Features
Pakistan and Imran Khan
The recent elections in Pakistan have been followed by me as similarities are marked between that country and ours. Imran Khan has long been a much admired and respected person about whom I have read much.
As I write this article on Thursday February 15, it looks as if there has been no great system change in the country though voters definitely voted for such, giving the highest number of votes to those who presented themselves as independent candidates but were of Imran Khan’s political party – Tehreek-e-Insaf or P.T.I.
A decision has been made to form a coalition government approved by the military of Nawaz Sharif’s PML-N and the PPI led by Asif Ali Zardari and his son Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, son of Benazir Bhutto. The Prime Minister will be Nawaz Sharif’s younger brother Shehbaz Sharif, not Bilawal Zardari 35, Chair of the PPP at 17 when his mother died and recently Minister of Foreign Affairs. The probable PM is a rich businessman dealing in steel.
Loyalists of Khan, like him, are strongly against the army and thus the jubilation at having won most seats – 91 against the PML-N’s 76 and PPP’s 54 of a total of 265 parliamentary seats. Military power seems to have prevailed again and will not give in easily to a more democratic government. P.T.I, loyalists have accused the army of massive vote rigging. Thus either Khan and his wife will remain in prison and have to serve their terms or chaos will result.
One never knows how the situation will be in Pakistan come Sunday February 18 when you read this column. (References: Imran Khan’s opponents reach deal to shut his allies out of government by Salman Masood and Christina Goldbaum, and other articles in the NYT of February 14)
Social media plays role
It is now well known that when Pakistan’s before-elections government censored media, Imran Khan’s party posted campaign videos on TikTok, and when their party rallies were banned, they hosted virtual gatherings with speeches by Imran Khan behind bars, simulated and broadcast using artificial intelligence. The county’s generals fell out with Khan as PM, who refused to be dictated to by the all-powerful army, and was ousted from Parliament in 2022. Authorities brought more than a dozen charges against Khan and imprisoned him.
One accusation was that he released state classified information. He and his wife, religious Bibi were imprisoned. The Elections Commission stated that the P.T.I had not been properly registered and thus banned candidates of the party with its symbol of a cricket bat, from contesting. Thus the large number of independent candidates of the P.T.I. who won in the February 8 elections.
Comparison
The obvious dissimilarities between Pakistan and Sri Lanka are size and population. To Pakistan’s population of 240m ours is 22; a glance at a map shows how small our land is compared to Pakistan. We are overall a more literate and educated populace of a more secular country with women not controlled or heavily discriminated against.
The most significant is that Pakistan has for most of its existence been under the military either directly or indirectly with even fairly democratically governments controlled by the military. It has gone through several military coups; our history registers but one failed – that of 1962 against Mrs Bandaranaike’s government – planned by a few military and police high ups. Pakistan is a nuclear power.
The greatest dissimilarity is that while Imran Khan rose to lead his country to a more democratic nation in truly heroic fashion, we have lacked since the earliest leaders like DS, Dudley and Kotelawela, any really great leader who puts country before self. Khan has been pronounced to be “A reformer who would bring change.
” “Mr Khan’s message resonated with millions across the country who were frustrated by the country’s economic crisis and old political dynasties… and only he could restore its former greatness.” He emerges a genuine, committed politician concerned first and last about his country and his people. One point here: Khan could have lived anywhere in the world in luxury and comfort but he decided to stay in Pakistan,
enter politics and lead the country to greater democracy, concerned about the poor and disadvantaged. He sacrificed a happy family life for the sake of his country; Jemima Goldsmith, his millionairess British wife, found extended family life in Pakistan stifling and wanted to return to England. Imran wanted to stay back. Hence their divorce and break up of family.
The Man
Imran Ahmad Khan Niazi was born in Lahore on October 5, 1952 to a wealthy upper middle class family of Pashtun descent of the Niazi tribe. His father was a civil engineer. Both on his paternal and maternal sides were distinguished ancestors. He attended a prestigious school in Lahore then Royal Green School, Worcester, and graduated from Keble College, Oxford University in 1975. He continued his cricket playing encouraged at school in Worcester until 1992, captaining the Pakistan team to win the World Cup that year.
As a very handsome, personable young man, flashy even, he was dubbed ‘hedonistic bachelor’ or in plain language, a playboy. He was just that, very evident in British high society, dating several film starlets and others; even accused of paternity which he denied. He married heiress Jemima Goldsmith in 1995, and she converted to Islam. By then he was drawn back to his country of birth and she moved with him, changing her style of dress and attempting to integrate to his family. They had two sons: Sulaiman Isa and Kasim. In 2004 they divorced very amicably with Jemima taking the two children back to England. Reason given: “Difficult for Jemima to adapt to life in Pakistan.”
By now Imran was fully into politics; opposed to military rule and sincerely concerned about country and his people. What makes me admire the man unreservedly is his devotion to his mother Shaukat Khannan who succumbed to cancer in 1985. Visiting her in hospital, he noticed how relatives of patients loitered around with no restrooms and other facilities.
He decided to build a cancer hospital with free service and accommodation for patients’ near relatives to stay over too. He invested his money and also wrote to friends. Contributions poured in. He built a cancer hospital in Lahore and a second one in Peshawar of the highest standard and created the Shaukat Khannan Memorial Trust which has set up cancer detecting and treating centres nationwide with international support of famous persons.
In January 2015 he contracted a disastrous marriage with beautiful British–Pakistani journalist Reham Khan who was a weather announcer on BBC. The marriage lasted less than a year – till October – and saw scorned Reham wreaking vengeance by writing her autobiography with very damaging chapters about Khan just prior to the 2018 elections which he contested, under his newly created Party which won most seats. Joining up with smaller parties he formed the government. Khan served as PM from August 2018 to April 2022 when the military maneuvered his ouster.
In 2016 to early 2018 reports emerged that Khan had married his spiritual mentor Bushra Bibi Manika, which were denied. In 2018 the PTI confirmed the marriage had taken place. His pet dogs, I read, proved to be a bone of contention as the bride was averse to dogs, so his were sent to his estate.
Comment
I listed some similarities and differences that exist between the status quo of Pakistan and that of Sri Lanka. Most people of both countries are disappointed in their leaders and government while in Pakistan there is severe criticism of the military interfering with politics and ruling de facto. We are free of this imposition. Political dynasties still hold sway in Pakistan judging by the leaders of the new formed coalition government; which curse is diminishing in Sri Lanka.
Many more miseries attend both nations like economic downfall. However, Pakistan has a potential statesman, now imprisoned, but having support of the majority of the population, judging by election results. Sri Lanka is woefully short of such a person. There are national minded, honest persons in the wings ready to serve the country and not oneself; but still unidentified. Thus what hope is possible?
Features
Political violence stalking Trump administration
It would not be particularly revelatory to say that the US is plagued by ‘gun violence’. It is a deeply entrenched and widespread malaise that has come in tandem with the relative ease with which firearms could be acquired and owned by sections of the US public, besides other causes.
However, a third apparent attempt on the life of US President Donald Trump in around two and a half years is both thought-provoking and unsettling for the defenders of democracy. After all, whatever its short comings the US remains the world’s most vibrant democracy and in fact the ‘mightiest’ one. And the US must remain a foremost democracy for the purpose of balancing and offsetting the growing power of authoritarian states in the global power system, who are no friends of genuine representational governance.
Therefore, the recent breaching of the security cordon surrounding the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington at which President Trump and his inner Cabinet were present, by an apparently ‘Lone Wolf’ gunman, besides raising issues relating to the reliability of the security measures deployed for the President, indicates a notable spike in anti-VVIP political violence in particular in the US. It is a pointer to a strong and widespread emergence of anti-democratic forces which seem to be gaining in virulence and destructiveness.
The issues raised by the attack are in the main for the US’ political Right and its supporters. They have smugly and complacently stood by while the extremists in their midst have taken centre stage and begun to dictate the course of Right wing politics. It is the political culture bred by them that leads to ‘Lone Wolf’ gunmen, for instance, who see themselves as being repressed or victimized, taking the law into their own hands, so to speak, and perpetrating ‘revenge attacks’ on the state and society.
A disproportionate degree of attention has been paid particularly internationally to Donald Trump’s personality and his eccentricities but such political persons cannot be divorced from the political culture in which they originate and have their being. That is, “structural” questions matter. Put simply, Donald Trump is a ‘true son’ of the Far Right, his principal support base. The issues raised are therefore for the President as well as his supporters of the Right.
We are obliged to respect the choices of the voting public but in the case of Trump’s election to the highest public position in the US, this columnist is inclined to see in those sections that voted for Trump blind followers of the latter who cared not for their candidate’s suitability, in every relevant respect, and therefore acted irrationally. It would seem that the Right in the US wanted their candidate to win by ‘hook or by crook’ and exercise power on their behalf.
By making the above observations this columnist does not intend to imply that voting publics everywhere in the world of democracy cast their vote sensibly. In the case of Sri Lanka, for example, the question could be raised whether the voters of the country used their vote sensibly when voting into office the majority of Executive Presidents and other persons holding high public office. The obvious answer is ‘no’ and this should lead to a wider public discussion on the dire need for thoroughgoing voter education. The issue is a ‘huge’ one that needs to be addressed in the appropriate forums and is beyond the scope of this column.
Looking back it could be said that the actions of Trump and his die-hard support base led to the Rule of Law in the US being undermined as perhaps never before in modern times. A shaming moment in this connection was the protest march, virtually motivated by Trump, of his supporters to the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021, with the aim of scuttling the presidential poll result of that year. Much violence and unruly behaviour, as known, was let loose. This amounted to denigrating the democratic process and encouraging the violent take over of the state.
In a public address, prior to the unruly conduct of his supporters, Trump is on record as blaring forth the following: ‘We won this election and we won by a landslide’, ‘We will stop the steal’, ‘We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn’t happen’, ‘If you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.’
It is plain to see that such inflammatory utterances could lead impressionable minds in particular to revolt violently. Besides, they should have led the more rationally inclined to wonder whether their candidate was the most suitable person to hold the office of President.
Unfortunately, the latter process was not to be and the question could be raised whether the US is in the ‘safest pair of hands’. Needless to say, as events have revealed, Donald Trump is proving to be one of the most erratic heads of state the US has ever had.
However, the latest attempt on the life of President Trump suggests that considerable damage has been done to the democratic integrity of the US and none other than the President himself has to take on himself a considerable proportion of the blame for such degeneration, besides the US’ Far Right. They could be said to be ‘reaping the whirlwind.’
It is a time for soul-searching by the US Right. The political Right has the right to exist, so the speak, in a functional democracy but it needs to take cognizance of how its political culture is affecting the democratic integrity or health of the US. Ironically, the repressive and chauvinistic politics advocated by it is having the effect of activating counter-violence of the most murderous kind, as was witnessed at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Continued repressive politics could only produce more such incidents that could be self-defeating for the US.
Some past US Presidents were assassinated but the present political violence in the country brings into focus as perhaps never before the role that an anti-democratic political culture could play in unraveling the gains that the US has made over the decades. A duty is cast on pro-democracy forces to work collectively towards protecting the democratic integrity and strength of the US.
Features
22nd Anniversary Gala …action-packed event
The Editor-in-Chief of The Sri Lankan Anchorman, a Toronto-based monthly, celebrating Sri Lankan community life in Canada, is none other than veteran Sri Lankan journalist Dirk Tissera, who moved to Canada in 1997. His wife, Michelle, whom he calls his “tower of strength”, is the Design Editor.
According to reports coming my way, the paper has turned out to be extremely popular in Toronto.
In fact, The Sri Lankan Anchorman won a press award in Toronto for excellence in editorial content and visual presentation.
However, the buzz in the air in Canada, right now, is The Sri Lankan Anchorman’s 22nd Anniversary Gala, to be held on Friday, 12 June, 2026, at the J&J Swagat Banquet Convention Centre, in Toronto.
An action-packed programme has been put together for the night, featuring some of the very best artistes in the Toronto scene.
The Skylines, who are classified as ‘the local musical band in Toronto’, will headline the event.

Dirk Tissera and wife Michelle: Supporting Sri Lanka-Canada community events, in Toronto, since launching The Anchorman
in 2002
They have performed and backed many legendary Sri Lanka singers.
According to Dirk, The Skylines can belt out a rhythm with gusto … be it Western, Sinhala or Tamil hits.
Also adding sparkle to the evening will be the legendary Fahmy Nazick, who, with his smooth and velvety vocals, will have the crowd on the floor.
Fahmy who was a household name, back in Sri Lanka, will be flying down from Virginia, USA.
He has captivated audiences in Sri Lanka, the Middle East and North America, and this will be his fourth visit to Toronto – back by popular demand,
Cherry DeLuna, who is described by Dirk as a powerhouse, also makes her appearance on stage and is all set to stir up the tempo with her cool and easy delivery.
“She’s got a great voice and vocal range that has captivated audiences out here”, says Dirk.
Chamil Welikala, said to be one of the hottest DJs in town, will be spinning his magic … in English, Sinhala, Tamil and Latin.

Both Jive and Baila competitions are on the cards among many other surprises on the night of 12 June.
This is The Anchorman’s fifth annual dance in a row – starting from 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 – and both Dirk and Michelle, and The Anchorman, have always produced elegant social events in Toronto.
“We intend to knock this one out of the park,” the duo says, adding that Western music and Sinhala and Tamil songs is something they’ve always delivered and the crowd loves it.
“We have always supported Sri Lanka-Canada community events, in Toronto, since launching The Anchorman, in 2002, and we intend to keep it that way.”
No doubt, there will be a large crowd of Sri Lankans, from all communities, turning up, on 12 June, to support Dirk, Michelle and The Anchorman.
Features
Face Pack for Radiant Skin
* Apple and Orange:
Blend a few apple and orange pieces together. Add to it a pinch of turmeric and one tablespoon of honey. Apply it to the face and neck and rinse off after 30 minutes. This face pack is suitable for all skin types.
According to experts, apple is one of the best fruits for your skin health with Vitamin A, B complex and Vitamin C and minerals, while, with the orange peel, excessive oil secretion can be easily balanced.
* Mango and Curd:
Ripe mango pulp, mixed with curd, can be rubbed directly onto the skin to remove dirt and cleanse clogged pores. Rinse off after a few minutes.
Yes, of course, mango is a tasty and delicious fruit and this is the mango season in our part of the world, and it has extra-ordinary benefits to skin health. Vitamins C and E in mangoes protect the skin from the UV rays of the sun and promotes cell regeneration. It also promotes skin elasticity and fights skin dullness and acne, while curd, in combination, further adds to it.
* Grapes and Kiwi:
Take a handful of grapes and make a pulp of it. Simultaneously, take one kiwi fruit and mash it after peeling its skin. Now mix them and add some yoghurt to it. Apply it on your face for few minutes and wash it off.
Here again experts say that kiwi is the best nutrient-rich fruit with high vitamin C, minerals, Omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin E, while grapes contain flavonoids, which is an antioxidant that protects the skin from free radical damage. This homemade face pack acts as a natural cleanser and slows down the ageing process.
-
News6 days agoWhistleblowers ask Treasury Chief to resign over theft of USD 2.5 mn
-
News6 days agoNo cyber hack: Fintech expert exposes shocking legacy flaws that led to $2.5 million theft
-
News3 days agoBIA drug bust: 25 monks including three masterminds arrested
-
Business4 days agoNestlé Lanka Announces Change in Leadership
-
News1 day agoTreasury chief’s citizenship details sought from Australia
-
News3 days agoBanks alert customers to phishing attacks
-
News4 days agoHackers steal $3.2 Mn from Finance Ministry
-
Business6 days agoDialog Enterprise partners Star Garments: Pioneering 5G innovation in Sri Lanka’s apparel industry
