Connect with us

Opinion

“Renewable Energy Dominance”: The required reality

Published

on

The sentiments expressed by Professor Kumar David in his article titled, “CEB’s LTGEP the best strategy” – published on September 3, 2020 differs significantly from the power sector development path favoured by many forward thinking professionals and academics in Sri Lanka.

While the Renewable Energy (RE) industry grows rapidly worldwide, Sri Lanka’s power sector technocrats continue to prepare generation expansion plans that emphasize coal and LNG based plants with token allocations for wind and solar. This conventional approach features large capacity fossil fuel based plants to be financed via state borrowing for meeting the demands of industry, commerce and consumers.

This approach is outdated! Today, the harnessing of RE resources for electricity generation is viewed as an important element in the economic and technological development of a nation.

Such a strategy helps to meet key development objectives such as: a) reduced exposure to risks (fuel price and currency); b) increased avenues for private sector investment (avoidance of State debt); c) dispersed project developments; d) technological advancement; e) skilled job creation, and; f) enhanced green credentials.

Does it make sense to export prosperity to a fossil fuel supplying country and increase the carbon footprint to effect an economy dependent on exports and tourism?

SL is uniquely blessed with abundant wind and solar resources. The technology is mature and continuing to advance, while costs are on a downward trajectory. Wind and solar power can be integrated with the existing fossil fueled and hydropower plants to meet the electricity demand in stable fashion. Analysis and simulation of the integrated power system will determine the quantum of RE capacity that can be supported by the existing power system.

The national leadership favors RE and State Minister Duminda Dissanayake referred to a farsighted plan to achieve a target of using 80 percent of RE in the national grid within the next 10 years.

While the target is ambitious, the generation expansion plan must reflect this vision. Experts can formulate plans to facilitate attainment of the goal.

Rather than brushing aside the potential of RE in dismissive fashion, Professor Kumar David could have contributed to a productive discourse by giving consideration to global technological trends on the RE front, and exploring their suitability for large scale adaptation in Sri Lanka.

Perhaps the following examples may encourage the Professor to do a rethink:

Wind/solar hybrid plants with battery storage: Land in the northern region of the island is zoned for development of wind-solar-storage hybrid projects. Auctioning of high capacity blocks for private sector development will see the benefit of economies of scale (low tariff). Advanced weather forecasting and battery storage for ramped electricity supply and withdrawal provide grid friendly characteristics. The annual energy potential of such hybrid RE power plants will be significant.

Micro grids: Micro grids for rural electricity supply based on Solar PV with battery storage and optional ‘off peak’ electricity supply via grid will curb electricity demand from fossil fueled plants. This helps to reduce transmission losses and address climate concerns. With over 70% of the SL population resident in rural areas, does it make sense to generate and distribute so-called “affordable” electricity from centralized fossil fueled plants and push the nation further into debt? The scale up potential of rural microgrids must be explored.

Prosumer: A prosumer (producer/consumer) is identified as an electricity subscriber with rooftop solar, battery storage and smart controls, who is subject to ‘time of hour’ metering, peak demand charge and demand side management programs. Smart devices will control consumption during high tariff rates and shave peak demand level by shutting off appliances.

Should the State deliver “affordable” fossil fuel based electricity to “high end” users such as hotels and luxury dwellings when they could be financially incentivized to adopt state of the art technologies? When commercial and industrial facilities and high end residences are considered, the scale up potential of this prosumer phenomenon will be significant.

The above are just a few examples. There is more! The hill country with existing hydro, future pumped storage combined with solar and wind opens up numerous possibilities.

A RE based power expansion strategy with private sector investment will lead to distributed generation and “unbundling” of the grid. Restructuring of the state electricity sector is essential.

Professor David should shed his conventional thinking and develop familiarity with the world of wind, solar, batteries, distributed generation, smart grids, smart meters, digitalization, AI, IoT, etc. This represents the future and Sri Lanka should adapt fast.

 

MAYURA BOTEJUE

Consultant – Renewable Energy

Email: mbotejue@gmail.com



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

We do not want to be press-ganged 

Published

on

Reference ,the Indian High Commissioner’s recent comments ( The Island, 9th Jan. ) on strong India-Sri Lanka relationship and the assistance granted on recovering from the financial collapse of Sri Lanka and yet again for cyclone recovery., Sri Lankans should express their  thanks to India for standing up as a friendly neighbour.

On the Defence Cooperation agreement, the Indian High Commissioner’s assertion was that there was nothing beyond that which had been included in the text. But, dear High Commissioner, we Sri Lankans have burnt our fingers when we signed agreements with the European nations who invaded our country; they took our leaders around the Mulberry bush and made our nation pay a very high price by controlling our destiny for hundreds of years. When the Opposition parties in the Parliament requested the Sri Lankan government to reveal the contents of the Defence agreements signed with India as per the prevalent common practice, the government’s strange response was  that India did not want them disclosed.

Even the terms of the one-sided infamous Indo-Sri Lanka agreement, signed in 1987, were disclosed to the public.

Mr. High Commissioner, we are not satisfied with your reply as we are weak, economically, and unable to clearly understand your “India’s Neighbourhood First and  Mahasagar policies” . We need the details of the defence agreements signed with our government, early.

 

RANJITH SOYSA 

Continue Reading

Opinion

When will we learn?

Published

on

At every election—general or presidential—we do not truly vote, we simply outvote. We push out the incumbent and bring in another, whether recycled from the past or presented as “fresh.” The last time, we chose a newcomer who had spent years criticising others, conveniently ignoring the centuries of damage they inflicted during successive governments. Only now do we realise that governing is far more difficult than criticising.

There is a saying: “Even with elephants, you cannot bring back the wisdom that has passed.” But are we learning? Among our legislators, there have been individuals accused of murder, fraud, and countless illegal acts. True, the courts did not punish them—but are we so blind as to remain naive in the face of such allegations? These fraudsters and criminals, and any sane citizen living in this decade, cannot deny those realities.

Meanwhile, many of our compatriots abroad, living comfortably with their families, ignore these past crimes with blind devotion and campaign for different parties. For most of us, the wish during an election is not the welfare of the country, but simply to send our personal favourite to the council. The clearest example was the election of a teledrama actress—someone who did not even understand the Constitution—over experienced and honest politicians.

It is time to stop this bogus hero worship. Vote not for personalities, but for the country. Vote for integrity, for competence, and for the future we deserve.

 

Deshapriya Rajapaksha

Continue Reading

Opinion

Chlorophyll –The Life-giver is in peril

Published

on

Chlorophyll

Chlorophyll is the green pigment found in plants, algae, and cyanobacteria. It is essential for photosynthesis, the process by which light energy is converted into chemical energy to sustain life on Earth. As it is green it reflects Green of the sunlight spectrum and absorbs its  Red and Blue ranges. The energy in these rays are used to produce carbohydrates utilising water and carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen in the process. Thus, it performs, in this reaction, three functions essential for life on earth; it produces food and oxygen and removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to maintain equilibrium in our environment. It is one of the wonders of nature that are in peril today. It is essential for life on earth, at least for the present, as there are no suitable alternatives. While chlorophyll can be produced in a lab, it cannot be produced using simple, everyday chemicals in a straightforward process. The total synthesis of chlorophyll is an extremely complex multi-step organic chemistry process that requires specialized knowledge, advanced laboratory equipment, and numerous complex intermediary compounds and catalysts.

Chlorophyll probably evolved inside bacteria in water and migrated to land with plants that preceded animals who also evolved in water. Plants had to come on land first to oxygenate the atmosphere and make it possible for animals to follow. There was very little oxygen in the ocean or on the surface before chlorophyll carrying bacteria and algae started photosynthesis. Now 70% of our atmospheric oxygen is produced by sea phytoplankton and algae, hence the importance of the sea as a source of oxygen.

Chemically, chlorophyll is a porphyrin compound with a central magnesium (Mg²⁺) ion. Factors that affect its production and function are light intensity, availability of nutrients, especially nitrogen and magnesium,  water supply and temperature. Availability of nutrients and temperature could be adversely affected due to sea pollution and global warming respectively.

Temperature range for optimum chlorophyll function is 25 – 35 C depending on the types of plants. Plants in temperate climates are adopted to function at lower temperatures and those in tropical regions prefer higher temperatures. Chlorophyll in most plants work most efficiently at 30 C. At lower temperatures it could slow down and become dormant. At temperatures above 40 C chlorophyll enzymes  begin to denature and protein complexes can be damaged.  Photosynthesis would decline sharply at these high temperatures.

Global warming therefore could affect chlorophyll function and threaten its very existence. Already there is a qualitative as well as quantitative decline of chlorophyll particularly in the sea. The last decade has been the hottest ten years and 2024 the hottest year since recording had started. The ocean absorbs 90% of the excess heat that reaches the Earth due to the greenhouse effect. Global warming has caused sea surface temperatures to rise significantly, leading to record-breaking temperatures in recent years (like 2023-2024), a faster warming rate (four times faster than 40 years ago), and more frequent, intense marine heatwaves, disrupting marine life and weather patterns. The ocean’s surface is heating up much faster, about four times quicker than in the late 1980s, with the last decade being the warmest on record. 2023 and 2024 saw unprecedented high sea surface temperatures, with some periods exceeding previous records by large margins, potentially becoming the new normal.

Half of the global sea surface has gradually changed in colour indicating chlorophyll decline (Frankie Adkins, 2024, Z Hong, 2025). Sea is blue in colour due to the absorption of Red of the sunlight spectrum  by water and reflecting Blue. When the green chlorophyll of the phytoplankton is decreased the sea becomes bluer. Researchers from MIT and Georgia Tech found these color changes are global, affecting over half the ocean’s surface in the last two decades, and are consistent with climate model predictions. Sea phytoplankton and algae produce more than 70% of the atmospheric oxygen, replenishing what is consumed by animals. Danger to the life of these animals including humans due to decline of sea chlorophyll is obvious. Unless this trend is reversed there would be irreparable damage and irreversible changes in the ecosystems that involve chlorophyll function as a vital component.

The balance 30% of oxygen is supplied mainly by terrestrial plants which are lost due mainly to human action, either by felling and clearing or due to global warming. Since 2000, approximately 100 million hectares of forest area was lost globally by 2018 due to permanent deforestation. More recent estimates from the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) indicate that an estimated 420 million hectares of forest have been lost through deforestation since 1990, with a net loss of approximately 4.7 million hectares per year between 2010 and 2020 (accounting for forest gains by reforestation). From 2001 to 2024, there had been a total of 520 million hectares of tree cover loss globally. This figure includes both temporary loss (e.g., due to fires or logging where forests regrow) and permanent deforestation. Roughly 37% of tree cover loss since 2000 was likely permanent deforestation, resulting in conversion to non-forest land uses such as agriculture, mining, or urban development. Tropical forests account for the vast majority (nearly 94%) of permanent deforestation, largely driven by agricultural expansion.  Limiting warming to 1.5°C significantly reduces risks, but without strong action, widespread plant loss and biodiversity decline are projected, making climate change a dominant threat to nature, notes the World Economic Forum. Tropical trees are Earth’s climate regulators—they cool the planet, store massive amounts of carbon, control rainfall, and stabilize global climate systems. Losing them would make climate change faster, hotter, and harder to reverse.

Another vital function of chlorophyll is carbon fixing. Carbon fixation by plants is crucial because it converts atmospheric carbon dioxide into organic compounds, forming the base of the food web, providing energy/building blocks for life, regulating Earth’s climate by removing greenhouse gases, and driving the global carbon cycle, making life as we know it possible. Plants use carbon fixation (photosynthesis) to create their own food (sugars), providing energy and organic matter that sustains all other life forms.  By absorbing vast amounts of CO2 (a greenhouse gas) from the atmosphere, plants help control its concentration, mitigating global warming. Chlorophyll drives the Carbon Cycle, it’s the primary natural mechanism for moving inorganic carbon into the biosphere, making it available for all living organisms.

In essence, carbon fixation turns the air we breathe out (carbon dioxide) into the food we eat and the air we breathe in (oxygen), sustaining ecosystems and regulating our planet’s climate.

While land plants store much more total carbon in their biomass, marine plants (like phytoplankton) and algae fix nearly the same amount of carbon annually as all terrestrial plants combined, making the ocean a massive and highly efficient carbon sink, especially coastal ecosystems that sequester carbon far faster than forests. Coastal marine plants (mangroves, salt marshes, seagrasses) are extremely efficient carbon sequesters, absorbing carbon at rates up to 50 times faster than terrestrial forests.

If Chlorophyll decline, which is mainly due to human action driven by uncontrolled greed, is not arrested as soon as possible life on Earth would not be possible.

(Some information was obtained from Wikipedia)

by N. A. de S. Amaratunga ✍️

Continue Reading

Trending