years of Reconstruction and Jim Crow laws, more segregationist and cruel than the South African model of Apartheid. African Americans finally achieved legal equality by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Legal equality, but not societal equality.

Frederick Douglass’ sunlight of natural justice may still be a few generations away from shining brightly on all Americans.

The latest Boogeyman invented by the racist Republicans for everything that ails the country is the teaching of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in schools and colleges, and at military schools. Also known as the 1619 Project, the teaching of CRT is objected to by Republican lawmakers on the basis that study of the subject is the main reason for the division and hatred among races that exist in the country today. They seek to ban the teaching of CRT in schools and colleges, even after the Trump incited insurrection on January 6, clear evidence of the continued infestation of racism and virulent white supremacy.

The core of the Republican argument is that CRT is racist, it’s abusive, and its theories are not based on fact. In other words, systemic racism does not exist in the USA, and teaching of its history of slavery would only result in the incitement of racial hatred.

Republican Senator Ted Cruz voiced his objections to the teaching of CRT on the basis that “Critical Race Theory is bigoted, it is a lie and it is every bit as racist as the Klansmen in white sheets”.

Critical Race Theory is defined as “an intellectual movement and a legal analysis according to which (1) race is a culturally invented category used to oppress people of color, and (2) the law and the legal institutions in the United States are inherently racist insofar as they function to create and maintain social, political and economic inequalities between white and nonwhite people”. Racism is a pervasive issue steeped in US society and in its legal and economic systems.

If you can’t teach about the history of the Klansmen in the white sheets, if you can’t examine where they came from, what they believe, who they hate and why they even wear those white sheets? If you’re forbidden from learning about the Confederacy that gave rise to the Klan, then how can you prevent modern day white children, high school and university students – future citizens – from thinking and behaving like the Klansmen of the 20th century and the Oathkeepers, Proud Boys and white supremacists of the 21st? Or prevent black kids from understanding where their resentment originates, and teaching them how best to deal with it and to overcome it?

If you are not even allowed to learn what Critical Race Theory is, how can you judge its validity? The refusal to teach systemic racism is systemic racism.

During a recent congressional budget hearing, suspected rapist, sex trafficker and the most shameless of Trump’s brownnosers, Congressman Matt Gaetz from Florida, asked the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, about the “white rage” that is taught by the CRT.

Milley talked about a “summit” on CRT held at Harvard Law School years ago, at which it was proposed that there were laws in the United States, antebellum laws prior to the Civil War, that “led to a power differential with African Americans, who were considered three-fifths of a human being when this country was formed”. Vestiges of these pernicious white supremacist laws exist even today.

The General tore into the white supremacist Congressman, stating, “What is it that caused thousands of people to assault this building and try to overturn the Constitution of the United States of America? What caused that? I want to maintain an open mind here. And I do want to understand that. It is important that leaders now and in the future understand that”.

General Milley continued, in response to evidence-fee allegations by Gaetz that he had encouraged teaching of Marxist theories among servicemen, “I’ve read Mao Zedong, I’ve read Karl Marx, I’ve read Lenin. That doesn’t make me a communist. So what is wrong with some situational understanding of the country which we are personally here to defend?”

Trump issued Executive Order 13950 in September 2020, ordering the ban on teaching of Critical Race Theory in schools, colleges, military services, corporation and government contractors. Trump’s target was against a theory with the premise that racism pervades government and other American institutions, giving white people an advantage.

The main premise of this Executive Order is that CRT “is rooted in the pernicious and false belief that America is an irredeemably racist and sexist country; that some people, simply on account of their race or sex, are oppressors; and that racial and sexual identities are more important than our common status as human beings and Americans”. Ironically, the Order’s stated aim was to end the perpetuation of “racial stereotypes and division in the workplace” presumably because the United States is a “nation completely free from prejudices against race, color, creed and sex”. Of course it is not.

Recent history has proved that the US cannot as a nation expect to work towards and achieve equality without first acknowledging and addressing the biases that are deeply rooted in the social fabric of the nation. Trump’s executive order affected government agencies, Fortune 500 companies, educational institutions, non-profits, any organization which already have government contracts or plan to apply for them. It had an almost immediate and chilling effect on reinvigorated efforts to address racial profiling and disparities in the workplace after the brutal murder of George Floyd by a white policeman.

US District Judge Beth Freeman granted a preliminary nationwide injunction blocking Trump’s Executive Order in December 2020, on the basis that it was against the First Amendment (Freedom of Speech). President Biden is expected to rescind Order 13950 shortly.

During the first presidential debate in October 2020, Trump said, “They (the CRT) were teaching that our country is a horrible place, it’s a racist place. And they were teaching people to hate our country. And I’m not going to allow that to happen.” It’s happened already.

Trump wants us to believe that America is a country totally devoid of racism. He alone, with his ‘inclusive” policies, has come close to achieving the dream of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr in 1963, that Americans will one day “live in a nation where they will be judged not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character”. As Trump has repeatedly said, “I am the least racist person you have ever met”. Of course he is, by his own reckoning.

These are the continuing rants and delusions of a treasonous lunatic who has been solely responsible for the re-emergence of racial hatred and violence during the past four years, culminating in the inciting of an insurrection to overturn the democracy and the Constitution of the United States. Delusions that deny the reality and causes of the racial crisis that has been destroying the social fabric of the country. Lies that prevent educators from even starting to take the necessary steps to mitigate what has been the blight of the nation for centuries.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Illegal solar push ravages Hambantota elephant habitat: Environmentalist warns of deepening crisis

Published

on

Land earmarked for the project

A large-scale move to establish solar power plants in Hambantota has triggered a major environmental and social crisis, with more than 1,000 acres of forest—identified as critical elephant habitat—cleared in violation of the law, environmental activist Sajeewa Chamikara said.

Chamikara, speaking on behalf of the Movement for Land and Agricultural Reform, said that 17 companies have already begun clearing forest land along the boundaries of the Hambantota Elephant Management Reserve. The affected areas include Sanakku Gala, Orukemgala and Kapapu Wewa, which are known to be key elephant habitats and long-used movement corridors.

He said that what is taking place cannot be described as development, but rather as a large-scale destruction of natural ecosystems carried out under the cover of renewable energy expansion.

According to Chamikara, the clearing of forests has been carried out using heavy machinery, while large sections have also been deliberately set on fire to prepare the land for solar installations. He said that electric fences have been erected across wide stretches of land, effectively blocking elephant movement and fragmenting their natural habitat.

“These forests are not empty lands. They are part of a living system that supports wildlife and nearby communities. Once destroyed, they cannot be easily restored,” he said.

The projects in question include a 50 megawatt solar development undertaken by five companies and a larger 150 megawatt project implemented by 12 companies. The larger project is reported to be valued at around 150 million US dollars.

Chamikara stressed that these projects are being carried out in a coordinated manner and involve extensive land clearing on a scale that raises serious environmental concerns.

He further alleged that certain companies had paid about Rs. 14 million to secure support and move ahead with the projects. He said this points to a troubling failure of oversight by state institutions that are expected to protect forests and wildlife habitats.

“This is not only an environmental issue. It is also a serious governance issue. The institutions responsible for protecting these lands have failed in their duty,” he said.

Chamikara pointed out that under the National Environmental Act, any project of this scale must receive prior approval through a proper Environmental Impact Assessment process.

He said that clearing forest land before obtaining such approval is a direct violation of the law.

He added that legal requirements relating to archaeological assessments had also been ignored. Under existing regulations, large-scale land clearing requires prior evaluation to ensure that sites of historical or cultural value are not damaged.

“The law is very clear. You cannot go ahead with projects of this nature without proper approval. What we are seeing is a complete disregard for legal procedure,” Chamikara said.

The environmental impact of these activities is already becoming visible. With their natural habitats destroyed, elephants are increasingly moving into nearby villages in search of food and shelter. This has led to a sharp rise in human-elephant conflict in several areas.

Areas such as Mayurapura, Gonnooruwa, Meegahajandura and Thanamalvila have reported increasing encounters between humans and elephants. According to Chamikara, more than 5,000 farming families in these areas are now facing growing threats to their safety and livelihoods.

 

He warned that farmers are being forced to abandon their lands due to repeated elephant intrusions, while incidents involving damage to crops and property are rising. There have also been increasing reports of injuries and deaths among both humans and elephants.

“This is turning into a serious social and economic problem. When farmers cannot cultivate their lands, it affects food production, income and rural stability,” he said.

Chamikara also raised concerns about the broader environmental consequences of clearing forests for solar power projects. While renewable energy is promoted as a solution to reduce carbon emissions, he said that destroying forests undermines that goal.

“Forests play a key role in absorbing carbon dioxide. When you clear and burn them, you are increasing emissions, not reducing them. That defeats the purpose of promoting solar energy,” he explained.

He added that large-scale deforestation in dry zone areas such as Hambantota could also affect local weather patterns and reduce rainfall, which would have further negative impacts on agriculture and water resources.

Chamikara called for a shift in policy, urging authorities to focus on more sustainable approaches to solar power development. He said that rooftop solar systems on homes, public buildings and commercial establishments should be given priority, as they do not require clearing large areas of land.

He also recommended that solar projects be located on degraded or abandoned lands, such as areas affected by past mining or other low-value lands, rather than forests or productive agricultural areas.

“Renewable energy development must be done in a way that does not destroy the environment. There are better options available if there is proper planning,” he said.

Chamikara urged the Central Environmental Authority and the Department of Wildlife Conservation to take immediate action to stop ongoing land clearing and investigate the projects. He stressed that all activities carried out without proper approval should be halted until legal requirements are met.

He warned that failure to act now would lead to long-term environmental damage that could not be reversed.

“If this continues, we will lose not only forests and wildlife, but also the balance between people and nature that supports rural life. The consequences will be felt for generations,” he said.

The situation in Hambantota is fast emerging as a critical test of whether development goals can be balanced with environmental protection. As pressure grows, the response of authorities in the coming weeks is likely to determine whether the damage can still be contained or whether it will continue to spread unchecked.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Features

Why Mahatma Gandhi’s teachings need to be at the heart of conflict resolution

Published

on

Mahatma Gandhi

All credit to the Tamil Nadu government for taking concrete measures to perpetuate the memory of the renowned Mahatma Gandhi of India, who on account of his moral teachings stands on par with the likes of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Confucius and Jalaluddin Rumi, to name a few such all-time greats. The time is indeed ripe to draw the world’s attention to the Mahatma’s humanistic legacy which has resonated in the hearts of peace-oriented sections the world over down the decades.

Under its mega developmental blueprint titled ‘ Tamil Nadu 2030’, the Tamil Nadu government, among other things, intends transforming villages into centres of economic growth in conformity with the Mahatma’s vision of making the village the fundamental unit of material and spiritual advancement. Thus will come into being the ‘Uttamar Gandhi Model Villages Project’, which will be initially covering 10 village Panchayats. (Please see page 3 of The Island of March 11, 2026).

The timeliness of remembering and appreciating anew the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi resides in the utter lawlessness that has been allowed to overtake the world over the last few decades by none other than those global powers which took it upon themselves to usher in a world political and economic order based on the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Mainly in ‘the dock’ in this regard are the permanent members of the UN Security Council.

As is plain to see, the international law and order situation has veered out of control. Principal priorities for the international community or what’s left of it is to prevent the current mainly regional war in the Middle East from degenerating dangerously into another world war, coupled with the task of eliminating the possibility of another nuclear holocaust.

The most scorching of ironies is that the world’s ‘number one power’, the US, has virtually lost its way in the ‘Global Disorder’ it has been party to letting lose. For instance, instead of making good its boast of militarily neutralizing Iran and paving the way for the constant flow of fuel and gas from the Strait of Hormus by itself and Israel, it is now appealing to the rest of the West to come to its assistance. Not surprisingly, US allies are indicating their unwillingness to help pull the US’ ‘chestnuts out of the fire’.

Oil and gas are the veritable life blood of countries and going ahead it should not come as a surprise if impatience gets the better of the major powers and the nuclear option is resorted to by some of them under the dangerous illusion that it would be a quick-fix to their growing economic ills and frustrations.

All the above and more are within the realms of the possible and the need is pressing for humanistic voices to take centre stage in the present runaway crisis. As pointed out in this column last week, Realpolitik has overtaken the world and unless the latter is convinced of the self-destructive nature of the major powers’ policy of ‘meeting fire with fire’ to resolve their disputes, annihilation could be the lot of a good part of the world.

For far too long the voice of humanity has been muted and silenced in the affairs of world by the incendiary threats and counter-threats of the big powers and their allies. No quarter has been bold enough in these blood pressure-hiking slanging matches to speak of the need for brotherly love and compassion among nations and countries. But it’s the language of love and understanding that is the most pressing need currently and the Mahatma in his time did just that against mighty odds.

At present the US and Iran are trading threats and accusations over military-related developments in the Gulf and it’s anybody’s guess as to what turn these events will take. However, calming voices of humanity and moderation would help in deescalating tensions and such voices need to go to the assistance of the UN chief and his team.

The Mahatma used the technique of ‘Satyagraha’ or the policy of non-violent resistance to oppose and dis-empower to a degree the British empire in his time and the current major powers would do well to take a leaf from Gandhi. The latter also integrated into the strategy of non-violent resistance the policy of ‘Ahimsa’ or love and understanding which helped greatly in uniting rather than alienating adversaries. The language of love, it has been proved, speaks to the hearts and minds of people and has a profoundly healing impact.

Mahatma Gandhi defined the ideal of ‘Ahimsa’ thus: ‘In its positive form, “Ahimsa” means the largest love, the greatest charity. If I am a follower of “Ahimsa”, I must love my enemy or a stranger to me as I would my wrong-doing father or son. This active “Ahimsa” necessarily includes truth and fearlessness.’ (See; ‘Modern Indian Political Thought; Text and Context’ by Bidyut Chakrabarty and Rajendra Kumar Pandey, Sage Publications India, Pvt. Ltd., www.sagepub.in).

In the latter publication, the authors also defined the essence of ‘satyagraha’ as ‘protest without rancour’ and this is seen as ‘holding the key to his entire campaign’ of non-violent resistance. From these perspectives, the teaching, ‘hatred begets hatred’ acquires more salience and meaning.

Accordingly, the voice of reason and love needs to come centre stage and take charge of current international political discourse. The UN and allied organizations which advocate conflict resolution by peaceful means need to get together and ensure that their voices are clearly heard and understood. The global South could help in this process by seeing to the vibrant rejuvenation of organizations such as the Non-aligned Movement.

An immediate task for the peace-oriented and well meaning is to make the above projects happen fast. In the process they should underscore afresh the profound importance of the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi, who is acclaimed the world over as a uniting and healing political personality and prophet of peace.

If the Mahatma is universally acclaimed, the reason is plain to see. Put simply, he spoke to the hearts and minds of people everywhere, regardless of man-made barriers. The language of peace and brotherhood, that is, is understood by everyone. The world needs more prophets of peace and reconciliation of the likes of the Mahatma to drown out the voices of discord and war-mongering and ensure that the language of humanity prevails.

Continue Reading

Features

Exciting scene awaits them …

Published

on

The Future Model Hunt extravaganza, organised by Rukmal Senanayake, and advocacy trainer Tharaka Gurukanda, held in late January 2026, has brought into the limelight four outstanding contestants who will participate, at the international level, this year – Sandeepa Sewmini, Demitha Jayawardhana, Diwyanjana Senevirathna, and Nimesha Premachandra.

Nimesha took the honours as Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka 2026 and was featured in The Island of 05th March,

Sandeepa Sewmini was crowned Miss Supranational 2026 and will represent Sri Lanka at the big event to be held in Poland later in the year.

A Business Management and Human Resources student, she will be competing under the guidance of Rukmal Senanayake from the Model With Ruki – Model Academy & Agency.

The Mister Supranational Sri Lanka crown went to Demitha Jayawardhana, a 20-year-old professional model and motocross rider.

Apart from modelling he is engaged in his family business.

Demitha Jayawardhana: Mister Supranational Sri Lanka 2026

Demitha is also a badminton player with a strong passion for sports, fitness and personal growth.

In fact, he is recognised for his strength, discipline, and passion for fitness.

A past student of Wycherley International School and St Peter’s College, Colombo, Demitha is currently in his second year of Economics Management at the Royal Institute of Colombo.

He will represent Sri Lanka at the 10th edition of the Mister Supranational pageant, in Poland, in August, 2026.

Mister and Miss Supranational are annual international beauty pageants, held in Poland, and are designed to discover new talent for the modelling and television industries and produce instant celebrities.

The competition focuses on elegance, intelligence, and social advocacy, with contestants, representing their countries.

The newly appointed Miss Teen International Sri Lanka 2026 is Diwyanjana Senevirathna.

She was crowned at the Future Model Hunt and will represent Sri Lanka at the Miss Teen International 2026 pageant in India.

Diwyanjana is noted for her grace and dedication to representing the country at this prestigious event that aims to celebrate talent, intelligence, charm, and individuality, and provide a platform for young girls to showcase their skills.

Continue Reading

Trending