Connect with us

News

SJB wants Labour Minister summoned before COPE

Published

on

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB) has suggested that Labour and Foreign Employment Minister, Manusha Nanayakkara be summoned before the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) over his recent outburst against the Parliamentary Watchdog Committee and Auditor General W.P.C. Wickramaratne.

Colombo District MP Mujibur Rahuman made the suggestion on behalf of the main Opposition party at a special session of the all-party committee, chaired by its Chairman Prof. Ranjith Bandara, on 05 January.

The former UNPer has pointed out that unless tangible action was taken against Minister Nanayakkara other ministers, too, would start publicly attacking the COPE and the AG.

Having switched allegiance to Sajith Premadasa following a split in the UNP, both Rahuman and Nanayakkara contested the last general election in August 2020, on the SJB ticket.

COPE member Rahuman has told the committee Nanayakkara’s attack should be dealt with, also taking into consideration of his previous role as a member of the watchdog committee. MP Nanayakkara accepted a ministerial portfolio, in May last year, in spite of the SJB’s decision not to accept the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s invitation to join his government.

MP Rahuman has alleged that perhaps Nanayakkara’s attack was meant to tarnish the AG’s image. Had his Ministry, or an institution, under him, not done anything wrong, there was absolutely no need for him to go on the offensive, MP Rahuman said.

The top SJB spokesperson told The Island that Minister Nanayakkara challenged the COPE and the AG at the National Productivity Award ceremony, held on Dec. 15, at Temple Trees, under the auspices of Premier Dinesh Gunawardena. Actually, the Premier as the leader of the government parliamentary group should have pulled up the Minister, MP Rahuman said. Perhaps, Minister Nanayakkara’s angry response reflected the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government’s attitude towards, not only the COPE, but the Committee on Public Accounts and Committee on Public Finance.

Declaring that ministers couldn’t challenge COPE, under any circumstances, AG Wickramaratne has told the January 05 meeting that the controversial speech by Nanayakkara was made in the Premier’s presence.

MP Rahuman stressed the urgent need to clarify the status of watchdog committees, in the wake of Minister Nanayakkara’s declaration that the COPE didn’t have the authority to issue such directives.

The Auditor General, however has reminded COPE that in terms of the Standing Orders it could even make recommendations to Parliament. The intrepid official has stressed that Secretary to Labour and Foreign Employment Ministry R.P.A. Wimalaweera was yet to address their concerns.

“We have decided to summon Ministry Secretary, Wimalaweera, on January 17. Let us see whether Wimalaweera, in his capacity as the Chief Accounting Officer of the Labour and Foreign Employment Ministry, abides by COPE directive,” MP Rahuman said.

Responding to another query, MP Rahuman said that once the watchdog took up the matter with President Ranil Wickremesinghe, Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena and the Cabinet-of-Ministers, the public could realise whether Minister Nanayakkara was pursuing an agenda.

Minister Nanayakkara is on record as having alleged, at the Temple Trees meeting, that the AG and COPE undermined measures taken by the Sri Lanka Foreign Employment Bureau (SLFEB) to expedite sending workers to South Korea. The Minister questioned COPE and AG for finding fault with special payments made to employees to speed up the process.



News

Prez seeks Harsha’s help to address CC’s concerns over appointment of AG

Published

on

Chairman of the Committee on Public Finance (CoPF), MP Dr. Harsha de Silva, told Parliament yesterday that President Anura Kumara Dissanayake had personally telephoned him in response to a letter highlighting the prolonged delay in appointing an Auditor General, a vacancy that has remained unfilled since 07 December.

Addressing the House, Dr. de Silva said the President had contacted him following the letter he sent, in his capacity as CoPF Chairman, regarding the urgent need to appoint the constitutionally mandated head of the National Audit Office. During the conversation, the President had sought his intervention to inform the Constitutional Council (CC) about approving the names already forwarded by the President for consideration.

Dr. de Silva said the President had inquired whether he could convey the matter to the Constitutional Council after their discussion. He stressed that both the President and the CC must act in cooperation and in strict accordance with the Constitution, warning that institutional deadlock should not undermine constitutional governance.

He also raised concerns over the Speaker’s decision to prevent the letter he sent to the President from being shared with members of the Constitutional Council, stating that this had been done without any valid basis. Dr. de Silva subsequently tabled the letter in Parliament.

Last week, Dr. de Silva formally urged President Dissanayake to immediately fill the Auditor General’s post, warning that the continued vacancy was disrupting key constitutional functions. In his letter, dated 22 December, he pointed out that the absence of an Auditor General undermines Articles 148 and 154 of the Constitution, which vest Parliament with control over public finance.

He said that the vacancy has severely hampered the work of oversight bodies such as the Committee on Public Accounts (COPA) and the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE), particularly at a time when the country is grappling with a major flood disaster.

As Chair of the Committee responsible for overseeing the National Audit Office, Dr. de Silva stressed that a swift appointment was essential to safeguard transparency, accountability and financial oversight.

In a separate public statement, he warned that Sri Lanka was operating without its constitutionally mandated Chief Auditor at a critical juncture. In a six-point appeal to the President, Dr. de Silva emphasised that an Auditor General must be appointed urgently in the context of ongoing disaster response and reconstruction efforts.

“Given the large number of transactions taking place now with Cyclone Ditwah reconstruction and the yet-to-be-legally-established Rebuilding Sri Lanka Fund, an Auditor General must be appointed urgently,” he said in a post on X.

By Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

Govt. exploring possibility of converting EPF benefits into private sector pensions

Published

on

The NPP government was exploring the feasibility of introducing a regular pension, or annuity scheme, for Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) contributors, Deputy Minister of Labour Mahinda Jayasinghe told Parliament yesterday.

Responding to a question raised by NPP Kalutara District MP Oshani Umanga in the House, Jayasinghe said the government was examining whether EPF benefits, which are currently paid as a lump sum at retirement, could instead be converted into a system that provides regular payments throughout a retiree’s lifetime.

“We are looking at whether it is possible to provide a pension,” Jayasinghe said, stressing that there was no immediate plan to abolish the existing lump-sum payment. “But we are paying greater attention to whether a regular payment can be provided throughout their retired life.”

Jayasinghe noted that the EPF was established as a social security mechanism for private sector employees after retirement and warned that receiving the entire fund in a single installment could place retirees at financial risk, particularly as life expectancy increases.

He also cautioned that interim withdrawals from the EPF undermined its long-term sustainability. “Even the interim payments that are given from time to time undermine the ability to give security at the time of retirement,” he said, distinguishing the EPF from the Employees’ Trust Fund, which provides more frequent interim benefits.

Addressing concerns over early withdrawals, the Deputy Minister explained that contributors have been allowed to withdraw up to 30 percent of their EPF balance since 2015, with a further 20 percent permitted after 10 years, subject to specific conditions and documentary proof.

Of 744 applications received for such withdrawals, 702 had been approved, he said.

The proposed shift towards an annuity-based system comes amid broader concerns over Sri Lanka’s ageing population and pressures on retirement financing. While state sector employees receive pensions funded by taxpayers, including EPF contributors, the EPF itself has been facing growing strain as it is also used to finance budget deficits.

Jayasinghe said the government’s focus was to formulate a mechanism that would ensure long-term income security for private sector employees, placing them on a footing closer to a pension scheme rather than a one-time retirement payout.

Continue Reading

News

Sajith accuses govt. of exacerbating people’s suffering to please IMF

Published

on

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa yesterday strongly criticised proposals to increase electricity tariffs, warning that the move would deepen the hardships faced by the public already reeling from disasters and rising fuel costs.

Premadasa, who is also the leader of the SJB, told Parliament that the government was considering an electricity price hike at a time when people were struggling to recover from recent crises, while coping with higher fuel prices. He accused the administration of acting contrary to its own election pledges and the expectations of suffering people.

Making a special statement, the Opposition Leader recalled that the government had come to power promising to reduce electricity bills by 30 percent, within three years, by shifting from fuel-based power generation to cheaper renewable sources, such as solar, wind and hydropower. Instead, he said, those commitments had been abandoned.

Premadasa pointed out that the CEB has sought approval from the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for an 11.57 per cent tariff increase for the first quarter of 2026 to cover its losses. He questioned whether the government had assessed the impact of such an increase on low- and middle-income households, as well as state institutions.

He also asked why the government had failed to honour its promise to cut electricity tariffs by one-third through a transparent pricing mechanism.

The Opposition Leader further criticised the limited time allocated for public consultations on the proposed new energy policy, saying it was unfair and should be extended, particularly given the prevailing national crises.

Premadasa warned that the removal of competitive tariff structures for industries would be unjust to large-scale consumers using more than five million units of electricity, and called for comparative reports before any subsidies are withdrawn.

He added that despite earlier assurances to reduce electricity bills by 33 percent, the government has once again increased fuel prices, even as global fuel prices decline, continuing, what he described as, a pattern of broken election promises.

Accusing the government of being constrained by International Monetary Fund (IMF) conditions, Premadasa said the simultaneous increases in fuel and electricity prices were exacerbating the economic burden on the public.

By Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

Trending