News
Sampanthan reminds Prez of meeting that never took place, urges speedy conclusion of new constitution making process
Tamil National Alliance (TNA) leader R. Sampanthan, in a letter delivered to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa has emphasized the need to bring the ongoing constitutional making process to a successful conclusion as early as possible.
In the letter dated Aug 14, Sampanthan, who represents the Trincomalee District has reminded President Gotabaya Rajapaksa that though a scheduled meeting between him and the TNA never took place, the TNA remains ready to meet him.
The following is the text of the letter a copy of which was also sent to Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa: “By letter dated 07/06/2021 I was informed that your Excellency and the Tamil National Alliance would meet on 16th of June 2021 at 4pm at the Presidential Secretariat. On the 15th evening I was informed by telephone that the meeting was postponed and that an early date would be given for the meeting soon, this was confirmed by a further telephone call the next morning. I have subsequently received two letters informing me that the said meeting would be soon re-fixed for an early date. I have received no further communication. I hereby inform your Excellency, that whenever Your Excellency so decides, we will meet with Your Excellency.
May I state that the following, our country since its independence has thus far had three different Constitutions.
1). The Constitution framed before independence by the Government in the United Kingdom based on their own constitutional practices.
This has now changed substantially. Wide powers have been devolved to both Scotland and Northern Ireland, both of which are historically inhabited by Scottish and Irish people with their own independent identities. Each of these territories now have their own independent legislatures and Executives Chief Minister and Cabinet of Ministers. They are governed within the frame work of the United Kingdom as per the democratic verdicts of their respective people delivered at regular democratic processes. This is what the Tamil people with their own independent identity have claimed in their areas of historical habitation within a united undivided Sri Lanka through their democratic verdicts for over the past six decades.
2). The 1972 First Republican Constitution enacted within two years by a majority party which was able to muster a two third majority in Parliament without looking for consensus. The Tamil people did not subscribe to the making of the 1972 Constitution.
3). The 1978 Second Republican Constitution enacted within less than a month, by a majority party which was able to muster a two thirds majority in Parliament without looking for consensus. The Tamil people did not subscribe to the making of the 1978 Constitution.
Since 1978 we have been governed under the 1978 2nd Republican Constitution, though this Constitution has been rejected by the people who are sovereign, at every National Election since 1994. We have thus been ruled under a Constitution that does not bear the will or the consent of the people. The Tamil people have since 1956 in their historical habitation rejected both the 1972 and 1978 First and Second Republican Constitution, and they too have been governed without their will or consent.
The above constitute violations of international covenants and instruments to which Sri Lanka has acceded and accepted.
After the anti-Tamil pogrom of 1983 India offered her good offices to resolve the national issue in Sri Lanka, which Sri Lanka accepted and the Constitution making processes commenced. Conferences, meetings, and discussions took place in Sri Lanka, India and abroad in foreign countries. The government of Sri Lanka political leaders and parties participated.
India, the Co – Chairs comprising Norway, Japan, the United States of America, the European Union and other countries were involved. Several of them made public statements in regard to the processes. The Secretary General of the United Nations and the United Nations Human Rights Council were involved. The Sri Lankan government made several commitments to these bodies in public which are all a matter of record and have to be fulfilled. I will not repeat the same because in my earlier letter I have reflected to same in detail.
The 13th Amendment to the Constitution was enacted in 1988 this was found to be inadequate and since 1988 every successive government has taken steps and agreed to build on the 13th Amendment to bring about meaningful devolution. There has been substantial consensus derived from these processes.
The Constitution making process should not be delayed any longer. The 1972 and 1978 constitutions took less than 2 years and one month respectively. The present process has been ongoing for more than the past thirty-two years.”
News
Ex-lawmakers group calls for IPU’s intervention to check “irregularities” in Parliament
Association of Former Members of Parliament of Sri Lanka has requested the Inter-Parliamentary Union to inquire into, what the group calls, institutional irregularities in Parliament.
The Association cited the decision taken by the Attorney General not to appear for Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremeratne, in a case filed in the Court of Appeal by sacked Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne, to underscore the need for IPU’s intervention.
The following is the text of the letter signed by former JVP MP Premasiri Manage, on behalf of the Association: We write to Your Excellency on behalf of the Association of Former Members of Parliament of Sri Lanka, an independent body representing former legislators who have served the Parliament of Sri Lanka across successive administrations. The Association is committed to upholding democratic values, parliamentary traditions, institutional integrity, and the rule of law within Sri Lanka’s governance framework. It is with grave concern that we bring to your attention a series of developments that, in our respectful view, seriously undermine parliamentary democracy, administrative fairness, and institutional independence in Sri Lanka.
1. Unlawful Cancellation of Parliamentary Pensions
The present Government of Sri Lanka has, through actions that we consider both unlawful and unethical, cancelled the pension entitlements of former Members of Parliament. This decision appears to have been taken arbitrarily, without adherence to established legal principles, legitimate expectations, or due process, thereby undermining the dignity and security of those who have served in the national legislature.
2. Illegal and Malicious Interdiction of the Deputy Secretary General of Parliament
We wish to draw urgent attention to the interdiction of the Chief of Staff and Deputy Secretary General of Parliament, which raises serious concerns regarding abuse of authority and interference in administrative due process. According to material presently before the Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka (CA/Writ Application No. 109/2026), the interdiction:
• Was imposed through the Parliamentary Staff Advisory Committee (PSAC), which lacks lawful authority to exercise such disciplinary powers, rendering the action ultra vires;
• Was based on a preliminary inquiry conducted without proper legal mandate, thereby invalidating the process from its inception;
• Was not the result of an independent administrative determination, but was carried out following the direct personal intervention and influence of Speaker, Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne;
• Appears to have been driven by personal and retaliatory considerations, amounting to a malicious exercise of authority rather than a lawful disciplinary process.
Importantly, it is also noted that the Attorney General of Sri Lanka has withdrawn from appearing on behalf of the Hon. Speaker in the related proceedings, reportedly in view of serious procedural irregularities associated with the interdiction process. The Speaker has consequently retained private legal counsel. This development strongly indicates that serious legal and procedural defects exist in the interdiction process, further reinforcing concerns regarding its legality and propriety. It is therefore evident that the lawful disciplinary framework vested in the Secretary General of Parliament was bypassed, resulting in a serious violation of the principles of natural justice, institutional independence, and the rule of law.
3. Discrimination and Harassment within Parliamentary Administration
We are also deeply concerned by credible allegations of discrimination and harassment within the parliamentary administrative structure, which, in our respectful view, have arisen as a result of the interference of the present Speaker in the administrative affairs of Parliament, thereby undermining the independence of the parliamentary administration. These concerns include:
• Discriminatory conduct affecting senior officials, including the Deputy Secretary General;
• Harassment and discriminatory treatment of female staff members within Parliament;
• The resignation of one female officer due to such circumstances;
• Confirmed findings of harassment in respect of another female officer attached to the Information Technology Division, as established by a report submitted by a former High Court Judge.
These incidents indicate a disturbing pattern of administrative misconduct and a failure to ensure a safe, independent, and professional working environment within Parliament.
3. Broader Institutional Concerns
The above matters collectively raise serious concerns regarding:
• The erosion of the independence of parliamentary administration;
• Abuse of authority and concentration of power;
• Undermining of due process and established legal frameworks;
• A broader decline in adherence to democratic governance standards.
Request for Engagement
In light of the foregoing, we respectfully request that the Inter-Parliamentary Union:
1. Intervene and monitor the situation;
2. Call for reports and clarifications from the Speaker and senior parliamentary administration;
3. Facilitate independent review and observation of relevant judicial proceedings;
4. Promote accountability and restoration of institutional integrity within Parliament.
Given the IPU’s distinguished role in safeguarding parliamentary democracy and promoting good governance worldwide, we firmly believe that your timely engagement will contribute significantly to restoring institutional integrity and public confidence in Sri Lanka’s Parliament.
News
Power and Energy Minister, Ministry Secy resign over coal probe
Power and Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody and Ministry Secretary Prof. Udayanga Hemapala have resigned from their posts.According to the President’s Media Division (PMD), the two officials submitted their letters of resignation to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake this afternoon.
The resignations come in the wake of a Special Presidential Commission of Inquiry appointed to probe possible unlawful activity and financial irregularities in coal procurement and power generation.
The PMD said the decision was taken to ensure that the Commission’s work proceeds without interference or perceived influence from individuals holding office.
Minister Jayakody, in his resignation letter, noted that following the appointment of the Commission, he had requested that investigations into coal imports, since 2009, be referred to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), describing it as part of the government’s anti-corruption mandate.
He added that the inquiry should be conducted independently and without bias, and said his continued presence in office could be perceived as an obstacle to the process.
Prof. Hemapala, in his resignation letter, said his decision was intended to facilitate the commencement of investigations and ensure a transparent and independent process, the PMD said.
The Special Presidential Commission was recently appointed to examine allegations of irregularities in coal imports and electricity generation over a prolonged period and to recommend corrective measures.
News
President appoints Commission to probe irregularities in coal imports from inception of Norochcholai
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake yesterday appointed a Presidential Commission of Inquiry to investigate alleged irregularities in coal imports and electricity generation, amid concerns over possible financial losses to the State.
The President’s Office said the Commission would examine transactions from the inception of coal-based power generation in Sri Lanka up to April 16, 2026, focusing on operations linked to the CEB-affiliated Lanka Coal Company (Pvt) Ltd., its successors, and private suppliers.
The three-member body is chaired by Supreme Court Justice Gihan Kulatunga, with Court of Appeal Justice Adithya Patabendige and High Court Judge Sanjeewa Somaratne as members. Former Ministry Secretary P.V. Bandulasena has been appointed Secretary to the Commission.
Appointed under the Special Presidential Commissions of Inquiry Act No. 07 of 1978, as amended, the Commission has been mandated to scrutinise procurement procedures, supply chains, quality testing, and operational processes connected to coal imports and utilisation.
The Commission has been tasked with the following mandates:
• To determine whether irregularities or illegal acts occurred in the procurement process for coal imports and to assess any resulting financial loss to the government.
• To investigate whether substandard coal was imported during the relevant period and to examine the entire associated workflow, including procurement, supply, quality testing, operational, and utility processes.
• To ascertain whether electricity generation using imported coal reached the expected levels of efficiency and productivity.
• To investigate whether legal or financial irregularities or illegal acts occurred during the power generation process if substandard coal was indeed utilized.
• To examine whether there were any breaches of expressed terms or conditions in these processes and, if so, whether measures such as withholding payments or other compensatory actions were taken.
• To identify the political authorities, government officials, officers of Lanka Coal Company (Pvt) Ltd, suppliers, or their agents responsible for any such incidents and to recommend future action to be taken against them.
• To propose measures to prevent the recurrence of such alleged malpractices or illegal acts in the future and to ensure proper governance and integrity.
In addition to the above, the Commission will also report on any other alleged malpractices or illegal acts related to coal importation and electricity generation, and recommend preventive measures to address such issues.
-
News6 days agoCEB orders temporary shutdown of large rooftop solar systems
-
Features6 days agoFrom Royal College Platoon to National Cadet Corps: 145 years of discipline, leadership, and modern challenges
-
Latest News5 days agoPNS TAIMUR & ASLAT arrive in Colombo
-
Features6 days agoCIA’s hidden weapon in Iran
-
Latest News5 days agoPrasidh, Buttler set up comfortable win for Gujarat Titans
-
News2 days agoPNS TAIMUR & ASLAT set sail from Colombo
-
Features6 days agoA Fragile Ceasefire: Pakistan’s Glory and Israel’s Sabotage
-
Latest News6 days agoHeat index likely to increase up to ‘Caution level’ at some places in the Northern, North-central, North-western, Western, Sabaragamuwa, Southern and Eastern provinces and Monaragala district
