News
Over 70-pct of Sri Lankan public unaware of Online Safety Bill: survey
By NETHMI RAJAWASAM
ECONOMYNEXT –Around 71.6 percent of the Sri Lankan public are unaware of the Online Safety Bill that is to be debated in parliament on January 23, a think tank has said.
“Responding to the Wickremesinghe government’s proposed legislation; Anti-Terrorism Act and Online Safety Bill, a majority of Sri Lankans expressed that they are ignorant about both these proposed legislation,” the Centre for Policy Alternatives’ Confidence in Democratic Governance Index report found.
The survey sample captured both men and women living in urban as well as rural localities in all 25 districts of Sri Lanka in November 2023, and was released in December.
The report found that 61.5 percent of the population were not aware of the ATA. “Of those who are aware, 40 percent of individuals across all age groups demonstrated awareness of the ATA, as opposed to the minimal percentage (20-30 percent) who exhibited awareness of the OSB.”
Among the offences listed in the draft bill were the communication of false statements on incidents within Sri Lanka, false statements causing defamation, disturbing religious assembly through false statements, communication of false statements with the sole intention of hurting religious emotions, communication of false statements with the sole intention for the abomination of religious emotions.
In addition to the online truths, the the bullet points also lumped criminal activities including fraud, cheating and child abuse, as part of ‘Online Safety’.
Of the 38.5 percent of respondents aware of the ATA, 72.6 percent disapprove of the Act mainly on the belief that those in power might misuse it for their benefit, and, that it will negatively impact human rights.
Of the 28.4 percent who are not aware of the proposed OSB, 71.1 percent disapproved of the Bill, saying that those in power will misuse it for their benefit and that existing laws were sufficient, “eliminating the need for new legislation at the moment,” the report said.
News
US$ 2.5 mn cyber heist exposes system failures
COPF final report on USD 2.5 mn cyber fraud recommends action against all responsible
The US$2.5 million loss incurred during Sri Lanka’s foreign debt repayment to Australia was a clear case of a cybercrime and theft, Committee on Public Finance (COPF) Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva told Parliament yesterday.
Presenting the COPF final report on the cyber fraud, Dr. de Silva said the incident amounted to a serious financial crime and called for a comprehensive investigation, by law enforcement authorities, to identify and prosecute all those responsible.
The report revealed serious governance, procedural and operational failures that enabled the fraudulent transfer of public funds, while recommending sweeping reforms to strengthen cybersecurity, financial controls and public debt management systems.
According to the report, officials of the Treasury and the Central Bank bore responsibility for governance lapses that contributed to the failures. It also highlighted the fact that the Ministry of Finance was operating an outdated Microsoft Exchange Server after security support had ended, while basic safeguards, such as multi-factor authentication, had not been implemented.
The COPF said suspicious payment instructions linked to debt repayments involving India, the United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium had also been detected, preventing further losses. However, the US$ 2.5 million fraud materialised only in the repayment transaction involving Australia.
The report has noted that officials had failed to verify lender email domains, relied on unverified email communications and lacked adequate internal controls, allowing the fraud to continue for months.
Although the investigation uncovered system-wide weaknesses across several institutions, only four mid-level Finance Ministry officials had been suspended so far, the report said.
The COPF has recommended a special audit of the foreign debt repayment process, strengthened cybersecurity measures across state institutions, updated financial regulations and improvements to public debt management systems.
by Saman Indrajith
News
Opposition signs no-confidence motion against Justice Minister for dereliction of duty over Negombo Prison deaths
Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, together with Opposition MPs, yesterday signed a No-Confidence Motion (NCM) in Parliament against Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara.The move comes in response to the unrest at the Negombo Prison, where both prison officers and inmates were killed.
Opposition members said the Minister had failed to fulfill his responsibility and accountability regarding their safety.According to the Opposition group, the NCM seeks to hold the Minister directly accountable for lapses in ensuring protection within the prison system.
News
AG informs SC of e-visa agreement review
The Attorney General yesterday informed the Supreme Court that the government has decided to review the legality of agreements entered into by the previous administration to hand over the country’s electronic visa issuance operations to private companies.
Additional Solicitor General Viveka Siriwardena, appearing for the Attorney General, made the submission when the Supreme Court took up the fundamental rights petitions filed by former MPs President’s Counsel M.A. Sumanthiran, Patali Champika Ranawaka, and Rauff Hakeem, challenging the previous Cabinet’s decision to outsource the e-visa system.
The petitions were heard before a three-judge bench, comprising Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena and Justices Achala Wengappuli and Arjuna Obeyesekere.
The Additional Solicitor General informed court that the current Cabinet had appointed a subcommittee to examine the legality of the agreements with the private companies and requested time to report on its findings, stating that the review was still underway.
President’s Counsel Sumanthiran, appearing as one of the petitioners, told the court that although the present government had indicated its intention to cancel the transaction, the petitioners wished to proceed with the case.
He noted that members of the current Cabinet had been named as respondents in the petitions.The Supreme Court directed the petitioners to issue notice on the members of the current Cabinet, named as respondents, and fixed September 29 for further proceedings.
-
News7 days agoSingapore-based Buddhist monk marks nearly four decades of humanitarian service
-
News2 days agoHerath warns prospective migrant workers not to get fleeced by racketeers
-
News6 days agoAI concerned over proposed SL military deployment in Haiti
-
Midweek Review4 days agoUnexpected focus on ‘pieces of tin’ worn by military men
-
Latest News5 days agoNyamhuri and Ngarava stun Bangladesh by defending 141
-
News3 days agoNegombo Prison riot: Ensuring protection of prisoners fundamental responsibility of the state – UN
-
Features7 days agoThe NPP’s New Challenge: Balancing Easter Lawfare and Economic Welfare
-
Foreign News2 days agoTensions erupt in Indian state after 11-year-old raped and murdered
