News
SJB accused of playing race card for cheap political mileage
By Saman Indrajith
The SJB was accused of playing the race card for narrow political gains, in Parliament, yesterday.
Justice Minister Ali Sabry said that SJB Badulla District MP Chaminda Wijesiri had attempted to make use of sub judice issue of Dr Safi Sahabdeen of the Kurunegala Teaching Hospital allegedly performing sterilisation surgeries on Sinhala women to score political points at the cost of raising racism in Parliament.
A question by MP Wijesiri had been listed in yesterday’s Order Paper. He has demanded to know from the government the names and addresses of the lawyers who appeared in courts on behalf of Dr Safi and the courses of action taken against that doctor so far and the course of action that would be taken to ensure the aggrieved mothers would get justice.
Asked whether the Minister was aware of the allegations against Dr Safi, Minister Sabry said that he had come to know of the issue from the media.
Asked to inform the House of the names and addresses of the lawyers appearing for Doctor Safi, Minister Sabry said that the matter was beyond his ministry’s purview. It was a matter up to the accused doctor to decide on the lawyers to represent him. There were 795,000 cases pending before the courts and the Justice Ministry did not maintain records of the names of counsel appearing in each of those cases. The Ministry was supporting only the judicial system and providing infrastructural support for the maintenance of the system. Neither the Justice Minister nor the ministry had powers to intervene in affairs of cases being heard in the courts, the minister said.
MP Wijesiri: I did not ask about the case and its proceedings. I just asked for the names and addresses of the lawyers appearing for Dr Safi. I’ve been in Parliament for long enough to understand what sub judice is. If not from the Ministry of Justice from whom we could get the answer. On the other hand, the issue related to Dr Safi that created a public outcry, which was one of the main reasons why the SLPP won the last general election.
Minister Sabry: If the MP needs to find out such details he could get them by asking for a certified copy from the particular court after paying the due amount for that. We do not get involved in cases as the way the former government did. We do not give calls to judges the way it did. We also do not create courts targeting specific persons.
MP Wijesiri: Now, you talk big. Let’s see where you would be once the 20th Amendment is passed.
Minister Sabry: You are asking about a case pending before a court. How could I give a response to you?
MP Wijesiri: Let’s see what will be the future of suit-wearing President’s Counsel when the 20th Amendment becomes the law.
Minister Sabry: Do I need to dress like you. I dress the way I like. My dress has nothing to do with this. Do not play the race card. You are instigating racism. See the content of your question. This is motivated by racism. Your party talks of co-existence while promoting racism here.
SJB MP Thushara Indunil: The way the minister responded is not acceptable. He acts like a thug.
SLPP MP Mohamed Muzammil: As per the Standing Orders a question could not be raised on the matter pertaining to a case pending before the court. That is against Standing Orders. How this question entered into the order paper is questionable.
Chief Government Whip Minister Johnston Fernando: Justice Minister has come in a proper dress. It is wrong to denigrate him because he is wearing a tie and coat. What is wrong with dressing like that?
News
Showers about 100 mm are likely at some places in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva, Southern, North-western, Northern and North-central provinces and in Trincomalee district.
WEATHER FORECAST FOR 11 MAY 2026
Issued at 05.30 a.m. on 11 May 2026 by the Department of Meteorology
The low-level atmospheric disturbance in the vicinity of Sri Lanka is likely to develop into a low-pressure area around the next 36 hours. Therefore, the prevailing showery conditions over the island are expected to continue during the next few days.
Showers or thundershowers will occur at times in most parts of the island and Cloudy skies are expected, under the influence of the aforementioned system. Heavy showers about 100 mm are likely at some places in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva, Southern, North-western, Northern and North-central provinces and in Trincomalee district.
The general public is kindly requested to take adequate precautions to minimize damage caused by temporary localized strong winds and lightning during thundershowers.
News
Treasury theft: Speaker’s conduct brought to IPU’s attention: SJB
SJB MP Dayasiri Jayasekera has sought the intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) to pressure the JVP-NPP government to respect the rights of the Opposition.
MP Jayasekera told The Island that they wouldn’t allow the NPP to suppress the truth regarding the theft of Treasury funds amounting to USD 2.5 million. He accused Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne of depriving the Opposition of its legitimate rights, at the behest of the government.
Jayasekera said that the Speaker’s conduct regarding the action taken against Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne, too, had been brought to the notice of IPU and other international associations.
The text of MP Jayasekera’s letter to the Secretary general of IPU: “I respectfully submit this petition seeking the attention and intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union concerning a matter affecting parliamentary accountability, the rights of elected representatives, and the proper functioning of constitutional oversight within the Parliament of Sri Lanka.
On 06 May 2026, I Dayasiri Jayasekara MP submitted a formal request to the Hon. Speaker of Parliament seeking permission, under the Parliament (Powers and Privileges) Act No. 21 of 1953 and Standing Order 29(1), to raise a question of privilege regarding alleged constitutional and parliamentary violations by Mr. Harshana Suriyapperuma, Secretary to the Treasury of Sri Lanka.
The proposed privilege motion raised matters including:
1. Alleged violations of Articles 148, 149, and 150 of the Constitution of Sri Lanka concerning parliamentary control over public finance;
2. Alleged failure to report to Parliament concerning a controversial and unlawful transfer of approximately USD 2.5 million from the Treasury;
3. Alleged non-compliance with parliamentary committee procedures under the Standing Orders of Parliament;
4. Questions relating to constitutional eligibility under Article 91(1)(d)(xiii) of the Constitution concerning dual citizenship and qualification to sit and vote in Parliament;
5. A request that the matter be referred to the Parliamentary Ethics and Privileges Committee established under Standing Order 118.
Despite the seriousness of the constitutional and parliamentary issues raised, the Hon. Speaker declined permission for the privilege issue to be raised in Parliament.
It is respectfully submitted that this refusal has the effect of:
• Preventing an elected Member of Parliament from exercising his parliamentary oversight function;
• Restricting parliamentary scrutiny over matters involving public finance and constitutional accountability;
• Undermining the privileges of Members of Parliament to raise matters of urgent public importance;
• Limiting institutional transparency concerning allegations involving senior state officials.
The right of parliamentarians to raise questions of privilege and matters relating to constitutional governance is an essential component of parliamentary democracy and legislative independence. The refusal to permit even the presentation or preliminary consideration of such a matter raises serious concerns regarding parliamentary accountability mechanisms in Sri Lanka.
Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Inter-Parliamentary Union:
1.Take cognizance of this matter as one affecting the rights and functions of Members of Parliament;
2.Seek clarification from the relevant parliamentary authorities in Sri Lanka regarding the grounds upon which the privilege motion was disallowed;
3.Consider whether the refusal is compatible with internationally recognised principles of parliamentary democracy, accountability, and freedom of parliamentary speech;
4. Encourage the Parliament of Sri Lanka to ensure fair and transparent procedures governing parliamentary privilege motions and constitutional oversight.
I further request that this communication be placed before the appropriate committee or mechanism within the IPU dealing with the rights and duties of parliamentarians.”
News
Navin calls for formal alliance between UNP and SJB
UNP Vice President and Kandy District Leader, Navin Dissanayake, on Saturday, stressed that any proposed merger between the UNP and the SJB must be carried out formally rather than in an ad hoc manner.
Addressing a media briefing in Kandy, Dissanayake said a structured framework was essential to ensure the successful reunification of the two parties ahead of future elections.
“A formal mechanism must be established for the unification of the UNP and the SJB. This process cannot be confined to personal verbal assurances given to suit individual interests. We must build a strong framework to contest future elections as a united force,” he said.
He added that the UNP could only regain political strength by reuniting with factions that had broken away from the party.
Dissanayake also claimed that the Government would be compelled to hold Provincial Council elections amid mounting international and domestic pressure.
“India is exerting pressure to conduct these elections, while the people in the North are also demanding governance under the Provincial Council system. They are awaiting the polls,” he said.
Announcing his own political intentions, Dissanayake said he hoped to contest as the Chief Ministerial candidate for the Central Province at the next Provincial Council election.
“I intend to contest as the Chief Ministerial candidate for the Central Province. Having served as a Governor, I understand the extent of service that can be delivered to the people through a Provincial Council,” he said.
Recalling the history of constitutional devolution, Dissanayake said his late father, Gamini Dissanayake, had played a significant role in the introduction of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka.
by SK Samaranayake
-
News4 days agoMIT expert warns of catastrophic consequences of USD 2.5 mn Treasury heist
-
News6 days agoCJ urged to inquire into AKD’s remarks on May 25 court verdict
-
News1 day agoLanka Port City officials to meet investors in Dubai
-
Editorial4 days agoClean Sri Lanka and dirty politics
-
Opinion6 days agoSecurity, perception, and trust: Sri Lanka’s delicate balancing act
-
Editorial3 days agoThe Vijay factor
-
News2 days agoSLPP expresses concern over death of former SriLankan CEO
-
News5 days agoDevelopment Officer bids Rs. 48 mn for CPC’s V8 at auction
