Business
‘PUCSL electricity tariff revision is discriminatory’

Electricity tariff design must meet two main objectives: firstly, raising the money needed to pay for the costs of provision, and secondly, sending the right economic signals to each customer to favour the optimal socio-economic use of electricity.
To achieve the above objectives the principles that must be followed when designing tariffs are;
Economic sustainability or revenue sufficiency,
Equity or non-discrimination among users,
Economic efficiency in resource allocation, and
Transparency, simplicity, and stability of the methodology.
A well-defined and appropriate tariff structure must balance the financial sustainability of the sector on the one hand and the well-being of various segments of society on the other. The CEB’s tariff revisions seem to be mainly focused on the aspect of revenue sufficiency, ignoring the other aspects. As electricity is a commodity, there should be no difference in the prices charged to different users, except when reflecting any differences in the cost of providing services to different classes of users.
A differential tariff implies that some categories are subsidised leading to the question of who pays these subsidies. The current structure is such that households consuming an excess of 60 Kwh, and general purpose bulk supply users subsidise the industrial, hotel and charitable sectors.
Households that consume over 90 Kwh and general purpose bulk customers are charged a tariff that is double that of industries and hotels. With regards to hotels, in effect, domestic consumers subsidise foreign tourists. However, the differential tariff between general bulk supply and industrial/hotel users is meaningless. For example, a hall that hosts weddings and celebrations would be treated as a general bulk customer and be charged double the tariff that a hotel would be charged, even though both host similar events. A restaurant in a shopping mall would be charged as a general customer, but the same restaurant located within a hotel would enjoy a tariff half of that which a hotel incurs. While this differential existed under the previous tariff, it is made worse under the new structure; hotels faced a 10% increase in tariff while general users faced a 20% increase.
If the idea behind a lower tariff for hotels is to make the sector more competitive, then the solution is to address the causes of uncompetitiveness directly. One area is construction costs which raises the level of investment and the cost of maintenance. Protectionism for the domestic construction materials industry raises the costs of steel bars and rods, sanitary ware, aluminium extrusions, granite, electrical fittings, and carpets resulting in high overall construction cost. The effective protection granted on these items can exceed 200%; the savings in finance cost from a lower capital outlay would probably exceed the savings from a lower electricity tariff.
Economic value creation can take place in many different ways in an economy and the service sector is no less important than other sectors. The cross subsidisation between customers violates the equity or non-discrimination principle of a good tariff and discourages use by the overcharged and promotes overconsumption by the subsidised.
For example, the higher domestic tariff may serve as a disincentive for remote work. Remote or flexible work arrangements can reduce transport costs, congestion, energy use and for some, enable a better work/life balance. The government should be facilitating flexible work but the higher rates applicable to some domestic consumers may be a disincentive.
Economic activity is increasingly complex and a value chain can involve many different sectors. For example, the tea industry involves agriculture, processing in factories, transport, warehousing, blending, financing, marketing and exports. Moreover, products are now more knowledge intensive, so a greater part of the value addition arises in non-production-oriented components of the value chain. With differential tariffs, parts of the same value chain may pay different prices for use of the same commodity.
Further, a lower tariff to “industry” penalises new economy enterprises while promoting highly energy intensive users. This distorts resource allocation by encouraging excessive energy consumption, artificially promoting capital-intensive industries where the country may not have a clear comparative advantage. A subsidised tariff also blunts the incentive to economise.
The cost of supplying electricity fluctuates throughout the day, depending on the power generation mix, cost of fuels used, transmission costs and energy losses but as electricity storage is not economically viable, it has to be consumed whenever it is produced. Households with rooftop solar thus enjoy a subsidy. Domestic solar generation takes place in day time where the cost of generation is low but the import of electricity to the house takes place at night when the cost of generation is high. Offsetting units generated against units imported results in a subsidy because of the difference in costs between the two. Time of use metres should be mandated for all domestic users on net metering with the import/export being accounted for on the respective time of use tariff. Indeed all users who consume above 60 Kwh should move to the time of use tariff.
Should the government decide to subsidise the capital or operating costs to serve certain customer classes, it should do so directly from the budget and while a lifeline tariff for the poor is justified the high domestic users pay a tariff 7.4x that of the lowest. Not all households are the same size and an extended family living in a single house may face a much higher tariff although their income level may not differ greatly from the average.
The PUCSL should review tariffs to prevent the distortions highlighted above. Instead of cross-subsidies, the regulator should be working to reduce overall cost of the provision of electricity through better procurement and greater efficiency.
Treating all costs as a pass-through in computing the tariff is a mistake. The PUCSL needs to set efficiency targets in order to set fair and reasonable tariffs. The CEB should be incentivised to control its costs by specifying and enforcing performance requirements. Benchmarking CEB performance against regional and international peers to assess relative efficiency is necessary, as is consulting stakeholders on achievable efficiency targets.
Advocata is an independent policy think tank based in Colombo, Sri Lanka. We conduct research, provide commentary and hold events to promote sound policy ideas compatible with a free society in Sri Lanka. Visit advocata.org for more information.
Advocata spokespersons are available for live and pre-recorded broadcast interviews via 0774858401
CONTACT:
Subashini Kaneshwaren,
Senior Communications Executive, Advocata Institute
Email: subashini@advocata.org
Business
Russell’s Tea partners with Sri Lanka’s indigenous community

Allocates 4% of global sales for their socio-economic empowerment
Sri Lankan tea exporter Russell’s Tea (Pvt) Ltd achieved a historic milestone by signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to allocate 4% of its international sales revenue from ‘Russell’s Ceylon Ancestral Herbal Infusions’ toward the sustainable development of Sri Lanka’s indigenous community.
The company simultaneously launched five premium tea ranges—Ceylon Health and Wellness Teas, Ceylon Ancestral Herbal Infusions, Ceylon Fine Teas, Ceylon Organic Specialty Teas, and Ceylon Artisan Teas—to the global market, beginning with the UAE.
The MOU, formalizing the 4% revenue pledge, was signed by Russell’s Tea Director Jehan Perera and Vedda leader Uruwarige Wannila Aththo during a ceremony at Colombo’s Amari Hotel on Saturday. This agreement marks the first time the indigenous community will receive dollar-denominated compensation for sharing their ancestral knowledge of herbal remedies, which contributed to the development of Russell’s Ceylon Ancestral Herbal Infusions.
“Our R&D team drew significant inspiration from the Vedda community’s traditional wisdom on natural health benefits,” said Jehan Perera. “We believe it is our responsibility to reciprocate by supporting their socio-economic growth through this initiative.”
He added that the company plans to export the Community’s goods like wild honey in the future, further integrating the community into global markets.
Russell’s Tea has already secured partnerships with major UAE retailers, including the Lulu supermarket chain, with plans to expand across Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries and Europe. All products, targeting luxury and tourism sectors, will be available in leading supermarkets by late June.
Celebrating its 38th anniversary, Russell’s Tea founder Russell Perera reflected on the company’s evolution: “From pioneering Sri Lanka’s corporate outdoor catering service to becoming a forex-earning exporter, this global launch symbolizes our commitment to innovation and national progress,” he said.
By Hiran Senewiratne
Business
Shyam takes helm at Sunshine Holdings as nephew succeeds uncle Vish in leadership transition

Under a Colombo sunset at the Taj Samudra, laughter, applause, and celebratory toasts recently marked the farewell of Vish Govindasamy, who stepped down from his executive role at Sunshine Holdings PLC after 28 years of transformative leadership.
The event, attended by business leaders, Sunshine’s senior team, and industry stakeholders, honoured his legacy as he transitioned to the Non-Executive Deputy Chairman role, while his nephew, Shyam Sathasivam, assumed the Group CEO position—a testament to the family bond steering this corporate evolution.
Sunshine Holdings announced that Govindasamy would continue in advisory capacity to ensure strategic continuity.
Govindasamy’s tenure which began in 1997 as CEO of Watawala Plantations, saw the Group expand into healthcare, consumer goods, renewable energy and dairy, while launching iconic brands such as Zesta, Watawala Tea, and Ran Kahata as well as Healthguard Pharmacy. Under his stewardship, Sunshine forged partnerships with global giants such as Wilmar and SBI Japan, earned recognition among Asia’s Best Workplaces, and championed social impact through the Sunshine Foundation for Good.
Shyam Sathasivam, Govindasamy’s nephew and successor, joined Sunshine in 2005 and has been integral to its recent growth. Having collaborated closely with his uncle for nearly two decades, Shyam emphasised his commitment to upholding the Group’s purpose-driven ethos: “Mr. Govindasamy nurtured a vision that blends business with heart. I am honored to build on this legacy, ensuring we continue to care for all stakeholders,” he stated at the farewell event.
During his address, Govindasamy observed attendees dispersed across the room and humorously underscored his attention to detail by remarking, “I kindly request everyone to assemble closer to the stage—such nuances catch my eye, a testament to my micro-management tendencies.” The lighthearted comment drew laughter while reflecting his reputed dedication to organizational precision.
Then shifting to the matter at hand and reflecting on his journey, Govindasamy acknowledged the Group’s resilience through Sri Lanka’s civil war and economic crises, expressing confidence in his nephew’s leadership: “Sunshine’s future is bright under Shyam. Our shared values and his forward-thinking approach will drive new heights,” he said.
The transition underscores a unique fusion of family trust and corporate strategy, positioning Sunshine Holdings for its next chapter.
By Sanath Nanayakkare
Business
Union Assurance is redefining financial literacy in Sri Lanka

‘Blog It Symposium’
The ‘Blog It Symposium’ hosted by Union Assurance on March 27 at the BMICH, had drawn writers, students and professionals alongside literary giants like Ashok Ferrey. The event was less a corporate gathering and more a cultural movement, symbolising a quiet revolution in Sri Lanka’s journey toward financial empowerment.
Financial literacy, often confined to jargon-filled pamphlets or intimidating technical writeups, has found an unexpected ally in storytelling with Union Assurance’s Blog It initiative, launched years prior, which recognises a universal truth: people connect with stories, not statistics. By inviting bloggers and writers to explore themes like life insurance, savings, and generational wealth through personal narratives, the initiative transforms complex concepts into relatable tales. A mother’s account of securing her child’s education amid economic uncertainty, a young entrepreneur’s journey from debt to stability, or a retiree’s challenges in the rest of his or her life were the seeds of stories that resonated deeply with the writers in the audience especially because they are writing for a society whose financial planning is often overshadowed by day-to-day struggles.
Ashok Ferrey, the keynote speaker asked the audience,” Why do we write? “We write,” he suggested, “to express ourselves in ways that evade the rigid pathways of ordinary consciousness.” Imagine, he said, slipping into a disguise to go to a fancy dress party; that lets you be someone else. Writing, in Ferrey’s vision, operates similarly—it is a costume party for the psyche. “When we write, we shed the constraints of our daylight selves. The keyboard or pen becomes a mirror that reflects not who we are, but who we might invent,” he said.
“These aren’t just blogs,” remarked Lal Medawattegedara, novelist and symposium panelist. “They’re survival guides written in the language of the people.”
Rather than lecturing, Union Assurance has created a platform for dialogue. Winning entries, published in newspapers and shared across social media, turns anonymous writers into local influencers. A gem merchant from Ratnapura, whose blog on gem buying and selling would go viral, encouraging young people in the area to follow suit. A Colombo college student’s poem about her family’s medical debt would inspire a community savings drive. “Financial literacy isn’t about telling people what to do,” said Union Assurance CMO Mahen Gunarathna. “It’s about giving them the tools to write their own futures.”
As the 2025 symposium concluded, the message was clear: financial literacy is not a solo journey but a shared narrative.
In a world where money talks, Union Assurance has mastered a profound lesson: sometimes, the most powerful currency is a story well told. Sri Lankans are not just learning about finances—they’re rewriting their financial destinies with the support of Union Assurance.
By Sanath Nanayakkare
-
Sports2 days ago
Sri Lanka’s eternal search for the elusive all-rounder
-
Features6 days ago
Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence: The Silver Jubilee of SLIIT – PART I
-
Business6 days ago
CEB calls for proposals to develop two 50MW wind farm facilities in Mullikulam
-
Business4 days ago
AIA Higher Education Scholarships Programme celebrating 30-year journey
-
News3 days ago
Gnanasara Thera urged to reveal masterminds behind Easter Sunday terror attacks
-
Features6 days ago
Notes from AKD’s Textbook
-
News2 days ago
ComBank crowned Global Finance Best SME Bank in Sri Lanka for 3rd successive year
-
Features2 days ago
Sanctions by The Unpunished