Connect with us

Editorial

Readying for the big fight

Published

on

The week that passed saw considerable political activity related to the forthcoming presidential election that must be held late next year in accordance with the constitution. Connected events included business magnate Dhammika Perera’s declaration that he is willing to run for president provided the political parties – he did not identify which parties though he said they included the SLPP – guarantee him 51 percent of the vote. Perera is no spring chicken not to know that no party nor anybody else can “guarantee” anybody a proportion of the vote. That must await the polling and the counting of the votes. The second event was the launching of Dilith Jayaweera’s new Mawbima Janatha Pakshaya (MJP) which opened its new party office in Colombo.

Neither Jayaweera nor Perera have declared themselves as candidates for the forthcoming presidential election. The only declared candidates up to now are Opposition and Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) leader Sajith Premadasa and Anura Kumara Dissanayake of the JVP/NPP. Both Jayaweera and Perera have been staunch supporters of disgraced former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. The Aragalaya-fuelled ejection of GR from the presidency he won comfortably in November 2019 propelled incumbent President Ranil Wickremesinghe into the hot seat. As is very well know, Wickremesinghe lost his own parliamentary seat in the parliamentary election that followed next August and led the UNP to stunning zero elected seats at that contest. Yet he entered the legislature through the UNP’s single National List seat and was anointed by Gotabaya first to succeed brother, Mahinda as premier and then GR himself as president.

All that, of course, is so much water that has passed under the bridges. Asked if he was a potential presidential candidate in November 2024, Jayaweera said at his party office opening: “First, we will give enough time of the MJP to succeed as a political movement across the country and then decide when to run for political office.” Perera, at a posh Nelumpokuna show in Colombo last week, declared that he does not invest in unwinnable projects. “I’m trying to unite a country divided by politics through education,” he said at this event celebrating the fourth anniversary of DP Education. Incidentally, DP stands not for Dhammika Perera but for Dhammika and Priscilla (Perera) Foundation which has already reached out to a claimed 1.5 million students enrolled in its programme which imposes no cost on the beneficiaries.

While Ranil Wickremesinghe has not declared himself as a candidate at the next presidential election, it is very clear that he is aspiring to an elected presidency. Much of what he says and does reflects that ambition. The SLPP which elected RW to office, and is keeping him there, is on record saying that it will field a candidate but it is very coy about who that will be. Pressed at news briefings it says that it will reveal the name “at the right time.

” Some SLPP parliamentarians have already expressed their support for RW. SLPP General Secretary Sagara Kariyawasam, widely considered to be the voice of Basil Rajapaksa, asked last week about the kite that Dhammika Perera has flown, responded that Dhammika is a valued member of their party. Several potential candidates are ambitious about running for president, and Dhammika being one of them is not a breach of party discipline. However, the SLPP has not decided on a candidate.

Political observers and commentators are of the view that more important than who the candidates will be next year is whether the election will be held on schedule in less than a year from now. According to Prof. GL Peiris, polling must be by September though GR’s term, which RW is serving out, would end only in November, But recent reports and statements that the government is looking at changes in the electoral system giving direct election (160 seats) a greater weight than the number elected by proportional representation (65 seat).

Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe has already presented a cabinet paper to this effect and a cabinet sub-committee going into it. This has triggered fears in political circles about an attempt to postpone elections. Such fears are legitimate in the context of the postponement sine die of the local election after nominations were accepted as well as elections to Provincial Councils.

A senior political analyst commented that in any society undergoing economic shock therapy that Sri Lanka is, it is vital that the safety valves be opened on schedule and that the public’s hope of a chance for change will not be frustrated. If next year’s presidential election is the earliest scheduled chance for a change, any experiment with the election laws should not be of a sort that defers the holding of that election. Our political history clearly proves that any blocking, retarding or distortion of the electoral calendar and/or process leads to violent upheavals.

Whether the SLPP will throw its weight behind Dhammika Perera, will remain with Ranil Wickremesinghe who arrested last year’s anarchy and restored a sense of normalcy – though at the cost of not repaying the country’s debt – or play a wild card will remain an open question certainly in the short term. The JVP/NPP has been demonstrating tight organization and growing support.

But it must be remembered that at the 2019 presidential election, Anura Kumara Dissanayake polled only 3.16% of the vote against Sajith Premadasa’s 41.99%. Undoubtedly both these candidates will pick-up SLPP votes next time round after GR destroyed his party’s rural agricultural base. Extensive Rupavahini publicity Dhammika Perera’s DP Education anniversary received last week demonstrates he’s not without government backers.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editorial

Where do funds come from?

Published

on

Saturday 2nd May, 2026

The government and some Opposition parties held big rallies purportedly to mark May Day yesterday. The JVP/NPP staged as many as 21 such events across the country, and the SJB rally took place in Colombo. Not to be outdone, the SLFP also held its May Day rally in Colombo. Those spectacles must have cost a fortune each. Where did the funds come from?

Both the government and the Opposition never miss an opportunity to declare their commitment to upholding transparency and other good governance principles. So, they should be able to disclose the costs of the aforementioned mega events, attended by thousands of their supporters, and how they raised funds. They must do so because anti-social elements use colossal amounts of black money to bankroll election campaigns and political events in return for favours from politicians. There is said to be no such thing as a free lunch in politics.

Following the assassination of upright High Court Judge Sarath Ambeypitiya in 2004, this newspaper reported that Kudu Nauffer, a notorious drug dealer, who ordered the killing, had sponsored food and beverages served at a judicial officers’ function. This shows how widespread the tentacles of the underworld are. Besides criminals, other moneybags also lavish funds on political parties and their leaders and leverage the quid pro quo to cut corrupt deals.

There have been instances where some political parties resorted to illegal operations to raise funds for elections, the 2015 Treasury bond scams being a case in point. The UNP could not pay its water and telephone bills at Sirikotha while it was out of power, but after the ouster of the Rajapaksa government in January 2015, its war chest overflowed, and the UNP candidates went on a spending spree during the 2015 general election campaign. A group of businessmen who financed the SLPP’s campaign events gained from the sugar tax scam in 2020. They made a killing at the expense of the state coffers. It is alleged that some financiers of the JVP/NPP benefited from the green-channelling of 323 red-flagged freight containers in the Colombo Port in January 2025. Another allegation is that the current government is beholden to the wealthy rice millers, known to shower funds on politicians, especially during elections.

Hence, the need for pressure to be ramped up on the government and the Opposition to reveal the costs of their political dog and pony shows on May Day and how funds were raised for them.

A large number of government politicians including President Anura Kumara Dissanayake attended the JVP/NPP’s main May Day rally in Nuwara Eliya yesterday. In doing so, they gave the lie to their claim that they had decided against holding a May Day rally in Colombo in view of the fuel crisis. Their supporters were bussed to Nuwara Eliya as well as other venues. VIP travel and security cost the public an arm and a leg. Will the government reveal the costs of transport, accommodation and security for the JVP/NPP leaders?

The government insists that it was wrong for Ranil Wickremesinghe to use state funds for a visit to a university in the UK, while he was the President. If so, it must be equally wrong for President Dissanayake to spend state funds on domestic travel to attend political events, from which no benefits accrue to the public.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Sanctity, rights and politics

Published

on

Friday 1st  May, 2026

Two full moon Poya days fall in May 2026, and there are two schools of thought about when Vesak should be observed. One insists that Vesak should be celebrated today, and the other is of the view that Vesak falls on 30 May. This difference of opinion has given rise to some confusion in the minds of the public and even protests in some quarters. The government has said its decision to observe Vesak on 30 May was taken on the recommendation of the Maha Sangha. This issue has come about and drawn so much attention because the International Workers’ Day, known for grand political events in this country, also falls today.

The overlap of Poya and May Day this year has been a blessing for some political parties that are not strong enough to stage shows of strength today. They have declared that they do not want to engage in political activities on a day of religious significance and therefore will not hold May Day rallies. Even if Poya had not fallen today, they would not have been able to hold successful May Day rallies.

Among the political parties that have decided against holding rallies today are the SLPP and the UNP, which has also used Poya as an excuse for turning down the SJB’s invitation to hold a joint May Day event. The UNP has written to the SJB that it will perform religious observances today in keeping with the late President Ranasinghe Premadasa’s policy that the UNP should not hold May Day rallies if the International Workers’ Day coincides with Poya. The subtext of its letter is that Sajith Premadasa, who leads the SJB, does not follow his late father’s policy.

The convergence of Poya and May Day has deprived the JVP/NPP of an opportunity to make a display of its political strength while it is reeling from several scandals and the Opposition is on the offensive. It has opted to hold May Day rallies at the district level. But they will not be as effective as a mammoth May Day rally in Colombo in boosting the morale of the rank and file of the JVP/NPP and sending a message to the Opposition that the government is far from weak.

JVP General Secretary Tilvin Silva has said the JVP/NPP decided not to bring its members to Colombo for a May Day rally in view of the current fuel crisis. This is not an implausible excuse in that the government would have drawn heavy criticism if it had held a political rally in Colombo while urging the public to use fuel sparingly. It would also have been criticised if it had held a grand May Day event in Colombo on a Poya Day.

No political issue would have arisen today if the workers’ day had not been politicised. Those which pass for labour day celebrations are shameful displays of workers’ servility to political leaders who have a viselike grip on the labour movement. Of course, there have been progressive, visionary politicians as well as independent labour leaders who championed the workers’ cause wholeheartedly and made a tremendous contribution towards the protection of labour rights. Those leaders must be remembered today, but unfortunately trade unions have become appendages of political parties, serving the interests of politicians rather than those of workers. These political trade unions are the bane of the labour movement. Political agendas of the parties controlling trade unions will continue to take precedence over workers’ interests unless the labour movement is liberated from the clutches of politicians. Trade unions have a pivotal role to play in helping the country achieve progress, but their political affiliations have prevented them doing so.

What workers, trade unionists and the politicians who claim to champion labour rights should do today, when a day of religious significance to Buddhists falls, is to remind themselves of the Buddha’s teaching on work, based on three main principles––doing no harm through one’s livelihood, earning honestly and using wealth responsibly and ethically.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Sobering truth vs belligerent bluster

Published

on

Thursday 30th April, 2026

US President Donald Trump has lashed out at German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for being critical of the US-Israeli military campaign against Iran. Instead of countering the German leader’s compelling arguments, Trump has alleged that Germany is not opposed to Iran’s nuclear programme. He has written in a social media post that Merz thinks it is all right for Iran to have a nuclear weapon and does not know what he is talking about. If Iran had a nuclear weapon, the whole world would be held hostage, Trump has claimed. Merz has said nothing to suggest that Germany is soft on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Instead, he has very convincingly pointed out that the US-Israeli military strategy is ill-conceived and flawed.

Trump is known for using circular reasoning and false dichotomy when he tries to defend the indefensible. His claim that Iran has to be prevented from acquiring nuclear capability is self-defeating, for US Intelligence Chief Tulsi Gabbard herself has testified before the Congress that Tehran is not building nuclear weapons. Washington has manufactured a casus belli again, the way it did in 2003 to justify the invasion of Iraq; it claimed that Saddam Hussein had stockpiles of chemical weapons.

Ironically, President Trump, who has been eyeing the Nobel Peace Prize, is not at peace with the rest of the world, including the NATO member states. Having bombed Iran, destroying assets worth billions of US dollars and killing thousands of civilians, he has opted for negotiations with Tehran. International media reports and defence analysts have indicated that the US has exhausted a substantial portion of some of its missile stockpiles, and now it has to rebuild the inventories, a task that will take a considerable time; this could affect Washington’s preparedness for future conflicts, they have pointed out. Trump is believed to have made a virtue of necessity by declaring a ceasefire.

Merz’s criticism of the US-Israeli war on Iran has struck a responsive chord with all peace-loving people around the world. His assessment of the West Asian conflict is spot on. He has rightly pointed out that Washington is being humiliated by Tehran’s negotiating tactics. Iran has openly stated that it did not ask for a ceasefire.

It is obvious that Trump plunged headfirst into war, without having an exit strategy. He and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may have expected to make short work of Iran, engineer a regime change and install a puppet regime in Tehran. Iran’s resilience and strategic moves made the US-Israeli military plans go awry.

Merz has cogently argued that the problem with conflicts like the current one in West Asia is that “always you don’t just have to get in – you have to get out again, as was seen in Afghanistan for 20 years and in Iraq”. In Afghanistan, after two decades of fighting, which caused thousands of civilian deaths and cost the western taxpayers about a trillion dollars, the US and its allies replaced the Taliban with the Taliban, as it were.

In an asymmetric engagement, there is hardly anything that the weaker side, fighting for survival, does not weaponise. Iran effectively shifted the war to the economic front while attacking Israel, the US bases in the region and the critical assets of the American allies within its missile range. The closure of the Hormuz Strait, which Iran is using as a strategic lever, has disrupted global oil and fertiliser supplies passing through that chokepoint. Massive oil price hikes could not have come at a worse time for Europe, which is still struggling to deal with the fallout from the Ukraine war and the Covid-19 pandemic. The soaring oil prices have become a double whammy for the European nations as well as others. It is only natural that Europe does not want the West Asian conflict to drag on. US farmers are also complaining of staggering increases in production costs due to soaring fertiliser prices. The US naval blockade has not helped Washington solve the problem—the closure of the Hormuz Strait for international navigation. Oil prices are rising and economies are screaming the world over. Trump has had to clean up the mess he and Netanyahu created in West Asia.

Continue Reading

Trending