Features
Reporting on mechanized gemming of the Kaluganga and Anura B’s invitation
During this period, I was suddenly appointed by the President as Chairman of a Committee appointed by him to examine and report on a proposed project put forward by a foreign consortium for mechanized gem mining in one of our most important rivers, the Kalu Ganga. A public controversy was building up about this proposal and the President and the government decided that they needed advice.
The other members of the committee were Dr. D. Nesiah, Secretary, to the Ministry of Environment and Parliamentary Affairs; Mr. C.G. Wickremasinghe, Additional Secretary to the President; Mr. D.G. Premachandra, Secretary to the Ministry of Forestry, Irrigation and Mahaweli Development: Mr. O.C. Jayewardene, Secretary to the Ministry of Lands; Mr. G.K. Amaratunge, Chairman Central Environmental Authority; Mr. W.M.P. Weerasinghe, Chairman State Gem Corporation; and Mr. A de Vaas Gunawardena, Director-General, Board of Investment.
The terms of reference given to us were as follows
(a) The advisability of approving the proposed
approving mechanized gem mining project in the Kalu Ganga;
(b) Whether the adverse environmental impacts resulting from mechanized gemming in rivers, streams, etc., in Sri Lanka would outweigh the benefits that would accrue from such activity;
(c) If so, whether such mechanized gem mining in river and stream beds should be banned island-wide; and
(d) Whether allowing a pilot project in the Kalu Ganga to determine the environmental impacts would serve any purpose or would be desirable in the present socio-political context.
Mr. Y.B. Pussedeniya, my Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Public Administration was appointed Secretary to the Committee.
A Presidential Committee imposes great responsibilities on the Chairman and members. It imposes a special obligation to go into matters thoroughly, so that no public criticism would emanate from the report itself. There was also every prospect that the government would act on the recommendations in the report. We therefore, gave wide publicity through the newspapers and the broadcasting media to the committee’s terms of reference and invited written submissions. Almost 50 memoranda and letters came in from persons, associations and groups mostly opposing the project.
The committee summoned the Director of Irrigation; the Land Commissioner and the Director, Geological Survey and Mines Bureau (who came with their relevant deputies) and had detailed discussions with them. We gave a hearing to the sponsors of the project. We looked at reports from geologists, hydrologists, ecologists, aquatic biologists, sociologists and environmental engineers. In the course of these deliberations, we covered the areas of water quality surveys of the river; aquatic habitats and fauna of the river; opinion surveys and land use analysis of residents along the middle stretch of the river where the proposed mining was to take place; hydrological and morphological impacts of mechanized dredging of the river, and the geological aspects pertaining to mechanized dredging of the river.
At the end of several rounds of meetings, hearings and studies, the committee unanimously recommended to government that the proposal be not proceeded with. The scientific evidence was clearly against it. In a 40 page report which I dictated, cogent reasons were given as to why the committee came to such a conclusion. No one opposed our conclusions and recommendations. The government accepted our report and abandoned the proposal. No doubt the gems and precious stones would continue to lie in the river for a future generation to exploit with safer and more modern technology.
This whole episode reveals once again, the varied uses to which Secretaries and other senior officials are put to by governments. Needless to say these extra responsibilities involve a tremendous amount of work which one has to find time for whilst carrying on one’s normal work. For this reason, most of the meetings connected with the work of this Presidential Committee were scheduled to commence at 5.30 or 6 p.m. Most days we finished well past 8.30 p.m.
An invitation to a change of responsibilities
It was now December, and 1993 was drawing to a close, when unexpectedly, I received a call from Mr. Anura Bandaranaike. In his own affable manner he asked me whether I could drop in at his home and meet him for a few minutes. He understood the sensitivities of a public servant enough to also say, “There should not be a problem of your dropping in at home, since I am now a government MP.” Sometime earlier, due to internal party problems Mr. Bandaranaike had left the Sri Lanka Freedom Party, which his father had founded, and joined the United National party, of which his father had been a senior Minister before he left it to form his own party.
We met on the morning of December 13. After greeting me cordially and after an exchange of pleasantries, and some recollections on my part of some of his doings as a very young man, which amused him greatly, he got to the point. He said “Dharmasiri, President Wijetunge has called me and offered the portfolio of Higher Education. I told him, I have been 16 years in Parliament and had also been Leader of the Opposition, at a most difficult time, but I have no ministerial experience. I therefore told him that I need a very experienced Secretary to guide me, and inquired whether I could choose my own Secretary. Mr. Wijetunge agreed and I asked for you. I am very sorry. I must apologize to you for not asking you before I made this request to the President.”
“What did the President say?” I asked. “He said that he does not want to talk to you about this, but if I spoke to you and you agreed, he would have no objection.”
I was impressed both by Mr. Bandaranaike’s affability which I already knew was part of his character, as well as his humility in telling the President of his lack of ministerial experience and asking for an experienced Secretary. This too was typical of him. I however had a problem. It would indeed be a pleasure to work with someone whom I had first come to know as a child running around the lawns of Temple Trees in a pair of shorts and with a cricket bat in his hands, and deciding whenever he got out that it was a no ball!
The problem was that I had hardly been six months in a difficult Ministry, which I had now stabilized and where there was so much to be done. Many changes and reforms were badly needed in the administrative structure, the way of conducting public business, acquiring, storing and using information and some of the other things that I have already referred to. This was going to be an enormous and challenging task, and I had just begun, in spite of other distractions such as reporting on “mechanized gemming in the Kalu Ganga,” to start a series of discussions with my senior colleagues in the Public Service about this whole issue of reforms and the areas, the modalities, the mechanisms, the sequencing and the pacing of such reforms.
I mentioned some of this. But Mr. Bandaranaike was not to be denied. He reiterated his earnest desire to have me as his Secretary, and when I smilingly kept on looking at him without comment, he went on to say “I will be honoured if you will be my Secretary,” and then followed up with the words, “I have already mentioned this to Amma, and she’s delighted.” I burst out laughing and said “you are a very clever young man. You have now bound me hand and foot.” By now, I had realized that I just could not say “No”. His final words that his mother, Mrs. Bandaranaike was “delighted” was the ultimate reinforcement. I accepted.
But before I left the Ministry of Public Administration, I was gratified at some of the compliments paid to me and my officers by Members of Parliament, when the Votes of the Ministry were being discussed in the debate on the Committee Stage of the Budget on the 9th of December 1993. The most generous reference was made by the reflective and cultured Member for the Batticaloa District Mr. Prince Cassinader. Addressing the Minister, he had this to say, as reported in Hansard:
“You are composed of a very fine team of officers. You are there in the first place to skipper this key Ministry and there are men of the calibre of Mr Pieris, Mr. Lakshman Perera, Mr. Gunaratne and others who are giving you excellent support. In fact when Mr. Pieris left the Education Ministry, I was very sad, but then I realized that we cannot have a good man all the time for us alone, and what was the loss of the Education Ministry has been the gain of the Public Administration Ministry… It was refreshing to meet men in your Ministry who exude warmth, who showed spirit of service and who are hell bent to bring down the problems of the people. “
What was most gratifying was that these remarks came from a Member of Parliament of the Opposition.
(Excerpted from In Pursuit of Governance, the autobiography of MDD Peiris)
Features
Peace march and promise of reconciliation
The ongoing peace march by a group of international Buddhist monks has captured the sentiment of Sri Lankans in a manner that few public events have done in recent times. It is led by the Vietnamese monk Venerable Thich Pannakara who is associated with a mindfulness movement that has roots in Vietnamese Buddhist practice and actively promoted among diaspora communities in the United States. The peace march by the monks, accompanied by their mascot, the dog Aloka, has generated affection and goodwill within the Buddhist and larger community. It follows earlier peace walks in the United States where monks carried a similar message of mindfulness and compassion across communities but without any government or even media patronage as in Sri Lanka.
This initiative has the potential to unfold into an effort to nurture a culture of peace in Sri Lanka. Such a culture is necessary if the country as the country prepares to move beyond its history of conflict towards a more longlasting reconciliation and a political solution to its ethnic and religious divisions. The government’s support for the peace march can be seen as part of a broader attempt to shape such a culture. The Clean Sri Lanka programme, promoted by the government as a civic responsibility campaign focused on environmental cleanliness, ethical conduct and social discipline, provides a useful framework within which such initiatives can be situated. Its emphasis on collective responsibility and shared public space makes it sit well with the values that peacebuilding requires.
government’s previous plan to promote a culture of peace was on the occasion of “Sri Lanka Day” celebrations which were scheduled to take place on December 12-14 last year but was disrupted by Cyclone Ditwah. The Sri Lanka Day celebrations were to include those talented individuals from each and every community at the district level who had excelled in some field or the other, such as science, business or arts and culture and selected by the District Secretariats in each of the 25 districts. They were to gather in Colombo to engage in cultural performances and community-focused exhibitions. The government’s intention was to build up a discourse around the ideas of unity in diversity as a precursor to addressing the more contentious topics of human rights violations during the war period, and issues of accountability and reparations for wrongs suffered during that dark period.
Positive Response
The invitation to the international monks appears to have emerged from within Buddhist religious networks in Sri Lanka that have long maintained links with the larger international Buddhist community. The strong support extended by leading temples and clergy within the country, including the Buddhists Mahanayakes indicates that this was not an isolated effort but one that resonated with the mainstream Buddhist establishment. Indeed, the involvement of senior Buddhist leaders has been particularly noteworthy. A Joint Declaration for Peace in the world, drawing on Sri Lanka’s own experience, and by the Mahanayakes of all Buddhist Chapters took place in the context of the ongoing peace march at the Gangaramaya Temple in Colombo, with participation from the diplomatic community. The declaration, calling for compassion, dialogue and sustainable peace, reflects an effort by religious leadership to assert a moral voice in favour of coexistence.
The popular response to the peace march has also been striking. Large numbers of people have been gathering along the route, offering flowers, water and support to the monks. Schoolchildren have been lining the roads, and communities from different religious backgrounds extend hospitality. On the way, the monks were hosted by both a Hindu temple and a mosque, where food and refreshments were provided. These acts, though simple, carry a message about the possibility of harmony among Sri Lanka’s diverse communities. It helps to counter the perception that the Buddhist community in Sri Lanka is inherently nationalist and resistant to minority concerns that was shaped during the decades of war and reinforced by political mobilisation that too often exploited ethnic identity.
By way of contrast, the peace march offers a different image. It shows a readiness among ordinary people to embrace values of compassion and coexistence that are deeply embedded in Buddhist teaching. The Metta Sutta, one of the most well-known discourses in Buddhism, calls for boundless goodwill towards all beings. It states that one should cultivate a mind that is “boundless towards all beings, free from hatred and ill will.” This emphasis on universal compassion provides a moral foundation for peace that extends beyond national or ethnic boundaries. The monks themselves emphasised this point repeatedly during the walk. Venerable Thich Pannakara reminded those who gathered that while acts of generosity are commendable, mindfulness in everyday life is even more important. He warned that as people become unmindful, they are more prone to react with anger and hatred, thereby contributing to conflict.
More Initiatives
The presence of political leaders at key moments of the march has emphasised the significance that the government attaches to the event. Prime Minister Harini Amarasuriya paid her respects to the peace march monks in Kandy, while President Anura Kumara Dissanayake is expected to do so at the conclusion of the march in Colombo. Such gestures signal an alignment between political authority and moral aspiration, even if the translation of that aspiration into policy remains a work in progress. At the same time, the peace march has not been without its shortcomings. The walk did not engage with the Northern and Eastern parts of the country, regions that were most affected by the war and where the need for reconciliation is most acute. A more inclusive geographic reach would have strengthened the symbolic impact of the initiative.
In addition, the positive impact of the peace march could have been increased if more effort had been taken to coordinate better with other civic and religious groups and include them in the event. Many civil society and religious harmony groups who would have liked to participate in the peace march found themselves unable to do so. There was no place in the programme for them to join. Even government institutions tasked with promoting social cohesion and reconciliation found themselves outside the loop. The Clean Sri Lanka Task Force that organised the peace march may have felt that involving other groups would have made it more complicated to organise the events which have proceeded without problems.
The hope is that the positive energy and goodwill generated by this peace march will not dissipate but will instead inspire further initiatives with the requisite coordination and leadership. The march has generated public discussion, drawn attention to the values of mindfulness and compassion, and created a space in which people can imagine a different future. It has been a special initiative among the many that are needed to build a culture of peace. A culture of peace cannot be imposed from above nor can it emerge overnight. It needs to be nurtured through multiple efforts across society, including education, religious engagement, civic initiatives and political reform. It is within such a culture that the more difficult questions of power sharing, justice and reconciliation can be addressed in a constructive manner.
by Jehan Perera
Features
Regional Universities
The countryside and peripheral regions have been neglected in the national imagination for many decades. This has also been the case with regional universities which were seen as mere appendages to the university system, and sometimes created to appease political constituencies in the regions. The exclusion of the rural world and the institutions in those regions was not accidental nor inevitable, but the consequence of conscious policies promoted under an extractive and exploitative global order. Neoliberalism globalisation, initiated in the late 1970s with far-reaching policies of free trade and free flow of capital, or the “open economy,” as we call it in Sri Lanka, is now dying. The United States and the Western countries that promoted neoliberalism, as a class project of finance capital to address the falling profits during the long economic downturn in the 1970s, are themselves reversing their policies and are at loggerheads with each other. However, those economic processes will continue to have national consequences into the future.
At the heart of such policies is the neoliberal city, which has become the centre of the economy with expanding financial businesses and a real estate boom. Such financialised cities also had their impact on universities, in lower income countries, where commercialised education with high fees, rising student debt, research for businesses and transnational educational linkages with branch campuses of Western universities, have become a reality.
In the case of Sri Lanka, while neoliberal policies began with the IMF and World Bank Structural Adjustment Programmes, in the late 1970s, the long civil war forestalled the accelerated growth of the neoliberal city. I have argued, over the last decade and a half, that it is with the end of the civil war, in 2009, coinciding with the global financial crisis, that a second wave of neoliberalism in Sri Lanka led to global finance capital being absorbed in infrastructure and real estate in Colombo. The transformation of Colombo into a neoliberal city was overseen by Gotabaya Rajapaksa as Defence Secretary with even the Urban Development Authority brought under the security establishment. While Colombo was drastically changing with a skyline of new buildings and shiny luxury vehicles drawing on massive external debt, there were also moves to promote private higher education institutions. The Board of Investment (BOI) registered many hundred so-called higher education institutions; these were not regulated and many mushroomed like supermarkets and disappeared in no time when they incurred losses.
In contrast to these so-called private higher education institutions that proliferated in and around Colombo, Sri Lanka, drawing on its free education system, has, over the last many decades, also created a number of state universities in peripheral regions. However, these regional universities lack adequate funding and a clear vision and purpose. The current conjuncture with the neoliberal global order unravelling, and the immediate global crisis in energy and transport are grim reminders of the importance of local economies and self-sufficiency. In this column I consider the role of our regional universities and their relationship to the communities within which they are embedded.
Regional context
The necessity and the advantage of robust public services is their reach into peripheral regions and marginalised communities. This is true of public transport, as it is with public hospitals. Private buses will always avoid isolated rural routes as their margins only increase on the busy routes between cities and towns. And private hospitals and clinics flock to the cities to extract from desperate patients, including by unscrupulous doctors who divert patients in public hospitals to be served in the private health facilities they moonlight. Similarly, it is affluent cities and towns that are the attraction for private educational institutions.
Public institutions, including universities, can only ensure their public role if they are adequately funded. Over the last decade and a half, with falling allocations for education, our state universities have been pushed into initiating fee levying courses, both at the post-graduate level and also for undergraduate international students. These programmes are seen as avenues to decrease the dependence of universities on budgetary support. However, the reality is that it is only universities in Colombo that can draw in students capable of paying such high fees. Furthermore, such fee levying courses end up pushing academics into overwork including by offering additional income.
Therefore, allocations for underfunded regional universities need to be steadily increased. Housing facilities and other services for academics working in rural districts would ensure their continued presence and greater engagement with the local communities. Increased time away from teaching and research funding earmarked for community engagement will provide clear direction for academics. Indeed, such funding with a clear vision and role for regional universities can provide considerable social returns. In a time when repeated crises are affecting our society, agricultural production to bolster our food system as well as rural income streams and employment are major issues. Here, regional universities have an important role today in developing social and economic alternatives.
Reimagining development
In recent months, there have been interesting initiatives in the Northern Province, where the Universities of Jaffna and Vavuniya have been engaging state institutions on issues of development. In an initiative to bring different actors together, high level meetings have been convened between the staff of the Agriculture Faculty and officials of the Provincial Agriculture Ministry to figure out solutions for long pending agricultural problems. Similar meetings have also been organised between provincial authorities and the Faculties of Technology and Engineering in Kilinochchi. These initiatives have led to academics engaging communities and co-operatives on their development needs, particularly in formulating new development initiatives and activating idle projects and assets in the region. Such engagement provides opportunities for academics to share their knowledge and skills while learn from communities about challenges that lead to new problems for research.
One of the most rewarding engagements I have been part of is an internship programme for the Technology Faculty of the University of Jaffna, where four batches of final year students, from food technology, green farming and automobile specialities, have been placed for six months within the co-operative movement through the Northern Co-operative Development Bank. This initiative has created a strong relationship between the Technology Faculty and the co-operative movement, with a number of former students now working fulltime in co-operative ventures. They are at the centre of developing solutions for rural co-operatives, including activating idle factories and ensuring quality and standards for their products.
I refer to these concrete initiatives because universities’ role in research and development in Sri Lanka, as in most other countries, are often narrowly conceived to be engagement with private businesses. However, for rural regions, the challenge, even with technological development, is the generation of appropriate technologies that can serve communities.
In Sri Lanka, we have for long emulated the major Western universities and in the process lost sight of the needs of our own youth and communities. Rethinking the development of our universities may have to begin with an understanding of the real challenges and context of our people. Our universities and their academics, if provided with a progressive vision and adequate resources and time to engage their communities, have the potential to address the many economic and social challenges that the next decade of global turmoil is bound to create.
Ahilan Kadirgamar is a political economist and Senior Lecturer, University of Jaffna.
(Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies)
by Ahilan Kadirgamar
Features
‘Disco Lady’ hitmaker now doing it for Climate Change
The name Alston Koch is generally associated with the hit song ‘Disco Lady.’ Yes, he has had several other top-notch songs to his credit but how many music lovers are aware that Alston is one of the few Asian-born entertainers using music for climate advocacy, since 2008.
He is back in the ‘climate change’ scene, with SUNx Malta, to celebrate Earth Day 2026, with the release of ‘A Symphony for Change’ – a vibrant Dodo4Kids video by Alston.
The inspiring musical video highlights ocean conservation and empowers children as future climate champions, honouring Maurice Strong’s legacy through education, creativity, and global collaboration for a sustainable planet.
The four-minute animated musical, composed and performed by platinum award-winning artiste Alston Koch, brings to life a resurrected Dodo, guiding children on a mission to clean up marine environments.
With a catchy melody and an uplifting message, the video blends entertainment with education—making climate awareness accessible and engaging for the next generation.
SUNx Malta is a Climate Friendly Travel system, focused on transforming the global tourism sector that is low-carbon, SDG-linked, and nature-positive.
Professor Geoffrey Lipman, President of SUNx Malta, described the project as a joyful collaboration with purpose:
“It’s always a pleasure to produce music with Alston for the good of our planet. And this time, to incorporate our Dodo4Kids in the video urging the next generation of young climate champions to help save our seas.”
For Alston, now based in Australia, the collaboration continues a long-standing journey of climate-focused creativity:
Says Alston: “I have been working on climate songs since the first release, in 2009, of the video ‘Act Now.’ Since then, I’ve performed at major global events—from Bali to Glasgow. I wrote this song because the climate horizon is darkening, and our kids and grandkids are our best hope for a brighter future.”
Alston’s very first climate song is ‘Can We Take This Climate Change,’ released in 2008.
It was written by Alston for the World Trade Organisation presentation, in London, and presented at ‘Live the Deal Climate Change’ conference in Copenhagen.
The Sri Lankan-born singer was goodwill ambassador for the campaign, and the then UK Minister Barbara Follett called it a “gift in song to the world suffering due to climate change.”
Alston said he wrote it after noticing butterflies, birds, and fruit trees disappearing from his childhood days.
In 2017, his creation ‘Make a Change’ was released in connection with World Tourism Day 2017.
Alston Koch’s work on climate advocacy is pretty inspiring, especially as climate change is now creating horrifying problems worldwide, and in Sri Lanka, too.
Alston also indicated to us that he has plans to visit Sri Lanka, sometime this year, and, maybe, even plan out a date for an Alston Koch special … a concert, no doubt.
Can’t wait for it!
-
News6 days agoLanka faces crisis of conscience over fate of animals: Call for compassion, law reform, and ethical responsibility
-
News5 days agoWhistleblowers ask Treasury Chief to resign over theft of USD 2.5 mn
-
News5 days agoNo cyber hack: Fintech expert exposes shocking legacy flaws that led to $2.5 million theft
-
News2 days agoBIA drug bust: 25 monks including three masterminds arrested
-
Business3 days agoNestlé Lanka Announces Change in Leadership
-
News2 days agoBanks alert customers to phishing attacks
-
News3 days agoHackers steal $3.2 Mn from Finance Ministry
-
News6 days agoUSD 2 mn bribe: CID ordered to arrest Shasheendra R, warrant issued against ex-SriLankan CEO’s wife
