News
Protest outside Chambers of Saliya Pieris: BASL asks for IGP’s intervention
Trouble erupts on eve of Kaushalya’s appointment as new head
Outgoing President of Bar Association Saliya Pieris, PC, yesterday (24) said that attempts were being made to intimidate him over the stand he took on a number of contentious issues including the appointment of the new IGP.
Pieris said so in response to The Island queries in the wake of protest outside his chambers yesterday. The BASL Chief questioned the attacks directed at him from Parliament. Protest was launched on the eve of the induction of new BASL President Kaushalya Nawaratne by Attorney General Sanjay Rajaratnam. The induction ceremony will be held today (25)
The following is the text of the letter sent by Anura Meddegoda, PC, Deputy President, BASL and Isuru Balapatabendi, Secretary, BASL to IGP C. D. Wickramaratne:We write with reference to an organised protest outside the chamber of Saliya Pieris, President of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka.
We have been made aware the said protest relates to Pieris conducting his professional duties with regard to a particular client. We are of the view the said protest seriously hinders his right to represent a client, a professional right which has been safeguarded by law.
In the case of Wijesundara Mudiyanselage Naveen Nayantha Bandara Wijesundara v Sirwardena and Others (SCFR 13/2019), the Supreme Court observed that: “The first piece of legislation passed by the Parliament soon after the promulgation of the 1978 Constitution was the Judicature Act No. 02 of 1978. As the administration of justice in any civilised society cannot be effectively implemented without lawyers, the legislature in its wisdom, through the Judicature Act, established the legal profession. Thus, there is no dispute that the legal profession is a sine qua non for the due administration of justice in this country and for that matter in any civilized society. The said profession is essential for the maintenance of the Rule of Law and maintenance of law and order and its due existence is of paramount importance to the organised functioning of the society which is primarily the basis for the smooth functioning of the country as a whole.”
Further, Section 41 of the Judicature Act which has clearly set out the right of representation, and, has further shed light on the above mechanism established for implementing the administration of justice in the country.It is as follows; Section 41 of the Judicature Act (Right of Representation) (1) Every attorney-at-law shall be entitled to assist and advise clients and to appear, plead or act in every court or other institution established by law for the administration of justice and every person who is a party to or has or claims to have the right to be heard in any proceeding in any such court or other such institution shall be entitled to be represented by an attorney-at-law.
(2) Every person who is a party to any proceeding before any person or tribunal exercising quasi-judicial powers and every person who has or claims to have the right to be heard before any such person or tribunal shall unless otherwise”
Therefore, we strongly demand that you take action to ensure that Mr. Peiris’s professional duties as an Attorney-at-law, are not hindered and to ensure his safety. Thanking you, Yours faithfully,Referring to a spate of allegations made by a former airman Keerthi Ratnayake in an interview with Chamuditha Samarawickremaon a social media platform, Pieris said that there was no basis for such claims.
Pieris said that interested parties were trying to exploit his appearance for Nandun Chintaka who was recently brought from Madagaskar to sling mud at him.The PC said: “I was retained by Attorney-at-Law Sanjaya Ariyadasa to appear for a Writ application on the police to ensure this suspect Nadun’s safety after his arrest . I have had no other involvement in his cases. I have not visited Dubai for the last 15 years as claimed by Keerthi Ratnayake in the video.
No lawyer from my chambers travelled to Madagascar or Dubai. Also I have never appeared for Vele Suda as claimed. Of course I do appear for criminal suspects and that’s my profession. I have never had calls from Podi Lassie from prison or detention.I have not visited the CID in the last 25 years and so his claim that I take a million rupees per visit is absolutely false as is his claim about the amount of fees I take for a case.
But also I want to say that as a criminal lawyer I am bound to appear for clients and in that process I don’t look at their credentials. It’s like a doctor who has to treat a patient whoever he is. Also it is the right of a suspect to counsel and also right to be protected while in custody.
In Parliament they are attacking me because they are angry over my letters on the judiciary and the IGP appointment. Also this attack is because of the work I have done over the last two years to stop police killings and my work relating to the protests including appearing for IUSF (Inter University Students’ Federation) Convener Wasantha Mudalige.Chamuditha has an axe to grind. I have repeatedly refused to give him an interview. This is from the time of my election campaign. We had information that he had been bought over by the other side. I also dislike his sensationalising stuff so I have repeatedly refused his requests.”
News
Padikkal fifty, Sudeera five-for before India A, Sri Lanka A settle for draw
Devdutt Padikkal’s half-century and left-arm spinner Dilum Sudeera’s five-wicket haul were the highlights on day four as the first unofficial Test between India A and Sri Lanka A petered to a draw.
India A declared for the second time in the game after setting Sri Lanka A a target north of 300, but were only able to take two wickets in the 15 overs they managed to get in.
India began the day on 48 for no loss and a lead of 170, although B Sai Sudharsan had retired hurt on the third day. Padikkal and Aayush Pandey added 42 runs on the fourth morning before Sudeera removed the latter for 38 for his first wicket. Two balls later, Ravindu Fernando trapped Ruturaj Gaikwad for 1 off 2.
Padikkal went on to make 67 in a knock laced with five boundaries before Sudeera struck in consecutive overs to remove him and Jurel. Shaik Rasheed and Harsh Dubey then added 47 runs for the fifth wicket before Dubey was caught behind off Chamika Gunasekara. Sudeera then snared Rasheed, Saransh Jain and Auqib Nabi in the next over, when India A decided to declare 311 runs ahead. Sudharsan did not return to bat for India A.
Sri Lanka A’s openers had brisk and solid start, but it slightly came apart when Nabi cleaned up Pawantha Weerasinghe for 20 off 19 in the fifth over and Dubey trapped Niroshan Dickwella lbw.
Nuwanidu Fernando and Ashen Bandara then saw the day out, with India A unable to inflict any further damage.
Scores:
India A 452 for 6 dec in 111.4 overs (Sai Sudharsan 132, Dhruv Jurel 141*, Shaik Rasheed 63; Chamika Gunasekara 3-84, Dilum Sudeera 2-143) and 189 for 8 dec in 57 overs (Devdutt Padikkal 67; Dilum Sudeera 5-49) vs Sri Lanka A 330 in 101.4 overs (Nuwanidu Fernando 84, Ashen Bandara 70, Sahan Arachchige 72; Auqib Nabi 4-58) and 70 for 2 (Pawantha Weerasinghe 20; Auqib Nabi 1-18, Harsh Dubey 1-25). Match ended in a draw

Dilum Sudeera captured five wickets [Cricinfo]
[Cricinfo]
News
LAWASIA warns against ad hoc initiative to increase judges’ retirement ages
The Law Association for Asia and the Pacific (LAWASIA) has backed the campaign by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka against the government’s effort’s to extend the retirement ages of judges of the Superior Courts.
T.L Yap, President of LAWASIA, in a statement dated 26 June, has expressed concern over the NPP government’s move in the wake of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s recent statement in Parliament on the delay in making the appointments.
The text of the statement: “LAWASIA shares the concern expressed by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) on 25th May 2026 in a letter to His Excellency the President of Sri Lanka regarding the prospect of the Government of Sri Lanka introducing an amendment to the Constitution which would increase the retirement age of the Judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.
LAWASIA supports the sentiments expressed by BASL in its letter of 25 May, namely: “Extending the retirement age of the sitting Judges of these Courts at this point of time is likely to be viewed by the public as a blatant attempt to interfere with the judiciary… The independence of the Judiciary and the public confidence reposed in it, are indispensable pillars of the rule of law and the democratic framework of (Sri Lanka).
In that regard it is of paramount importance that the Judiciary must not only remain independent in fact but also must be seen by the public to be wholly independent, impartial, and free from even the slightest perception of influence, favour, accommodation, or impropriety”
The Constitution of Sri Lanka recognizes the independence of the judiciary and its importance in preserving and maintaining the rule of law. The retirement age of senior judges is presently fixed by Article 107(5) of the Constitution. Constitutional amendment in any jurisdiction is a serious matter which must not be undertaken lightly. LAWASIA’s principal concern is that the proposed constitutional amendment has the appearance of an ad hoc initiative without adequate public consultation. This in turn has the potential to undermine public confidence in the judiciary.
An independent, competent and respected judiciary is the cornerstone of any democracy. LAWASIA has long advocated the fundamental importance of this principle.
The essence of LAWASIA’s formal position in relation to the independence of the judiciary lies in the Beijing Statement of Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary in the LAWASIA Region, adopted at the Conference of Chief Justices held in Beijing in 1997 and subsequently signed by 32 Chief Justices from across the Asia-Pacific.
The Beijing Statement in essence emphasizes the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, and comments on a range of related issues including the objectives of the judiciary, the appointment of judges, the tenure of judges, judicial conditions and the relationship between the judiciary and the executive.
Endorsing the concerns raised by another international organization, the Commonwealth Lawyers Association, LAWASIA accordingly calls upon the authorities in Sri Lanka to:
• refrain from proceeding with the proposed constitutional amendments seeking to increase the
retirement age of members of the Judiciary;
• resist piecemeal and ad hoc amendments to the Constitution of Sri Lanka.
• adhere to due process of consultation and stakeholder engagement in constitutional reform;
• desist from taking any steps which would undermine confidence in the Judiciary and
irreparably diminish the independence of the judiciary; and
• ensure adherence to the rule of law and respect for the independence of the judiciary.
News
Countrywide drug bust:7, 300 youths arrested
A total of 7,300 young people, below the age of 21, had been arrested on suspicion since the launch of the nationwide ‘Ratama Ekata’ anti-drug operation, DIG in charge of the Police Narcotics Bureau, Ashoka Dharmasena, told The Island yesterday.
DIG Dharmasena said the suspects included about 150 females under the age of 21. He added that more than 214,000 suspects had been taken into custody since the commencement of the national anti-narcotics operation.
The operation was launched with the primary objectives of disrupting the supply of narcotics across the country, reducing the demand for illegal drugs and rehabilitating those addicted to narcotic substances, he said.
DIG Dharmasena said law enforcement authorities had so far seized more than 15,000 kilogrammes of narcotics, including cannabis, during the ongoing operation.
He also noted that police had achieved considerable success in intercepting narcotics smuggled into the country by sea, contributing significantly to efforts to curb the illicit drug trade.
The Police Narcotics Bureau said the nationwide operation would continue as part of the government’s broader strategy to dismantle drug trafficking networks and minimise the social impact of narcotics.
by Norman Palihawadane ✍️
-
Opinion6 days agoRanasinghe Premadasa: The man who would not take ‘No’ for an answer
-
News2 days agoAnother 1,132 Sri Lankan Personnel to be deployed for United Nations Peacekeeping Missions
-
Opinion5 days agoSri Lanka’s national security: Justice, reconciliation, and forward-looking vigilance
-
News6 days agoUS Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs meets President
-
News3 days agoKelaniya emerges as highest ranked Lankan uni in Times Higher Education Sustainability Impact Ratings
-
Opinion4 days agoA triumph for Pakistan’s skilled diplomacy at Iran-US talks
-
Editorial6 days agoFCID’s big catch
-
Features5 days agoUS-Iran war, global exchange rates and Sri Lankan Rupee
