Connect with us

News

SLFP leader issues veiled threat to govt. in Parliament

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

Former President, and Polonnaruwa District MP Maithripala Sirisena yesterday reminded the government in Parliament that it had a two-thirds majortiy because the SLFP members of the SLPP parliametnary group were with it.

Participating in the third reading debate on Budget 2022, MP Sirisena said that there had been many instances in the past where some governments caused their own dowfall by attacking their coaltion partners. “I would like to stress that it is with the 14 SLFP MPs that the government has a two-thirds majority.

Responding to an allegation levelled by Agriculture Minister Mahindananda Aluthgamage, MP Sirisena said: “The Agriculture Minister has told this House that I live in a luxury house made by amalgamating three houses. I challenged him to prove it and promised to resign from my MP post if he would do so.

So far he has not been able to prove his allegation. What he said was a lie. When the expenditure heads of the President were taken for debate in this House last Tuesday, Mahindananda stated that the former President had used 200 vehicles. He also said that the expenditure of the Presidential Secretariat at that time was around Rs. 3.5 billion. Even if one uses a single vehicle a day, it would take a person 200 days to use them all. That allegation too was a lie. I had been allocated only four vehicles. They sling mud at me.

“I was accused of spending extravagantly when I was the president. During my tenure as the President, there were seven major projects under the Presidential Secretariat. None of those projects has been continued. Money was spent on those projects, which included national environment project, anti-narcotics project, national project to safeguard children and project to prevent chronic kidney disease, etc., those projects were very successfully implemented throughout the country.

“I too am an MP of this government. It is wrong to level baseless allegations of this nature against me. Do not let these issues drag long. All 14 SLFP MPs met on Tuesday and decided that I should make this speech, today. I also call on the Speaker not to allow MPs to use this House for mudslinging and spreading falsehoods,” MP Sirisena said.

State Minister Dayasiri Jayasekera: It is not easy for us to remain silent when they sling mud at the former President in this manner. Mahindananda today is like a dancing peacock which does not know that its back is exposed when it performs dances raising its tail feathers. I call upon Mahindananda to dig deep further because he would find more to his own detriment.

“We have always protected this government as its members. If you want to hit us, do so but if you think you can get away by attacking our party leader this would not end without a major crisis. Maitripala Sirisena is a former President. He obtained the highest number of votes from the Polonnaruwa District. He did not come to this House from the national list.

Leader of the House Education Minister Dinesh Gunawardena: If an MP makes a serious statement which is wrong, then it should be clarified in his presence. It is the tradition that those who make the clarification inform beforehand the particular MP who made the wrong statement that he should be present in the House when the clarification is done so that he would get a chance to rectify his error. It is our belief that we can clarify any such doubt amicably. I do not think that former President Sirisena’s name was associated with any of these allegations. On Tuesday the way the financial allocations have been made to the Presidential Secretariat under incumbent President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, was appreciated.

“There is no problem between the SLPP government and the SLFP. It is not right to interpret any misunderstanding as a problem between the two entities. The incumbent president has set a very clear and transparent example on his expenses and he is entitled to be praised. Whenever he went abroad, he took only the least number of officials. If he took with him any of his family members, he met those expenses out of his personal money. This is not a matter for a clash between two parties.

Agriculture Minister Mahindananda Aluthgamage: Minister Dayasiri Jayasekera made a statement while I was not in this Chamber. He had warned that if we dig deep in this pit there would be more smell of wrong doings. I too admit that. There could be exposures of many wrong doings if we dig deeper. There would be more uncovering of wrongdoings such as accepting cheques from Arjun Aloysius. Therefore I do not resort to talk of dirt digging.

I made a speech on the expenses of the former President and the incumbent President in this House. I spoke of the differences between the expenses. I spoke of the example set by the incumbent President to the country by spending less. We have a right to speak about the incumbent president. If the incumbent president has saved 17 billion rupees to the government coffers compared to the former president, then we have a right to talk about it and appreciate it. That was what I spoke about on that day. I table those expenditure reports in this House.

I obtained details about the official residence of the former president. I was not to speak about this. Since I was accused of lying, I table these documents too. We have no need to attack any party leader. I was called an agriculture minister who could not walk on a ridge (niyara) of a paddy field. We have walked on the ridge as well as the field. We have no need to attack you. But if we are attacked, we too are ready to respond. We have done nothing wrong. We are also not ready to act as eunuchs without a backbone. It is wrong to speak about this in my absence. I am not afraid of setting effigies in my shape on fire. Come what may, I will stand by this government’s decision.

MP Maitripala Sirisena: Mahindananda made a very emotional speech. As the former President I too have a right to respond to what he had said. We do not hit. Even if we are attacked we would not resort to counterattack but we look at the attackers with sympathy and equanimity. If we resort to attack we would not come down to your level. I must add that if we attack, we would attack in a different way.

“There is no problem with regard to statements made by Mahindananda on presidential expenditure heads. Minister Dinesh Gunawardena said that the incumbent President has set an example. There is no problem pertaining to that. A comparison between my expenses and the current expenses was made to show that I spent more. I call on you not to throw stones while you are in glass houses. I too have set an example compared to the expenses incurred by the presidents prior to me. I set an example from 2015 with regard to the way the helicopters and airplanes had been used by the presidents prior to me. I must state that.

There is a question about what would be the wounds if we resort to attacks and who would receive them. . Today the government commands two thirds majority with the help of 14 SLFP MPs. We have seen many instances and their results when parties within a government clash with each other. There are examples since 1947. The first government formed after independence later broke into pieces because of enmity between allied parties. Sirimavo Bandaranaike faced the same in 1964. Her government suffered a similar predicament in 1975 again. JR Jayewardene continued in power enjoying five-sixths power in the House with the help of a referendum but the UNP too faced a split with Lalith and Gamini breaking away. It dealt the grand old party with a debilitating blow that the UNP cannot stand up even today. There had been another instance of a split during the times of Chandrika Bandaranaike. That led to the downfall of her government. In 2014 I left the party on many reasonable grounds to contest the presidential election as the common candidate. The then government lost. Governance and managing two thirds power in the House are matters that should be considered seriously and taken with a more open mind with more intelligence and experience.

This too is an alliance government. We too can make fiery speeches. But we do not resort to fisticuffs since we are very innocent people. Mahindananda Aluthgamage spoke to our Minister Duminda Dissanayake yesterday. When Minister Dissanayake had asked about this row, Aluthgamage told him that he made such statements to give some marks to the incumbent president. We do not give two hoots if you want to give marks to the president, but do not attack us. You may find many other ways and means to give marks to the president without attacking us. Remember we too are under the same president. We must act with restraint without creating problems within the government. We must keep our friendship. Mahindananada is a cabinet minister. I am a former President. Dayasiri Jayasekera is a former Chief Minister. We must address each other keeping our positions in mind.

“If you talk about my houses, it is better to talk about the houses of others too. I view the example set by the incumbent president in using houses is a good one.

Minister Mahidananda lied to the Cabinet. He lied to the President. He lied to parliament. He lied to people. He lied to farmers. He lied to consumers. It is owing to those lies that agriculture today is suffering from a crisis. That was the reason for the government losing its popularity.

Minister Aluthgamage: It was said that I made statements to curry favour with the incumbent president. That is a lie. I was also accused of being the reason for the crisis. I implemented the government policy. I too can talk about the Easter Sunday attacks. But I would not talk about that since it would hurt the former president. I do not lie. I am not a person who leaves my prime minister after promising him not to leave. It is not good for a former president to lie in the House.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Focus on developing the Coconut and Food & Beverage export industries into a USD 3 billion economy within the next two years

Published

on

By

A discussion was held on Friday (26) afternoon  at the Presidential Secretariat between President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and industrialists in the coconut and food and beverage manufacturing sectors on developing the coconut and food and beverage export industries into a USD 3 billion economy within the next two years.

Accordingly, the objective is to expand the coconut-based export industry into a USD 2 billion sector and the food and beverage export industry into a USD 1 billion sector, and extensive discussions were held on the plans required to achieve these targets.

The President stated that the Government is prepared to provide every possible form of incentive necessary to promote export diversification and encourage value-added products.

Proposals and suggestions aimed at developing these industries were also presented during the meeting, and the President further noted that future plans would be formulated after taking all such proposals and recommendations into consideration.

The President also expressed agreement to provide incentives for establishing industries in the Northern Province and assured that the Government would extend its fullest support for setting up coconut-based manufacturing industries in the region.

Attention was also focused on plans to streamline the importation of raw materials required for export production while safeguarding domestic producers. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake further stated that his Government’s objective is to build the country’s economy into an export-oriented production economy by strengthening domestic supply chains.

Minister of Labour and Deputy Minister of Finance and Planning Anil Jayantha Fernando; Secretary to the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Dr Harshana Suriyapperuma; Secretary to the Ministry of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development, Thilaka Jayasundara; and Chairman of the Export Development Board, Mangala Wijesinghe, were among those present.

The  President of the Sri Lanka Food Processors Association, Aruna Senanayake; Vice President Rasika Seneviratne; Managing Director of CBL Group, Shyamali Wickramasinghe; Chief Executive Officer of SriLankan Catering Ltd, Mangala Wijesekera; Managing Director of Ma’s Tropical Food Processing (Pvt) Ltd, Mario D. Alwis; Chairman of the Consumer Foods Sector of John Keells Food Holdings PLC, Daminda Gamlath; together with a number of leading business leaders from the food production sector were also present.

President’s Media Division (PMD)

Continue Reading

News

Another 1,132 Sri Lankan Personnel to be deployed for United Nations Peacekeeping Missions

Published

on

By

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake joined the ceremony held on Friday (26) morning  at the Sri Lanka Infantry Regimental Centre in Panagoda to extend his best wishes to members of the Sri Lanka Army and the Sri Lanka Police Special Task Force who are set to depart on United Nations peacekeeping missions.

This marks the largest contingent of personnel ever to depart from Sri Lanka at a single time for United Nations peacekeeping operations. It is also significant as the first occasion on which a President has attended in person to extend his good wishes to the departing contingent.

Addressing the gathering, the President stated that this demonstrates to the world that Sri Lanka possesses forces prepared to stand for the protection, democracy and human rights of oppressed people wherever they may be. The President noted that this is a tremendous source of pride and honour for the nation. The President further pointed out that, although it may be difficult for Sri Lanka to become the wealthiest country in the world, it can nevertheless become one of the world’s most respected and dignified nations.

The President also emphasised that all those departing on peacekeeping missions carry the pride of the nation upon their shoulders and that it is the responsibility of every individual to safeguard the country’s honour and dignity by performing their duties with dedication and professionalism.

In order to help ease the current crisis in Haiti and support efforts to establish peace and stability in that country, the Government of Sri Lanka is scheduled to deploy this Gang Suppression Force (GSF) to Haiti in August.

The contingent comprises 900 Army personnel drawn from various regiments, 189 officers of the Police Special Task Force, and, for the first time in Sri Lanka’s military history, 43 female Army personnel specially trained in demining and explosive ordnance disposal operations. In addition, the battalion has been equipped with armoured vehicles, locally manufactured Uni Buffel vehicles, as well as two specialised bulletproof vehicles provided by the Presidential Security Division.

Following is the speech delivered by the President;

“We know that all of you gathered here today are preparing to undertake an extremely important mission in the service of world peace, carrying with you the reputation and pride of our nation. What is it that you take with you as you leave our country? First and foremost, we believe that you depart bearing the honour and dignity of Sri Lanka upon your shoulders. Each of you carries a profound responsibility to safeguard our motherland, its esteem and its pride in the course of your duties. This is because we must transform our country into one that enjoys great international respect and prestige. We all understand one thing: we may not become the richest nation in the world. However, we can become one of the world’s most dignified and honourable nations.

To achieve that, there are many tasks that we must undertake and fulfill. In doing so, we know that we must build a state whose economy does not collapse in the manner we have experienced before. When a country suffers economic collapse, its pride, reputation and dignity are also diminished in the eyes of the international community. If we are a nation unable to repay its debts, if we are a nation that has gone bankrupt, then we become a state that has lost its self-respect. Therefore, one of our greatest challenges is determining how to transform Sri Lanka into a strong and resilient economy.

In that regard, I believe we have already achieved several significant successes. One of them is that our economy has developed the capacity to withstand internal shocks, including floods, cyclones and other disasters. You are aware that cyclone Ditwah that struck during the November–December period last year became one of the most economically devastating cyclones in Sri Lanka’s recent history. That was an internal challenge. Yet we possessed the capability to build an economy strong enough to confront such an internal crisis. As a result, we were able to allocate Rs. 500 billion for recovery without printing new money or obtaining fresh loans. Consequently, by January, February and March, our economy remained stable and continued to record growth. Had that not been the case, we would not have achieved an economic growth rate of 5.1 per cent. Our ability to respond swiftly was made possible by the economic strength we had built.

Similarly, with the recent conflict in the Middle East, many people began to speculate that our country would once again come to a standstill. There were discussions about possible fuel shortages, power cuts, import restrictions and the suspension of vehicle imports, among many other concerns. Yet, in response to the impact of that conflict, we allocated Rs. 100 billion, to provide relief to the people. What does this demonstrate? It shows that we have strengthened an economy capable of withstanding internal shocks.

I believe our principal challenge now lies in how we respond to external shocks. How do we mitigate the effects on our economy arising from wars and conflicts elsewhere in the world? To address this, I believe we require a strategic plan.

We have engaged in extensive discussions on this matter and have already taken a number of important steps towards preparing ourselves for such external disruptions.

Your service, as you depart today, is in the interest of both our nation and global peace.

Next, if a nation is to attain true dignity and honour, the rule of law and the supremacy of law must be firmly established. Every citizen must respect the law and submit to it. However, our country long maintained a culture in which certain groups neither feared the law nor obeyed it. They possessed the means to evade justice through their wealth and influence. How can a nation achieve international respect, honour and prestige under such circumstances? A country cannot progress when one law applies to the wealthy and powerful and another to the poor and vulnerable.

Therefore, I firmly believe that one of the most important foundations of national dignity and honour is breathing life into the principle that all are equal before the law. Society must have confidence that the law will be applied equally to everyone whenever wrongdoing occurs. Internationally, Sri Lanka must be recognised as a country that respects the rule of law.

I believe that we have already taken considerable strides in this regard. We are building a state in which everyone is subject to the law. This is not easy, because old habits and entrenched influences continue to exert pressure. Nevertheless, we remain determined to establish the principle that every person must be accountable under the law.

In that endeavour, our armed forces and our Special Task Force have a vital role to play. We have every confidence that you will fulfill the unique responsibility entrusted to you in upholding the rule of law and the authority of the state in our country.

At the same time, we must safeguard the freedom of our citizens. No citizen of this nation should have to live in fear of those who govern them.

Yet, for a long period, the citizens of our country did live in fear of their rulers. A nation cannot move forward under such circumstances. A state cannot progress when its people live in fear of, and in subservience to, those in power. What, then, must we do? Citizens must have the right to criticise those who govern them. They must have the right to organise themselves in defence of their rights in opposition to the governing authorities. If the people have entrusted us with the office of President, then the people have the right to question me. We must build a state that safeguards such freedoms and human rights. That is an essential foundation for a nation’s progress and for earning an honourable reputation in the world.

In this regard, we know that our armed forces and our distinguished officers have rendered immense service to our country over many years. However, there have at times been reports, both domestically and internationally, raising certain doubts concerning some aspects of that service.

Nevertheless, I wish to state clearly that, from the ordinary soldier at the lowest rank to the Commander of the Army and from the police constable on the ground to the Inspector General of Police, if any action has been taken in defence of this country, its people and the security of the state, then we, as a government, are duty-bound to protect and uphold every such action. If anyone, anywhere, has carried out duties in the interests of national security, the freedom of our people and the protection of the state, then we have a responsibility to protect all those who stood in support of those efforts.

At the same time, we also have a responsibility to investigate any actions that may have harmed the reputation of our armed forces or undermined their responsibilities in pursuit of the ambitions of a small group. If, in furtherance of the interests of a very small faction, things inappropriate for the armed forces have been done, or acts have been committed that fall outside what is expected of them, then, for the sake of the reputation of the military, the protection of victims and the dignity of our nation, we are prepared to act and indeed we must act. None of this constitutes personal vengeance or political persecution. We must rebuild a strong and respected reputation for our armed forces.

If a small group, in pursuit of narrow interests, has abandoned the honour, values and commitment that the military owes to the people and to the state, then I believe that, for the sake of the dignity and reputation of the armed forces themselves, such matters must be investigated, examined and made known to society. Our honour does not rest upon burying crimes in the sand; it rests solely upon conducting proper investigations and bringing the truth to light. That is the conviction we hold. Therefore, I believe that the mission upon which you are about to embark today is one of immense responsibility. It will bring honour and prestige to our country.

The people of Haiti are facing an internal crisis that requires the easing of conflict, the safeguarding of their fundamental rights and the creation of an opportunity for them to choose a strong government through democratic elections. What has happened there is that the state itself has found it difficult to protect its own democracy, freedom and the lives of its citizens. Consequently, the United Nations has had to intervene. For what purpose? To uphold the freedom, democracy and human rights of the people of that country.

So, for what purpose are you departing today? You are leaving Sri Lanka to help safeguard the freedoms, democracy and rights of the citizens of another nation. What a source of pride and honour this is for us as a country. You are setting out from Sri Lanka to uphold the freedom of the people of another land. You are departing to strengthen democracy in another country. You are leaving to protect the rights of another people. You are going to safeguard the lives of citizens in another nation. I believe this is among the highest honours and greatest sources of pride that we can attain as a country.

You are demonstrating to the world that we possess an armed force and a Special Task Force that are prepared to stand for the protection, democracy and human rights of oppressed people wherever they may be in the world. That is of great importance. Moreover, Sri Lanka has, for many years, served alongside United Nations peacekeeping forces and on every occasion has earned distinction and respect. Today, you depart bearing the honour of a nation that has long performed its duties within UN peacekeeping missions with exemplary discipline and professionalism.

Your predecessors and the contingents that served before you protected that honour in those lands. I believe that, as you prepare to depart for Haiti, you carry with you not only the honour of the nation but also the reputation of your senior officers. Therefore, you are setting out to safeguard both the dignity of the country and the esteem of those who served before you.

Your parents, too, must feel immense pride. If there is a profession in this country that exemplifies discipline, it is the military and the police service. Generally speaking, a tendency has emerged among the younger generation to shy away from disciplined professions. Many are more attracted to unstructured lifestyles and less inclined towards orderly and regulated forms of work. Consequently, many young people today show a preference for informal employment rather than careers founded upon discipline and structure.

It is in such circumstances that you chose to join the armed forces and the Special Task Force of Sri Lanka, embracing a life of discipline. Your uniform, your appearance, your grooming, the time at which you rise and your daily duties are all governed by a structured code of conduct. Your parents have entrusted their children to a profession founded upon discipline and they must undoubtedly take great pride in that. The uniform you wear represents the honour and dignity of our nation and the fact that their child wears it is a source of great distinction for the country.

Moreover, your role becomes especially significant in times of war or disaster. Whenever a disaster occurs, the first person I contact is the Secretary to the Ministry of Defence. Whether it was the recent fire at an elderly care home in Horana, a building fire, or the emergence of instability or conflict, it is to the Defence Secretary that we turn. Not only during natural disasters such as landslides and floods, but even in times of conflict, is it upon you that we first rely. We have great confidence that you will respond swiftly and take the necessary action.

Your parents have raised and guided you to become the professionals we need whenever disaster strikes this country. We need young people who are prepared to work to help the nation recover from any calamity. That, too, is a source of immense pride for parents. Today, you are not only protecting the freedom, democracy, and human rights of your own motherland, but are also departing to stand for the security and liberty of the people of another country. Reflect for a moment on how proud your parents must be that their child is travelling far from home to serve in defence of the safety and well-being of another people. It is a tremendous honour and source of pride for parents and equally a matter of national pride.

Therefore, this moment of your departure is an occasion on which all of us feel renewed respect and admiration for you. My final appeal to you is this: remember that you carry our national flag upon your shoulders. In every duty you perform and in every step you take, this motherland and your parents are watching you. Consequently, I believe that all of us bear a responsibility to act with the utmost seriousness, dedication and sense of duty. I look forward to meeting you again in Sri Lanka after you have fulfilled that responsibility. I sincerely wish you every success in this important mission. Thank you very much, everyone”.

President’s Media Division (PMD)

Continue Reading

News

FSP complains of irregularities in a Guinness World Record event held in Sri Lanka

Published

on

FSP Secretary Duminda Nagamuwa speaking to the media outside the CIABOC yesterday

The Jana Aragala Sandhanaya yesterday lodged a complaint with the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC), calling for an investigation into Deputy Minister Sundaralingam Pradeep over alleged irregularities related to a Guinness World Record event held in Sri Lanka.

The organisation alleged that state patronage had been extended to a private company for the event and that large sums of money had been collected from around 5,000 families of participating students.

Speaking to the media, after submitting the complaint, Jana Aragala Sandhanaya National Executive Council member and Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) Secretary, Duminda Nagamuwa, alleged that the government had promoted the Bharatanatyam workshop, held on June 14, as an event that secured a Guinness World Record for the participation of the largest number of students.

He said a government politician had taken the lead in organising the event, attended by Deputy Minister Mahinda Jayasinghe.

Nagamuwa questioned the decision to provide state support for an event organised by a private entity, claiming that the Guinness certificate issued for the achievement had been awarded not to Sri Lanka or a state institution, but to a company.

“Why did the government provide state patronage to a private institution’s programme?” he asked.

He alleged that each of the approximately 5,000 participating students had paid Rs. 5,000, resulting in the collection of a substantial amount of money. He claimed that parents were also asked to pay additional amounts of Rs. 3,450 for logos and Rs. 2,350 for certificates.

Nagamuwa alleged that many families, from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, had incurred heavy expenses travelling to Colombo and staying there for several days for the event, with some families spending around Rs. 30,000 each.

Continue Reading

Trending