Connect with us

News

SJB plans major campaign over dismissal of cases by AG and CIABOC

Published

on

MP Rahuman addressing the media outside the CIABOC on Monday (8)

Rahuman alleges manipulation at the highest levels

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) would respond to the Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB) request for information pertaining to the withdrawal indictments and/or court proceedings filed by the outfit or filed for/and on behalf of it since the last presidential election in Nov 2019, a senior official said.

In terms of the 20th Amendment to the Constitution enacted in Oct 2020, the appointments to the CIABOC are made by the President.

Secretary to the CIABOC Apsara Caldera said so when The Island asked her whether the commission would reveal information sought by the SJB in terms of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The Commissioners would decide on the SJB’s request, Caldera said, adding that an application was received on Monday (8).

The CIABOC comprises retired Supreme Court justice Eva Wanasundera (Chairperson), retired Court of Appeal justice Deepali Wijesundera and one-time head of the State Intelligence Service (SIS) DIG Chandra Nimal Wakista.

Colombo District lawmaker Mujibur Rahuman who made the application on behalf of the SJB told The Island that according to the available information the CIABOC alone had

terminated about 45 cases on so called technical grounds. Addressing the media outside the CIABOC, Rahuman questioned the rationale in the CIABOC actions at a time the government was propagating ‘One Country, One Law’ concept. MP Rahuman was flanked by colleagues, J.C. Alawathuwala and Harshana Rajakaruna.

The SJB last week, also in terms of the RTI law sought similar information from the Attorney General. The SJB has submitted the following questions to the CIABOC:

1. How many indictments and/or court proceedings filed by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption or filed for/and on behalf of the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption have been withdrawn after the 19th of November 2019?

2. What are the names of the accused parties in the indictments and/or court proceedings that have been withdrawn by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption or withdrawn for/and on behalf of the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption after the 19th of November 2019?

3. What are the case numbers of the cases that have been withdrawn by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption or withdrawn for/and on behalf of the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption after the 19th of November 2019?

4. On what dates have the indictments and/or court proceedings filed by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption or filed for/and on behalf of the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption after the 19th of November 2019 been withdrawn?

Lawmaker Rahuman said that once they obtained required information from the AG and the CIABOC a detailed study would be done. “We intend to give widest possible coverage to the AG and the CIABOC actions. Altogether over 50 cases have been dismissed on technical grounds. Interestingly all of them happened to be either members of the incumbent administration or those close to the powers that be,” MP Rahuman said.

Responding to another query, MP Rahuman said that the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) should state its stand on the dismissal of high profile cases on unexplained technical grounds. Political interference in the judiciary would erode public confidence in the system, the former UNP lawmaker said, underscoring the importance of the executive, the legislature and the judiciary working in unison to ensure public confidence in the legal system. MP Rahuman said that right thinking people couldn’t remain silent over the matter. The whole law enforcement process would be a joke if political parties were allowed to manipulate legal procedures at will, MP Rahuman said, the country never experienced a similar situation before. “We expect the BASL to reveal its stand on this matter,” the MP said.



News

Suspended Parliament official to move Court of Appeal, seek international intervention

Published

on

Chamindra and Dr. Jagath

Chamindra Kularatne, the suspended Deputy Secretary General of Parliament and Chief of Staff, has told the Opposition that he will seek the intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA), Association of Secretaries General of Parliament (ASGP) and the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).

Kularatne has also declared his intention to move the Court of Appeal against the suspension that came into effect on 23 January on the basis of an inquiry conducted by retired Additional Secretary S.K. Liyanage.

The inquiry found fault with Kularatne for receiving a pension for a three-year and seven-month period he served as the Secretary to the Chief Government Whip during the previous administration. However, political sources said that though that particular appointment had been on a contract basis, in terms of a gazette issued at that time, it was made pensionable. Therefore, there couldn’t have been any issue with regard to Kularatne receiving a pension as stipulated in the gazette, sources said. The Island learns that Public Administration, Provincial Councils and Local Government Ministry advised that the Cabinet of Ministers be consulted regarding the matter but the Parliament acted even without bothering to seek Kularatne’s explanation.

The Staff Advisory Committee (SAC), chaired by Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne, has initiated the inquiry, though such an action should have been the prerogative of the Secretary General of Parliament, Kushani Rohanadeera, sources familiar with the developments relating to the unprecedented case, said. The SAC has also disregarded stipulation that in case of an inquiry against the Deputy Secretary General of Parliament, it should have been conducted by an officer senior to him.

The SAC consists of the Speaker, Chief Government Whip Bimal Rathnayake, Deputy Finance Minister Prof. Anil Jayantha (he represents President Anura Kumara Dissanayake who also holds the Finance portfolio) and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa/Chief Opposition Whip Gayantha Karunatilleke. Sources said that the SAC had been deeply divided over the decision, with SJB Karunatilleke expressing opposition to the course of action proposed by the Speaker, while Prof. Jayantha didn’t extend his support. Before Kularatne had been informed of the SAC decision on 23 January, he wasn’t given an opportunity to respond to whatever allegations directed at him, sources said.

Kularatne’s complaint to IPU would be the second against Speaker Dr. Wickremaratne since his appointment as the Speaker on 17 December, 2024. The first complaint has been lodged by Jaffna District independent group member Ramanathan Archuna. Parliament accepted the NPP’s proposal to appoint the Polonnaruwa District lawmaker after their first choice Asoka Ranwala resigned after being exposed for false claims of his higher educational qualifications.

Sources said that the ruling party had targeted Kularatne because an influential section, within the government, believed that he had sneaked on the Speaker. Kularatne’s sacking and related accusations and counter accusations dominated social media.

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and ITAK Batticaloa District lawmaker Shanakiyan Rasamanickam threw their weight behind Kularatne with Premadasa questioning the legality of the action taken without seeking an explanation from the official.

Authoritative sources said that in terms of the Parliament (Powers and Privileges) Act, in addition to members of Parliament, officials, too, received protection.

During the United National Front government of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, the then Speaker, the late W.J. M. Lokubandara, interdicted Director General (Administration) Lacille de Silva over alleged misconduct though the official claimed he was punished for leaking information. Lacille de Silva successfully moved court against his interdiction and secured his position.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Sri Lanka, UAE review energy cooperation; Trincomalee hub plans discussed

Published

on

Abassador of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to Sri Lanka, Khaled Nasser Al Ameri, with Minister of Power and Energy Eng. Kumara Jayakody

The Ambassador of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to Sri Lanka, Khaled Nasser Al Ameri, met Minister of Power and Energy Eng. Kumara Jayakody yesterday (26) to review progress on bilateral energy cooperation and explore new avenues for collaboration, with a strong focus on regional energy security and strategic infrastructure development.

The high-level discussion centred on the implementation status of understandings reached in recent years, particularly in the energy sector, and on identifying fresh opportunities to deepen engagement between Sri Lanka and the UAE. Both sides underscored the importance of translating earlier agreements into tangible outcomes amid Sri Lanka’s ongoing energy transition.

A key focus of the talks was the proposed development of the Trincomalee region as a regional energy hub. The meeting reviewed follow-up actions related to the tripartite Memorandum of Understanding signed last year between Sri Lanka, India and the UAE, which envisages collaborative development of energy-related infrastructure and logistics in and around Trincomalee, leveraging its strategic location in the Indian Ocean.

Officials discussed the next steps required to operationalise elements of the agreement, including coordination mechanisms, investment frameworks and timelines, with a view to positioning Trincomalee as a focal point for energy storage, supply and distribution in the region.

The discussions also addressed broader cooperation on regional energy security, with both parties acknowledging the growing importance of resilient, diversified and sustainable energy systems amid global volatility.

The UAE reiterated its willingness to support Sri Lanka’s energy objectives, including through technical expertise, investment and strategic partnerships aligned with the country’s long-term power sector goals.

Minister Jayakody highlighted Sri Lanka’s commitment to strengthening international partnerships to ensure energy security, accelerate infrastructure development and support the shift towards a more reliable and future-ready energy mix.

Ambassador Al Ameri reaffirmed the UAE’s interest in expanding its role as a key partner in Sri Lanka’s energy sector, building on existing goodwill and cooperation.

The meeting reflects Colombo’s broader diplomatic and economic efforts to attract strategic partners to its energy sector, particularly for large-scale projects with regional significance, as Sri Lanka seeks to stabilise supply, enhance security and position itself as an emerging energy and logistics hub in the Indian Ocean, the Ministry said.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

Pathfinder Foundation inaugurates a repository for Sri Lanka’s peace initiatives

Published

on

The Pathfinder Foundation’s Repository for Sri Lanka Peace Initiatives was inaugurated by Erik Solheim—former Norwegian Special Envoy to the Sri Lanka peace process. Milinda Moragoda, Founder Pathfinder Foundation, and Bernard Goonetilleke, Chairman of the PF, both among the principal negotiators of the peace process, seen at the event

The Pathfinder Foundation’s Repository for Sri Lanka Peace Initiatives was inaugurated by Erik Solheim—former Norwegian Special Envoy to the Sri Lanka peace process, former Minister of the Environment and International Development of Norway, and former Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)—at the invitation of Milinda Moragoda, Founder, and Bernard Goonetilleke, Chairman of the Pathfinder Foundation, both among the principal negotiators of the peace process.

Over several decades, Sri Lanka repeatedly sought to resolve the separatist conflict through negotiations. Despite several initiatives, none succeeded in bringing the conflict to a negotiated conclusion.

Over the years, numerous publications—both local and foreign—have examined Sri Lanka’s conflict. SCOPP maintained a substantial body of documentation on the peace process, from January 2002 to January 2008, and the Norwegian facilitators also hold an extensive collection of records. Nevertheless, a major gap remains: the absence of a consolidated repository that brings together available documentation on the peace process, particularly one that preserves material relating to negotiations that did not reach a conclusive settlement.

Responding to this gap and encouraged by many associated with or studying the process, the Pathfinder Foundation has taken steps to establish a dedicated repository to collect and preserve documentation on Sri Lanka’s peace initiatives. Under this project, the Foundation will gather relevant information on the peace process from local and international sources.

Continue Reading

Trending