Connect with us

Opinion

Ranil’s undiplomatic DW interview

Published

on

I write his comment after reading and rereading the Editorial and Dr Upul Wijayawardhana’s opinion –Ranil seems to have seen sense at last, in The Island of Friday October 6. Also having listened twice to the videoed interview.

As usual, The Island editor in his editorial, wrote perfect sense. His header, Berlin Buster conveys so much summing up the interview as bluster on the part of Ranil W. ‘Bluster’ is defined as ‘Talk in a loud, aggressive, or indignant way with little effect, which was exactly President Ranil Rajapaksa – whoops sorry –Ranil Wickremesinghe’s stance with the TV news network Deutsche Welle in Berlin recently.

To comment on Dr W’s title. I say it should have additions inserted: Ranil seems to have seen sense at last, ‘but became insensible and intolerant in the Berlin interview.’ His article carried not much critical comment on the interview per se but praised RW and digressed to UNHCR and Mangala Samaraweera.

To this careful listener and observant reader our Prez was totally out of character and disgraced himself. He was undiplomatic; took offence where no offence was meant; was from very early on in the interview on the defensive and assumed insults and fault finding and very definitely Western degrading of Sri Lanka. To this woman he appeared childish in his assumptions, attitude and even in the language he used.

As the editor wrote “Wickremesinghe, who was once accused of being subservient to the West, is now taking on the West as vigorously as the Rajapaksas.” He mentions the radical change of RW and asks whether it is “due to his close association with the Medamulana family since last year’s political marriage of convenience.” Of course it is and some say he is defending those brothers. He seems to have even caught the ‘makka’ of being abrasive, aggressive and not able to carry through an interview with diplomacy and no show of temper. Hope the flea of hounding journos has not been caught; we want to live longer. So different from the RW, who was intellectual and cool and admired by oldies whatever his political tactics were.

I quote certain statements made by RW in the interview which prove my negative judgment of how he handled the DW interview. Given the fact that interviewers are not the most unbiased, the onus to keep cool is on the person interviewed, which RW definitely was not. The interview started off well and degenerated to almost a word slamming match.

Talking of children being deprived of adequate food and a Save the Children report, RW retorts: “Don’t accuse us …” Then who is to be accused of what the child of SL suffers? RW admitted we had food scarcity and added that under his presidency things are much better. (?)

About the BBC Channel 4 documentary: “Why do you treat C4 as sacred?” Uncalled for remark and accusation since the interviewer just asked his question, not loaded at all with blame of accusation or even innuendo. Then started the battle of words – heated on RW’s side. RW insisted he and his government were dealing with the Bishops’ Conference and not the Cardinal. Then he burst out: “You take a piece of paper from Cardinal… You have no business… You try to corner me.”

About missing persons and reconciliation: “We had British, Australian, Indian, Pakistani, Chinese secret service policemen in Sri Lanka helping us…” He asked the interviewer whether they ever got international help to solve their problems, meaning so why insist on us getting international persons to investigate Sri Lankan matters. “You are talking nonsense …

“Don’t accuse me. I have run the business long before you. Western media thinks we are bad; what international enquiries have you had? Do you think Sri Lanka is second class?” “Don’t shout at me!” “You have made a serious accusation” which was denied by interviewer.

After more or less answering a question on Missing Persons Commission, RW shouts: “You are shouting I am bad.” Childish comment and we know about the Commission and how slow it has been.

The Interviewer asked several times to be allowed to complete asking his question. RW retorts towards the end of the interview: “What you have got is all bunkum” about the human rights situation in the country.

What was the purpose of the bravado? One cannot imagine RW merely lost his cool or was badgered by the interviewer who was good in his job; he could not be accused of belittling Sri Lanka

I sum up my assessment with these words: surprising; uncalled for belligerence; jumping to negative conclusions; accusing interviewer of statements he did not make; very disappointing.

One further point. No one must claim that if Modi brought down an interviewer, our Big Boss can do the same. So different are the two countries and respective leaders. India is sought after by the most important nations, while Sri Lanka is looked askance as a miserably failed, bankrupt country that allowed its past leaders to set the rot in.

Interested woman



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Jeffrey: Cartoonist par excellence 

Published

on

If there exists a print media personality who does not receive the due recognition and appreciation he rightfully deserves, it undoubtedly is ‘Jeffrey’ of The Island newspaper. The works of many a journalist have been frequently highlighted and appreciated but the capabilities and efficiency of personnel of the calibre of ‘Jeffrey ‘ are, more or less, taken for granted.

In every sphere of life, professional or occupational, there are people who function, not necessarily from behind the scenes, but nevertheless perform an equally efficient service, which in all probability goes unnoticed.

To be frank, even before reading the headlines of the Newspaper, as is customary now, my eyes seek for the Cartoon of the day. Indeed, a sight for sore eyes each morning, the lovable ‘Jeffrey’ makes my day.

Suffice to say that a ‘Good Job done man’ type of occasional pat on the back, to a person who puts his very soul into his work, would touch the only place where it matters the most – his heart. If a smile could work wonders, then how much further would a word of appreciation go.

‘Jeffrey ‘ has, time and again through his  cartoons, aptly proven his innovative and creative skills to present factual depiction of current affairs, both local and global. His drawing pen effortlessly covers all boundaries, irrespective of whatever nature. On a previous occasion, too, I have openly commended his abilities, finding it difficult to fathom how he could convey pertinent incidents, normally requiring hundreds of words to express, with a single drawing.

To all intents and purposes, ‘Jeffrey ‘ ranks much higher and could be considered as a rare find when compared with the numerous others actively engaged in this particular field of professionalism.

In ‘Jeffrey ‘, The Island newspaper indeed has a Cartoonist par excellence!

Jeffrey, more power to your elbow!

WILLIAM PHILLIPSZ 

Continue Reading

Opinion

Anti-aging injection shows promise in re-growing knee cartilage

Published

on

Scientists at Stanford Medicine have reported a discovery that could change how arthritis and joint damage are treated. In experiments on animals and human tissue, researchers found that blocking a protein linked to aging can restore worn cartilage in the knee and prevent arthritis after injury. The treatment works not by adding stem cells, but by reprogramming existing cartilage cells to behave in a more youthful way.

In aging mice, an injectable drug rebuilt knee cartilage that normally thins with age. In mice with knee injuries similar to anterior cruciate ligament tears, the same treatment prevented the onset of arthritis, a condition that often follows such injuries in humans. A pill form of the drug is already being tested in early clinical trials for age-related muscle weakness, raising hopes that a similar approach could one day be used for joints.

Human knee cartilage removed during joint replacement surgery also responded to the treatment. When exposed to the drug in the laboratory, the tissue began forming new cartilage that resembled healthy, functional joint cartilage. These findings suggest that cartilage lost to aging or arthritis might eventually be restored through injections into the joint or even oral medication, potentially reducing the need for knee and hip replacements.

Osteoarthritis affects about one in five adults in the United States and costs tens of billions of dollars annually in direct health care spending. Despite its prevalence, there is no drug that can stop or reverse the disease. Current treatment focuses on pain relief, physical therapy and, in advanced cases, joint replacement surgery.

The new therapy targets a protein known as 15-PGDH, which increases in the body with age. The research team classifies it as a gerozyme, a type of enzyme that contributes to the gradual decline of tissue function over time. Previous work from the same group showed that rising levels of 15-PGDH weaken muscles with age. Blocking the protein restored muscle strength and endurance in older mice, while forcing young mice to produce it caused muscle loss.

Unlike muscle, bone or blood, cartilage does not rely on stem cells to repair itself. Instead, cartilage cells called chondrocytes can change their gene activity. By inhibiting 15-PGDH, researchers found that these cells reverted to a more youthful state and began producing healthy cartilage again.

“This is a new way of regenerating adult tissue, and it has significant clinical promise for treating arthritis due to aging or injury,” said Helen Blau, professor of microbiology and immunology at Stanford and a senior author of the study.

There are three main types of cartilage in the body. Elastic cartilage forms flexible structures like the outer ear. Fibrocartilage is tough and shock absorbing, found between spinal vertebrae. Hyaline cartilage, also called articular cartilage, is smooth and glossy and allows joints such as the knees, hips and shoulders to move with minimal friction. Osteoarthritis mainly affects this last type.

The disease develops when joints are stressed by aging, injury or excess weight. Chondrocytes begin releasing inflammatory molecules and breaking down collagen, the main structural protein of cartilage. As collagen is lost, cartilage thins and softens, leading to pain, swelling and stiffness. Articular cartilage rarely regenerates on its own, and attempts to find stem cells capable of rebuilding it have largely failed.

In the new study, researchers compared knee cartilage from young and old mice and found that levels of 15-PGDH roughly doubled with age. When older mice were treated with a drug that blocks the protein, either throughout the body or directly in the joint, their knee cartilage thickened and regained function. Importantly, the new tissue was true hyaline cartilage rather than weaker fibrocartilage.

The results were equally striking in injured joints. In mice with ligament injuries, repeated injections over four weeks sharply reduced the likelihood of developing arthritis. Untreated animals showed high levels of 15-PGDH and developed arthritis within weeks. Treated animals moved more normally and placed more weight on the injured limb.

Detailed analysis showed that the treatment shifted the balance of cartilage cells. Cells associated with inflammation and cartilage breakdown became less common, while cells responsible for producing healthy joint cartilage increased markedly. This change occurred without the involvement of stem cells.

When human osteoarthritic cartilage was treated in the laboratory for one week, similar changes were observed. Levels of harmful gene activity fell, and signs of cartilage regeneration appeared.

The findings are encouraging but still early. While safety trials of a 15-PGDH inhibitor for muscle weakness have shown promising results, clinical trials focused on cartilage regeneration have yet to begin. Even so, researchers are optimistic.

“Imagine regrowing existing cartilage and avoiding joint replacement,” Blau said. For millions living with joint pain and stiffness, that possibility now seems closer than ever.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Why is transparency underfunded?

Published

on

The RTI Commission has now confirmed what many suspected — although the RTI Act grants it independence to recruit staff, this authority is rendered toothless because the Treasury controls the purse strings. The Commission is left operating with inadequate manpower, limiting its institutional growth even as it struggles to meet rising public demand for information.

 This raises an uncomfortable question: if the Treasury can repeatedly allocate billions to loss-making State-Owned Enterprises — some of which continue to hemorrhage public funds without reform — why is adequate funding for the RTI Commission treated as optional?

 Strengthening transparency is not a luxury. It is the foundation of good governance. Every rupee spent on effective oversight helps prevent many more rupees being wasted through inefficiency, misuse, or opaque decision-making.

 In such a context, can one really fault those who argue that restricting the Commission’s resources conveniently limits disclosures that may prove politically inconvenient? Whether deliberate or not, the outcome is the same: weaker accountability, reduced public scrutiny, and a system where opacity is easier than openness.

 If the government is serious about reform, it must start by funding the institutions that keep it honest. Investing in RTI is not an expense — it is a safeguard for the public purse and the public trust.

A Concerned Citizen – Moratuwa

Continue Reading

Trending