Connect with us

Features

Pope and Trump

Published

on

Pope Francis

One, a holy, kind and well – respected man and the other an arrogant man described as a liar, a cheat and a womaniser. Both are world leaders but in very different ways. For a start, the above two photos show the vast difference between them. One a genuine photo showing a smiling and happy Pope and the other a doctored photo, showing an angry and threatening President. Trump joked that he would “like to be Pope” and then out of the blue he posted the above photo on Twitter (X). This irreverent posting, which was in very poor taste drew instant outrage and condemnation from all over the world. This act alone shows the terrible calibre of the man.

The Pope is the spiritual leader of 1.4 billion Catholics in the world. Francis lived in a modest guest house instead of the traditional Papal apartments and he was totally focused on humility and simplicity. He often spoke about social justice, inequality and the marginalised in the world. He also called for global action on climate change and promoted improved relations with other religions including Islam and Judaism. His criticism of free market economics and siding with the left prompted claims that he was a communist. He even said, “It is the communists who think like Christians”. He called capitalism a source of inequality at best and at worst a killer. It is shocking how things have changed in the Catholic church. One of his predecessors, Pope John Paul the second, is widely credited with playing a significant part along with Ronald Reagan and Margret Thatcher in bringing down communism in Eastern Europe. One Pope brings communism down and another wants to embrace it. While Francis’ behaviour and statements were progressive, kind and loving, it is doubtful whether they had a significant impact on any of the causes he was championing. He had no armies to fight and he cannot fix tariffs like Trump does. He could only preach but his preaching seems to fall in deaf ears.

On the other hand, Trump, a convicted felon is the ultimate capitalist, and almost everything he does as president affects the whole world. Before the election he said he will stop the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, in 24 hours after his election. When asked why this has not happened yet, he said he was joking. Similarly, he had to backtrack on many hasty decisions such as increased tariffs, annexing Canada, Greenland and Panama. His approval rating has fallen to historic lows and his arrogance seems to have no bounds. His deeds during the first 100 days are well documented and there is no need to repeat them here.

The US has always been a violent country. The genocide of the native Americans, Slavery and its associated cruelty, the civil war and wars with Mexico, Spain and the Philippines are some examples of the violent past. The US has 750 military bases in 80 countries around the world. The CIA was instrumental in effecting 100 regime changes around the world since 1947. Three million people were killed in Vietnam, a war initiated by the US. In the September 11, 2001 Twin Towers attacks, 3,000 people were killed in the US but in anger US bombed Afghanistan killing 15,000 people. They went to Iraq looking for WMDs and did not find any but killed a million Iraqis during the war and its aftermath. With this background and the power Trump wields, what he can do are obvious as he seems to ignore all the checks and balances built into the U.S. constitution. When he is done with the tariffs, immigration, education and DOGE, the US and the world are going to be different places.

The first Pope was St Peter the Apostle, appointed by Jesus 2,000 years ago. There has been a succession of Popes since then. While many popes are remembered for their holiness, reform, or leadership, a number have been widely regarded as morally corrupt, politically manipulative, or deeply scandalous. For example, Pope John XII (955CE – 964CE) became pope at 18 and is accused of conducting orgies, murder, incest and blasphemy. Pope Stephen VI (896CE – 897CE) exhumed the corpse of his predecessor, Pope Formosus, and put it on trial, dressed the body in papal robes, interrogated it, and declared it guilty, had the body stripped, mutilated, and thrown into the Tiber River. There were several such popes involved in weird behaviour and sexual and financial crimes.

During the early 1500s, the Vatican was financially broke and deeply in debt, largely due to lavish spending by the popes, expensive wars, and the ambitious project of rebuilding St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome. At that time, the Papal courts resembled princely courts — with banquets, art commissions, and luxurious lifestyles. To raise funds, the Church intensified the sale of indulgences. Indulgences were certificates sold by the Church that promised to reduce time in purgatory for sins already forgiven, a controversial practice that became one of the primary triggers of the Protestant Reformation.

The biggest fraud of them all was the “Donation of Constantine”, one of the famous forgeries in Western history. It was a letter, an imperial decree, supposedly written by Emperor Constantine the Great (306CE-337 CE), in which he transferred authority over Rome and the western part of the Roman Empire to Pope Sylvester I and his successors. The document claimed Constantine was healed of leprosy by Pope Sylvester and converted to Christianity and was baptized by Sylvester.

It was claimed that out of gratitude Constantine made this donation. The document served to Justify papal claims to political authority over Rome and parts of Europe and support the idea that the pope had supremacy over secular rulers, including emperors and kings. In the 15th century, Lorenzo Valla, a humanist and Catholic priest, proved the donation was a forgery. Even after it was exposed, the Church took centuries to fully distance itself from the document.

Today, the Catholic Church does not recognise it as legitimate. However, the Church benefited enormously from it for many centuries. For example, the first European colonisers Spain and Portugal had to seek and receive Papal approval for their overseas conquests. The Catholic Church often shared in the spoils of colonization, both materially and institutionally, through its close partnership with European colonial powers like Spain and Portugal. While the Church’s stated goal was the conversion of indigenous peoples, in practice it gained wealth, land, influence, and power from the colonial enterprise. One has only to visit the Vatican Museum to learn the scale of plunder. There are two large churches in Rome with Gold ceilings – not gold plated.

Trump depicted as the Pope in an AI-generated image

Christianity owes its popularity to Emperor Constantine who, mainly for political reasons, ended the prosecution of Christians and legalised Christianity in the Roman empire in 313 BCE through the Edict of Milan. In 380 BCE, Christianity was made the official religion of the empire. This made Christianity spread through the vast western Roman empire. The countries of the West were the colonisers of the world and they spread Christianity throughout their colonies. Now the largest Catholic populations are not in Europe but in places like Brazil, Philippines or the Democratic Republic of Congo, the result of colonisation.

The Catholic church and its papacy have a terribly violent past. The western countries claim that their civilisation is based on Judeo Christian values. Lord Jesus Christ, when asked what his commandments were, said “love god with all your heart and love your neighbour as yourself.” However, there was no love in what the West did to the world and its innocent people during colonisation – massacres, hangings, torture, rape, plunder, famines and murder.

The first colonizers, Portugal and Spain had to seek and obtain papal sanction for their conquests which of course were granted. The Pope also issued the “Doctrine of Discovery” which allowed Spain and Portugal to seize lands and subjugate people on the seized lands if they were not Christian. The pope is also responsible for millions of deaths that occurred during events like the Crusades (1096–1291), The Inquisitions (12th–19th centuries) or the 30 Years’ War (1618–1648), where Catholics and Protestants massacred each other across Europe. While the Catholic Church has also been a force for art, education, healthcare, and spiritual guidance, its history is stained with violence and oppression tied to power — not the Gospel of love it professes.

Now, within the church, the fire for violence is gone. It is all about love, which is good. Pope Francis said that there is no hell but the suffering for sinners is the absence of God. He also tried to mellow down laws against remarried divorcees and same sex couples but faced tremendous opposition to these within the church. His opponents claim that God’s word cannot be changed just because it is the right thing to do. The Vatican Bank has been involved in money laundering, connections to organised crime, fraud and property investment scandals and the Pope has been unable to control any of these except putting the man in charge, Cardinal Becciu in jail. So, the Pope is unable to change things within his own church leave alone making a difference in the world. His fine words of love and tolerance seem to fall on deaf ears and war, hunger, cruelty, genocide seem to go on unabated.

On the other hand, Trump’s actions have consequences for the whole world. Just imagine his plan of chasing all the Palestinians from Gaza and making it a US controlled Riviera. To achieve this, he keeps funding the genocidal Israel. He can make or break the world. There are many crazy things he is proposing to do. It is difficult to imagine what the world would be at the end of his term. One hopes it would be a better place with minimal damage done.

Then there is this big question – why did Trump attend Pope Francis’ funeral. It was his first trip overseas after the election. Their ideas were diametrically opposite. Was it a case of paying respect to a world leader, even though they did not agree on many things or was it a case of political point scoring. We will never know.

The institutions headed by both gentlemen have violent and terrible histories. However, one has mellowed and is promoting love and peace in the world for which we are happy and thankful. The other, while talking about peace, fuels wars in Gaza and Ukraine and is involved in many such activities. Trump is converting the USA from a country whose government Abraham Lincoln said was “of the people, by the people and for the people” to “of the rich, by the rich and for the rich”. What affect all this will have on us, only time can tell.

by Remy Jayasekere ✍️



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Cricket and the National Interest

Published

on

The appointment of former minister Eran Wickremaratne to chair the Sri Lanka Cricket Transformation Committee is significant for more than the future of cricket. It signals a possible shift in the culture of governance even as it offers Sri Lankan cricket a fighting possibility to get out of the doldrums of failure. There have been glorious patches for the national cricket team since the epochal 1996 World Cup triumph. But these patches of brightness have been few and far between and virtually non-existent over the past decade. At the centre of this disaster has been the failures of governance within Sri Lanka Cricket which are not unlike the larger failures of governance within the country itself. The appointment of a new reform oriented committee therefore carries significance beyond cricket. It reflects the wider challenge facing the country which is to restore trust in public institutions for better management.

The appointment of Eran Wickremaratne brings a professional administrator with a proven track record into the cricket arena. He has several strengths that many of his immediate predecessors lacked. Before the ascent of the present government leadership to positions of power, Eran Wickremaratne was among the handful of government ministers who did not have allegations of corruption attached to their names. His reputation for financial professionalism and integrity has remained intact over many years in public life. With him in the Cricket Transformation Committee are also respected former cricketers Kumar Sangakkara, Roshan Mahanama and Sidath Wettimuny together with professionals from legal and business backgrounds. They have been tasked with introducing structural reforms and improving transparency and accountability within cricket administration.

A second reason for this appointment to be significant is that this is possibly the first occasion on which the NPP government has reached out to someone associated with the opposition to obtain assistance in an area of national importance. The commitment to bipartisanship has been a constant demand from politically non-partisan civic groups and political analysts. They have voiced the opinion that the government needs to be more inclusive in its choice of appointments to decision making authorities. The NPP government’s practice so far has largely been to limit appointments to those within the ruling party or those considered loyalists even at the cost of proven expertise. The government’s decision in this case therefore marks a potentially important departure.

National Interest

There are areas of public life where national interest should transcend party divisions and cricket, beloved of the people, is one of them. Sri Lanka cannot afford to continue treating every institution as an arena for political competition when institutions themselves are in crisis and public confidence has become fragile. It is therefore unfortunate that when the government has moved positively in the direction of drawing on expertise from outside its own ranks there should be a negative response from sections of the opposition. This is indicative of the absence of a culture of bipartisanship even on issues that concern the national interest. The SJB, of which the newly appointed cricket committee chairman was a member objected on the grounds that politicians should not hold positions in sports administration and asked him to resign from the party. There is a need to recognise the distinction between partisan political control and the temporary use of experienced administrators to carry out reform and institutional restructuring. In other countries those in politics often join academia and civil society on a temporary basis and vice versa.

More disturbing has been the insidious campaign carried out against the new cricket committee and its chairman on the grounds of religious affiliation. This is an unacceptable denial of the reality that Sri Lanka is a plural, multi ethnic and multi religious society. The interim committee reflects this diversity to a reasonable extent. The country’s long history of ethnic conflict should have taught all political actors the dangers of mobilising communal prejudice for short term political gain. Sri Lanka paid a very heavy price for decades of mistrust and division. It would be tragic if even cricket administration became another arena for communal suspicion and hostility. The present government represents an important departure from the sectarian rhetoric that was employed by previous governments. They have repeatedly pledged to protect the equal rights of all citizens and not permit discrimination or extremism in any form.

The recent international peace march in Sri Lanka led by the Venerable Bhikkhu Thich Paññākāra from Vietnam with its message of loving kindness and mindfulness to all resonated strongly with the masses of people as seen by the crowds who thronged the roadsides to obtain blessings and show respect. This message stands in contrast to the sectarian resentment manifested by those who seek to use the cricket appointments as a weapon to attack the government at the present time. The challenges before the Sri Lanka Cricket Transformation Committee parallel the larger challenges before the government in developing the national economy and respecting ethnic and religious diversity. Plugging the leaks and restoring systems will take time and effort. It cannot be done overnight and it cannot succeed without public patience and support.

New Recognition

There is also a need for realism. The appointment of Eran Wickremaratne and the new committee does not guarantee success. Reforming deeply flawed institutions is always difficult. Besides, Sri Lanka is a small country with a relatively small population compared to many other cricket playing nations. It is also a country still recovering from the economic breakdown of 2022 which pushed the majority of people into hardship and severely weakened public institutions. The country continues to face unprecedented challenges including the damage caused by Cyclone Ditwah and the wider global economic uncertainties linked to conflict in the Middle East. Under these difficult circumstances Sri Lanka has fewer resources than many larger countries to devote to both cricket and economic development.

When resources are scarce they cannot be wasted through corruption or incompetence. Drawing upon the strengths of all those who are competent for the tasks at hand regardless of party affiliation or ethnic or religious identity is necessary if improvement is to come sooner rather than later. The burden of rebuilding the country cannot rest only on the government. The crisis facing the country is too deep for any single party or government to solve alone. National recovery requires capable individuals from across society and from different sectors such as business and civil society to work together in areas where the national interest transcends party politics. There is also a responsibility on opposition political parties to support initiatives that are politically neutral and genuinely in the national interest. Not every issue needs to become a partisan battle.

Sri Lanka cricket occupies a special place in the national consciousness. At its best it once united the country and gave Sri Lankans a sense of pride and international recognition. Restoring integrity and professionalism to cricket administration can therefore become part of the larger task of national renewal. The appointment of Eran Wickremaratne and the new committee, while it does not guarantee success, is a sign that the political leadership and people of the country may be beginning to mature in their approach to governance. In recognising the need for competence, integrity and bipartisan cooperation and extending it beyond cricket into other areas of national life, Sri Lanka may find the way towards more stable and successful governance..

by Jehan Perera

Continue Reading

Features

From Dhaka to Sri Lanka, three wheels that drive our economies

Published

on

Court vacation this year came with an unexpected lesson, not from a courtroom but from the streets of Dhaka — a city that moves, quite literally, on three wheels.

Above the traffic, a modern metro line glides past concrete pillars and crowded rooftops. It is efficient, clean and frequently cited as a symbol of progress in Bangladesh. For a visitor from Sri Lanka, it inevitably brings to mind our own abandoned light rail plans — a project debated, politicised and ultimately set aside.

But Dhaka’s real story is not in the air. It is on the ground.

Beneath the elevated tracks, the streets belong to three-wheelers. Known locally as CNGs, they cluster at junctions, line the edges of markets and pour into narrow roads that larger vehicles avoid. Even with a functioning rail system, these three-wheelers remain the city’s most dependable form of everyday transport.

Within hours of arriving, their importance becomes obvious. The train may take you across the city, but the journey does not end there. The last mile — often the most complicated part — belongs entirely to the three-wheeler. It is the vehicle that gets you home, to a meeting or simply through streets that no bus route properly serves.

There is a rhythm to using them. A destination is mentioned, a price is suggested and a brief negotiation follows. Then the ride begins, edging into traffic that feels permanently compressed. Drivers move with instinct, adjusting routes and squeezing through gaps with a confidence built over years.

It is not polished. But it works.

And that is where the comparison with Sri Lanka becomes less about what we lack and more about what we already have.

Back home, the three-wheeler has long been part of daily life — so familiar that it is often discussed only in terms of its problems. There are frequent complaints about fares, refusals or the absence of meters. More recently, the industry itself has become entangled in politics — from fuel subsidies to regulatory debates, from election-time promises to periodic crackdowns.

In that process, the conversation has shifted. The three-wheeler is often treated as a problem to be managed, rather than a service to be strengthened.

Yet, seen through the experience of Dhaka, Sri Lanka’s system begins to look far more settled — and, in many ways, ahead.

There is a growing structure in place. Meters, while not perfect, are widely recognised. Ride-hailing apps have added transparency and reduced uncertainty for passengers. There are clearer expectations on both sides — driver and commuter alike. Even small details, such as designated parking areas in parts of Colombo or the increasing standard of vehicles, point to an industry slowly moving towards professionalism.

Just as importantly, there is a human element that remains intact.

In Sri Lanka, a three-wheeler ride is rarely just a transaction. Drivers talk. They offer directions, comment on the day’s news, or share local knowledge. The ride becomes part of the social fabric, not just a means of getting from one point to another.

In Dhaka, the scale of the city leaves less room for that. The interaction is quicker, more direct, shaped by urgency. The service is essential, but it is under constant pressure.

What stands out, across both countries, is that the three-wheeler is not a temporary or outdated mode of transport. It is a necessity in dense, fast-growing Asian cities — one that fills gaps no rail or bus system can fully address.

Large infrastructure projects, like light rail, are important. They bring efficiency and long-term capacity. But they cannot replace the flexibility of a three-wheeler. They cannot reach into narrow streets, respond instantly to demand or provide that crucial last-mile connection.

That is why, even in a city that has invested heavily in modern rail, Dhaka still runs on three wheels.

For Sri Lanka, the lesson is not simply about what could have been built, but about what should be better managed and valued.

The three-wheeler industry does not need to be politicised at every turn. It needs steady regulation — clear fare systems, proper licensing, safety standards — alongside encouragement and recognition. It needs to be seen as part of the solution to urban transport, not as a side issue.

Because for thousands of drivers, it is a livelihood. And for millions of passengers, it is the most immediate and reliable form of mobility.

The tuk-tuk may not feature in grand policy speeches or infrastructure blueprints. It does not run on elevated tracks or attract international attention. But on the ground, where daily life unfolds, it continues to do what larger systems often struggle to do — show up, adapt and keep moving.

And after watching Dhaka’s streets — crowded, relentless, yet functioning — that small, three-wheeled vehicle feels less like something to argue over and more like something to get right.

(The writer is an Attorney-at-Law with over a decade of experience specialising in civil law, a former Board Member of the Office of Missing Persons and a former Legal Director of the Central Cultural Fund. He holds an LLM in International Business Law)

 

by Sampath Perera recently in Dhaka, Bangladesh 

Continue Reading

Features

Dubai scene … opening up

Published

on

Seven Notes: Operating in Dubai

According to reports coming my way, the entertainment scene, in Dubai, is very much opening up, and buzzing again!

After a quieter few months, May is packed with entertainment and the whole scene, they say, is shifting back into full swing.

The Seven Notes band, made up of Sri Lankans, based in Dubai, are back in the spotlight, after a short hiatus, due to the ongoing Middle East problems.

On 18th April they did Legends Night at Mercure Hotel Dubai Barsha Heights; on Thursday, 9th May, they will be at the Sports Bar of the Mercure Hotel for 70s/80s Retro Night; on 6th June, they will be at Al Jadaf Dubai to provide the music for Sandun Perera live in concert … and with more dates to follow.

These events are expected to showcase the band’s evolving sound, tighter stage coordination, and stronger audience engagement.

With each performance, the band aims to refine its identity and build a loyal following within Dubai’s vibrant nightlife and event scene.

Pasindu Umayanga: The group’s new vocalist

What makes Seven Notes standout is their versatility which has made the band a dynamic and promising act.

With a growing performance calendar, new talent integration, and international ambitions, the band is definitely entering a defining phase of its journey.

Dubai’s music industry, I’m told, thrives on diversity, energy, and audience connection, with live bands playing a crucial role in elevating events—from corporate shows to private concerts. Against this backdrop, Seven Notes is positioning itself not just as another band, but as a performance-driven musical unit focused on consistency and growth.

Adding fresh momentum to the group is Pasindu Umayanga who joins Seven Notes as their new vocalist. This move signals a strategic upgrade—not just filling a role, but strengthening the band’s front-line presence.

Looking beyond local stages, Seven Notes is preparing for an international tour, to Korea, in July.

Bassist Niluk Uswaththa: Spokesperson for Seven Notes

According to bassist Niluk Uswaththa, taking a band abroad means: Your sound must hold up against unfamiliar audiences, your performance must translate beyond language, and your discipline must be at a professional level.

“If executed well, this tour could redefine Seven Notes from a local band into an emerging international act,” added Niluk.

He went on to say that Dubai is not an easy market. It’s saturated with highly experienced, multi-genre bands that can adapt instantly to any crowd.

“To stand out consistently you need to have tight rehearsal discipline, unique sound identity (not just covers), strong stage chemistry, audience retention – not just applause.”

No doubt, Seven Notes is entering a critical growth phase—new member, multiple shows, and an international tour on the horizon. The opportunity is real, but so is the pressure.

However, there is talk that Seven Notes will soon be a recognised name in the regional music scene.

Continue Reading

Trending