Connect with us

News

NMRA blind to Bisphenol A danger

Published

on

Dilena Pathragoda

Keep your child safe from plastic food containers

By Ifham Nizam

Sri Lanka needs a gradual ban on plastic food containers widely used by children and instead alternative containers because testing facilities to detect harmful chemicals in them are sparse, says Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ) Executive Director Dilena Pathragoda.

The CEJ director told The Island yesterday that the Court of Justice of the European Union had confirmed that Bisphenol A (BPA) must be listed as a `substance of very high concern’. He warned that further delay in decision-taking here in that regard increased threats to children’s health.

The CEJ revealed the presence of Bisphenol A in baby feeding bottles, juice feeders and feeding cups last February (2022).

The research team had been sharing study findings and recommendations with relevant stakeholders throughout the past few months but, the decision-makers do not seem to understand the depth of the issue, said CEJ Planning and Management officer Chalani Rubesinghe

In December 2021, the court of Justice of the European Union confirmed that BPA must be listed as a “substance of very high concern” considering its hormone-disrupting properties, while rejecting the attempt of Plastics Europe to reverse the decision of European Chemical Agency (ECHA) to identify BPA as an Endocrine Disruptive Chemical.

The European Food Safety Authority has now established a new permissibility total daily intake of 0.04 nanograms per kilogramme of body weight per day, drastically reducing its previous standard (4 micrograms per kilogramme of body weight per day) by 100,000 folds. [source: Morrison, O., EFSA poised to slash daily exposure limits for bisphenol A as EU court confirms it as ‘substance of very high concern’].

In the European Union, BPA is classified as a reproduction toxic, a substance that causes eye damage, respiratory irritation, skin allergies, and a potential hazard to the aquatic environment.

“Another important fact we identified in our study was despite having legal provisions and standards, plastic feeding bottles and cups can contain these chemicals. For example, in Malaysia use of BPAin polycarbonate baby bottles is prohibited. But our study found that one baby feeding bottle (“Minitree regular neck feeding bottle”), made in China and purchased in Malaysia, contained 2.6 µg/kg of BPA and it also had a “BPA-free” label,” Chalani said

Pathragoda said that their study had also found that two baby feeding bottles sold in Bhutan but made in India, where the use of BPA in baby feeding bottles is prohibited, had BPA levels of 0.6 and 3.2 µg/kg proving its non-compliance with Indian legislation. There was also a sample purchased from Bhutan, manufactured in Italy that contained BPA, 0.7 µg/kg. This indicates that having laws is not sufficient to stop manufacturers from using these chemicals and thereby will not ensure the chemical safety intended by the law.

“We believe that to ensure the safety of children, Sri Lanka must go for plastic-free alternative child food containers. The local market already has glass feeding bottles as an alternative and now there is a silicon cover for glass bottles that serves as a protective cover,” he added.

In the international markets, stainless-steel and silicon bottles are available as alternatives. In Sri Lanka, the feeding bottle importation license is issued by the NMRA (National Medicines Regulatory Authority). Therefore, the authority has the ability to prevent the importation of plastic feeding bottles and replace them with alternatives. But the authority doesn’t seem to be sensitive to this issue.

CEJ as an organization that cares for children’s health and the environment, proposes a complete ban on the importation and sale of feeding bottles made of polycarbonate materials, with a grace period given until a sufficient supply of glass, silicon or stainless-steel feeding bottles reaches the market, to prevent any unbearable price inflations applied to feeding bottles that may result in negative feedback leading to reverse the ban.

The CEJ director observed that in this matter, the Sri Lanka Standard Institution (SLSI) puts its best effort to bring the necessary standards. But it is questionable to what extent the standards on plastic can prevent Bisphenol A from seeping into the country through importation. It is a challenge for a country like Sri Lanka with fewer facilities to test chemicals like BPA and Phthalates.

The Sri Lanka Import/Export control heavily depends on the laboratories for testing and has no facility like an XRF scanner to facilitate immediate testing of harmful chemicals in imported items. Even then reluctance to take a brave decision like closing the entering gates for plastic feeding bottles (at least) is the misfortune of children in the country.



News

Review of progress in reforms and modernisation of key state revenue-collecting institutions

Published

on

By

A progress review meeting on reforms and modernisation initiatives at Sri Lanka’s key state revenue-collecting institutions was held on Thursday  (15) at the Presidential Secretariat, chaired by Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, with the participation of representatives of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and officials of the Revenue Administration, Reform and Modernisation Bureau (RARMB) of the Presidential Secretariat.

At the meeting, the IMF representatives commended the revenue collection efficiency of the Department of Inland Revenue, Sri Lanka Customs and the Department of Excise, the country’s three leading state revenue-collecting institutions. Extensive discussions were also held on the progress of the reform and modernisation programmes being implemented at these institutions.

Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake outlined the progress achieved by the three institutions to date and the reforms planned for implementation in the future.

The IMF representatives also highlighted the importance of strengthening risk management, developing human resources and ensuring the efficient operation of computer systems at the respective institutions.

Senior Additional Secretary to the President Seevali Arukgoda also attended the meeting. The IMF was represented by Cindy Negus, Senior Economist in Revenue Administration for the Asia and Pacific, Europe, Middle East and Central Asia regions; Alison Lister, Revenue Administration Adviser; and Gregory Toppin, Resident Revenue Adviser in Sri Lanka. A group of senior officials from the Revenue Administration, Reform and Modernisation Bureau of the Presidential Secretariat also participated.

(President’s Media Division)

Continue Reading

News

Cut power bills by 3-5%, don’t hike them, consumers demand

Published

on

By Anuradha Hiripitiyage

Electricity tariffs should be reduced by between 3 and 5 percent instead of being increased by 2.88 percent in the fourth quarter, as proposed by the National System Operator (NSO), Electricity Consumers’ Association Secretary Sanjeewa Dhammika said.

Addressing a media briefing in Maradagahamula, Divulapitiya, Gampaha, yesterday (16), Dhammika said a proper assessment of electricity generation costs, including the contribution of hydropower, could justify a reduction in tariffs.

He said the NSO had sought approval from the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for a 2.88 percent tariff increase, which was expected to generate an additional Rs. 4,438 million.

However, the Commission had indicated that an increase of only 1.46 percent was warranted, amounting to Rs. 2,245 million, he said, adding that even this increase was unnecessary.

Dhammika alleged that the proposed revision sought to pass on to electricity consumers the financial burden arising from the non-arrival of five coal shipments and failed tenders.

“The Government had said that the burden of coal-related losses would not be passed on to the public. It is therefore unjust to make consumers bear these costs,” he said.

He pointed out that the PUCSL had forecast that hydropower would account for 32.34 percent of total electricity generation in the coming quarter, while the cost of such generation would represent only 3.45 percent of the overall cost of electricity production.

Consumers should benefit from the lower cost of hydropower generation rather than bear the burden of more expensive thermal power generation, he said.

Dhammika also questioned the inclusion of Rs. 669 million in capacity charges that had not been approved by the PUCSL, as well as a further Rs. 1,069 million to repay loans relating to incomplete projects.

Including such charges in the proposed tariff revision was unjustifiable, he said.

The PUCSL has given the public until October 30 to submit their views on the proposed tariff revision.

Dhammika said the possibility of increased hydropower generation in the coming weeks, as reservoir levels rise, should also be taken into account when determining electricity tariffs.

He maintained that tariffs could be reduced by 3 to 5 percent if hydropower generation was properly assessed and coal-related losses and unapproved charges were excluded from the calculations.

He further claimed that electricity tariffs could be reduced by as much as 10 percent through the promotion of renewable energy and the effective use of solar power and battery storage systems.

The Electricity Consumers’ Association urged the Government to withdraw the proposed tariff increase, insisting that consumers should not be made to bear costs arising from coal supply problems and other disputed charges.

Continue Reading

News

Asgiri Mahanayake calls for immediate release of Gnanasara Thera

Published

on

Most Ven. Warakagoda Sri Gnanaratana Mahanayake Thera

By S.K. Samaranayake

Most Ven. Warakagoda Sri Gnanaratana Mahanayake Thera of the Asgiri Chapter has called for the immediate release of Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera, who is currently serving a prison sentence, following a court ruling.

The Asgiri Mahanayake made the appeal when a delegation of senior prison officials, including Assistant Commissioner of Prisons and Director of Operations Senaka Pallegedara, called on him on the 16th.

During the meeting, the prelate warned that the continued incarceration of Ven. Gnanasara Thera could lead to a volatile situation and cause public agitation.

Responding to the appeal, the prison officials informed the Mahanayake Thera that the authority to order the release of Ven. Gnanasara Thera did not rest with the Prisons Department but with the President.

Other senior prison officials, including Rajeev Srimal Silva, Sampath Warnakulasooriya and Mangala Welivita, were also present at the meeting.

Continue Reading

Trending