News
Online Safety Bill will drive final nail into coffin of Lanka’s democratic values: Chief Opp Whip
By Saman Indrajith
The Online Safety Bill would be the final nail in the coffin of the country’s democratic values, Chief Opposition Whip and Kandy District SJB MP Lakshman Kiriella told Parliament yesterday.
Kiriella said so, registering the Opposition’s protest against the Bill soon after it was presented to the House by Public Security Minister Tiran Alles.
“We, as a nation are already on the dock for failing to uphold democratic values. This would take us a step further towards the gallows,” Kiriella said, condemning the Bill as an assault on democracy.
The Bill seeks to provide for the setting up a five-member commission by the President with powers to block any social media account, prosecute, fine and even imprison individuals.
The Online Safety Bill, dated 15 of September 2023, was gazetted by the order of the Minister of Public Security.
The Online Safety Bill presented to the House yesterday contains provisions to establish the Online Safety Commission; to make provisions to prohibit online communication of certain statements of facts in Sri Lanka; and to prevent the use of online accounts and inauthentic online accounts for prohibited purposes, and other related matters.
Subject to the provisions of section 6, the Commission shall consist of five members appointed by the President and the term of office of a member of the Commission shall be three years from the date of its appointment.
As per the Online Safety Bill, the commission members shall have qualifications and experience in one or more of the fields of information technology, law, governance, social services, journalism, science and technology or management.
The Commission will have the power to issue directives to persons, service providers or internet intermediaries, who have published or communicated or whose service has been used to communicate any prohibited statement, requiring them to provide to persons who have been adversely affected by any prohibited statement, an opportunity of responding to such prohibited statement.
The Commission will have the power to issue notices to any internet access service providers or internet intermediary to disable access to an online location which contains a prohibited statement by the end users in Sri Lanka or to remove such prohibited statement from such online location.
SLPP dissident MP Prof. Peiris told Parliament that every citizen has the right to challenge a Bill before the Supreme Court within 14 days of its presenting to the House, but the government presented yesterday’s Bill irestricting that period to seven days.
Deputy Speaker Ajith Rajapakse said that the the 14-day period would commence from yesterday.
News
Sri Kalyani Vesak Zone 2026
Sri Kalyani Vesak Zone 2026 was held this year under the guidance of Venerable Emeritus Professor Kollupitiya Mahinda Sangarakkitha Nayaka Thero, the Chief incumbent of the Kelaniya Rajamaha Viharaya and Chancellor of the University of Kelaniya.
The auspicious opening ceremony was held on 01st June, 2026, by Venerable Deniyaye Pannaloka Buddharakkitha Thero and Dhammika Attygalle, Chief Basnayaka Nilame of the Kelaniya Raja Maha Viharaya.
Former Sri Lanka Cricket Captain Sanath Jayasuriya also participated in this event.
News
Post-war disappearances: GR to give evidence online in Jaffna court case
Arrangements are underway for former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to give evidence online in a case regarding the disappearance of Lalith Kumar Weeraraj and Kugan Muruganandan in December, 2011.
The Jaffna Magistrate’s Court has granted permission for Gotabaya Rajapaksa to give evidence online in the ongoing case.
Lalith Kumar Weeraraj and Kugan Muruganandan, of the Movement for People’s Struggle, disappeared at Avarangal, on 09 December, 2011, a day before a protest, organised by relatives of those who disappeared during the war, to mark International Human Rights Day in Jaffna.
The relatives of Lalith and Kugan filed a Habeas Corpus petition before the Court of Appeal, in Colombo, in 2012. During the hearing of the petition, the Court of Appeal directed the Jaffna Magistrate’s Court to record evidence from witnesses and submit a report regarding the alleged abduction.
Accordingly, proceedings commenced before the Jaffna Magistrate’s Court on September 19, 2012.
During the Yahapalana administration, in 2017, Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s name was included in the list of witnesses. The court subsequently ordered him to appear and testify. However, Rajapaksa repeatedly informed the court that he was unable to travel to Jaffna due to security concerns.
Accordingly, through his lawyers, he sought permission to testify virtually via an online platform. The court had earlier instructed him to submit an affidavit confirming the alleged security threats.
When the case was taken up yesterday (02), the Jaffna Magistrate’s Court granted permission for Gotabaya Rajapaksa to give evidence online.
News
Religious body refutes ‘Moulavi’ label in child abuse case
The All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama (ACJU) Irakkamam branch has categorically rejected claims that a suspect arrested in connection with the alleged sexual abuse of a 14-year-old girl was a Moulavi, asserting that the accused has no recognised religious qualifications, no formal Arabic education and no affiliation with the country’s premier Islamic religious organisation.
The clarification comes amid growing public concern over reports identifying a 21-year-old resident of Eragama as a Moulavi after he surrendered before court in connection with the alleged offence. The suspect was remanded until June 03, together with another individual accused of aiding and abetting the crime.
In a strongly-worded statement, the ACJU Irakkamam branch said the description of the suspect as a Moulavi was incorrect and misleading.
“The individual concerned has neither studied at a recognised Arabic college nor obtained the qualifications required to be identified as a Moulavi,” the statement said.
The organisation further stressed that the suspect has no connection whatsoever with the ACJU or any of its branches.
The ACJU expressed concern that the erroneous use of the religious title had the potential to misinform the public and unfairly tarnish the reputation of qualified Islamic scholars and religious institutions that have no link to the alleged crime.
Religious leaders pointed out that the title “Moulavi” is traditionally conferred upon individuals who have successfully completed formal Islamic theological studies at recognised institutions and are acknowledged for their religious scholarship.
The controversy arose after reports and social media posts widely referred to the suspect as a Moulavi following his arrest.
The ACJU maintained that the designation was factually inaccurate and called for greater diligence when identifying suspects in criminal investigations.
The organisation urged both law enforcement authorities and media institutions to verify information before assigning religious titles, particularly in sensitive cases involving children and serious criminal allegations.
Meanwhile, investigations into the alleged sexual abuse of the minor are continuing under Police supervision. The suspects remain in remand custody pending further judicial proceedings.
The case has attracted widespread attention across the Eastern Province, with child protection advocates calling for a thorough investigation and swift justice for the victim, while community leaders have appealed for accuracy and responsibility in public reporting to prevent the stigmatisation of religious institutions and scholars unconnected to the alleged offence.
By Ifham Nizam
-
News4 days agoIMF urges Lanka not to meddle with exchange rate
-
Business5 days agoSri Lanka’s construction industry losing ground while no one watches
-
Business2 days agoIMF’s unstated rate:Sri Lanka’s $695m loan costs about 5.33% per annum
-
News4 days agoState of emergency extended
-
Features5 days agoThe Division Bell Mystery
-
News2 days agoUNP challenges NPP move to amend Vihara – Devalagam Act
-
News6 days agoRTI query of Ditwah funds: Presidential Secretariat mum on key questions
-
Features3 days agoAre threats to Buddha Sasana external or from within?
