News
SLPP ensures passage of Electricity Amendment Bill
Regardless of MR’s call to suspend divestiture drive:
By Saman Indrajith
The government parliamentary group yesterday voted for the Electricity Amendment Bill in spite of SLPP leader Mahinda Rajapaksa’s opposition to the ongoing privatisation and restructuring programmes. The Bill was passed in Parliament yesterday with amendments.
As no division was called at the end of the third reading stage, Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena announced that the Bill had been passed with amendments.
The second reading of the Bill was passed with a majority of 44 votes with 103 voting for the Bill while 59 opposed it.
The SJB, JVP/NPP and SLPP dissidents voted against the Bill. TNA MPs were not present in the Chamber in the time of the vote was taken.
The Bill was taken for the debate despite questions on amendments, overlooking Standing Orders and absence of Sectoral Oversight Committee certificate on the Bill to the House.
Soon after the House commenced sitting, UPFA dissident MP Prof. Charitha Herath raising a point of order said that the Bill had been rushed through parliament without giving ample time for the MPs to study its content. As per Standing Order 50 (2), after Bill’s passage through the Sectoral Oversight Committee, time should be given to the MPs to study the amendments. We know the Bill went through the Sectoral Oversight Committee and it is scheduled to be taken up today itself. This deprives the MPs of time to study this. The purpose of Standing Order 50 (2) is lost. The Speaker should prevent this,” Prof Herath said.
SLPP dissident MP Chandima Weerakkody said that the Sectoral Oversight Committee (SOC) after considering a Bill should submit its certificate on the amendments and other remarks on the Bill to the House.
This requirement has not been completed regarding the Electricity Amendment Bill. The report should have been submitted by the Chairman of the SOC. Instead, we saw the subject minister announcing to the House on Wednesday of the amendments to be introduced at the committee stage. The Supreme Court has determined that the Bill, as a whole, was against the Constitution and recommended amending 13 out of 54 clauses of the Bill. We call on the Speaker to prevent this undemocratic act. The Chair can give a ruling to stop this for the sake of democracy. This government has only two more months to go. It is unjust to pass Bills in this manner,” Weerakkody said.
Minister Kanchana Wijesekera said that the government brought the Bill to debate after completing all legal requirements.
State Finance Minister Shehan Semasinghe said that the Bill sought to eliminate the monopoly of electricity distribution. “The opposition has been trying to put this off for the past two years. They will try to do the same today,” he said.
SLPP dissident MP Gevindu Cumaratunga said that there are many amendments proposed to the draft bill and they were of very technical in their nature. “The Supreme Court has questioned one such clause and not even given a guideline as to how it should be amended. We need time to study this. On the other hand, if you limit this debate to a single day, then many MPs would not get a chance to speak. We oppose this Bill and need to speak of its ill. It is our duty as MPs. What is the use of we are being here if we are not given time to speak,” Cumaratunga queried.
SLPP Kandy district MP Mahindananda Aluthgamage said that Minister Wijesekera gave time to all MPs to present their views on the Bill. “A day was allocated, and time was given for all MPs to attend that meeting and speak of this Bill. Time for the debate was determined at the party leaders’ meeting where the opposition should have asked for more time. They agreed for a single day debate,” Aluthgamage said.
Chief Opposition Whip Kandy District SJB MP Lakshman Kiriella: I asked for two days’ time for the debate. The government did not give it. The Speaker too was present, and he can confirm this to the House. The government has no mandate to sell national assets in this manner.
Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa: People did not give a mandate to this government to bankrupt the country, but they did. Now to cover the losses caused by the bankruptcy, they have resorted to sell off national assets. This Bill needs to be debated properly. It is reasonable for the opposition to ask for time.
Leader of the House Education Minister Susil Premajayantha: The matter of deciding the time for a debate should be done by a party leaders’ meeting. The next party leaders’ meeting is scheduled for this afternoon, so we can take this matter up.
Speaker Abeywardena said that the matter to consider whether the debate be prolonged or not could be decided by the party leaders.
The government made use of its numerical supremacy to reject the opposition’s call to conduct the debate for two days and to put the Bill to vote on Friday at the party leaders’ meeting with the Speaker presiding. Accordingly, the matter was reverted to the previous agreement to have the vote as planned.
News
President proposes; Speaker disposes
AKD’s request to Harsha:
Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne has frustrated an attempt by Chairman of the Committee on Public Finance (CoPF) Dr. Harsha de Silva, MP, to intervene to settle the continuing dispute over the appointment of a new Auditor General.
Dr. De Silva yesterday told The Island he had recently written to all members of the Constitutional Council (CC) drawing their attention to the urgent need to address the issue at hand. The AG’s position remains vacant since 08 Dec, 2025. AG W.P.C. Wickremanayake retired in April and since then there have been a couple of Acting appointments. The CC has declined to endorse any of President Dissanayake’s nominees as the AG.
Asked whether he had taken up the issue with the CC following President Anura Kumara Dissanayake soliciting his support in this regard, MP de Silva said that he had written to CC members as agreed with the President.
The former UNPer and one-time State Minister said: “I did so, giving due respect to CC’s independence, underscoring the critical importance in them working with the President to resolve the crisis. I alluded to the need to have transparency in public financial management during this post-cyclone period where large amounts of funds are being transacted on multiple fronts, both domestic and foreign.”
Responding to another query, Dr. De Silva emphasised that he had clarified that the President must send the names of qualified and experienced persons to the CC for consideration. “However, these letters were returned to me by the Speaker, without being delivered to members of the CC. The Speaker didn’t give an explanation. Thus, except for members who are MPs who had been copied via email by my committee office, others never received my letter of concern. Even though I questioned, in Parliament, the basis of his refusal to forward my communication to the members of the CC of which he is Chairman, no answer was given.”
The CC consists of Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne, Speaker and Chairman of the 10-member body. Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, Prime Minister, Sajith Premadasa, Leader of the Opposition, Bimal Rathnayake, Aboobucker Athambawa, Ajith P. Perera, Sivagnanam Shritharan, and three civil society members namely Dr. Prathap Ramanujam, Dr. Dilkushi Anula Wijesundere and Dr. Dinesha Samararatne. None of the President’s nominees could obtain CC’s approval as all of them were rejected by the CC.
The present CC was introduced by the 21st Amendment to the Constitution which was endorsed on 31 October 2022.
Both the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) and the Transparency International Sri Lanka Chapter recently requested President Dissanayake, in writing, to propose a suitable person to the post of AG. The BASL, in another statement that dealt with the forthcoming vacancies in the CC due to three civil society members completing their terms, declared its concern over possible attempts by the President and the NPP government to fill the vacancies with rubber stamps.
The three civil society members will complete their terms on 18 January. In terms of Article 41E of the Constitution, the CC meets at least twice every month, and may meet as often as may be necessary. The Chairman presides at all meetings of the CC and in the absence of the Chairman, the Prime Minister, and in the absence of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition presides at the meetings of the CC.
Asked whether the CC could be disrupted due to the end of civil society members’ terms, an authoritative official pointed out that in case new appointments were not made the current members could continue.
The Parliament has not so far called for applications to fill the forthcoming vacancies.
by Shamindra Ferdinando ✍️
News
Sri Lanka loses Rs.7.5 bn due to coal tender irregularities: FSP
The NPP government’s coal procurement process has once again come under scrutiny following allegations by the Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) that substandard coal has been imported for power generation and that tender procedures were manipulated to favour a specific supplier.
Addressing the media after a party meeting in Maharagama on Saturday, FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jagoda said a test report issued by the government laboratory at the Lakvijaya Power Plant had confirmed that the latest coal shipment unloaded in Sri Lanka did not meet the required quality standards. According to the report, the coal’s calorific value ranged between 5,600 and 5,800 kilocalories per kilo, below the 5,900–6,200 kCal/kg range specified in tender requirements.
Jagoda warned that lower calorific value coal would require higher volumes to generate the same amount of electricity, increasing costs significantly. Preliminary estimates, he said, indicated an additional financial burden of around Rs. 7,500 million, which might eventually be passed on to consumers through higher electricity tariffs.
The FSP also accused the government of tailoring procurement rules to benefit the Indian supplier, which has deposited bonds for long-term coal supply for the upcoming season. Jagoda alleged that tender conditions had been altered to accommodate the company, pointing to changes in coal reserve requirements. Under the 2021 Sri Lanka Coal Registration Document, suppliers were required to maintain a minimum reserve of one million metric tonnes with a gross calorific value of 5,900 kCal/kg. This threshold, he said, had been reduced to 100,000 metric tonnes in the 2025 document which is a 90% reduction raising serious concerns.
He further cited past allegations against the Indian company, including findings in a 2016 Auditor General’s report that the company violated procurement guidelines regarding a rice supply contract with Sathosa in 2014. Jagoda also referred to legal issues involving individuals linked to the company, and the suspension of a representative by the International Cricket Council in 2019 over match-fixing allegations.
Beyond company-specific concerns, Jagoda criticised what he described as systemic manipulation of the coal tender process. He questioned why the coal tender, typically called in February or March, was delayed until July, despite electricity being declared an essential service. He also alleged that the tender submission period had been progressively shortened from the internationally accepted six weeks to five weeks, and now reportedly to three giving an unfair advantage to suppliers with existing stock.
The Ministry of Energy has recently issued an amended tender to procure 4.5 million metric tonnes of coal for the Lanka Coal Company for the 2025/26 and 2026/27 periods, following the cancellation of an earlier tender.
Jagoda warned that delays and irregularities could lead to coal shortages, higher spot market purchases, increased electricity costs, and even power cuts if hydropower generation falls short. He called for urgent investigations into the procurement process, insisting that the burden of alleged mismanagement and corruption must not be transferred to the public.
by Chaminda Silva ✍️
News
CID summons SJB MP for criticising education reforms
SJB Gampaha District MP Prasad Siriwardhana has been summoned to the CID today (12) for questioning in connection with a statement he made on a private television channel regarding education reforms.
He was earlier asked to report to the CID on 10 January to make a statement. However, as Siriwardhana had notified the authorities that he was unable to appear on that day, he was subsequently asked to come today.
Siriwardhana is one of the critics of the shortcomings of the education reforms introduced by the NPP government.
-
News2 days agoSajith: Ashoka Chakra replaces Dharmachakra in Buddhism textbook
-
Business2 days agoDialog and UnionPay International Join Forces to Elevate Sri Lanka’s Digital Payment Landscape
-
Features2 days agoThe Paradox of Trump Power: Contested Authoritarian at Home, Uncontested Bully Abroad
-
News7 days agoInterception of SL fishing craft by Seychelles: Trawler owners demand international investigation
-
Features2 days agoSubject:Whatever happened to (my) three million dollars?
-
News2 days agoLevel I landslide early warnings issued to the Districts of Badulla, Kandy, Matale and Nuwara-Eliya extended
-
News7 days agoBroad support emerges for Faiszer’s sweeping proposals on long- delayed divorce and personal law reforms
-
News2 days ago65 withdrawn cases re-filed by Govt, PM tells Parliament
