Connect with us

News

SC deems Electricity Amendment Bill inconsistent with Constitution

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

The Supreme Court has determined that the Electricity Amendment Bill is inconsistent with the Constitution as a whole.

Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena yesterday informed the Parliament of the SC’s ruling.

The Supreme Court has determined that some clauses in the draft Bill were inconsistent with the Articles 3, 4 (a), 12 (1), 14 (1) a, and 76 of the Constitution.

The Court has ruled that the Bill could be passed if it is amended, as per the guidelines stipulated by the Court.

Chief Opposition Whip Lakshman Kiriella raising a point of order said that the amendments recommended by the SC for the Bill could not be studied within a day. Kiriella asked the Speaker to put off the debate scheduled for Thursday (06).

“At the last party leaders’ meeting we pointed out this. It is practically not possible to study all these guidelines today and then go for the debate the day after tomorrow.

This is a very important Bill. It proposes that the CEB be divided into 12 sectors to pave the way for privatization. This affects the lives of 23,000 employees of the CEB. We need time. “

Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena’s declaration that he couldn’t rule on the matter led to exchange of words between government and Opposition members.

Speaker Abeywardena said that the matter of making that decision was not up to him but to the party leaders.

However, when the MPs kept demanding that a party leaders’ meeting be announced, the Speaker continued in reading his announcements.

SJB and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa called for a postponement of the debate. “We need to conduct a broad study on the Bill and the Supreme Court determination and therefore we call for a postponement of the debate set for Thursday,” Premadasa said.

Minister of Power and Energy Kanchana Wijesekera said that the Bill would be amended as per the Supreme Court determination. “We can go ahead with the debate on Thursday with the amendments. The Supreme Court determination is a guideline to ensure that the Bill is consistent with the Constitution. We will ensure that the Electricity Amendment Bill will be made consistent with the Constitution. We have already agreed with some amendments, and we stated this when the case was heard by the Supreme Court. We wonder why the SJB is shouting about the Bill as they themselves have stated in their economic blueprint that they will also restructure the CEB,” the Minister said.

NFF leader Wimal Weerawansa said that it was regrettable to note the way Minister Wijejesekera oversimplified the Supreme Court recommended amendments. “We must study these recommendations and make sure that they are incorporated because this government is notorious for overlooking Supreme Court recommendations in passing Bills,” Weerawansa said.

SLPP dissident MP Chandima Weerakkody: The Supreme Court has determined that this draft Bill violates Article 12(1) of the Constitution. That Article is there to ensure equality of opportunity for all. There are some other recommendations, too. We need time. This could be debated in the Sectoral Oversight Committee for two days.

SLPP Dayasiri Jayasekera: I am a member of Sectoral Oversight Committee on Power and Energy. I know that not all the stakeholders of the power and energy sector have been consulted in making this draft Bill. The reason for trying to rush this Bill through Parliament is obvious to some of us. There are companies lining up to enter into agreements. Suppose the Minister signs an agreement this evening with a wind power company and gets this Bill passed tomorrow, then the provisions of this draft Bill would not be applicable to that company. It is to favour such deals that the need to rush through the Bill arises.

SLPP dissident MP Genvindu Cumaratunga said that the MPs have not been given copies of the Supreme Court ruling. When we ask for the SC rulings, the officials tell us that it would be printed in the Hansard. The Supreme Court rulings are printed in very small letter size in the Hansard that no one bothers to find magnifying glasses to read them. We demand that a copy of the SC ruling be given us today,” he said.

Leader of the House Education Minister Susil Premajayantha said that the government would include all recommended guidelines by the Supreme Court, and it would go ahead to hold the debate on Thursday as scheduled.

Minister Wijesekera said that the government would adhere to the parliamentary process and to the agreements reached at the party leaders meeting. The debate would be on Thursday and the vote would be taken at 6 pm on that day. Those who oppose this bill can come and oppose it on that day too.

State Finance Minister Shehan Samarasinghe said MP Cumaratunga does not know the parliamentary process and becomes a nuisance by raising impertinent points of order. We invite private companies to invest in the electricity sector. We break the ongoing monopoly so that people would benefit. We do so while upholding Supreme Court guidelines. There are some MPs who think like frogs in a well.

JVP/NPP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake said that Minister Semasinghe was against privatization when in the Rajapaksa camp and now being a member of the Wickremesinghe camp become an ardent supporter of privatization. “According to his description he was in the well when with Rajapaksas and now is out of the well. This House is known for bypassing Supreme Court determinations. We did not have a chance to attend the party leaders’ meeting that determined the dates for this debate. We keep on asking the Speaker to hold party leaders’ meetings on sitting days. This is what happens when party leaders’ meetings are held on non-sitting days.”

MP Nimal Lanza said that the debate should be held on Thursday and should not be postponed under any ground cited by the Opposition because the latter opposes anything done by the government.

MP Harsha de Silva said that the reforming of CEB was there in the SJB blueprint to revive the economy, but it was wrong for the government to interpret it as privatization. He requested that the debate on the Bill be extended to two days and not to be confined to a single day.

NFF leader Weerawansa said that he and other SLPP dissidents are not represented in the party leaders’ meeting. “We have 17 MPs. When the time is allotted for debates, we get only two slots of seven minutes. Therefore, we, too, demand that the debate on the Bill should be held on two sitting days.”

SJB MP Mujibur Rahuman said that the content of the draft Bill was in contradiction with the SLPP manifesto ‘Vistas of Prosperity.”

Speaker Abeywardena said that the matter should be sorted out at a party leader’s meeting. Then the opposition MPs demanded that a party leaders’ meeting be held, however, the Speaker continued to read the next items in the list of announcements despite the shouting by MPs.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Plans to open underutilised state land for new investment opportunities

Published

on

By

A discussion between President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and the Circular Revision Committee appointed to review and update circulars issued under the State Lands Ordinance and the Land Development Ordinance was held on Tuesday  (16)  afternoon at the Presidential Secretariat. The Committee has been mandated to recommend to the Cabinet the cancellation of out-dated circulars, the issuance of new circulars, and the revision of existing circulars to ensure alignment with current requirements.

The Committee is chaired by the Secretary to the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation, D.P. Wickramasinghe. Its other members include the Senior Additional Secretary to the President (Constitutional and Statutory Affairs Division), Legal Adviser to the Presidential Secretariat, an Additional Solicitor General from the Attorney General’s Department, the Additional Secretary (Lands) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation, the Additional Director General of the National Budget Department, the Western Province Land Commissioner, the Divisional Secretary of Nuwaragampalatha East, the Deputy Chief Valuer of the Valuation Department and the Director (Lands) of the Mahaweli Authority.

The Commissioner General of Lands serves as the Convener of the Committee.

The Committee’s responsibilities include establishing a reliable, uniform and regularised system of land taxation within the existing legal framework, ensuring state revenue optimisation without prejudice to lessees. This includes reviewing annual lease rentals charged on long-term leases and grants, aligning related circulars with current requirements, and amending or formulating new provisions and directives where necessary.

During the meeting, detailed discussions were held on the proposals submitted by the expert committee in relation to the revision of these circulars.

The President emphasised that a new, time-appropriate policy should be formulated to address the underutilisation of State lands and to ensure their more efficient use.

Deputy Minister of Lands and Irrigation Aravinda Senarath, Secretary to the President Dr. Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, Legal Adviser to the President, Senior Attorney-at-Law J.M. Wijebandara, Secretary to the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation D.P. Wickramasinghe, Additional Solicitor General of the Attorney General’s Department, President’s Counsel Ravindra Pathiranage, Commissioner General of Lands Chandana Ranaweraarachchi, Director General (Institutional Affairs), Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development J.G.L.S. Jayawardena, Additional Director General (National Budget Department) D.A. Asantha Gunasekara, and Commissioner of Lands (Leasing Division) P.K.C. Nilani Mahindaganamage, together with members of the Committee, were also present.

Senior officials from the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation also attended the meeting.

(PMD)

Continue Reading

Business

National Export Development Plan (2026–2030) presented to the President

Published

on

By

Marking an important milestone in Sri Lanka’s economic development, the National Export Development Plan (NEDP) for the period 2026–2030 was presented to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake on Tuesday morning (16) at the Presidential Secretariat.

The 2026–2030 National Export Development Plan (NEDP) is a key national programme formulated in line with the Government’s policy direction under the 2025 Budget. It aims to strengthen the country’s export sector and achieve export-led sustainable economic growth.

The strategic plan has been developed under the guidance of the Ministry of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development and the leadership of the Sri Lanka Export Development Board (EDB), with technical assistance provided through the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) Policy-Based Lending (PBL) programme. It is the result of an extensive consultative process carried out in close collaboration with key government institutions, private sector stakeholders, and development partners.

The proposal submitted by the Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development to recognise the “Sri Lanka National Export Development Plan 2026–2030” as the official strategic framework for export development and promotion in Sri Lanka was approved by the Cabinet of Ministers on 4 May 2026. The Plan reflects a broad consensus among government institutions, private sector experts, and international development partners.

In line with the national vision of “A Thriving Nation – A Beautiful Life”, the Plan has been formulated to enhance Sri Lanka’s export competitiveness and achieve an export revenue target of USD 36 billion by 2030.

The core vision of the Plan is to transform Sri Lanka into a competitive logistics and knowledge-based export hub serving regional and global markets. The strategy is based on two key interconnected pillars: “horizontals” and “verticals”, which together provide the foundation for strengthening export competitiveness, diversification, and sustainable growth.

The horizontal enablers, which support the growth and expansion of all priority sectors, include logistics and integrated hub operations, trade facilitation, trade finance and reforms in the business and investment environment, trade promotion and market linkages, quality management, standards, environmental, social and governance (ESG) capacity development, as well as entrepreneurship and innovation.

The Plan also identifies eight priority export sectors to enhance export diversification and value addition, and to position Sri Lanka more competitively in global markets. These include automotive components, mineral-based industries, rubber-based industries, maritime industries (including boat and shipbuilding), spices and concentrates, digital products and services, electrical and electronic equipment, and processed food and beverages.

The preparation of the Plan involved contributions from over 300 stakeholders, including government institutions, the private sector, civil society organisations and international development partners. Broad consensus was achieved through consultations held from October to December 2025 and workshops conducted in January 2026.

The Government expects that, with implementation supported by strong governance and monitoring framework, the Plan will elevate local products to international standards and ensure long-term economic stability and growth. It is further anticipated that the National Export Development Plan will serve as a key driver of Sri Lanka’s economic progress in the years ahead.

Minister of Labour and Deputy Minister of Finance and Planning Dr. Anil Jayantha Fernando, Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development Sunil Handunnetti, Senior Additional Secretary to the President and Secretary to the Ministry of Energy Russell Aponso, Secretary to the Ministry of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development Thilaka Jayasundara, and Chairman of the Sri Lanka Export Development Board Mangala Wijesinghe were also present at the event.

[PMD]

Continue Reading

News

Complaint of custodial deaths and torture submitted to UN

Published

on

Senaka and Aisha

The Committee for Protecting Rights of Prisoners (CPRP) has complained to the UN regarding custodial deaths.

Executive Director of the Committee, Attorney-at-Law Senaka Perera told The Island that they had submitted written submissions to the visiting UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture (SPT) on Monday (15). “We are confident that they’ll take up the issues at hand with the government and take tangible measures to improve the conditions in prisons and detention facilities,” Perera said.

The SPT is here from 15 to 24 June. The visiting delegation consists of Aisha Shujune Muhammad, Head of Delegation (Maldives), Jakub Julian Czepek (Poland), Nika Kvaratskhelia (Georgia), Anica Tomsic (Croatia) and two human rights officers from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.

Claiming that there had been 184 prison deaths in 2024, the Committee asserted that though there was a drop in the number of cases, the deaths caused by underlying health complications and systemic issues weren’t available at the moment.

According to a copy of the submissions made to the SPT, received by The Island, there had been seven custodial deaths this year alone, reported from various parts of the country.

The Committee took a very critical position, while Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath assured the visiting delegation that the government didn’t tolerate torture at all.

The Ministry statement Monday night quoted Herath as having described the government response as zero tolerance policy.

The Committee for Protecting Rights of Prisoners also dealt with several other contentious issues, including special treatment granted to those with political connections and privileged backgrounds. Perera alleged that in spite of a change of government, in 2024 September, the much anticipated improvements failed to materialise and the continuing custodial deaths highlighted the crisis in the prisons and detention facilities.

According to the Committee, the situation was so bad and further deteriorating in overcrowded prisons, the national overcrowding rate has reached an unsustainable 286.6%, with some facilities, like the Vavuniya Remand Prison, exceeding capacity by 300%.

A significant portion of this population (65.4%) consists of persons not convicted awaiting trial, the Committee said, urging the SPT to look into the pathetic situation.

The Committee also complained of torture and ill-treatment at some detention facilities. There had been cases of lawyers, visiting detention centres at Welisara and Boossa, been subjected to degrading and humiliating searches, including forced removal of clothing.

The Committee also brought to the SPT’s notice how the Supreme Court, on 14 December, 2023, held the former Inspector General of Police (IGP), Deshabandu Thennakoon, personally responsible for torture. The failure on the part of prison authorities to grant inmates a fair hearing during internal investigations, too, has been raised by the Committee.

Among the other issues that had been raised were enforced disappearances, health and medical conditions, food, water and sanitation, corporal punishments and the operation of detention facilities within military bases.

Referring to the enforced disappearance of Gonapinuwala Kapila Kumara de Silva on 27 March, 2024, the Committee alleged that the Attorney General failed to take action against the perpetrators, believed to be members of the Special Task Force (STF)

The Committee alleged that in spite of them submitting formal complaints and an urgent letter to the Attorney General demanding prosecution under the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearances Act, No. 5 of 2018, the AG took no meaningful action.

Consequently, CPRP filed a Writ of Mandamus petition in the Court of Appeal (CA/WRIT/185/26) against the Attorney General and other officials, seeking judicial intervention to compel investigation and prosecution. The case remains pending

by Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

Trending