Connect with us

Latest News

Nepal-Tibet floods: What happened, what caused them and who is missing?

Published

on

A drone view shows mud covering properties following the flash flood, in the Nuwakot district, Nepal, August 26, 2026 [Aljazeera]

On Wednesday, part of a glacier collapsed high in the Himalayas, triggering catastrophic flooding along the Nepal-Tibet border.

At least 160 people have been confirmed dead, while nearly 1,500 people are missing across Nepal and China’s Tibet.

In Nepal, 826 people are missing, including almost 600 foreign tourists, according to police and tourism officials. Across the border, Chinese state media reported that 558 people were missing in Tibet’s Gyirong County, including 260 foreign nationals.

Here is what we know about what triggered the disaster, where the floods struck, and the risks facing the rapidly warming Himalayan region.

What happened in Nepal?

At about 8:40am local time (02:55 GMT) on Wednesday, flash floods and mudslides swept through mountainous areas along the Nepal-Tibet border, killing at least 157 people in Nepal and three in Tibet and leaving nearly 1,500 people missing across the region.

A huge flood of water, mud and rocks swept through the Lhende Khola river valley, engulfing villages and destroying homes and critical infrastructure. At least 19 bridges and about 40km (25 miles) of roads were washed away.

Nepalese soldiers and rescue teams have been deployed with helicopters, drones and search dogs, but high river levels, damaged roads and mud have complicated efforts to reach some of the worst-hit areas.

Across the border in Tibet, deep sediment has also delayed Chinese rescue teams trying to reach the border zone.

Officials were caught off-guard by the floods on Wednesday because it was not raining, according to local news editors

The disaster appears to have begun high in the Himalayas, where part of a glacier collapsed, triggering a chain of events that caused a powerful surge of water and debris downstream

Satellite imagery showed that a substantial section of the lower end of the glacier broke away at an elevation of about 5,200 metres (17,000 feet), plunging about 1,200 metres (3,900ft) onto the valley floor, gathering rock and sediment as it fell.

The resulting ice-rock avalanche struck the Lhende River in Tibet, about 20km (12 miles) northeast of the Nepal-China border crossing. Debris temporarily blocked the river before the natural dam gave way, releasing a powerful flood downstream.

Early reports suggested that a magnitude 4.4 earthquake had triggered the collapse. However, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) later revised its assessment, saying the seismic signal had been generated by the landslide itself rather than an earthquake.

The landslide eventually registered as a magnitude 5.2 seismic event.

Where exactly did the floods happen?

The disaster struck the mountainous Nepal-Tibet border region, with some of the worst damage in Nepal’s Rasuwa district, immediately south of the Chinese border.

The initial surge entered the Lhende Khola, which feeds into the Bhote Koshi and then the Trishuli River, carrying floodwaters south through Nepal. Water levels in the Trishuli reportedly rose by as much as 9 metres (27 ft) in just 30 minutes.

In the Rasuwa district, Timure and Syapru Besi were among the affected settlements. Further downstream, flooding reached parts of Nepal’s Nuwakot and Dhading districts, damaging homes, roads and other infrastructure.

Across the border in Tibet, mud and debris hit Gyirong Port in the Shigatse region.

The Trishuli eventually joins the Narayani River, which crosses into India’s Bihar state, where it is known as the Gandak River.

What do we know about the victims?

At least 160 people have been confirmed dead, while nearly 1,500 remain missing on both sides of the Nepal-Tibet border.

  • Nepal: Police have recovered at least 157 bodies.
  • Tibet: Authorities have reported at least three deaths in Gyirong County, where 558 people are missing, including 260 foreign nationals.

“My brother-in-law had a liquor store here. I got a call from him this morning, and they were crying and said their entire house had been swept away,” Raju Bhadel, a local businessman in Nepal, told Al Jazeera.

Manoj Mishra, a teacher, described seeing vehicles and people being carried away by the floodwaters in Nepal. “I saw around nine trucks being swept away by the floods, including people. It’s a heartbreaking incident,” he said.

Damaged houses stand precariously near the swollen, debris-choked banks of the Trishuli River after flash floods in Nepal’s Nuwakot district on Wednesday
Damaged houses stand precariously near the swollen, debris-choked banks of the Trishuli River after flash floods in Nepal’s Nuwakot district on Wednesday [Aljazeera]

Who is missing?

Nearly 1,500 people are missing across Nepal and Tibet, including at least 800 foreign nationals.

In Nepal, 826 people were reported missing, including almost 600 foreign tourists, according to police and tourism officials. The missing tourists come from more than two dozen countries.

Among those reported missing in Nepal are:

  • India: 177
  • United States: 63
  • Australia: 34
  • United Kingdom: 33
  • Canada: 25

Authorities have not yet provided a complete nationality breakdown for all the missing foreign nationals.

Across the border, Chinese state broadcaster CCTV said 558 people were missing in Tibet’s Gyirong County, including 260 foreign nationals.

Many of those caught up in the disaster were pilgrims travelling towards Kailash Mansarovar in Tibet. Tourism officials are working to account for groups that had been travelling through the region when the floods struck.

The injured and rescued

At least 65 people were being treated for injuries in local hospitals and in Kathmandu.

More than 5,000 Nepalese army and police personnel have been mobilised for the rescue operation, while helicopters are searching for survivors and delivering emergency supplies to communities cut off by damaged roads and flooding.

Survivors from badly affected areas have also been evacuated by military helicopter, including some taken to hospitals in Kathmandu.

Countries and international organisations have offered emergency assistance, funding and technical support as rescue operations continue in Nepal and Tibet.

Humanitarian and financial aid

India has sent a rescue aircraft carrying about 10 tonnes of emergency supplies to Nepal, including temporary shelters, blankets, hygiene kits, solar lamps and medicines.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke with Nepalese Prime Minister Balendra Shah and pledged India’s support.

The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) has released 1 million Swiss francs ($1.2m) in emergency funding to support the Nepal Red Cross Society’s relief operations and damage assessments.

The United Nations has deployed personnel in Nepal to support government-led relief efforts, while its office in China has said it is ready to assist rescue operations in Tibet.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed his condolences to those affected and said the organisation stood in solidarity with communities hit by the disaster.

The European Union has activated its Copernicus Emergency Management Service, which uses satellite imagery to map disaster zones and provide information that can help authorities assess damage and coordinate rescue operations.

South Korea has established a government task force after several South Korean nationals working at a hydropower project were reported missing. Seoul said it planned to send a rapid-response team involving government, fire and police personnel to Nepal to assist with the search.

The United States said it was sending a disaster response adviser and providing $500,000 in assistance.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said Canada was closely following the situation, describing the floods as “absolutely devastating”.

On the Chinese side, President Xi Jinping ordered an “all-out” search-and-rescue operation for people missing in Tibet and called for efforts to prevent further disasters.

Scientists are still investigating what triggered the glacier collapse, and it is too early to determine how much climate change contributed to this specific event.

However, the disaster comes against a backdrop of rapid warming and glacial loss across the Himalayas. Glaciers across the Hindu Kush Himalaya mountain range – which spans Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Myanmar, Nepal and Pakistan – lost ice 65 percent faster between 2011 and 2020 than during the previous decade. Nepal’s glaciers have lost close to one-third of their ice volume in roughly three decades.

As glaciers retreat, mountain slopes can become increasingly unstable, and meltwater can accumulate in or around glaciers, increasing the potential for sudden floods.

Satellite observations showed unusually warm conditions around the affected glacier before the collapse, with snow cover diminishing considerably and exposing more bare ice.

Researchers are investigating whether melting contributed to the glacier’s instability, but a direct link between climate change and this week’s collapse has not been established.

What is the situation now?

More than 5,000 Nepalese army and police personnel are searching for survivors and recovering bodies, while helicopters are delivering tents, food and other emergency supplies to communities cut off by the floods.

Officials have warned that the death toll is likely to rise as rescuers reach areas that remain inaccessible because of damaged roads, high water levels and thick layers of mud.

In Tibet, Chinese authorities are also monitoring a still-dammed lake upstream from the disaster zone in Gyirong that could complicate rescue efforts and pose a further flood risk.

[Aljazeera]



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Farhan and Sadaqat help Pakistan seal series in style

Published

on

By

Maaz Sadaqat clobbered 96 off just 51 balls [Cricinfo]

Maaz Sadaqat crashed 96 off 51,Sahibzada Farhan clobbered 73 off 44, and Pakistan scorched their way through the last 12 overs of their innings to mount a fearsome total of 215 for 3. Pakistan reaped 156 runs just in the last 12 overs of their innings, as a 73-run stand between Sadaqat and Farhan was followed by a manic 72-run partnership between Sadaqat and Hasan Nawaz.

Sri Lanka’s batting was woeful in response. They slumped to 64 for 5 by the 11th over, with none of their top seven managing to get to 30. They limped to 133 for 7, having had their hopes of leveling the series wrecked by quicks Mohammad Imran and Salman Mirza, who took five wickets between them.

Sadaqat propels Pakistan into the stratosphere

The openers had laid a decent platform with Pakistan having got to 55 for 1 by the end of the seventh over. But it was Sadaqat who injected the energy that truly set Pakistan on course to their mammoth total. Having gone at less than a run a ball in his first eight balls, Sadaqat unleashed a spectacular lofted square drive off Eshan Malinga to collect his first six, before pumping the same bowler down the ground later in the 10th over.

Sadaqat would go on to clobber six further sixes and five further fours. The big hits tended to come down the ground, while his fours were more square of the wicket. Of the 125 runs Pakistan plundered in the second half of their innings, 79 off 40 came from Sadaqat, who pummeled both pace and spin with equal relish. Off the sixteenth over, bowled by Maheesh Theekshana, Sadaqat thumped three sixes in the arc between long on and midwicket.

Sadaqat, whose previous top score in three T20Is had been 50, could have gone to triple figures off the last ball of the innings, but holed out to deep cover instead, unable to quite find the power to lift a Malinga slower ball over the ropes. He had utterly dominated the middle and late overs, however.

Farhan sets the tone

On another flat Rawalpindi deck, Farhan made the first big charge, although he waited until spin came on to really get into high gear. Theekshana was one of his main victims as well. Farhan’s first six came from a slog sweep off Theekshana in the seventh over, before he launched the same bowler over wide long on and cow corner off successive balls in the ninth over. Getting to his 12th T20I fifty off the 31st ball he faced, Farhan began to aim big blows off the seamers as well. He was caught at deep third off the bowling of Dasun Shanaka, in the 15th over.

Sri Lanka stumble in the powerplay

An excellent Salman Mirza bouncer took the glove of Lahiru Udara in the first over, ending the innings of one of Sri Lanka’s few form batters for a mere five runs. And although Sineth Jayawardena – playing his first international in a full-strength Sri Lanka side – hit three consecutive boundaries in the third over, Sri Lanka were unable to build up any momentum in the powerplay. By the end of the sixth over, they had laboured to 35 for 2.

Imran’s spell lights up the middle overs

A full house in Rawalpindi was treated to some excellent fast bowling by Imran, who finished with the game’s best figures of 3 for 11 from his four overs. Having got Jayawardena to top-edge a desperate pull shot at the end of his second over, Imran had Kusal Mendis caught behind off a slower delivery, before two balls later (a wide in between), he took Sahan Arachchige’s edge with a quick delivery angled across the left-hander. Wicketkeeper Khawaja Nafay made two diving grabs to convert these chances in the eighth over.

All through his unbroken spell, Sri Lanka’s batter struggled to so much as hit Imran off the square, despite the good batting conditions on offer. Imran mixed up his pace, frequently going to slower balls, but his line and length control were also excellent through the spell. When he finished his unbroken spell at the end of the 10th over, Sri Lanka’s required rate had climbed past 15.

Chamindu Wickramasinghe and Theekshana struck some late boundaries, but by the time they came to the crease, Sri Lanka did not have a realistic shot at levelling this series. They lost by 82 runs in the end.

Scores:
Pakistan 215 for 3 in 20 overs (Sahibzada Farhan 73, Fakhar Zaman 22, Maaz Sadaqat 96, Hasan Nawaz 19*; Maheesh Theekshana 1-55, Eshan Malinga 1-41,Dasun Shanaka 1-30)  beat Sri Lanka 133 for 7 (Sineth Jayawardena 22, Kamnbdu Mendis 23, Chamindu Wickremasinghe 29, Maheesh  Theekshana 32*; Salman Mirza 2=28, Mohammad  Imran 3-11, Saim Ayub 1-19, Shadab Khan 1-19) by 82 runs

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Foreign News

At least 139 dead, 84 missing as migrant boat capsizes off Djibouti

Published

on

By

A member of the International Organization for Migration inspects the abandoned wreckage of a boat that capsized off the coast of Djibouti on April 12, 2026 [Aljazeera]

At least 139 people, including 15 children, have died and 84 are missing after a boat capsized off the coast of Djibouti, according to the United Nations migration agency.

In a statement on Sunday, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) quoted survivors as saying that the incident happened near Guhere off Djibouti’s eastern coast in the Gulf of Aden near the Bab al-Mandeb strait from Thursday night to before dawn on Friday.

The boat was heading from Djibouti to Yemen with more than 300 people on board. More than 80 people – all Ethiopians – survived the shipwreck while Djiboutian search and rescue operations continued.

“Our teams are on the ground alongside local authorities to provide emergency assistance,” IOM Chief of Mission in Djibouti Alexandre Coissac said, lamenting the “devastating loss of life”.

That number only includes those buried by authorities in Djibouti. Others have been buried by the migrants themselves but they won’t be added to the official count until authorities can verify the bodies, Alexandre Coissac, IOM Chief of Mission in Djibouti, told the Associated Press.

“This tragedy is a stark reminder of the dangers faced by migrants along this migration corridor as they seek economic opportunities,” Coissac added.

[Aljazeera]

Continue Reading

Foreign News

‘Time for Ukraine to get new president,’ says Trump after Zelensky condemns diesel deal

Published

on

By

[file pic]

US President Donald Trump has said he thinks “it’s time for Ukraine to get a new president” as he responded to Volodymyr Zelensky’s criticism of the US diesel deal with Russia.

The Ukrainian president warned a new deal to release millions of tonnes of Russian diesel into the US would provide Moscow with money to continue its war against his nation, calling it a gift to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Trump told reporters outside the White House on Saturday that Zelensky “wants to make problems for the world” by continuing to authorise attacks on Russian refineries.

“He’d better damn well stop,” Trump said, before suggesting Ukraine should “get a new leader who can make a deal”.

Global fuel supplies, including diesel, have been severely limited by the war against Iran launched by the US and Israel, which led to the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil products usually flows.

Russia – a major producer – and Ukraine have recently intensified their strikes on each other’s energy infrastructure and transport facilities, further straining energy markets.

“We said, ‘you can do whatever you want to Russia, don’t hit the refineries’, because that’s a world problem that’s caused,” Trump continued.

“He could have made many deals and for some reason, he never does.”

Putin’s envoy Kirill Dmitriev described Trump’s intervention as “iconic and historic”, saying that Ukraine “needs leadership actually focused on peace”.

The US president confirmed on Friday that an agreement had been reached with Moscow to suspend sanctions on Russian diesel exports until 7 April.

Zelensky reacted by saying it would allow Moscow to raise new funds to source new military equipment to continue the war.

He also accused Moscow of taking the deal “to mean they can keep fighting, to mean they keep dropping bombs on cities” following deadly new strikes on Zaporizhzhia.

The Ukrainian president spoke to several allies on Saturday to discuss the latest developments, calling for “real decisions to protect lives in Ukraine” and to protect European security.

A Downing Street spokesperson said UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham had spoken to Zelensky and offered his “complete solidarity”.

The pair had agreed Russia should acquiesce to “an immediate energy ceasefire” and end its attacks on shipping in the Black Sea, the spokesperson said, as “this would immediately release more energy and food supplies into the global market”.

News of the US-Russia diesel deal was also met with criticism by EU’s foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas, who echoed Zelensky in saying that suspending sanctions “provides Moscow with more revenues to wage war”, adding: “This is not the time to ease pressure on Russia, and Europe won’t.”

She said European foreign ministers intended to approve the biggest set of sanctions on Russia since the start of its full-scale invasion on Monday.

The deal with Russia is the latest effort from Trump to lower fuel prices in the US ahead of the midterm elections, after months spent grappling with the political consequences of the Iran war.

That conflict, which began in February, has sent the cost of petrol and in particular diesel skyrocketing, which has soured his standing with the American public who have been stung by the higher pump prices and knock-on effects that led to across-the-board inflation.

The average price of diesel is currently $6.28 (£4.74) a gallon, according to the AAA – up from last month’s $5.94 average, and $3.68 last year.

Under the deal, Russia would release an initial 300,000 tonnes of diesel “to the American and global marketplace” followed by an additional 500,000 tonnes in November.

A further million would follow, Trump wrote on Truth Social, and then another 3m tonnes “within a short period of time” – but he noted that this delivery will be “based on the condition of their diesel refineries”.

In the past 10 months, Russia experienced two waves of severe fuel shortages across the country due to Ukrainian drones strikes on its oil refineries.

Diesel production in Russia dropped by an estimated 30%, according to the International Energy Agency.

Trump had already called for new elections in Ukraine last December, saying Ukrainian voters should have the choice to replace Zelensky.

Since the war broke out in 2022 Ukraine has been under martial law, meaning elections are suspended.

[BBC]

Continue Reading

Trending