Connect with us

News

SLPP ensures passage of Electricity Amendment Bill

Published

on

Regardless of MR’s call to suspend divestiture drive:

By Saman Indrajith

The government parliamentary group yesterday voted for the Electricity Amendment Bill in spite of SLPP leader Mahinda Rajapaksa’s opposition to the ongoing privatisation and restructuring programmes. The Bill was passed in Parliament yesterday with amendments.

As no division was called at the end of the third reading stage, Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena announced that the Bill had been passed with amendments.

The second reading of the Bill was passed with a majority of 44 votes with 103 voting for the Bill while 59 opposed it.

The SJB, JVP/NPP and SLPP dissidents voted against the Bill. TNA MPs were not present in the Chamber in the time of the vote was taken.

The Bill was taken for the debate despite questions on amendments, overlooking Standing Orders and absence of Sectoral Oversight Committee certificate on the Bill to the House.

Soon after the House commenced sitting, UPFA dissident MP Prof. Charitha Herath raising a point of order said that the Bill had been rushed through parliament without giving ample time for the MPs to study its content. As per Standing Order 50 (2), after Bill’s passage through the Sectoral Oversight Committee, time should be given to the MPs to study the amendments. We know the Bill went through the Sectoral Oversight Committee and it is scheduled to be taken up today itself. This deprives the MPs of time to study this. The purpose of Standing Order 50 (2) is lost. The Speaker should prevent this,” Prof Herath said.

SLPP dissident MP Chandima Weerakkody said that the Sectoral Oversight Committee (SOC) after considering a Bill should submit its certificate on the amendments and other remarks on the Bill to the House.

This requirement has not been completed regarding the Electricity Amendment Bill. The report should have been submitted by the Chairman of the SOC. Instead, we saw the subject minister announcing to the House on Wednesday of the amendments to be introduced at the committee stage. The Supreme Court has determined that the Bill, as a whole, was against the Constitution and recommended amending 13 out of 54 clauses of the Bill. We call on the Speaker to prevent this undemocratic act. The Chair can give a ruling to stop this for the sake of democracy. This government has only two more months to go. It is unjust to pass Bills in this manner,” Weerakkody said.

Minister Kanchana Wijesekera said that the government brought the Bill to debate after completing all legal requirements.

State Finance Minister Shehan Semasinghe said that the Bill sought to eliminate the monopoly of electricity distribution. “The opposition has been trying to put this off for the past two years. They will try to do the same today,” he said.

SLPP dissident MP Gevindu Cumaratunga said that there are many amendments proposed to the draft bill and they were of very technical in their nature. “The Supreme Court has questioned one such clause and not even given a guideline as to how it should be amended. We need time to study this. On the other hand, if you limit this debate to a single day, then many MPs would not get a chance to speak. We oppose this Bill and need to speak of its ill. It is our duty as MPs. What is the use of we are being here if we are not given time to speak,” Cumaratunga queried.

SLPP Kandy district MP Mahindananda Aluthgamage said that Minister Wijesekera gave time to all MPs to present their views on the Bill. “A day was allocated, and time was given for all MPs to attend that meeting and speak of this Bill. Time for the debate was determined at the party leaders’ meeting where the opposition should have asked for more time. They agreed for a single day debate,” Aluthgamage said.

Chief Opposition Whip Kandy District SJB MP Lakshman Kiriella: I asked for two days’ time for the debate. The government did not give it. The Speaker too was present, and he can confirm this to the House. The government has no mandate to sell national assets in this manner.

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa: People did not give a mandate to this government to bankrupt the country, but they did. Now to cover the losses caused by the bankruptcy, they have resorted to sell off national assets. This Bill needs to be debated properly. It is reasonable for the opposition to ask for time.

Leader of the House Education Minister Susil Premajayantha: The matter of deciding the time for a debate should be done by a party leaders’ meeting. The next party leaders’ meeting is scheduled for this afternoon, so we can take this matter up.

Speaker Abeywardena said that the matter to consider whether the debate be prolonged or not could be decided by the party leaders.

The government made use of its numerical supremacy to reject the opposition’s call to conduct the debate for two days and to put the Bill to vote on Friday at the party leaders’ meeting with the Speaker presiding. Accordingly, the matter was reverted to the previous agreement to have the vote as planned.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

X-Press Pearl disaster fuels global call to classify plastic pellets as hazardous

Published

on

X-Press Pearl

Nearly five years after the catastrophic sinking of the X-Press Pearl, off Sri Lanka’s western coast, the environmental scars remain visible — from contaminated beaches to disrupted fisheries. Now, that tragedy has become a rallying point for an international coalition of scientists, demanding urgent reforms to global maritime law.

A group of leading researchers and environmental experts is calling on the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) to formally recognise plastic pellets — commonly known as nurdles — as hazardous to the marine environment. They argue that existing international shipping regulations fail to adequately address the environmental devastation caused by pellet spills.

Their appeal comes through a newly accepted scientific commentary, published in Cambridge Prisms: Plastics, consolidating decades of research on the impacts of plastic pellet pollution.

Plastic pellets are small, lentil-sized (2–5 mm) particles made from virgin or recycled plastic and used to manufacture a vast range of plastic

products. Scientists say that spills occur frequently during handling and transport, both on land and at sea. Once released into the ocean, pellets persist for decades, spreading across vast distances and entering marine food chains.

Dr. Jennifer Lavers, who studies pollutants in seabirds, warned that the scale of plastic ingestion has reached crisis levels.

“Today the volumes of plastic pellets entering the marine environment are enough to ‘feed’ millions of young seabirds,” she said. “In some areas we are seeing nearly a 100% rate of plastic ingestion, with pellets being particularly problematic.”

Beyond physical harm such as digestive blockages in wildlife, pellets also pose chemical threats. According to Dr. Sinja Rist of DTU Aqua, they are far from inert materials.

“Pellets are persistent, widely dispersed, readily ingested by wildlife, and capable of transporting hazardous chemicals,” she explained, noting that they can absorb and release toxic substances across oceans.

Sri Lanka’s experience with the X-Press Pearl disaster, in 2021, highlighted these dangers on an unprecedented scale. The burning container ship released vast quantities of chemicals and billions of plastic pellets into the sea, causing widespread marine contamination and severe economic losses to coastal communities.

Hemantha Withanage, Chairperson of the Centre for Environmental Justice in Sri Lanka, said the disaster exposed major gaps in international maritime regulation.

“After studying the aftermath of the X-Press Pearl disaster, it is impossible to argue that plastic pellets are harmless cargo,” Withanage stressed. “The impacts in Sri Lanka were immediate, widespread, and long-lasting. Stronger international regulation is essential to prevent this from happening again.”

Under the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), the intentional discharge of plastics is banned. However, scientists argue that current rules are inadequate when it comes to preventing or responding to accidental spills, especially those involving container ships.

The researchers are urging the IMO to assign plastic pellets a specific United Nations classification number. Such recognition would formally acknowledge their environmental hazard potential and trigger stricter requirements for packaging, labelling, and emergency notification during shipping.

Dr. Therese Karlsson, lead author of the commentary and Science Advisor for the IPEN, said the scientific case is clear.

“There are decades of studies highlighting threats from plastic pellets released into the oceans, including risks to marine animals and the food chain,” she said. “Plastics contain thousands of chemicals, many known to cause harm to the environment and human health. It is past time for global regulations to protect our oceans.”

The European Union has recently introduced measures aimed at preventing pellet losses throughout the supply chain, and in 2021 the IMO committed to addressing pellet pollution as part of broader efforts to reduce marine plastic litter. Yet experts warn that without binding global action, pellet spills will continue.

For Sri Lanka, still recovering from one of the worst maritime environmental disasters in its history, the international call carries particular urgency.

Scientists say the message from the island nation’s experience is unmistakable: plastic pellets must no longer be treated as ordinary cargo, but as hazardous materials demanding strict global oversight.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

Foreign Minister Herath decries deadlock in global disarmament

Published

on

Minister of Foreign Affairs, Vijitha Herath, has underscored the urgent global need for enduring peace, security, and strengthened multilateral cooperation, warning that rising geopolitical tensions have created deadlocks in global disarmament efforts and posed serious challenges to international humanitarian law.

The Minister said so while addressing the High-Level Segment of the Conference on Disarmament (CD) in Geneva on Monday (23 Feb), reaffirming Sri Lanka’s firm commitment to global disarmament and multilateral cooperation.

Minister Herath said that safeguarding the future of humanity must be treated as a paramount priority, stressing that trust and mutual respect are essential foundations for effective decision-making in multilateral forums. He reaffirmed that Sri Lanka remains committed to ensuring a secure and stable world for future generations.

Highlighting Sri Lanka’s longstanding role in nuclear disarmament, he recalled the country’s contribution to the 1964 Non-Aligned Movement Summit in Cairo, which called for the establishment of nuclear-free zones. He reiterated that Sri Lanka continues to strongly support such initiatives, particularly in the Middle East, and emphasiSed that total elimination and non-proliferation remain the only guarantees against the use of nuclear weapons.

Sri Lanka also urged that non-nuclear-weapon states must receive unconditional, non-discriminatory, legally binding security assurances, achievable through the work of the Conference on Disarmament.

On humanitarian demining, Minister Herath noted that Sri Lanka remains an active partner in that effort and currently serves as a senior member of the victim assistance committee of the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention. He further reaffirmed Sri Lanka’s continued commitment to the Cluster Munitions Convention, which the country presided over in 2019.

Recognising the rapidly evolving threat landscape, the Minister warned of the impact of emerging technologies that have already reshaped the global disarmament architecture while putting international humanitarian law at significant risk. In this context, he said Sri Lanka has been advocating for the early start of negotiations on a legally binding instrument to prohibit lethal autonomous weapon systems.

He also addressed growing threats to outer space security, stressing that Sri Lanka, long a supporter of disarmament in outer space, continues to back negotiations on a legally binding instrument to prevent an arms race beyond Earth.

Minister Herath concluded by affirming Sri Lanka’s readiness to work with all nations to ensure global efforts toward a safer world are accelerated and achieved at the earliest opportunity.

Continue Reading

News

CoPF orders officials to establish legal framework for Rs. 200 for estate workers daily attendance allowance

Published

on

NDF MP Ravi Karunayake speaking at the COPF meeting

The Parliamentary Committee on Public Finance has directed officials to establish a proper legal framework for the Rs. 200 daily attendance allowance provided by the Government to estate workers.

During the Committee meeting on February 17, 2026, chaired by MP Dr. Harsha de Silva, members emphasised that while there is no objection to increasing estate worker wages, the current payment mechanism lacks a formal legal basis. The allowance is being distributed under a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with private plantation companies without gazette notification, leaving the arrangement vulnerable to termination and excluding contributions to the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) and Employees’ Trust Fund (ETF), according to parliament sources.

Officials noted that the MoU with plantation companies was valid for three years, and thereafter a policy decision would be required to continue the payments. The Committee stressed that public funds should not be used to pay salaries in private institutions without proper financial discipline, despite the allowance being approved under the 2026 Budget as a “development subsidy.” The Deputy Secretary to the Treasury suggested the payment would be more appropriately classified as a “production incentive,” though existing payments and MoUs did not specify such requirements.

The Committee also reviewed disaster relief efforts for those affected by Cyclone Ditwah. Officials reported that approximately Rs. 24.4 billion had been disbursed under various relief programs, including allowances for house cleaning, household purchases, and school assistance. Delays in housing reconstruction and rental support were attributed to damage assessments and land identification, with Committee members urging faster delivery of housing aid.

Officials from the National Insurance Trust Fund (NITF) highlighted reinsurance claims of around Rs. 11 billion following Cyclone Ditwah, noting that although NITF had not reinsured its exposure internationally since 2023, it was capable of settling existing claims.

Continue Reading

Trending